• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
TeamLiquid Liquipedia LiquidDota LiquidLegends
EST 23:18
CET 05:18
KST 13:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • WCS
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Foregone Conclusion? Finland wins NationWars 201929NationWars 2019: RO4 & Finals Preview13NationWars: Italy, Finland, Korea, France to semis14NationWars 2019: Quarterfinals Preview8[HotS] New Year, New Faces1
Community News
Creator re-signs with JinAir41Mkers: Payment Withhold Dispute160Liquibet SC2 Season 22 Begins2Toodming joins Chivo14Cure joins DPGaming16
StarCraft 2
General
Mkers: Payment Withhold Dispute Foregone Conclusion? Finland wins NationWars 2019 Creator re-signs with JinAir 4.11.0 Patch - Major balance changes, Mengsk Commander Smart Command 2019? What did Blizzard do to it...
Tourneys
[Nationwars 2019] Semi Finals + Grand Final Alpha X Younglings Tourney Kashynical Open Cup 2 [Alpha Pro Series] Trap (P) vs INnoVation (T) [Alpha Pro Series] Zest (P) vs Cure (T)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers Dealing with WM harass as Protoss [D] Terran Base-Order [G] TheCore - Advanced Keyboard Layout
Custom Maps
[A] MagiCraft [UMS] Photon Cycles Work In Progress Melee Maps [M] (4) Autumn Fields
External Content
Mutation Week 188 Equivalent Exchange Ranks/Tiers Mutation #188 Equivalent Exchange Mutation Week 187 Onslaught Ranks/Tiers Mutation #187 Onslaught
Brood War
General
Hello to foreign StarCraft fans. Mac mouse issues solution BSL Season 8 Announcement StarCraft Human 'N' AI League FlaSh's ASL8 Finals Analysis
Tourneys
Nation Wars Week 6 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [KCM Race Survival] Season 12 NA Autumn Starleague - Qualifiers, Dates, & More!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers 2vs2 strategies for (almost) all MUs Collection of tricks? cadenzie muta micro tutorial 2019
Other Games
Heroes of the Storm
Patch notes HotS: WP and Funny Moments Deathwing is the next new hero [HotS] New Year, New Faces QQ/Rage Thread.
General Games
Path of Exile World of Warcraft Classic Final Fantasy XIV Tekken 7 - PC/PS4/Xone, June 2nd 2017 Pokémon Go!
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Liquid Arcanon News [0]Paper TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy
Hearthstone
LiquidHearth.com closing on April 10th
LoL General
LoL Tournaments
LoL Strategy
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread If you're seeing this topic then another mass shooting happened and people disagree on what to do Ask and answer stupid questions here! UK Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club The Polt Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker SPOILERS ALLOWED Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently... [Manga] Shingeki no Kyojin
Sports
2019 - 2020 Football Thread Major League Baseball 2015 TL Fantasy Football '19 2019 NFL and CFB Season NBA Season 2019-2020
Tech Support
Simple Questions Simple Answers PC crashes when loading a "heavy" game. Changing gmail nickname
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts [Interview] NrGdde The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Assess.
coffeesession
Zula the Christmas zealot…
misterG420
SIAN #003: PvP - Not Enough…
NeoBlade
TvP Guide
Archangelsc2l
Dialysis
Jockmcplop
Last news
c0mp1exx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 556 users

Blizz: Proposed changes for post-BlizzCon patch 2019 - Pag…

Forum Index > SC2 General
642 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 29 30 31 32 33 Next All
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2253 Posts
November 10 2019 13:03 GMT
#601
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
57 Posts
November 10 2019 13:35 GMT
#602
On November 10 2019 18:36 Aocowns wrote:
rapidfire casting is a scourge on the game


Indeed,
I never used the rapid fire, and as i m casual and i like performance i feel this would be a huge step fooor.. ohh wait i m Terran..
totalpigeon
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom105 Posts
November 10 2019 13:52 GMT
#603
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.
washikie
Profile Joined February 2011
United States579 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-10 17:06:45
November 10 2019 17:06 GMT
#604
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.
"when life gives Hero lemons he makes carriers" -Artosis
totalpigeon
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom105 Posts
November 10 2019 22:30 GMT
#605
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.
washikie
Profile Joined February 2011
United States579 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-10 22:45:43
November 10 2019 22:42 GMT
#606
On November 11 2019 07:30 totalpigeon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.


If you stim vs adept shade they can just cancel you have paid life on your units/ medivac energy for a cooldowns what a trade!

Also does Protoss realy need help vs Terran right now?

This is a bad idea glad it’s not in the patch notes.
"when life gives Hero lemons he makes carriers" -Artosis
Sprog
Profile Joined April 2010
New Zealand35 Posts
November 10 2019 22:45 GMT
#607
There was an interesting suggestion that stalkers models should be made a little smaller, may unlock some more micro potential.

The other thing that sprung to mind is a range upgrade (+1 range) to stalkers on the cyber core.. Could make for some kiting

Carriers need to be a little bit tankier for their cost/time to make. +2 armour or something like that.

Don't really like the change to the void ray, it's interaction with stalkers means we might have a completely different PvP style if it were to go ahead. I'm not really sure of the role it's attempting to fill at the moment.

Z3nith
Profile Joined October 2017
250 Posts
November 10 2019 22:49 GMT
#608
Does anyone know when these changes are going live? It's got to be soon right?
Sprog
Profile Joined April 2010
New Zealand35 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-10 23:03:57
November 10 2019 22:58 GMT
#609
On November 11 2019 07:49 Z3nith wrote:
Does anyone know when these changes are going live? It's got to be soon right?


There was a suggestion earlier that it could be when ladder season ends. Makes sense to me for that to be the case, I want it earlier though cause I'm not participating in ladder atm
totalpigeon
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom105 Posts
November 11 2019 02:49 GMT
#610
On November 11 2019 07:42 washikie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2019 07:30 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.


If you stim vs adept shade they can just cancel you have paid life on your units/ medivac energy for a cooldowns what a trade!

Also does Protoss realy need help vs Terran right now?

This is a bad idea glad it’s not in the patch notes.


Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that.

You point about about toss not needing help against terran is irrelevant, the adept as a unit is trash once midgame ends and needs some love. Anyway there's no need to get emotional over a suggestion, if you don't like it you don't like it, whatever. Why even bother replying? Just let it die.
washikie
Profile Joined February 2011
United States579 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-11 04:17:53
November 11 2019 03:52 GMT
#611
On November 11 2019 11:49 totalpigeon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2019 07:42 washikie wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:30 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.


If you stim vs adept shade they can just cancel you have paid life on your units/ medivac energy for a cooldowns what a trade!

Also does Protoss realy need help vs Terran right now?

This is a bad idea glad it’s not in the patch notes.


Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that.

You point about about toss not needing help against terran is irrelevant, the adept as a unit is trash once midgame ends and needs some love. Anyway there's no need to get emotional over a suggestion, if you don't like it you don't like it, whatever. Why even bother replying? Just let it die.


You have contradicted yourself first you state:

"You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished"

now your telling me

"Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that."

The things is. if you dont stim then shades are faster then bio so they are ontop of you. that's not catching Terran off guard.... they knew you were going to do it and had to let you.

If they didn't then you just cancel the shade and you have traded a cooldown for limited medivac energy or raw hp if medivacs are not out.

LOTV beta and launch were plagued by this sort of thing until the adept nerf went through. I'm happy with the current state of the adept its a reaper like unit that is best used for scouting and has some utility in allins, but is not a main army unit and not oppressive. That's fine. Why would we ever want to bring back the old adept styles of them shading on teran's army with no counter play and instagibbing it? that does not sound fun to me.

Glad this is not a proposed change by the balance team.
"when life gives Hero lemons he makes carriers" -Artosis
Harris1st
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany2814 Posts
November 11 2019 13:55 GMT
#612
So the current season began on August 22nd. Does this mean we have a ladder lock incoming on November 14th with a new season start on November 22nd?

Can't find any blue posts concering this
TheDougler is the master of signature bets, he is the two-time Blizzcon SigBet Champ. Also, Serral let me down.
totalpigeon
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom105 Posts
November 11 2019 14:20 GMT
#613
On November 11 2019 12:52 washikie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2019 11:49 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:42 washikie wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:30 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.


If you stim vs adept shade they can just cancel you have paid life on your units/ medivac energy for a cooldowns what a trade!

Also does Protoss realy need help vs Terran right now?

This is a bad idea glad it’s not in the patch notes.


Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that.

You point about about toss not needing help against terran is irrelevant, the adept as a unit is trash once midgame ends and needs some love. Anyway there's no need to get emotional over a suggestion, if you don't like it you don't like it, whatever. Why even bother replying? Just let it die.


You have contradicted yourself first you state:

"You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished"

now your telling me

"Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that."

The things is. if you dont stim then shades are faster then bio so they are ontop of you. that's not catching Terran off guard.... they knew you were going to do it and had to let you.

If they didn't then you just cancel the shade and you have traded a cooldown for limited medivac energy or raw hp if medivacs are not out.

LOTV beta and launch were plagued by this sort of thing until the adept nerf went through. I'm happy with the current state of the adept its a reaper like unit that is best used for scouting and has some utility in allins, but is not a main army unit and not oppressive. That's fine. Why would we ever want to bring back the old adept styles of them shading on teran's army with no counter play and instagibbing it? that does not sound fun to me.

Glad this is not a proposed change by the balance team.


You have new emp now too. Shading in mass adept onto clumped bio will be worthless against that. I don't really share your concerns about the playstyle coming back and being too strong after one such buff.
Hvvacha
Profile Joined April 2018
70 Posts
November 11 2019 16:29 GMT
#614
On November 11 2019 11:49 totalpigeon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2019 07:42 washikie wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:30 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.


If you stim vs adept shade they can just cancel you have paid life on your units/ medivac energy for a cooldowns what a trade!

Also does Protoss realy need help vs Terran right now?

This is a bad idea glad it’s not in the patch notes.


Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that.

You point about about toss not needing help against terran is irrelevant, the adept as a unit is trash once midgame ends and needs some love. Anyway there's no need to get emotional over a suggestion, if you don't like it you don't like it, whatever. Why even bother replying? Just let it die.


why it's irrelevant tho, having more viable styles affects already-problematic state of the tvp, it's on new balance btw.
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3087 Posts
November 11 2019 19:08 GMT
#615
On November 12 2019 01:29 Hvvacha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2019 11:49 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:42 washikie wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:30 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
On November 08 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
Thinking on the adept and how it might be kept useful in its role for longer in the game. Keep glaives, but also add a new upgrade which reduces enemy unit attack speed when it is hit by the adept (say 25%?)

It effectively effectively buffs their existing role by making them more effective in small engagements. This keeps them relevant for longer when harassing or defending fringe bases. It synergises with their ability to shade onto an army or key units (to apply the debuff as the fight breaks out). As a unit that could be warped in en-masse, this also avoids giving them extra dps that could become abusive (especially vs workers) and retains their weaknesses to aoe units, longer ranged units and air units. Massed, due to their low range and the way that front line units absorb shots (i.e. the debuff is only distributed across the enemy front line) they don't gain a significant buff, keeping them from become significantly better than the zealot as a front line unit.

Thoughts?

Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.


If you stim vs adept shade they can just cancel you have paid life on your units/ medivac energy for a cooldowns what a trade!

Also does Protoss realy need help vs Terran right now?

This is a bad idea glad it’s not in the patch notes.


Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that.

You point about about toss not needing help against terran is irrelevant, the adept as a unit is trash once midgame ends and needs some love. Anyway there's no need to get emotional over a suggestion, if you don't like it you don't like it, whatever. Why even bother replying? Just let it die.


why it's irrelevant tho, having more viable styles affects already-problematic state of the tvp, it's on new balance btw.

That's missing Harstem' point and misrepresenting what he said though. His point in that clip was that the matchup is currently (as in, on this current patch) harder for terran right now because the current map pool favours protoss, which even most protoss players would agree with. The literal quote is "most terrans can't last for very long in this matchup because, well, it's rather okay for protoss at the moment, espec--, mainly because it's on the current map pool. It's very difficult for terrans to get good results in this matchup". Big, open maps have always typically favoured protoss, while smaller maps with more chokes have favoured terran.

Harstem's point is something several of us having been trying to drive home in this thread for a while now. There are definitely issues right now with the game, but the current map pool has been exacerbating many of them to seem much worse than they are on maps of other sizes. Most map pools have had 1-2 large maps at the most, along with a few medium and small maps, and on occasion a gimmicky map. This map pool contains mostly larger than average maps, and many of the maps are much more open than maps from the past. The two maps in this pool that aren't large and open, Ephemeron and Winter's Gate, are instead gimmicky maps with weird layouts that make expansions difficult to take in some matchups. For Ephemeron, for example, the only options for a fourth are either expanding towards your opponent, or expanding quite far away from the only viable option for a third. Winter's Gate has similar issues.

As I said in a previous post, it was fine to have Acropolis and Thunderbird in the last map pool because there were other maps to balance them out since they were such a large, open maps that favoured one side in some matchups. Instead, now we have 5 maps roughly the size of Acropolis that all share similar traits to Acropolis, and we have ended up with a map pool where you can't really veto out all of the bad maps, so we end up with games where pros are forced to play on maps they know will not be favourable for them at all. For example, no protoss would willingly try to play a macro PvZ on Thunderbird since it's so easy for the zerg to pin protoss on 3 bases with one of several different styles that work well on that map. That's why most protoss wins on that map came from all-ins.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
ThunderJunk
Profile Joined December 2015
United States320 Posts
November 11 2019 19:43 GMT
#616
On November 12 2019 04:08 Ben... wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2019 01:29 Hvvacha wrote:
On November 11 2019 11:49 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:42 washikie wrote:
On November 11 2019 07:30 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 11 2019 02:06 washikie wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:52 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 10 2019 22:03 Lexender wrote:
On November 09 2019 19:16 totalpigeon wrote:
On November 09 2019 05:40 serendipitous wrote:
[quote]
Terran would never win against adepts then. Adepts are my favourite toss unit but I can't imagine a way to make them good in actual fights without them being broken against terran. I like the direction they're going that emphasises harass and burst damage though.


Oh? I actually thought an attack slow debuff would be most underwhelming in TvP. Gated as a separate upgrade to glaives it would be kind of late, so it won't buff early game adepts or any glaives allin (except perhaps as a transition), and adepts aren't generally used after that point normally because they just don't have enough dps or hp for their cost and supply. The upgrade indirectly makes them a bit tankier in a big fight, so I suppose they may compare a bit better to zealots, but I don't see it being a particularly big deal against a ranged terran army which can abuse its speed, range and dps advantage.


Considering a flat 25% damage reduction would work on top of stim, it will incredibly good in reducing the DPS of a bio army rendering incredibly weak.


Keep the debuff duration short and it should be fine. Then it would only affect units who are at that moment engaged with the adepts. It's also pretty unlikely that you manage to debuff everything in a large army, as the front row will soak most of the shots and the rest of the army will keep its full dps. You don't need to stutter step away from adepts like zealots, so you'll probably only lose 10-15% dps at most in a large engagement. That makes it similar to the 20 shield hp buff proposed before. A short duration of 0.5s or so also means if a a few units can break away from the adepts to hit a colossus or something, they'll be back up to full dps more or less immediately.


If the adepts shade ontop of you nearly your whole army will get hit by them. Additionally if they have not shaded ontop of you stutter stepping is useful since adepts only have 4 range to the marines 5 and the marauders 6.


You mean if Terran isn't paying attention to his army, he might get punished? Well, yeah. That's how the game is supposed to work. You can still stim and move to split against the shade, or stim and pull your marines out of it while the marauders tank. Besides, stim bio wrecks adepts at the minute. A small buff isn't unreasonable - like I said, it would probably work out to a 10-15% dps decrease, which is similar to the shield buff the balance team were suggesting. This is just a more interesting way of doing it with some additional utility and micro potential.


If you stim vs adept shade they can just cancel you have paid life on your units/ medivac energy for a cooldowns what a trade!

Also does Protoss realy need help vs Terran right now?

This is a bad idea glad it’s not in the patch notes.


Obviously you don't stim until they commit. I'm surprised I need to clarify that.

You point about about toss not needing help against terran is irrelevant, the adept as a unit is trash once midgame ends and needs some love. Anyway there's no need to get emotional over a suggestion, if you don't like it you don't like it, whatever. Why even bother replying? Just let it die.


why it's irrelevant tho, having more viable styles affects already-problematic state of the tvp, it's on new balance btw.

That's missing Harstem' point and misrepresenting what he said though. His point in that clip was that the matchup is currently (as in, on this current patch) harder for terran right now because the current map pool favours protoss, which even most protoss players would agree with. The literal quote is "most terrans can't last for very long in this matchup because, well, it's rather okay for protoss at the moment, espec--, mainly because it's on the current map pool. It's very difficult for terrans to get good results in this matchup". Big, open maps have always typically favoured protoss, while smaller maps with more chokes have favoured terran.

Harstem's point is something several of us having been trying to drive home in this thread for a while now. There are definitely issues right now with the game, but the current map pool has been exacerbating many of them to seem much worse than they are on maps of other sizes. Most map pools have had 1-2 large maps at the most, along with a few medium and small maps, and on occasion a gimmicky map. This map pool contains mostly larger than average maps, and many of the maps are much more open than maps from the past. The two maps in this pool that aren't large and open, Ephemeron and Winter's Gate, are instead gimmicky maps with weird layouts that make expansions difficult to take in some matchups. For Ephemeron, for example, the only options for a fourth are either expanding towards your opponent, or expanding quite far away from the only viable option for a third. Winter's Gate has similar issues.

As I said in a previous post, it was fine to have Acropolis and Thunderbird in the last map pool because there were other maps to balance them out since they were such a large, open maps that favoured one side in some matchups. Instead, now we have 5 maps roughly the size of Acropolis that all share similar traits to Acropolis, and we have ended up with a map pool where you can't really veto out all of the bad maps, so we end up with games where pros are forced to play on maps they know will not be favourable for them at all. For example, no protoss would willingly try to play a macro PvZ on Thunderbird since it's so easy for the zerg to pin protoss on 3 bases with one of several different styles that work well on that map. That's why most protoss wins on that map came from all-ins.



I really hope next season features more weird maps, like Desert Oasis or Dasan Station. Even as a P, it's not fun to be shoehorned into standard play every game.
I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.
Slydie
Profile Joined August 2013
568 Posts
November 11 2019 23:02 GMT
#617
There was some debate about the Adept change on BeastyQT's stream today. He did not like the proposed change as it can be considered a nerf compared to how the unit works currently. However, I do understand why they want to focus more on the shade ability:

-It makes it feel more different from the Zealot, a unit it overlaps with a lot.
-To have the most DPS out of your adepts, you will have to shade constantly, even in fights, which is cool imo, and it increases the skillcap of the unit.
-Players will find ways to abuse the increased burst damage, obviusly for harassment, but also for flanking and sniping important units during fights.

I don't thing it is meant as a balance change but rather a way to make the unit more interresting. It reminds me of the "critical strike when leaving cloak" abilities we know from games like WC3 and mobas.
Buff the siegetank
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic8933 Posts
November 11 2019 23:09 GMT
#618
On November 12 2019 08:02 Slydie wrote:
There was some debate about the Adept change on BeastyQT's stream today. He did not like the proposed change as it can be considered a nerf compared to how the unit works currently. However, I do understand why they want to focus more on the shade ability:

-It makes it feel more different from the Zealot, a unit it overlaps with a lot.
-To have the most DPS out of your adepts, you will have to shade constantly, even in fights, which is cool imo, and it increases the skillcap of the unit.
-Players will find ways to abuse the increased burst damage, obviusly for harassment, but also for flanking and sniping important units during fights.

I don't thing it is meant as a balance change but rather a way to make the unit more interresting. It reminds me of the "critical strike when leaving cloak" abilities we know from games like WC3 and mobas.

At the same time we're getting to
1) You need to more control speedlots
2) You need to more control adepts

3) Blink
4) FF
5) WP + immortal juggling
6) Storm
(we can continue)

Do you see the trend and where am I going? This isn't very healthy IMO compared to the other armies. While the meme of the a-move to victory is funny one the longer the game goes the more control heavy Protoss is with constant addition of some micro helpers.

(Both #1 and #2 are added right now)
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Obamarauder
Profile Joined June 2015
270 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-11 23:26:03
November 11 2019 23:21 GMT
#619
personally id give vikings and/or stalkers some sort of upgrade that changes their attack from projectile to instant damage or maybe automatically unlock it after 2/2 or 3/3 is finished. Theres so much overkill in these units in large scale late game fights. right now Smart zergs can just amove their overseers at the start of engagement and automatically soak up the first few volleys of shots. Meanwhile terran most likely has to control ghost lib + micro and splitting for fungals and parasitic bomb. It just feels like the effort required to win a fight is way less for the zerg and extremely unforgiving for the terran.
Slydie
Profile Joined August 2013
568 Posts
November 12 2019 00:40 GMT
#620
On November 12 2019 08:09 deacon.frost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2019 08:02 Slydie wrote:
There was some debate about the Adept change on BeastyQT's stream today. He did not like the proposed change as it can be considered a nerf compared to how the unit works currently. However, I do understand why they want to focus more on the shade ability:

-It makes it feel more different from the Zealot, a unit it overlaps with a lot.
-To have the most DPS out of your adepts, you will have to shade constantly, even in fights, which is cool imo, and it increases the skillcap of the unit.
-Players will find ways to abuse the increased burst damage, obviusly for harassment, but also for flanking and sniping important units during fights.

I don't thing it is meant as a balance change but rather a way to make the unit more interresting. It reminds me of the "critical strike when leaving cloak" abilities we know from games like WC3 and mobas.

At the same time we're getting to
1) You need to more control speedlots
2) You need to more control adepts

3) Blink
4) FF
5) WP + immortal juggling
6) Storm
(we can continue)

Do you see the trend and where am I going? This isn't very healthy IMO compared to the other armies. While the meme of the a-move to victory is funny one the longer the game goes the more control heavy Protoss is with constant addition of some micro helpers.

(Both #1 and #2 are added right now)


Did you ever try microing 2 drops while sieging forward with mines and liberators, emping with ghosts and stim/kiting bio? It is humanly impossible of course. Increasing the skill cap of Toss is completely fine imo. You will get used to it!
Buff the siegetank
Prev 1 29 30 31 32 33 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The Pylon Show
01:40
w Artosis !
Discussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Polt 1024
WinterStarcraft680
ViBE 471
Artosis442
JimRising 394
puck 268
Spanishiwa 96
RuFF_SC2 93
UpATree 64
PvP 35
Temp0 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 1524
Pusan 448
Sharp 100
Noble 62
Killer 23
Sacsri 12
eros_byul 8
Shine 7
sorry 5
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Skadoodle1309
jdm64286
shahzam138
semphis_92
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang01975
AZ_Axe317
Chillindude11
Other Games
summit1g14648
NeuroSwarm193
JuggernautJason99
Mew2King90
HugS8688
ChuDatz8
Organizations
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO5827
StarCraft 2
OGamingTV SC2 296
OgamingTV Inter131
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
dreamhackcs71
StarCraft 2
SC2 Vod Archives44
StarCraft: Brood War
Classic BW VODs22
StarCraft 2
TaKeTV26
[ Show 5 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 32
• CosmosSc2 21
StarCraft: Brood War
• sscaitournament3
• SouL)Z(Silver 1
Other Games
• TSM TheOddOne1360
Upcoming Events
OSC
12h 42m
Alpha Pro Series
1d 4h
Trap vs INnoVation
Kashynical Open Cup
1d 12h
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
IndyK Event
2 days
Chance vs Angry
PassionCraft
2 days
Cheesadelphia
2 days
GG of the Year
2 days
Big Gabe Invitational
2 days
Elazer vs MarineLorD
Lambo vs souL
ShoWTimE vs Harstem
PtitDrogo vs Clem
IndyK Event
2 days
[ Show More ]
Copa América
2 days
Grand Platypus Open
3 days
DSCL Nationals
3 days
BW Jeez Weekly
3 days
PassionCraft
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
Copa América
3 days
Blazing Series
4 days
Rex vs Creator
Nice vs Bomber
GG of the Year
4 days
OlimoLeague
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

North American Autumn Starleague
WESG 2019 - North America Qualifier
H. Lounge Div. S S2 EU Qual. 4
EPL Season 10 - Finals

Ongoing

Titanes Del Ring Nation Wars
BWCL Season 49
KCM Race Survival Season 12
2019 Liquipedia Shinhan Tank Proleague
GPC 2019 - Grand Finals
WESG 2019 - China Qualifier
HotS League: REVIVAL S4
H. Lounge Div. S S2 EU Qual.
Nexus Cup 3

Upcoming

BW Jeez weekly 52
BSL8 Ladder Open #3
BW Jeez weekly 51
BSL8 Ladder Gosu & Chobo #3
BSL8 Ladder Open #2
BW Jeez weekly 50
BSL8 Ladder Gosu & Chobo #2
WESG 2019
IEM Katowice 2020
WESG 2019 - Latin America Qualifier
OSC Championship Season 7
Copa América 2019 Season 3
Cheeseadelphia XI
Agon Premier League: Season 1
H. Lounge Div. S S2 EU Crucible
H. Lounge Div. S S2 NA Qual. 4
H. Lounge Div. S S2 NA Qual. 5
Champions Cup Finals
EPICENTER 2019
ESEA S32 - Global Challenge
DH Open Sevilla 2019
cs_summit 5
BLAST Pro Series: Global Final
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2019 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.