EPTi remember Morhaime standing in front of the first 20 story office building he bought for Blizzard. The guy didn't have $100 worth of clothes on. what a great company.
LotV Design Changes announced - Page 13
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17685 Posts
i remember Morhaime standing in front of the first 20 story office building he bought for Blizzard. The guy didn't have $100 worth of clothes on. what a great company. | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12475 Posts
On August 15 2016 06:27 Gullis wrote: He is sitting on his stream playing hallelujah music. he seems pretty happy to me. Wanna bet on how long it takes him to say that Blizzard fucked up after the patch is released? I'm betting negative time. | ||
|
SCHWARZENEGGER
206 Posts
| ||
|
DSK
England1110 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17685 Posts
On August 15 2016 06:08 Kerence wrote: Oh hey, actual big changes instead of just small balance ones. This could be good going forward. can't do massive changes in the middle of a competitive season. they have to wait until after BlizzCon 2016... and obviously they'll have to make sure the game is stabilized by the beginning of the 2017 competitive season. | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:09 SCHWARZENEGGER wrote: widow mine can't kill armored banelings via splash? so rip bio The widow mine attack is a spell and therefore ignores armor upgrades I'm pretty sure. | ||
|
Metalcore1993NZ
New Zealand1 Post
| ||
|
TronJovolta
United States323 Posts
| ||
|
SCHWARZENEGGER
206 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:13 Elentos wrote: The widow mine attack is a spell and therefore ignores armor upgrades I'm pretty sure. ok I thought armor works against only splash for some reason | ||
|
Shuffleblade
Sweden1903 Posts
| ||
|
bjornkavist
Canada1235 Posts
| ||
|
adMachine
Australia54 Posts
| ||
|
Mnijykmirl
United States299 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:09 SCHWARZENEGGER wrote: widow mine can't kill armored banelings via splash? so rip bio Widow mine now kills 1 baneling and leaves all the rest alive with 5 hp. Bio is dead without tanks. TvZ will have two possible faces after these changes. Banelings gettings a 33% increase in survival from marine focus fire and hundreds of times more likely to die on top of marines. 1. Late WoL ling/bling/muta suffocating Marine/Medivac/Tank 2. Full I-wanna-hang-myself turtle mech. There's also a lot of chances of baneling all-ins being an every-game sort of thing. No tankivac micro options, unlikely to have the firepower to kill banelings. | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:33 Mnijykmirl wrote: Widow mine now kills 1 baneling and leaves all the rest alive with 5 hp. No. The mine does 40 splash and the banes will have 40 hp. | ||
|
JackONeill
861 Posts
It lasts 32 seconds, and has 42 cd. Only 10 secs CD? With a 13 sec cast range that's actually quite the same, so i really don't see the point. | ||
|
Clbull
United Kingdom1439 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:15 TronJovolta wrote: NO FUCKING NO TO THE DT BUFF. Seriously? I'll be fine with DTs getting Blink if they temporarily de-cloak themselves on attacking. That way, DTs get a mobility buff and an escape cooldown while at the same time no longer punishing players with build order losses should they fail to build detection in time. | ||
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
And blink DT's lol | ||
|
Mnijykmirl
United States299 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:37 Elentos wrote: No. The mine does 40 splash and the banes will have 40 hp. I stand (happily) corrected. I like to see more baneling to deal with adepts in ZvP. I hope they don't continue on their plan of making Ravager armored so turtle mech won't be the most horrible to face in TvZ. | ||
|
Clbull
United Kingdom1439 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:39 JackONeill wrote: Tempest ability seems quite idiotic in large numbers. Sure you'll have less of them since they cost 2 more pop, but you can't chase tempest with ground AA anymore. It's like adding a weak storm to the tempest, that is known to combo very well with storm. It lasts 32 seconds, and has 42 cd. Only 10 secs CD? With a 13 sec cast range that's actually quite the same, so i really don't see the point. Yup, a 13 range disruption field is almost the same damage potential wise as just flat-out giving Tempests 15 attack range, and that's why I feel unsure of this change. At least the supply cost increase should make them far less massable. | ||
|
Mnijykmirl
United States299 Posts
On August 15 2016 07:15 TronJovolta wrote: NO FUCKING NO TO THE DT BUFF. Seriously? Just imagine DT's blinking onto spore/missile turret detectors all game and killing it before chance to respond. | ||
| ||
