| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
PuroYO
Norway163 Posts
On July 16 2017 04:12 imre wrote: 200k only. If you want to support esport you should sub to your favorite player twitch channel, not buy the warchest. That does not support eSport at all. | ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
Helping a player to pay his rent/living cost supports esport in a very concrete way. Especially in a scene where only a few are making a decent living. | ||
|
Espartaquen
88 Posts
| ||
|
PuroYO
Norway163 Posts
On July 16 2017 04:49 imre wrote: Helping a player to pay his rent/living cost supports esport in a very concrete way. Especially in a scene where only a few are making a decent living. One player =\= eSports. Competitive scene and professionals = eSports. Funding one player does not help eSports, it helps one player. | ||
|
nOgi109
5 Posts
On July 16 2017 04:24 imre wrote: there is no cap on the compendium. there is a cap there, don't you see the difference ? you're not supporting the players past the 200K prizepool there, you're helping blizzard to invest less in WCS 2018 contribution doesn't go to the prizepool. Might give too much money to the players you know. They're still investing the exact same amount into the esport prizes. Its 200k plus the money they already put up. The rest goes towards 2018 operations. I never said it goes towards prize pools but we don't really know either way yet. Considering the size of the community this is probably the best way to keeping things funded. Blizz can't do all that production at a loss forever. More money in the scene is never a bad thing whether it goes to players or casters. | ||
|
Thax
Belgium1060 Posts
On July 16 2017 03:51 Solar424 wrote: Why have more people working on cosmetics than actually working on the game itself. Oh wait, it's because making the game better doesn't make Blizzard money, but cosmetics do. I'm sure all those 3d-model, texture and animation artist will get onto to balance changes as soon as they're done with the war chest! | ||
|
Thax
Belgium1060 Posts
| ||
|
Suchbalancemuchwow
76 Posts
Unfortunately much like Playstation Plus the extra's you get for buying that which you actually want just make the price even more absurd, but can easily be used as ''justification'' of said price. | ||
|
Kerdinand
Germany113 Posts
Only thing I'm scared of is how hard it is to distinguish Dropperlords from normal Overlords in the preview pictures (I already have this problem with the "mutated" skin), hope its easier in the real game or they'll change it up a bit. | ||
|
PuroYO
Norway163 Posts
On July 16 2017 04:59 Kerdinand wrote: Loving these skins a lot! I never liked the red-black Tal'Darim look, but in blue these look really sick. Only thing I'm scared of is how hard it is to distinguish Dropperlords from normal Overlords in the preview pictures (I already have this problem with the "mutated" skin), hope its easier in the real game or they'll change it up a bit. These ar things they need feedback on now that they have released it, give it, constructively, but do give it! | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
| ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24239 Posts
On July 16 2017 05:03 Zaros wrote: The great irony of all is you will never see any of the skins in any big tournaments, which is a shame they look really cool. well the winged zergling is now seen once and again, and I seem to remember INno playing with the new hellion skin. We also saw a lot of the colossi skins (the white and the taldarim ones). So I think we'll see those skins in professionnal play. | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On July 16 2017 05:10 [PkF] Wire wrote: well the winged zergling is now seen once and again, and I seem to remember INno playing with the new hellion skin. We also saw a lot of the colossi skins (the white and the taldarim ones). So I think we'll see those skins in professionnal play. Skins are banned in all big tournaments unfortunately | ||
|
KR_4EVR
316 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17682 Posts
On July 16 2017 04:40 Garuga wrote: This. This is what's wrong with video games. Charging more for the price of fucking skins than for the actual game. its the pay whatever you can afford revenue model. if u have no cash at all you pay $30 to join the party. if u r in ur prime earning years and want to spend $400+ on Starcraft you can do that too. so far i've spent ~$600 on SC2 stuff and much, much more on the 2 Blizzcons i've attended. So far the airline companies are making more money off of me than Blizzard. On July 16 2017 05:17 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: So my question is will these skins be allowed in WCS tournaments? They've been weirdly against it so far why is it weird to be against it? let the top players make the call. if the top players want the skins off... keep 'em off. | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17682 Posts
| ||
|
JackONeill
861 Posts
Make people pay for events that are bringing you money. That's like if IKEA asked you to pay 10 bucks for a hotdog, so that the money gathered could help them design a new couch they'll make you pay for full price. It's brilliant if you think about it, what a PR masterpiece. | ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2142 Posts
On July 16 2017 04:40 Garuga wrote: This. This is what's wrong with video games. Charging more for the price of fucking skins than for the actual game. then don't buy them, it's really not that hard | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
