|
I think people are just hungry for drama. Nothing Naniwa has ever done has struck me as over the top. Nani brings passion back into the scene. Whether you hate him or love him, you're going to watch his games.
|
On January 18 2015 14:04 mYiKane wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 14:00 Jornada wrote:On January 18 2015 13:49 mYiKane wrote:On January 18 2015 13:49 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: I wish Naniwa had never come back to Starcraft. Don't worry, he's bound to get boo'd into retirement again soon enough  This may be true.... but at least he will make it to Premier.... You on the other hand.... have fun qualifying for challenger over and over again. I'd rather be a good person and a bad player than a shitty person and a good player. Also, I'd MUCH rather be a good person and a shitty player than a shitty player AND an irrelevant fanboy 
I'd rather be an irrelevant fanboy then have no success in SC2...
but i guess you have become accustomed to that position....
I'd rather also be an irrelevant fanboy then make lame videos of myself petting myself.
yea... im good with where im at 
you on the other hand. Keep on qualifying for challenger. And if you want a piece of this Fanboy all you gotta do is msg
Jornada.156
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On January 18 2015 15:20 Legio wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 15:18 ZigguratOfUr wrote: It'll be interesting to see how far he'll go in WCS. It'll be really frickin entertaining to see how many feuds he can start along the way. He might not even get that far. Kane is running a Twitter campaign now to have him DQ'ed by Blizzard.
Won't happen. Worse Blizzard will do is fine him, I don't think even that. I guess since its Naniwa, he might ragequit SCII because of the fine, and claim its unfair and that Kane should be fined for his other Twitter comments, but I doubt it.
On January 18 2015 15:25 Cascade wrote:Sorry to go off-topic from the drama, but can we talk just a bit about nanis sc2 form? Is he as good as before? Then we can continue with the personal insults and drama please. 
We haven't seen much of his play, but he hasn't practised for a while so he's certainly not at his former level at the peak of his form. However, due to that his form may increase dramatically as we approach the WCS season, so there's really no way to know. Personally I don't think he'll make it far, but its really up in the air.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 18 2015 15:22 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 15:19 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:11 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:08 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:05 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:01 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 14:57 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 14:50 SoleSteeler wrote: Almost everyone has a negative reaction to Nani when he insults them. When others insult each other they always seem to just brush it off. I guess Naniwa is more "serious" in his insults.
That said, I'm a huge fan of watching Nani's games and interviews. I find his personality fascinating too... It's because the other pros don't/won't come to Naniwas defense. And so you see some challenging him to a fight, wanting to see him physically hurt, like schoolyard bullies. They cannot best Naniwa in SC2 and they can't break his spirit, so this is the ugly result. Saying they can't best him may be taking it a bit far. "Best" doesn't mean "defeat in a game." It doesn't mean "defeat in a series" either, or "show better results in a tournament." Naniwa has had the most illustrious career of any foreigner, and immediately starts stomping face after not playing competitively for a long time. Stephano and IdrA are the only foreigners who can sit at the adults table with Naniwa. Thorzain, Jinro, Huk, Vortix, Sen, Scarlett have all had as good as or better careers than Idra in SC2 in terms of results, consistency and competitive environment. Right, I left HuK out, but he's borderline. Had Jinro competed longer in Korea he might belong. The rest aren't close. When I talk about Naniwa, IdrA, Stephano, and (possibly) HuK, I'm talking about foreigners who have succeeded to some extent at the highest level against good completition. Players who Koreans feared. We'll see if Naniwa can bring it back to that now. For somebody who writes so much about SC2, you have a distorted view of the game's history. I don't think I have a distorted view of SC2 at all? Evidently you do, if you think that Vortix or Thorzain remotely belong in this conversation.
Vortix was more consistent than idra was in a more competitive time period for a longer period of time. I respect his multiple top 8 finishes from the latter end of 2012 to the end of 2014 more than Idra's reputation as a great Zerg in the early 2010-2011 period and MLG runs.
And Thorzain's reputation was as good as Idra's during his prime. He was respected by Koreans for his methodical builds, compositions and ideas. Slayers greatly respected his play and MMA and him talked about strategy fairly often. His prime was from latter half 2011 to halfway 2012, but his strategic innovations on TvP play were extremely important and he was Naniwa's rival during that entire era for a reason with both going even in maps the entire way. Oh he also won Stockholm in 2012.
And "players who Koreans feared" is fairly intangible. And yes, Vortix and Thorzain did succeed to some extent against highest level competition.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 18 2015 15:26 oBlade wrote:Well this piece really takes a stand doesn't it? 
a tautological stand
|
Naniwa is drama gold. Always good content when he is around.
|
On January 18 2015 15:25 Cascade wrote:Sorry to go off-topic from the drama, but can we talk just a bit about nanis sc2 form? Is he as good as before? Then we can continue with the personal insults and drama please.  Well, no one actually knows Naniwa's current state. From the looks of it, he only participated in the third qualifier for WCS EU, and he made it through in that one time. He beat Space Marine, Mana, Hanfy, and Happy -- mostly players who ended up qualifying eventually. He looked quite solid versus those players. Does he look as good as before? Well, depends on what stage of before you look at. Does he look like a top 8 GSL player? No, of course not. But he does look very solid, and I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him beat Nerchio.
For reference, Nerchio beat Tefel, lost to Dayshi, beat Complain, lost to Ptit Drogo, lost to some guy named Miszu, lost to fraer, beat ZhuGeLiang, beat Complain (again), and beat Space Marine. He qualified on his 5th qualifier versus Naniwa's 1st qualifier.
|
On January 18 2015 15:22 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 15:19 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:11 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:08 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:05 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:01 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 14:57 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 14:50 SoleSteeler wrote: Almost everyone has a negative reaction to Nani when he insults them. When others insult each other they always seem to just brush it off. I guess Naniwa is more "serious" in his insults.
That said, I'm a huge fan of watching Nani's games and interviews. I find his personality fascinating too... It's because the other pros don't/won't come to Naniwas defense. And so you see some challenging him to a fight, wanting to see him physically hurt, like schoolyard bullies. They cannot best Naniwa in SC2 and they can't break his spirit, so this is the ugly result. Saying they can't best him may be taking it a bit far. "Best" doesn't mean "defeat in a game." It doesn't mean "defeat in a series" either, or "show better results in a tournament." Naniwa has had the most illustrious career of any foreigner, and immediately starts stomping face after not playing competitively for a long time. Stephano and IdrA are the only foreigners who can sit at the adults table with Naniwa. Thorzain, Jinro, Huk, Vortix, Sen, Scarlett have all had as good as or better careers than Idra in SC2 in terms of results, consistency and competitive environment. Right, I left HuK out, but he's borderline. Had Jinro competed longer in Korea he might belong. The rest aren't close. When I talk about Naniwa, IdrA, Stephano, and (possibly) HuK, I'm talking about foreigners who have succeeded to some extent at the highest level against good completition. Players who Koreans feared. We'll see if Naniwa can bring it back to that now. For somebody who writes so much about SC2, you have a distorted view of the game's history. I don't think I have a distorted view of SC2 at all? Evidently you do, if you think that Vortix or Thorzain remotely belong in this conversation.
Thorzain is easily up there with the best foreigners. Winning TSL3 and an offline premiere (DH) with Koreans in it is nothing to scoff at. He had his share of other good performances against Koreans as well, such as when he almost beat DRG in DH Valencia.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
I like how everyone neglected Sen in this argument, just like always.
Only foreigner to win a Premier Tournament in the WCS era, guys
can't argue against that
|
On January 18 2015 15:42 lichter wrote: I like how everyone neglected Sen in this argument, just like always.
Only foreigner to win a Premier Tournament in the WCS era, guys
can't argue against that
oh fo sho
Top 5 foreigner of all time imo. The forgotten badass. Been one of the best outside of Korea since the beta days of WoL.
|
On January 18 2015 15:42 lichter wrote: I like how everyone neglected Sen in this argument, just like always.
Only foreigner to win a Premier Tournament in the WCS era, guys
can't argue against that
Well, you kind of can when you look at his bracket
|
Regardless of what Naniwa does, he definitely benefits the overall scene.
|
I like Naniwa because he is kind to women.
|
On January 18 2015 15:32 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 15:22 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:19 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:11 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:08 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:05 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:01 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 14:57 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 14:50 SoleSteeler wrote: Almost everyone has a negative reaction to Nani when he insults them. When others insult each other they always seem to just brush it off. I guess Naniwa is more "serious" in his insults.
That said, I'm a huge fan of watching Nani's games and interviews. I find his personality fascinating too... It's because the other pros don't/won't come to Naniwas defense. And so you see some challenging him to a fight, wanting to see him physically hurt, like schoolyard bullies. They cannot best Naniwa in SC2 and they can't break his spirit, so this is the ugly result. Saying they can't best him may be taking it a bit far. "Best" doesn't mean "defeat in a game." It doesn't mean "defeat in a series" either, or "show better results in a tournament." Naniwa has had the most illustrious career of any foreigner, and immediately starts stomping face after not playing competitively for a long time. Stephano and IdrA are the only foreigners who can sit at the adults table with Naniwa. Thorzain, Jinro, Huk, Vortix, Sen, Scarlett have all had as good as or better careers than Idra in SC2 in terms of results, consistency and competitive environment. Right, I left HuK out, but he's borderline. Had Jinro competed longer in Korea he might belong. The rest aren't close. When I talk about Naniwa, IdrA, Stephano, and (possibly) HuK, I'm talking about foreigners who have succeeded to some extent at the highest level against good completition. Players who Koreans feared. We'll see if Naniwa can bring it back to that now. For somebody who writes so much about SC2, you have a distorted view of the game's history. I don't think I have a distorted view of SC2 at all? Evidently you do, if you think that Vortix or Thorzain remotely belong in this conversation. Vortix was more consistent than idra was in a more competitive time period for a longer period of time. I respect his multiple top 8 finishes from the latter end of 2012 to the end of 2014 more than Idra's reputation as a great Zerg in the early 2010-2011 period and MLG runs. And Thorzain's reputation was as good as Idra's during his prime. He was respected by Koreans for his methodical builds, compositions and ideas. Slayers greatly respected his play and MMA and him talked about strategy fairly often. His prime was from latter half 2011 to halfway 2012, but his strategic innovations on TvP play were extremely important and he was Naniwa's rival during that entire era for a reason with both going even in maps the entire way. Oh he also won Stockholm in 2012. And "players who Koreans feared" is fairly intangible. And yes, Vortix and Thorzain did succeed to some extent against highest level competition. I didn't say "highest level competition." I said "at the highest level," which means IN KOREA... you seem to have amnesia about IdrA winning an IEM too. All I can gather from this is that you haven't been watching SC2 as long as I have, given how you discount pre-patch WoL performances, or how you forget just how IdrA and HuK stood above the rest back then. Micro has gotten a bit better and the maps have become more balanced, but the game hasn't changed that much. The idea that Vortix can be compared to IdrA is laughable. Vortix literally never won a thing of significance.
|
On January 18 2015 15:42 lichter wrote: I like how everyone neglected Sen in this argument, just like always.
Only foreigner to win a Premier Tournament in the WCS era, guys
can't argue against that Homefield advantage + underwhelming competition + few terrans when terrans dominated = unimpressive. I'm happy for Sen, but a lone tournament victory does not measure up to what the other guys I mentioned did. No clue why Taiwan Open was given Premier status even. Sen belongs in the next tier of foreigners with Scarlett, Snute, and Thorzain.
|
On January 18 2015 15:25 Cascade wrote:Sorry to go off-topic from the drama, but can we talk just a bit about nanis sc2 form? Is he as good as before? Then we can continue with the personal insults and drama please. 
I think he looked kind of rough around the edges. Definitely not in shape to start killing Koreans, I felt like he was simply waiting out Happy, and hoping his control would win him a decisive engagement. But even when Naniwa did win engagements, he didn't pounce on them for the kill like you see Koreans doing.
In terms of macro and micro, he was top shelf foreigner level for sure. He is not going to make mistakes or get stressed out, but he was vulnerable against Happy in game one. His main was getting dropped over and over.
He seems to be content to play with an economy deficit for some reason. I'm not sure if that is confidence, or simply his style of protoss.
|
On January 18 2015 15:48 argonautdice wrote: I like Naniwa because he is kind to women. Yeah, Kas can't say that.
|
On January 18 2015 15:48 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 15:32 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:22 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:19 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:11 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:08 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:05 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:01 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 14:57 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 14:50 SoleSteeler wrote: Almost everyone has a negative reaction to Nani when he insults them. When others insult each other they always seem to just brush it off. I guess Naniwa is more "serious" in his insults.
That said, I'm a huge fan of watching Nani's games and interviews. I find his personality fascinating too... It's because the other pros don't/won't come to Naniwas defense. And so you see some challenging him to a fight, wanting to see him physically hurt, like schoolyard bullies. They cannot best Naniwa in SC2 and they can't break his spirit, so this is the ugly result. Saying they can't best him may be taking it a bit far. "Best" doesn't mean "defeat in a game." It doesn't mean "defeat in a series" either, or "show better results in a tournament." Naniwa has had the most illustrious career of any foreigner, and immediately starts stomping face after not playing competitively for a long time. Stephano and IdrA are the only foreigners who can sit at the adults table with Naniwa. Thorzain, Jinro, Huk, Vortix, Sen, Scarlett have all had as good as or better careers than Idra in SC2 in terms of results, consistency and competitive environment. Right, I left HuK out, but he's borderline. Had Jinro competed longer in Korea he might belong. The rest aren't close. When I talk about Naniwa, IdrA, Stephano, and (possibly) HuK, I'm talking about foreigners who have succeeded to some extent at the highest level against good completition. Players who Koreans feared. We'll see if Naniwa can bring it back to that now. For somebody who writes so much about SC2, you have a distorted view of the game's history. I don't think I have a distorted view of SC2 at all? Evidently you do, if you think that Vortix or Thorzain remotely belong in this conversation. Vortix was more consistent than idra was in a more competitive time period for a longer period of time. I respect his multiple top 8 finishes from the latter end of 2012 to the end of 2014 more than Idra's reputation as a great Zerg in the early 2010-2011 period and MLG runs. And Thorzain's reputation was as good as Idra's during his prime. He was respected by Koreans for his methodical builds, compositions and ideas. Slayers greatly respected his play and MMA and him talked about strategy fairly often. His prime was from latter half 2011 to halfway 2012, but his strategic innovations on TvP play were extremely important and he was Naniwa's rival during that entire era for a reason with both going even in maps the entire way. Oh he also won Stockholm in 2012. And "players who Koreans feared" is fairly intangible. And yes, Vortix and Thorzain did succeed to some extent against highest level competition. I didn't say "highest level competition." I said "at the highest level," which means IN KOREA... you seem to have amnesia about IdrA winning an IEM too. All I can gather from this is that you haven't been watching SC2 as long as I have, given how you discount pre-patch WoL performances, or how you forget just how IdrA and HuK stood above the rest back then. Micro has gotten a bit better and the maps have become more balanced, but the game hasn't changed that much. The idea that Vortix can be compared to IdrA is laughable. Vortix literally never won a thing of significance. pre-patch WoL? The game where InControl was a top 4 MLG player and no Korean actually played?
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 18 2015 15:48 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 15:32 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:22 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:19 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:11 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:08 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 15:05 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 15:01 stuchiu wrote:On January 18 2015 14:57 pigmanbear wrote:On January 18 2015 14:50 SoleSteeler wrote: Almost everyone has a negative reaction to Nani when he insults them. When others insult each other they always seem to just brush it off. I guess Naniwa is more "serious" in his insults.
That said, I'm a huge fan of watching Nani's games and interviews. I find his personality fascinating too... It's because the other pros don't/won't come to Naniwas defense. And so you see some challenging him to a fight, wanting to see him physically hurt, like schoolyard bullies. They cannot best Naniwa in SC2 and they can't break his spirit, so this is the ugly result. Saying they can't best him may be taking it a bit far. "Best" doesn't mean "defeat in a game." It doesn't mean "defeat in a series" either, or "show better results in a tournament." Naniwa has had the most illustrious career of any foreigner, and immediately starts stomping face after not playing competitively for a long time. Stephano and IdrA are the only foreigners who can sit at the adults table with Naniwa. Thorzain, Jinro, Huk, Vortix, Sen, Scarlett have all had as good as or better careers than Idra in SC2 in terms of results, consistency and competitive environment. Right, I left HuK out, but he's borderline. Had Jinro competed longer in Korea he might belong. The rest aren't close. When I talk about Naniwa, IdrA, Stephano, and (possibly) HuK, I'm talking about foreigners who have succeeded to some extent at the highest level against good completition. Players who Koreans feared. We'll see if Naniwa can bring it back to that now. For somebody who writes so much about SC2, you have a distorted view of the game's history. I don't think I have a distorted view of SC2 at all? Evidently you do, if you think that Vortix or Thorzain remotely belong in this conversation. Vortix was more consistent than idra was in a more competitive time period for a longer period of time. I respect his multiple top 8 finishes from the latter end of 2012 to the end of 2014 more than Idra's reputation as a great Zerg in the early 2010-2011 period and MLG runs. And Thorzain's reputation was as good as Idra's during his prime. He was respected by Koreans for his methodical builds, compositions and ideas. Slayers greatly respected his play and MMA and him talked about strategy fairly often. His prime was from latter half 2011 to halfway 2012, but his strategic innovations on TvP play were extremely important and he was Naniwa's rival during that entire era for a reason with both going even in maps the entire way. Oh he also won Stockholm in 2012. And "players who Koreans feared" is fairly intangible. And yes, Vortix and Thorzain did succeed to some extent against highest level competition. I didn't say "highest level competition." I said "at the highest level," which means IN KOREA... you seem to have amnesia about IdrA winning an IEM too. All I can gather from this is that you haven't been watching SC2 as long as I have, given how you discount pre-patch WoL performances, or how you forget just how IdrA and HuK stood above the rest back then. Micro has gotten a bit better and the maps have become more balanced, but the game hasn't changed that much. The idea that Vortix can be compared to IdrA is laughable. Vortix literally never won a thing of significance.
You're making multiple fallacious arguments. And even more ad hominem attacks as time goes on. At this point, no argument I make no matter how cogent or factual will convince you otherwise. May as well stop here.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
wow cogent? are you cosmicspiral
|
|
|
|
|
|