EPTRed Bull TLMC Finalists - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
| ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
On November 05 2013 08:08 FeyFey wrote: where is the use all maps option >:3 This is what I'm saying. Can't we just audible into this for upcoming season map pool? | ||
|
VieuxSinge
France231 Posts
But I don't mind the lava map winning though :D Anyway, thank you Red Bull for doing this, you guys are awesome! | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
SidianTheBard
United States2475 Posts
On November 05 2013 08:07 EatThePath wrote: I really does, I'm pretty bummed I don't get to vote for it. I see how it is...next time you ask for feedback on one of your maps............... :D robpsimpson wrote: Only one guaranteed! Who knows what the rest of the map pool will look like  Was said on Reddit so maybe they would use multiple maps from this tournament. Would be pretty awesome. | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12041 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
 Mappers did an excellent job this season. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
kochanfe
Micronesia1338 Posts
| ||
|
shid0x
Korea (South)5014 Posts
| ||
|
Samro225am
Germany982 Posts
| ||
|
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
| ||
|
unifo
Canada65 Posts
On November 05 2013 07:44 EatThePath wrote: I don't think all the pros will hate it once it starts getting some play. Much of the time it will seem completely normal. It's a good layout without the lava anyway. But please don't say "no mapmakers dared use [innovative thing]". We have since the beginning, and have been repeatedly slapped down by a heedless community and Blizzard's insistence on rigid and boring map standards. I apologize for this ignorance (as I don't see things from the mapmaker point of view) as it just simply appears this way through the casual viewer of SC2. However, if this lava map does actually go through, then I think we might start to see the change of "standards that exist for tourney maps". And maybe finally we can actually see some real change for maps in the standard map pool than what we see today. I do still think the lava map has the VIEWERs vote, as the Viewers love to see everything blown up by lava... hands down. So for pure spectator point of view, this map probably has the most to offer in terms of tense situations (especially when the events are outside of the player's control). Just note that I'm not saying that this map is the most interesting strategically wise... but just the thought of everything melting in lava and that it got approved in this map pool... oh that thought excites me. | ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
On November 05 2013 09:21 unifo wrote: I apologize for this ignorance (as I don't see things from the mapmaker point of view) as it just simply appears this way through the casual viewer of SC2. However, if this lava map does actually go through, then I think we might start to see the change of "standards that exist for tourney maps". And maybe finally we can actually see some real change for maps in the standard map pool than what we see today. I do still think the lava map has the VIEWERs vote, as the Viewers love to see everything blown up by lava... hands down. So for pure spectator point of view, this map probably has the most to offer in terms of tense situations (especially when the events are outside of the player's control). Just note that I'm not saying that this map is the most interesting strategically wise... but just the thought of everything melting in lava and that it got approved in this map pool... oh that thought excites me. No worries, I just have to put it out there because it sucks that we haven't been able to use all the coolness of the editor this whole time. I definitely agree with you and that's why I'm pulling for LAVA. *bold* I really hope so! :D sidian my feedback will always come crawling back to you | ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
| ||
|
Tezkat
Canada72 Posts
| ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 05 2013 10:16 Tezkat wrote: It could just mean that zergs will use overlords to spread creep more, which would be an interesting development imoWow... New Polaris Rhapsody has an enormous lead. Not sure how I feel about that. On the one hand, it's a kinda cool map with a very unique mechanic, and I'm eager to see what kinda crazy stuff pro players concoct to exploit it. We didn't really see enough games on that map during the tournament to get a feel for how that would affect play. It also opens the door for more of the quirky map mechanics folks like TLO have been pushing for. On the other hand... the lava thing is probably very unbalanced in some matchups, especially with respect to things like automatically wiping out creep every five minutes. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On November 05 2013 10:44 Plexa wrote: It could just mean that zergs will use overlords to spread creep more, which would be an interesting development imo Zerg can still spread creep around the sides, and Terran cannot parade push through the middle because every 5 minutes he has to pack up and leave lol | ||
|
Aircooled
United States79 Posts
| ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
| ||
| ||
