|
I don't know if I'm getting this wrong. But feels like most of you are. This isn't proposed patch. This is just a balance test map. Keeping that in mind, I think Blizzard puts in big changes in balance test map, so they can analyze the data. Which direction does it take game. And I'm sure they get more specified data than you would think. After that they make assumptions and implement minor changes, that they are sure won't ruin the game. So I think giving the feedback on the subject is ok. But crying before something is implemented is just retarded!
|
On February 04 2014 02:46 bilow wrote: I don't know if I'm getting this wrong. But feels like most of you are. This isn't proposed patch. This is just a balance test map. Keeping that in mind, I think Blizzard puts in big changes in balance test map, so they can analyze the data. Which direction does it take game. And I'm sure they get more specified data than you would think. After that they make assumptions and implement minor changes, that they are sure won't ruin the game. So I think giving the feedback on the subject is ok. But crying before something is implemented is just retarded!
I'm going to respectfully disagree with you.
1) proposed balance maps give us some insight into what blizzard is thinking 2) these "big changes" blizzard proposes are not actually big enough - see mothership core, swarmhost late game fix, and if you want to look all the way back to the start of starcraft: warpgate tech 3) blizzard does implement these changes, sometimes regardless of waht the community thinks: queen range, oracle speed
|
On February 03 2014 19:05 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2014 18:28 Squat wrote:On February 03 2014 11:45 aZealot wrote:On February 03 2014 11:22 Squat wrote:On February 03 2014 11:12 Ammanas wrote:On February 03 2014 11:07 aZealot wrote:On February 03 2014 09:37 Hryul wrote:thanks for the effort tl. really nice to see some opinions on it. e: On February 03 2014 09:35 Pino wrote:On February 03 2014 08:31 Squat wrote:On February 03 2014 03:11 stuchiu wrote: [quote]
Protoss is still deathballing after the patch =O They could add 50 bastardized, inbred cousins to the oracle and give them all 8.5 move speed. It's not going to make protoss stop deathballing. How anyone thought that giving protoss some random harass units would break up the deathball is beyond me, there is nothing in the addition of the oracle that works to change how protoss plays late game at all. It does not change that colossi, templars, immortals, tempests, void rays, i.e. every big scary gas unit, needs to be in a big blob to be effective. If you want to break up the deathball, you have to attack its constituent parts, not add new ones that don't fit in it. That will just lead to them being unused, or in the case of the oracle, used in the early/mid game and then discarded precisely because they have no real place in the deathball. Some really ass backwards logic went into this kind of thinking. This is precisely on spot, like the best comment in this thread. To me the problems is deeper, and the real discussion should not lie in balance but in design. I hope one day blizzard has the balls to redesign protosses. Like remove FF, redesign WG to keep a defender's advantage, buff gateway units and let them be effective by themselves, with a synergy boost from higher tech units (in this case nerfing them, just like medivacs are for bio), mutas for ling/bane and so on. All these buffs, like MSC addition, oracle speed etc. looks like bandaids. After so many of them, you gotta see there's something wrong with the design. After so many times, I wonder when the "design whine" will stop. it's really annoying. When will it stop? Never. There will always be something to complain about and tack "design" onto. There's a difference between 'always something' and 'exactly the same few things for last 4 years' If people complain about something for four years, might be something to it. Or they might be dead wrong but be unable or unwilling to realise it or accept it. Unlikely. You can't really be wrong about a subjective experience of fun anyway. Your passive-aggressive defense of every aspect of the game strikes me as somewhat frantic. Well he is a zealot after all. ;D ;D ;D But yea tbh you've got to be delusional not to realize the flaws that this game's had since its inception. I mean it's great that Blizzard are still trying to fix things, but still... Then again looking at this suggested batch of chances it makes you wonder if they have any idea what the problems are, since this would break more than it would fix for sure.
Mate, I'm well aware of the game's flaws. Always have been. But, it would be equally delusional to deny that there is disagreement about some of the flaws, and disagreement about how to fix them (even if the flaws are agreed on), and disagreement that TL posters' agreement speaks for the SC2 community. Don't confuse skepticism with blindness.
In this case, I do not agree that GW units are weak or that WG is seriously flawed. Blizzard have even stated as such (way back in WOL). I do think the economy may be a problem (but I don't know for sure). It would be great if Blizzard looked at it again but, having done so before HOTS (see an AMA with DB) they have chosen to continue with it as it is because changing the economy would be too much work (maybe for unknown reward). That is a valid reason even if I may not like it.
So, I see little point in remaking the same arguments for the nth time.
Given that, when I see these arguments pop up, sometimes I'm going to make fun of them. Because most of them are stupid. (Although, to be fair, they may be new posters who may have independently come to the conclusion: fix WG = fix game!)
As to these changes, they will rarely please everybody. I was against most of these changes but now I am not so sure. With some tweaks they could make the game better (e.g. cheaper Hydra upgrade). And having played with the Tempest in the test map a few times, I like it. It could use some work (tone down damage and make it an upgrade) but it is a cool change.
|
Italy12246 Posts
On February 04 2014 02:46 bilow wrote: I don't know if I'm getting this wrong. But feels like most of you are. This isn't proposed patch. This is just a balance test map. Keeping that in mind, I think Blizzard puts in big changes in balance test map, so they can analyze the data. Which direction does it take game. And I'm sure they get more specified data than you would think. After that they make assumptions and implement minor changes, that they are sure won't ruin the game. So I think giving the feedback on the subject is ok. But crying before something is implemented is just retarded!
The problem is that the games played on the custom maps are completely worthless because: a) you almost never get two evenly skillayed players matched up b) even if you do, it might not be a matchup changed by the patch (say, tvt in this one) c) either way, top players don't bother playing on it; non-pro games do not matter for balance.
Test maps are (i hope) almost exclusively a Pr move because it's impossible to extract meaningful data from them.
|
Please Blizzard, rethink how the SwarmHost is designed, everybody knows this and everybody wants this so please don't just do this shitty Tempest patch and say it's fixed, because it's not going to change anything in the matchup.
Minigun makes some really excellent ideas, and they are very reasonable for both sides of the matchup. I think seeing what something like that would do to help Terrans while not killing Protoss in PvP or other matchups is something that needs to happen right now to keep the players and the viewers interested in the game in it's current state.
TLO makes some great points as well, so I really hope Blizzard takes a look at this, and thinks up some fresh ideas. Because just the fact that they would throw out ideas like the Tempest buff, or the Hydra decrease in cost, is just really, really baffling, and shows a very large lack of understanding of what's going on in this game at the moment.
Avilo, as much as he complains and whines about things all the time, makes a very good point in his post earlier in this thread about mech. Decreasing the armory cost would be a step in the right direction, and much more so then removing the ghost upgrade, in getting mech to a respectable level of viability. Although I think mech is a very untapped strength of Terran's that we are starting to see the strength of in all matchups, there needs to be something to help them out in the early game that makes it a smart decision to go down that path instead of bio. And with the ghost buff, I think it will just reinforce the idea that bio is just hands down a better composition in TvP, while only slightly helping mech get ghosts with more energy 40 seconds sooner. Armory costs would be a much more realistic and logical step to helping mech in that matcup in my extremely humble opinion.
|
On February 03 2014 21:01 RaFox17 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2014 20:47 boxerfred wrote:On February 03 2014 20:41 Destructicon wrote:On February 03 2014 20:33 kandiru wrote: Rather than buff the hydralisk, why not make Corrupters not so rubbish against void rays? Make corruption have a (very)small AoE so its more easily targeted on clumped up void rays, and make it cancel/block the use of abilities for the duration. That way you can prevent vikings from landing, and remove void ray prismatic alignment, and cancel/prevent Yamato Cannon if you get close enough.
Void rays could kite back away after the corruption and come back Prismatic Alignment activated after the corruption expired, etc.
You could even use Corruption on stalkers to prevent blink if you were supporting roaches with corrupters.
Would be a more interesting change than halving the gas cost of hydralisks! We don't need more micro limiting abilities in this game. I'm also not sure the aoe will accomplish much, voids tend to not clump as much because of how slow they are, so the aoe would need to be quite substantial. Finally, the real problem with corrupter is that they totally and utterly melt to void rays, due to the rays doing bonus vs armored, add storms and/or archons and the problem is even worst. There are two kinds of balance whine. One: "I lose cause PROTOSS OP". Two: "MAKE MY RACE OP" We have number two here . On a more serious note: what about buffing ghosts via reducing mineral costs? And, whatthefuck hydras? I just hope this is a "Let's do it to rage the Community" move, and not a serious plan. So you think that void ray vs corruptor is an even fair fight? I thought that quite reasonable solution to giving zerg some chance to fight air toss without super turtle.
You're simplifying the problem and stating an example that is stupid. Roaches get killed by immortals, according to your logic, we should buff them. Also, corruptors die to void ray (and void ray to queens, lol) - you simply do not go mass corruptor vs. a voidray based composition.
|
On February 04 2014 03:45 Teoita wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 02:46 bilow wrote: I don't know if I'm getting this wrong. But feels like most of you are. This isn't proposed patch. This is just a balance test map. Keeping that in mind, I think Blizzard puts in big changes in balance test map, so they can analyze the data. Which direction does it take game. And I'm sure they get more specified data than you would think. After that they make assumptions and implement minor changes, that they are sure won't ruin the game. So I think giving the feedback on the subject is ok. But crying before something is implemented is just retarded! The problem is that the games played on the custom maps are completely worthless because: a) you almost never get two evenly skillayed players matched up b) even if you do, it might not be a matchup changed by the patch (say, tvt in this one) c) either way, top players don't bother playing on it; non-pro games do not matter for balance. Test maps are (i hope) almost exclusively a Pr move because it's impossible to extract meaningful data from them.
I think you are right, unfortunately. Worse, 2.1 means that total newbies (and I mean total newbies) sometimes play on that map. A couple of games I played were a total waste of time. I made a comment regarding this on the Blizzard forums. That said, I still liked playing with building smashing Tempests, though. It was a lot of fun smashing structures.
A weekend invitational for a small prize with pro players (they don't even have to be top pros) would be better.
|
On February 04 2014 04:45 aZealot wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 03:45 Teoita wrote:On February 04 2014 02:46 bilow wrote: I don't know if I'm getting this wrong. But feels like most of you are. This isn't proposed patch. This is just a balance test map. Keeping that in mind, I think Blizzard puts in big changes in balance test map, so they can analyze the data. Which direction does it take game. And I'm sure they get more specified data than you would think. After that they make assumptions and implement minor changes, that they are sure won't ruin the game. So I think giving the feedback on the subject is ok. But crying before something is implemented is just retarded! The problem is that the games played on the custom maps are completely worthless because: a) you almost never get two evenly skillayed players matched up b) even if you do, it might not be a matchup changed by the patch (say, tvt in this one) c) either way, top players don't bother playing on it; non-pro games do not matter for balance. Test maps are (i hope) almost exclusively a Pr move because it's impossible to extract meaningful data from them. I think you are right, unfortunately. Worse, 2.1 means that total newbies (and I mean total newbies) sometimes play on that map. A couple of games I played were a total waste of time. I made a comment regarding this on the Blizzard forums. That said, I still liked playing with building smashing Tempests, though. It was a lot of fun smashing structures. A weekend invitational for a small prize with pro players (they don't even have to be top pros) would be better. How about some special icon for playing ten games on a test map? I played WoW for ages and all that was necessary to motivate me to spend 10 hours doing some trivial task was the promise of a special mount or pet. SC2 is different of course, but maybe it works.
|
The hydralisk thingy is insane
|
On February 02 2014 22:35 uh-oh wrote: make interceptors spread out more(so they are less vulnerable vs fungal growths)
why exactly does fungal even work on interceptors? i feel like it should at least not root them...
like, one fungal makes a carrier dead weight...
|
They went back on the hydra change, I hope everyone is happy, we're left with only the most pointless and conservative changes.
God only knows when we'll see a proper shake up of late game PvZ at this rate.
|
Am I the only one who thinks that the ghost buff will actually encourage 2 base allins even more? I mean, we are talking about a unit that has an ability that is supposed to damage (if not right out counter) the whole protoss race regardless of the units used... I'm not a pro nor an expert, please correct me if I'm wrong but -No Mobius reactor -> 100 vespene more, so there's a free ghost beside the first one in production. -There's still no cloak, but since they'll be 75 energy the terran will have two EMPs right on. -I yet have to see terrans hiding ghosts in speedvacs to then unload them and EMP the deathball (kinda like protoss do with HT in warp prisms), but that could be a possibility, especially since a terran wouldn't be stupid enough to leave the medivacs with full energy to eat HT feedbacks
Given how sc2 works units end to clump up, so 2 EMPs are already troublesome, but we are assuming that a Toss will attack right after only 2 ghosts pop out... but what if a terran manages to get two additional ones and then carpet bomb an area with 4 EMPs - assuming that the first two ones don't have enough energy to cast a second one?
The only way to prevent this would be close the game earlier, hence the fear for even more allins...
I hope someone more skilled than me can correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't read any concern about the ghost buff, so I'm wondering if I'm the only one!
|
The problem is that the games played on the custom maps are completely worthless because: a) you almost never get two evenly skillayed players matched up b) even if you do, it might not be a matchup changed by the patch (say, tvt in this one) c) either way, top players don't bother playing on it; non-pro games do not matter for balance.
Test maps are (i hope) almost exclusively a Pr move because it's impossible to extract meaningful data from them.
@Teoita I think that is a really smart statement about the usefulness of test maps though I'm sure a few of the pros would try out the map in their spare time. If HuK and Idra have time to play mini-games on their streams they most likely have time to try out a test map or two. This wouldn't be serious testing which is the main point to be taken from proposed changes and test maps such as this.
Always interesting to hear the perspectives of the pros.
|
On February 04 2014 09:11 Dingobloo wrote: They went back on the hydra change, I hope everyone is happy, we're left with only the most pointless and conservative changes.
God only knows when we'll see a proper shake up of late game PvZ at this rate. Yeah, really bad move by Blizzard. As a zerg, going to MLG and kicking the shit out of Parting, Rain and Sos would've been amazing, but thanks to Blizzard I'm going to have to get out of gold league before trying to go pro. Great job guys. No really.
|
man...that hydra buff would make doing roach hydra vs mech even more viable. More gas for vipers in the late game as well as making them become more disposable. They're trying to buff mech but nerf it at the same time (in that regard to tvz). I see things moving 1 step forward...then 1 step back somewhere else.
|
how to fix tvp: bring warhound back!
|
On February 04 2014 10:05 MavivaM wrote: Am I the only one who thinks that the ghost buff will actually encourage 2 base allins even more? I mean, we are talking about a unit that has an ability that is supposed to damage (if not right out counter) the whole protoss race regardless of the units used... I'm not a pro nor an expert, please correct me if I'm wrong but -No Mobius reactor -> 100 vespene more, so there's a free ghost beside the first one in production. -There's still no cloak, but since they'll be 75 energy the terran will have two EMPs right on. -I yet have to see terrans hiding ghosts in speedvacs to then unload them and EMP the deathball (kinda like protoss do with HT in warp prisms), but that could be a possibility, especially since a terran wouldn't be stupid enough to leave the medivacs with full energy to eat HT feedbacks
Given how sc2 works units end to clump up, so 2 EMPs are already troublesome, but we are assuming that a Toss will attack right after only 2 ghosts pop out... but what if a terran manages to get two additional ones and then carpet bomb an area with 4 EMPs - assuming that the first two ones don't have enough energy to cast a second one?
The only way to prevent this would be close the game earlier, hence the fear for even more allins...
I hope someone more skilled than me can correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't read any concern about the ghost buff, so I'm wondering if I'm the only one! The all in is indeed earlier - mere seconds earlier. The three ghosts you make when you go for the ghost+scv All In generate 25 mana on the way to your base and thus, are EMP ready when they get there anyways. Maybe this makes the timing a couple of seconds earlier, but nothing major. You don't get a free extra ghost either, because in the build you produce three (the number of tech-labbed Barracks you have). The defensive timing is a lot faster, by about 40 seconds, which is good for mech and bio alike, but Bio doesn't really face offensive attacks you need Ghosts for that couldn't be replaced by sim city and bunkers - Mech, however, greatly benefits from EMP on Archons and Immortals.
Also, don't overestimate EMP. It's the combination of mass EMP, Vikings and Cloak that deals with the Deathball, just EMP means you get collosus'd. You seem to fear a late-game occurrence as a result of this buff, but that situation only happens because of mass ghost viking.
|
Minigun and TLO made some very insightful comments. Minigun's suggestions for the Mothership Core were some of the most well thought out I've come across.
Avilo's suggestions for Armory balance changes was also very poignant. I think some thing that goes unaddressed is how Terran is unable to utilize gas in the late game. Dumping all that gas into Ravens is not an effective use of gas. Going Battlecruisers also doesn't do anything. It's a whacky suggestion, but I think nuke call-down time should be reduced a bit. Clide once showed how nukes could be used as a zoning tactic, and in general, nukes are severely underused.
The ghost balance changes doesn't really do much for Terran. Some of the Terran pro-gamers have already noted that Ghosts will pick up the EMP energy as they walk across the map. Giving Ghosts EMP energy out of the Barracks just creates this funky timing for a bio push.
|
On February 04 2014 10:05 MavivaM wrote: Am I the only one who thinks that the ghost buff will actually encourage 2 base allins even more? I mean, we are talking about a unit that has an ability that is supposed to damage (if not right out counter) the whole protoss race regardless of the units used... I'm not a pro nor an expert, please correct me if I'm wrong but -No Mobius reactor -> 100 vespene more, so there's a free ghost beside the first one in production. -There's still no cloak, but since they'll be 75 energy the terran will have two EMPs right on. -I yet have to see terrans hiding ghosts in speedvacs to then unload them and EMP the deathball (kinda like protoss do with HT in warp prisms), but that could be a possibility, especially since a terran wouldn't be stupid enough to leave the medivacs with full energy to eat HT feedbacks
Given how sc2 works units end to clump up, so 2 EMPs are already troublesome, but we are assuming that a Toss will attack right after only 2 ghosts pop out... but what if a terran manages to get two additional ones and then carpet bomb an area with 4 EMPs - assuming that the first two ones don't have enough energy to cast a second one?
The only way to prevent this would be close the game earlier, hence the fear for even more allins...
I hope someone more skilled than me can correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't read any concern about the ghost buff, so I'm wondering if I'm the only one!
I do not see it bad to give Terrans option to go 2-base allinning.
|
Somebody said a change to hydra upgrades would be better (they wanted to decrease cost to 100/100) and I really agree, except I think it's not the upgrade cost that makes hydras tough to field, it's the build duration. Back in broodwar it made sense to have the long duration when hydras were fully T1—it created situations where you were choosing between speed (choose your engagement/kite/harass) or range (straight up fight) and it made hydra rushes more nuanced.
Now, since hydras are lair, they're coming out so late anyway that you are super-committed to doing damage with the first wave, which makes the range upgrade the strongly favored choice. And since it's so late, there's almost zero chance you're gonna be fighting a melee army that you can kite the way you might have been in BW, further undermining the value of speed in actual combat situations. Where you used to have this valid dichotomy, now you have a high-odds choice and a low-odds choice. Reducing the build time doesn't really fix the underlying problem, but at least it means that you'll be getting the speed upgrade part way through the fight instead of after you've either won or all your hydras are already dead.
|
|
|
|