EPTYou can't agree to win a match on purpose. You can only lose a match on purpose.
Naniwa offers Bounty to whoever beats Revival - Page 18
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
You can't agree to win a match on purpose. You can only lose a match on purpose. | ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
 " | ||
|
Lephex
Germany153 Posts
| ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:09 Lephex wrote: whould someone please put this in a context for me? i dont get it If Revival does well/wins IEM, he can tie with Naniwa for WCS points. If does, Naniwa and Revival play a tiebreaker vs each other and the winner goes to Blizzcon and automatically gets $5,000 for attending, more for winning. Naniwa offering money to the player who knocks revival out of IEM. | ||
|
Paragleiber
413 Posts
| ||
|
Visage814
United States109 Posts
| ||
|
LimeNade
United States2125 Posts
On October 29 2013 07:43 Thieving Magpie wrote: Would a qualifier/code a/code b/challenger format that payed per win instead per placement be better at giving players incentive/help low level players stay afloat until they get enough exposure? I don't have a fix for it off the top of my head but I am just saying the format blizzard has made has resulted in this situation. Therefore I think Naniwa has every right on his own to offer an incentive for players in Revivals group to play. | ||
|
Lephex
Germany153 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:11 Thieving Magpie wrote: If Revival does well/wins IEM, he can tie with Naniwa for WCS points. If does, Naniwa and Revival play a tiebreaker vs each other and the winner goes to Blizzcon and automatically gets $5,000 for attending, more for winning. Naniwa offering money to the player who knocks revival out of IEM. thx! gogo naniwa :D | ||
|
Ammanas
Slovakia2166 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:11 Thieving Magpie wrote: If Revival does well/wins IEM, he can tie with Naniwa for WCS points. If does, Naniwa and Revival play a tiebreaker vs each other and the winner goes to Blizzcon and automatically gets $5,000 for attending, more for winning. Naniwa offering money to the player who knocks revival out of IEM. There's no IEM... You mean WCS Challenger League - if Revival ends 1st or 2nd, they are tied. And since Taeja reportedly forfeited that group, well... | ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:13 Visage814 wrote: It's challenger league, not IEM Challenger then, it gets confusing which counts as what. IEM was what Revival enough points for this to matter right? (I know its related somehow) | ||
|
mikedebo
Canada4341 Posts
| ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:13 LimeNade wrote: I don't have a fix for it off the top of my head but I am just saying the format blizzard has made has resulted in this situation. Therefore I think Naniwa has every right on his own to offer an incentive for players in Revivals group to play. No, I'm asking if it sounds like a good idea  I don't mind the system (confusing, but whatever) what I do mind is payout distribution. Enough money needs to flow to the lower brackets so that it doesn't feel like a waste without gimping the top of the bracket too much to make the competition feel like its not real. So, for example, if you get $100 for every game you win, you'll fight hard for at least a 2:1 when faced off against a tough opponent. But if you end up stuck in Code B you still at least try hard every single map despite knowing you can't go to Blizzcon. Payout system changes once you get out of the qualifier/challenger of course, but I was asking the thread in general if that would be a fair way of getting money to the amateurs. | ||
|
mikumegurine
Canada3145 Posts
2. Jon Snow 3. Revival 4. Taeja (forfeit) | ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:20 mikumegurine wrote: 1. Select 2. Jon Snow 3. Revival 4. Taeja (forfeit) If Revival wins out Blizz should offer $500 to whoever wins the tie breaker between them lol | ||
|
SixStrings
Germany2046 Posts
On October 29 2013 03:30 Zealously wrote: This is awesome. I have the biggest smile now, this is a typical Naniwa. Such a fucking badass. | ||
|
mikumegurine
Canada3145 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:21 Thieving Magpie wrote: If Revival wins out Blizz should offer $500 to whoever wins the tie breaker between them lol they could but its not necessary, dont underestimate that American Talent (Select + Jon Snow)! | ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:15 Ammanas wrote: There's no IEM... You mean WCS Challenger League - if Revival ends 1st or 2nd, they are tied. And since Taeja reportedly forfeited that group, well... Pretty sure its only if Revival comes in first in the group, I definitely could be wrong though EDIT: I am wrong, didn't realize liquipedia separated 9th-16th and 17th-24th and even though they give the same amount of points | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:20 mikumegurine wrote: 1. Select 2. Jon Snow 3. Revival 4. Taeja (forfeit) thats the group? Revival lock to win that group. | ||
|
schimmetje
Netherlands1104 Posts
.. What? If you want drama.. | ||
|
General Nuke Em
United States680 Posts
1. Revival and other player to reach agreement 2. Revival throws game 3. Revival and other player splits $500 | ||
| ||
