| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Elentos
55585 Posts
On December 13 2019 23:23 Harris1st wrote: It's like in AoE 2, when archers and swordsman fight vs each other and then one player types BIG DADDY and a armored super vehicle with lasers and bazookas appears. That's Serral Everyone knows in AoE 2 you enter howdoyouturnthison to get a Shelby Cobra firing machine guns. | ||
|
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On December 14 2019 00:09 deacon.frost wrote: Yet he didn't win the IEM nor Blizzcon. His Bazooka wasn't big enough? And it's not a racial issue, both events were won by Zerg  Yes, we all know the list of the tournaments someone didn't win is the most relevant; just accept Serral's greatness at this point, denying it is useless. | ||
|
Aunvilgodess
954 Posts
| ||
|
dbRic1203
Germany2655 Posts
On December 14 2019 00:34 Aunvilgodess wrote: I think they need to change up the format again. I am not interested in teams being carried by a single player like that. To me it leads the whole concept of a team tournament ad absurdum. Like Korea, wich got hard carried by Stats in the finals, as their only player to actually take maps of the finnish rooster? | ||
|
UnLarva
458 Posts
On December 14 2019 01:16 dbRic1203 wrote: Like Korea, wich got hard carried by Stats in the finals, as their only player to actually take maps of the finnish rooster? Even better than that, Zhuge's win against soO cannot be put on imba. Koreans where good (by default), but... the tournament format was same for every country and Finland managed to use its available roster the best in given circumstances, Serral being just Serral. Note that TheMusZero took a map vs Italy, an another One-man-army team, thus as a team effort everyone in Team Finland contributed for the team's success. That "Ad Absurdum" is Serral, but you know that as I do. :D | ||
|
Kertorak
125 Posts
On December 11 2019 13:48 RandomPlayer wrote: I agree, good format by NW. SC2 teams are not suitable for team leagues, it’s a 1vs1 game. Good event though. I disagree, while sc2 is popular for its 1on1, 2vs2 is still played by pros occasionally. It's something you can play... So it IS absolutely suitable. It's not like I'm saying every tournament needs to do 2vs2.. but 1 of 100, why not. Indeed the balance is "different" here. | ||
|
ElMeanYo
United States1032 Posts
| ||
|
kajtarp
Hungary490 Posts
On December 14 2019 02:53 UnLarva wrote: Even better than that, Zhuge's win against soO cannot be put on imba. Koreans where good (by default), but... the tournament format was same for every country and Finland managed to use its available roster the best in given circumstances, Serral being just Serral. Note that TheMusZero took a map vs Italy, an another One-man-army team, thus as a team effort everyone in Team Finland contributed for the team's success. That "Ad Absurdum" is Serral, but you know that as I do. :D I'm not happy to say but soO's form after his IEM victory is getting worse and worse. Had Rogue or Dark played its a completely different ball game... | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
OSC
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
