• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 12:30
CET 18:30
KST 02:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Dark completes military service, returns to SC22[BSL23] RO16 Group Stage17Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?2Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175
StarCraft 2
General
Greetings.. Dark completes military service, returns to SC2 No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Serral's getting trashed by New Catsle's Mind Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?
Tourneys
soO & FanTaSy return! SC2 Kevin Scrim 4v4 (Nov 16) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament iNu's Battles #22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [G] How to playtest arcade maps [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
List of top players active on ShieldBattery BW General Discussion [BSL23] RO16 Group Stage Starcraft player cRuZa Passed away. screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4 BWCL Season 65 Announcement [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL23] Ro16 Group C - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Infested Terran strategies in 2026 Nuke strategy worked in K-League 2026-11-09 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy)
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread List of Game Threads The PlayStation 5 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Can Game Data Analytics Help Players Improvements
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? US Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 13381 users

Community Update - January 12th - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
211 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 Next All
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
January 12 2018 23:12 GMT
#61
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-12 23:17:01
January 12 2018 23:15 GMT
#62
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"

1. Hates all the nerfs to Protoss.
2. Loves all the nerfs to Zerg.

Gee, I wonder which race this guy plays?
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
January 12 2018 23:16 GMT
#63
On January 13 2018 08:07 Ranari wrote:
"Professional Viewer" perspective here. I look at balance from the perspective of making sure that all units have a role to play in the game, and get used at all levels of play. When I start noticing that players don't use units, it concerns me.

Although I do feel that the old Raven had more use than the new Raven, I'm not so sure bringing back the Auto-Turret is the way to balance the unit. The issue I see is that none of the abilities that the Raven has really impacts a battle in a meaningful way. When you think about it, any Abducted unit is going to be a dead unit. It's especially useful for ripping Lurkers out of the ground and wearing away the expensive units of an enemy army. And, when the Viper is out of energy, it just goes back and gets more. High Templar are a bit different, but Psionic Storm is horrendously unforgiving against a player that isn't microing well. That, and it just does a lot of damage when used properly. And when the High Templar are out of energy, they can become Archons. Ghosts can keep fighting as a decent anti-light unit. Infestors are probably similar to Ravens, and that's why I haven't seen them used as much lately. But when Ravens (and Infestors) run out of energy, they just have to sit there. I'm purposefully leaving out Oracles because it's more of a harass unit, and I don't think anyone here is questioning their usefulness.

The other issue is that when you think about it, Raven abilities overlap Ghost abilities. Interference Matrix is really meant to disable mechanical or psionic units, but there's a purpose overlap there with EMP. I can either disable a Viper for 10 seconds, or I can wipe its energy clean with EMPs. Both effectively do the same thing.

Repair Drones are cool, but they need to travel. I think we would find a lot more use out of them if they were tethered to the Raven, and if the Raven dies, they stay in that spot. Or, they attach themselves to the nearest Raven.

Anti-Armor Missile - Easily the most interesting ability the Raven has, but right now it does nothing significant in a battle. I guess I just don't get the "Activation Time" on it. The Seeker Missile made sense since its damage stacked and it would annihilate armies, but the Anti-Armor Missile doesn't do enough damage to really see that happen. Abduct is instant, Blinding Cloud is instant, Psionic Storm is instant, EMP, Parasitic Bomb, and Fungal Growth are fast, but Anti-Armor Missiles are slow. There is lots to play around with here, but I'd like to see the ability made to be a little faster and more instant.

And no, not calling for any nerfs whatsoever to the other caster units. I just want to make sure they're useful enough to get used.


I like your suggestions.

About the Repair Drone: How about it is a castable ability that produces NO drone. Instead, the raven goes into "healing mode" and repairs X amount of hp per second until the ability finishes (so for example the description would say: heals X hp per second. costs 75 mana and last X seconds). So it's mobile and still locked to the Raven.

I cant stress enough how much I think bringing back autoturrets is a terrible idea.
avilo
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States4100 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-12 23:25:12
January 12 2018 23:21 GMT
#64
Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.
Sup
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
January 12 2018 23:34 GMT
#65
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.


Fuck that. Players going for 30 raven spamming seeker missiles so that everything explodes is exactly what Blizzard doesn't want in the game (and rightly so). And it wasn't even particularly common at the highest level--it was good for abusing on ladder and creating miserable games there.
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-12 23:40:54
January 12 2018 23:35 GMT
#66
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.


I'm glad that you agree that autoturrets are a terrible thing to bring back to the game.

Blizzard had hinted before that they dont want to see late game spellcasters vs spellcaster. Which is good in principle.
The reality though is that the High Templar and Viper utterly obliterate Terran late game and are just made without question.

At it's current state, Terran literally does not have a go-to late game unit.

Honestly they should just change the Battlecruiser attack to how it was in brood war. Single powerful shots that arent affected by armor so much. Then Terran has something actually scary in late game. Just keep the raven as a support unit and buff the battlecruiser somehow. I am partial about the old seeker to be honest. Maybe something inbetween the seeker and the newseeker would be good.
franzji
Profile Joined September 2013
United States583 Posts
January 12 2018 23:40 GMT
#67
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"


I'm not gonna mention every nerf and buff that I agree, I think poor performance of foreigner protoss player vs. zerg as well as 42% winrates over and over again should be more looked into instead of PvT. Also my PvT winrate shows that I am not favored if you want to see it. I did mention the hydra nerf too.

On January 13 2018 08:15 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"

1. Hates all the nerfs to Protoss.
2. Loves all the nerfs to Zerg.

Gee, I wonder which race this guy plays?



like usual, just stop. where is your basic intelligence?
NutriaKaiN
Profile Joined June 2016
88 Posts
January 12 2018 23:46 GMT
#68
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"


or maybe because the pvz winrate is worse then the tvp?
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
January 12 2018 23:47 GMT
#69
On January 13 2018 08:34 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.


Fuck that. Players going for 30 raven spamming seeker missiles so that everything explodes is exactly what Blizzard doesn't want in the game (and rightly so). And it wasn't even particularly common at the highest level--it was good for abusing on ladder and creating miserable games there.


Players will still spam ravens for the autoturrets in late game. Rapidfire trick and autoturrets from 20 ravens is bat-shit crazy.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-12 23:50:34
January 12 2018 23:48 GMT
#70
On January 13 2018 08:40 youngjiddle wrote:

Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 08:15 pvsnp wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"

1. Hates all the nerfs to Protoss.
2. Loves all the nerfs to Zerg.

Gee, I wonder which race this guy plays?



like usual, just stop. where is your basic intelligence?

Oh hey, it's you again!

I normally just read the post and ignore the poster name but when you immediately insulted me I double-checked the name and sure enough it's my old pal youngjiddle. Nobody else would start making personal attacks so quickly.

Stay classy, my friend.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
franzji
Profile Joined September 2013
United States583 Posts
January 12 2018 23:49 GMT
#71
On January 13 2018 08:48 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 08:40 youngjiddle wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"


I'm not gonna mention every nerf and buff that I agree, I think poor performance of foreigner protoss player vs. zerg as well as 42% winrates over and over again should be more looked into instead of PvT. Also my PvT winrate shows that I am not favored if you want to see it. I did mention the hydra nerf too.

On January 13 2018 08:15 pvsnp wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"

1. Hates all the nerfs to Protoss.
2. Loves all the nerfs to Zerg.

Gee, I wonder which race this guy plays?



like usual, just stop. where is your basic intelligence?

Oh hey, it's you again!

I normally just read the post and ignore the poster name but when you immediately insulted me I double-checked the name and sure enough it's my old pal youngjiddle. Nobody else would start making personal attacks so quickly.

Stay classy, my friend.


honest question.
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada18051 Posts
January 12 2018 23:51 GMT
#72
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

no i prefer teh Raven as a support unit. Terran has too many air attack options.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
Jett.Jack.Alvir
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Canada2250 Posts
January 12 2018 23:55 GMT
#73
Please, someone, save this for posterity and when someone says "Blizzard doesn't listen to the community" link this update.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
January 13 2018 00:02 GMT
#74
On January 13 2018 08:47 Psychobabas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 08:34 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.


Fuck that. Players going for 30 raven spamming seeker missiles so that everything explodes is exactly what Blizzard doesn't want in the game (and rightly so). And it wasn't even particularly common at the highest level--it was good for abusing on ladder and creating miserable games there.


Players will still spam ravens for the autoturrets in late game. Rapidfire trick and autoturrets from 20 ravens is bat-shit crazy.


I highly doubt it. With no PDD and no Seeker Missile going for mass raven is asking for getting dived on by corruptors and losing everything.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
January 13 2018 00:13 GMT
#75
On January 13 2018 08:49 youngjiddle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 08:48 pvsnp wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:40 youngjiddle wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"


I'm not gonna mention every nerf and buff that I agree, I think poor performance of foreigner protoss player vs. zerg as well as 42% winrates over and over again should be more looked into instead of PvT. Also my PvT winrate shows that I am not favored if you want to see it. I did mention the hydra nerf too.

On January 13 2018 08:15 pvsnp wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:12 Fango wrote:
On January 13 2018 07:58 youngjiddle wrote:
The team should focus on PvZ instead, the hydra change is nice but not what expected.


"balance team should stop changing the matchup because it's the one I'm favoured in"

1. Hates all the nerfs to Protoss.
2. Loves all the nerfs to Zerg.

Gee, I wonder which race this guy plays?



like usual, just stop. where is your basic intelligence?

Oh hey, it's you again!

I normally just read the post and ignore the poster name but when you immediately insulted me I double-checked the name and sure enough it's my old pal youngjiddle. Nobody else would start making personal attacks so quickly.

Stay classy, my friend.


honest question.


'Honest,' you say?

On December 22 2017 02:24 youngjiddle wrote:
fuck off tbh
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-13 00:39:33
January 13 2018 00:33 GMT
#76
On January 13 2018 09:02 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 08:47 Psychobabas wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:34 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.


Fuck that. Players going for 30 raven spamming seeker missiles so that everything explodes is exactly what Blizzard doesn't want in the game (and rightly so). And it wasn't even particularly common at the highest level--it was good for abusing on ladder and creating miserable games there.


Players will still spam ravens for the autoturrets in late game. Rapidfire trick and autoturrets from 20 ravens is bat-shit crazy.


I highly doubt it. With no PDD and no Seeker Missile going for mass raven is asking for getting dived on by corruptors and losing everything.


Yes that is true but why wouldnt you want 15 ravens and their 60 autoturrets vs anything else in Terran late game where you already have your backbone of tanks, your sprinkle of hellbats, your thors. I am not saying that the terran will go full on raven but they sure can make 10-15 of them. And honestly, once it goes into really late and all it matters are orbitals, then the ravens can go up to 30 easily. There is no real reason not to do this. The 30 supply of ravens is so much superior vs the 5 thors you can make or anything else really. (I assume the player is using the rapid fire trick to deploy mass turrets in a blink of an eye.)

And this promotes turtle style mech which is just...

pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-13 00:37:16
January 13 2018 00:36 GMT
#77
On January 13 2018 09:33 Psychobabas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 09:02 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:47 Psychobabas wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:34 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.


Fuck that. Players going for 30 raven spamming seeker missiles so that everything explodes is exactly what Blizzard doesn't want in the game (and rightly so). And it wasn't even particularly common at the highest level--it was good for abusing on ladder and creating miserable games there.


Players will still spam ravens for the autoturrets in late game. Rapidfire trick and autoturrets from 20 ravens is bat-shit crazy.


I highly doubt it. With no PDD and no Seeker Missile going for mass raven is asking for getting dived on by corruptors and losing everything.


Yes that is true but why wouldnt you want 15 ravens and their 60 autoturrets vs anything else in Terran late game where you already have your backbone of tanks, your sprinkle of hellbats, your thors. I am not saying that the terran will go full on raven but they sure can make 10-15 of them. There is no real reason not to do this. The 30 supply of ravens is so much superior vs the 5 thors you can make or anything else really. (I assume the player is using the rapid fire trick to deploy mass turrets in a blink of an eye.)



Even when Ravens had autoturrets, PDDs, and seekers, mass Raven only happened once in a blue moon at the professional level (in LotV). Transitioning to mass Raven takes too much time and too much gas.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
KaiserCommander
Profile Joined April 2010
Mexico290 Posts
January 13 2018 00:40 GMT
#78
@Avilo I share your vision about the Terran late game in general but not your solutions about it.

For me I totally agree with the opinion of the guy that mentioned the Battlecruisers, Terran needs a buff fearsome unit, the Battlecruiser was supposed to be that unit but it's Cyclone-esque attack makes it non-viable for the sustain of late game, another option is to make the Battlecruiser able to atack while it is charging Yamato Cannon.
Talking about the Raven and as someone mentioned me (stealing my idea) is that you can lock the regeneration to the Raven and make it consume it's energy for HP AND if they will bring back Auto Turrets they can at least set some kind of anti-spam regulation like constructing them (like the carrier) or assign the Raven a single buff turret for cycle. Still I don't think the return of auto turret is a good idea.
And with the insta-cloack there is the end of my TvT bullshit Ghost in Main cheese. RIP.
Jinro, Polt, Bomber, ForGG, MajOr, Flash, Maru. Terran Fighting...
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-13 00:42:00
January 13 2018 00:40 GMT
#79
On January 13 2018 09:36 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2018 09:33 Psychobabas wrote:
On January 13 2018 09:02 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:47 Psychobabas wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:34 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On January 13 2018 08:21 avilo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, most issues are identified in this update, which is a new high for this balance team.

Hydralisks are too strong period because they have a free combat shields they aren't supposed to have, same thing happened with banelings that killed bio play.

You cannot give units free combat shields. +10 hp is a big deal, imagine if marines were given this upgrade for free. It changes the entire balance of the game. This is why currently every single game TvZ is vs a guy making 50 hydras and remaxing on 50 pure hydras because it's too good not to make.

Also, stalkers will be fixed soon? I hope so.

But the main thing here is...Blizzard still does not "get it" about the raven nerfs. Adding auto-turret back to the raven is a terrible idea, it's one of the main reasons mass raven was becoming problematic in the first place.

Terran has no late game scaling unit because seeker was nerfed and so was PDD. Every race had a late game scaling unit: Zerg infestors/vipers/swarmhosts, Protoss tempest/carrier,high templar, disruptors/collosus, anything with splash, and Terran had....ONLY THE RAVEN SEEKER MISSILE/PDD/AUTO-TURRET accumulation.

By severely nerfing and killing seeker missile and removing point defense drone, blizzard has REMOVED TERRAN LATEGAME FROM THE GAME. Every race has to have a hyper scaling late game "carry" unit if the game is to be fair.

IF the raven was to be severely nerfed as it was that's fine - if it's done across the board. Nerf viper/infestor/sh, nerf high templar, carriers, etc.

What happened is an absolute travesty because it makes one race near unplayable as time goes on in a game, which is objectively unfair and not balanced.

Every Terran player agrees the raven was hard nerfed and needs to be reverted in some manner, but not the auto-turret. The current seeker is just bad and a hard nerf. Bring back the seeker that killed things. No one cares if a unit turns red. The other races get parasitic bomb - KILLS THINGS. Psi storm - KILLS. Terran HAD seeker that KILLED now we've lost that source of late game splash that scales with time and energy.

Currently, Terran lategame revolves around massing as many vikings as humanly possible and praying you hit an emp/snipes onto your opponent's hyper scaling energy units because you aren't allowed to mass your own.

The old raven seeker needs to come back. Arguably PDD as well.

Also, for those of you here or elsewhere that don't understand what a "hyper scaling unit is" you can see this in MOBA games champions/heroes.

There are hyper scaling carries that scale up in damage with critical strike items/damage as the game goes on. But some champions in MOBA games do not scale nearly as much or at all, and stay near flat static values and have to "win the game early."

That is perfectly fine, for a MOBA champion / game where there's asymettrical balance and many other factors. For an RTS game, every race has to have fair options as a game time goes longer. What we currently have are Zerg and Protoss that contain "hyper scaling carries" in the form of energy units previously mentioned - high templar, vipers, infestors, swarmhosts, carriers, tempest, meaning the more of them you make, the better your army is getting.

As a Terran player, making more vikings isn't making my army stronger - it's getting weaker and weaker as we both reach 200/200 supply because a 2 supply viking does not have the "hyper scaling" that a 2 supply raven with seeker/PDD/auto turrets had. Or that a 2 supply high templar has with storm, etc.

Bring back the raven and Terran lategame.


Fuck that. Players going for 30 raven spamming seeker missiles so that everything explodes is exactly what Blizzard doesn't want in the game (and rightly so). And it wasn't even particularly common at the highest level--it was good for abusing on ladder and creating miserable games there.


Players will still spam ravens for the autoturrets in late game. Rapidfire trick and autoturrets from 20 ravens is bat-shit crazy.


I highly doubt it. With no PDD and no Seeker Missile going for mass raven is asking for getting dived on by corruptors and losing everything.


Yes that is true but why wouldnt you want 15 ravens and their 60 autoturrets vs anything else in Terran late game where you already have your backbone of tanks, your sprinkle of hellbats, your thors. I am not saying that the terran will go full on raven but they sure can make 10-15 of them. There is no real reason not to do this. The 30 supply of ravens is so much superior vs the 5 thors you can make or anything else really. (I assume the player is using the rapid fire trick to deploy mass turrets in a blink of an eye.)



Even when Ravens had autoturrets, PDDs, and seekers, mass Raven only happened once in a blue moon at the professional level (in LotV). Transitioning to mass Raven takes too much time and too much gas.


Absolutely but I am talking about ladder here. The games we play. If Blizzard was balancing according to pro gamers only then the ravens wouldnt even be touched. Which they clearly arent.
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-13 00:41:49
January 13 2018 00:41 GMT
#80
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
01:00
OSC 5000
EmpressLilyy39
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
MindelVK 23
EnDerr 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 19584
Calm 2866
Rain 1514
Mini 331
Shuttle 322
EffOrt 279
Rush 152
firebathero 109
Dewaltoss 89
Zeus 64
[ Show more ]
hero 48
Hyun 32
Terrorterran 24
Killer 23
Barracks 23
Trap 23
Hm[arnc] 22
910 17
scan(afreeca) 16
Aegong 15
Movie 13
soO 11
Sacsri 7
Dota 2
Gorgc8564
monkeys_forever399
420jenkins294
Counter-Strike
x6flipin320
jkaem143
gobbtv88
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr58
Other Games
singsing1845
Liquid`RaSZi1258
FrodaN1125
Beastyqt580
Grubby236
KnowMe155
Liquid`VortiX149
ArmadaUGS136
QueenE97
Mew2King78
Railgan9
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 1
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 15
• Reevou 4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1724
League of Legends
• TFBlade891
Other Games
• Shiphtur441
Upcoming Events
OSC
5h 30m
ArT vs MindelVK
MiniZergUA vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
Ultimate Battle
18h 30m
OSC
20h 30m
OSC
1d 6h
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
CranKy Ducklings
1d 16h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 18h
IPSL
1d 23h
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
BSL
2 days
TerrOr vs OyAji
UltrA vs Gosudark
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
2 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
BSL
3 days
Artosis vs Dewalt
Ret vs Tech
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-11
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
Individual League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 591
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
StarCraft2 Weekly Open Tournament 2026 Grand Finals
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.