• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:54
CET 14:54
KST 22:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation13Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
Zerg is losing its identity in StarCraft 2 [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ What happened to TvZ on Retro? SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
PvZ map balance Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2241 users

[Guideline] SC2 Computers - Page 39

Forum Index > Tech Support
Post a Reply
Prev 1 37 38 39 40 41 66 Next
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 03:13:35
April 26 2010 03:12 GMT
#761
Uh

there are so many multithreaded apps atm for people who need extra cores. "not using cores very well" is already a thing of the past in everything except probably gaming.

AMD also has that autoclock feature similar to TurboBoost that activates when 3 or less cores are working (can bump up 500MHz apparently)
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
April 26 2010 03:16 GMT
#762
as far as i can tell the X6 will be a strong contender for its price range ($299-320 for a 3.2ghz 6 core thx). it would be a tough choice between the i7 930/860 and the 1090. preliminary benches (from asian markets) show it clocking to 4ghz as easily if not more easily than its quad core predecessors. very exciting stuff!
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
Orpheos
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1663 Posts
April 26 2010 03:20 GMT
#763
yea this shit is awesome. im studying materials science engineering and seeing the crazy shit they do to get it to 32 nm and beyond is just amazing. its just one of those industries that has the incentive and the knowledge to really keep outdoing itself.
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
April 26 2010 03:30 GMT
#764
On April 26 2010 12:16 mahnini wrote:
as far as i can tell the X6 will be a strong contender for its price range ($299-320 for a 3.2ghz 6 core thx). it would be a tough choice between the i7 930/860 and the 1090. preliminary benches (from asian markets) show it clocking to 4ghz as easily if not more easily than its quad core predecessors. very exciting stuff!

it's still based on the worthless arch that amd has they seriously need a full revision clocks is a penis nice to show around but doesn't mean jack. Seriously AMD needs to get their shit together they compete with intel in games but everywhere else it's just shit.
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 03:42:20
April 26 2010 03:41 GMT
#765
On April 26 2010 12:30 semantics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2010 12:16 mahnini wrote:
as far as i can tell the X6 will be a strong contender for its price range ($299-320 for a 3.2ghz 6 core thx). it would be a tough choice between the i7 930/860 and the 1090. preliminary benches (from asian markets) show it clocking to 4ghz as easily if not more easily than its quad core predecessors. very exciting stuff!

it's still based on the worthless arch that amd has they seriously need a full revision clocks is a penis nice to show around but doesn't mean jack. Seriously AMD needs to get their shit together they compete with intel in games but everywhere else it's just shit.

um. wat.

AMD isn't that far behind intel in terms of ipc. sure, if they were priced within the same range performance/price easily goes to intel but they aren't so it's pretty difficult to say that deneb plain sucks when it provides 90% performance at 80% the price and that's not taking into consideration platform costs. i also find it impressive that they are doing all this on the 45nm process and still achieving such high clocks.

50% of the price if you don't count microcenter :D
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
Deleted User 47542
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
1484 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 03:45:46
April 26 2010 03:43 GMT
#766
Thuban x6 is the most pointless chip coming out. The i7 920/930 still beat it in most situations when clocked similiarly, not to mention that improvements over a phenom x4 955/965 are very minimal as well. The two added cores will only be good for benchmarks and video encoding. This is because it really is just two more cores, no real changes to architecture to improve anything.

What will be exciting is AMD's bulldozer release next year that will have 4/6/8 cores, a completely new architecture, possibly an AM4 platform mobo with back support, and competitive pricing. This will probably force down Intel's Sandy Bridge pricing to something affordable, and if it doesn't I'll be making the switch to AMD.

Funny how Intel is killing AMD while ATI is killing Nvidia atm.
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 03:50:12
April 26 2010 03:46 GMT
#767
i7 will be better for gaming in the end imo. The stronger turboboost, and the limited 'threadedness' of games will probably benefit the i7 arch and clock speed.

mahnini, I never trust chinese benchmarks. Remember those 5830 benches that were performed? looool.

AMD fucking packed 6 cores into a cpu with 45nm and the cpu still has overclocking headroom. That is very impressive imho.

http://www.maximumpc.com/files/u69/Phenom_OC.jpg

impressive.

The Thuban is a decent chip that will contend against the lower end i7s (920/930/860) which currently don't have any real competition. The Phenom II X4s are great, but they trade blows with the i5 750 ><. No matter how 'unrevolutionary' it is (who cares?) it's still a 6 core. The decision atm is probably 4 virtual vs 2 physical cores (which benchmarks will clear up)

Bulldozer is either going to be SPARKLE SPARKLE AMAZING or ABSOLUTELY FUCKING TERRIBLE, yeah. It seems to be AM3 compatible as well.

uh superbabo, your conclusions don't have any backing to them whatsoever...
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
April 26 2010 03:55 GMT
#768
if we look at thuban from a value perspective it is definitely not a pointless chip. the addition of 2 extra cores allows it to compete with the i7 in video rendering and other such multithreaded apps while still keeping the same pace in gaming. the phenom ii x4s have dropped below $180 with the only one that really matters (the 955) hitting $160 while the entry level i7s still hover at $299. with the X6 AMD is able to compete in the higher price ranges and take a jab at intel in the middle ranges with the 955.

the people who say the i7s will still beat it blahblahblah. a few seconds in a few benchmarks is something i would easily give up for +2 physical cores, i am sure many people would feel the same way. i mean, it's a 6 core that performs pretty closely with the i7s in multithreaded apps (might surpass it now, still waiting for reliable benches) provides on par gaming performance and costs the same amount. what's left to be seen is the temperature / power consumption numbers which may be a deal breaker but for now i think people are just being butthurt that their i7s didn't sit on the throne as long as they wanted them to. :D
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
April 26 2010 04:08 GMT
#769
I doubt temps will be very high :|

i7 chips running lower than $300 will probably all succumb to it I doubt hypertheaded cores will be able to stand up to actual physical cores.

I kinda want to see how the quad core performs as well, though it is most likely just a 965 with that weird AMD TurboBoost. Power consumption would probably be the place I am concerned the most in (especially with overclocking. 3.8ghz on stock voltages plz!)
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
April 26 2010 06:17 GMT
#770
AMD turbo boost from my knowledge is automatic throttling and disabling of cores, it works by cutting the available cores in half giving 500mhz of more head room due to freed up tdp, it's always half the amount of cores which i found odd else eh idk too much about it runs much the same as intel in my book "oh that's nice". I still want a better arch from them intel has clearly been winning in profits for years now amd gobbles up the low end selling for little profit hell most of their product now seems like defective chips that would have been trashed other wise that have been crippled and sold as a new chip t-t. I really don't care for this cripple a defective chip trend that coming out of amd I'm used to it to some extent in the GPU business although i don't care for how prevalent it is now, the R5850 R5830 GTX480 GTX470 5750 basically the whole high end market.

per clock intel still wins, it's why they can sell their chips for more becuase they are better. not that clock matters to much performance is performance doesn't matter how it's dressed up. Just saying AMD needs to fix their arch it's the lame boy in the corner. Although I'm not too found on intel right now hearing their new chipset will require active cooling...

ramble ramble ramble
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 06:22:42
April 26 2010 06:21 GMT
#771
Can't really blame AMD/ATi/Nvidia for the problems that TSMC and Globalfoundries have...

It's not just defective chips, since there are many, many people who succeed in unlocking the disabled AMD cores

I mean ATi has had to delay their Northern Islands GPUs and their second half 2010 refresh because of the problems TSMC and Globalfoundries have had with their 32nm processes. I believe Intel is suffering the same problem...
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
April 26 2010 06:32 GMT
#772
"The Patsburg chipset is going to require active cooling which seems like a flawed design, but presumable the PCI Express 3.0 controller runs quite hot and requires additional cooling beyond a passive heatsink."
and that's not from Charlie so you can believe it.
http://semiaccurate.com/2010/04/15/intels-patsburg-replace-x58-2011/
active cooling on my mobo?!?! if i want active cooling i'll use a zip tie and a tiny fan and strap that to my northbridge which is what i do use on my older p45 chipset to allow for a good oc in a silent case that isn't a typhoon to cool everything.
along with this which is also a bit worrying
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/04/21/sandy-bridge-rumors/
but that is just a rumor so far we can see how shitty it becomes later.
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
April 26 2010 06:35 GMT
#773
oh a side note guess who did what now..
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/blizzard-entertainment-starcraft-ii-benchmark,2611.html
figures shortly after one of the writers gets into the beta
DanceDance
Profile Joined November 2008
226 Posts
April 26 2010 06:40 GMT
#774
On April 26 2010 15:35 semantics wrote:
oh a side note guess who did what now..
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/blizzard-entertainment-starcraft-ii-benchmark,2611.html
figures shortly after one of the writers gets into the beta


Thank you for posting this. Nice information!
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 06:56:37
April 26 2010 06:52 GMT
#775
FINALLY Tomshardware has it!

FINALLY

Semantics: Yeah, I heard about that and just went 'wtf'. I was never excited about Sandy Bridge in the first place (since Bulldozer will RAPE IT YEAH), but that just pushed me further away from it rofl

Those numbers as abyssmal

;_;
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
April 26 2010 07:16 GMT
#776
Actually after looking at these numbers I'm calling bullshit. I didn't really like the Legionhardware benches, but these Tomshardware benches are absolutely unbelievable. A 3.06Ghz i7 and an HD 5870 should be able to push out more than 46FPS at 1920x1200 Ultra.
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 07:25:45
April 26 2010 07:22 GMT
#777
Yeah I ran test using a 5770 oced to 1050/1405 and a E8400 at 4.0ghz and i get pretty much ~55fps with drops to 40fps and max at upper 60's not quite sure what's going on in their test. maxed out the game on ultra with extreme shaders

Ofc i only ran it at 16 resolution i noticed toms is a 16:10 i t could be a ratio bad luck thing but i wouldn't think so.

games performance tend to be more tied to the raito rather then the resolution unless you get into the 2k resolution.
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-26 07:24:57
April 26 2010 07:24 GMT
#778
well, an OC'd 5770 doesn't help that much, but I have seen people here post 50+ FPS with 5770s at 1680x1050 so I'm confident that there is something wrong with the TomsHardware benches. The LegionHardware ones look a bit more attractive atm.

and I don't even like those either.
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
April 26 2010 07:30 GMT
#779
The prob is that the cpu bound game theory is consistent with the fps given. Easy way to clear it up with be to re run the test with higher clocks on the cpu.

Also what was their testing method i only skimmed and didn't find it i noticed fps in games vs fps in replays tend to differ.
FragKrag
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States11554 Posts
April 26 2010 07:34 GMT
#780
some guy got 150fps-200fps with i7 920 @ 4ghz and 5870

1ghz = 100 frames?

lol...
*TL CJ Entusman #40* "like scissors does anything to paper except MAKE IT MORE NUMEROUS" -paper
Prev 1 37 38 39 40 41 66 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Korean Royale
12:00
Group Stage 1 - Group A
WardiTV559
LiquipediaDiscussion
Kung Fu Cup
12:00
2025 Monthly #3: Day 5
Cure vs herOLIVE!
Reynor vs TBD
RotterdaM693
TKL 366
IndyStarCraft 269
SteadfastSC122
IntoTheiNu 43
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 617
TKL 352
Tasteless 324
Reynor 276
IndyStarCraft 269
Rex 147
SteadfastSC 113
Railgan 25
MindelVK 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36790
Rain 8932
Sea 4139
firebathero 4096
BeSt 1748
Horang2 1687
GuemChi 939
Soma 605
EffOrt 552
Stork 500
[ Show more ]
Mini 456
actioN 283
Rush 225
Killer 174
Last 146
Hyun 144
scan(afreeca) 136
hero 133
Bonyth 99
Mind 90
Barracks 61
Sharp 51
zelot 50
yabsab 49
Sea.KH 45
sorry 42
Snow 39
sas.Sziky 24
Shinee 18
Hm[arnc] 15
NaDa 8
Bale 6
Dota 2
singsing3070
qojqva1678
Dendi1083
Gorgc737
XcaliburYe301
Counter-Strike
byalli539
x6flipin531
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor238
Liquid`Hasu193
Other Games
FrodaN4939
B2W.Neo1844
Pyrionflax359
Fuzer 256
KnowMe216
DeMusliM40
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream14873
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream1808
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 8
• Dystopia_ 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV606
• Ler66
Upcoming Events
BSL 21
6h 7m
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
6h 7m
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
9h 7m
Wardi Open
22h 7m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 9h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 22h
BSL: GosuLeague
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL: GosuLeague
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
IPSL
6 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.