|
On October 29 2013 08:29 chipmonklord17 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 08:15 Ammanas wrote:On October 29 2013 08:11 Thieving Magpie wrote:On October 29 2013 08:09 Lephex wrote:
whould someone please put this in a context for me? i dont get it If Revival does well/wins IEM, he can tie with Naniwa for WCS points. If does, Naniwa and Revival play a tiebreaker vs each other and the winner goes to Blizzcon and automatically gets $5,000 for attending, more for winning. Naniwa offering money to the player who knocks revival out of IEM. There's no IEM... You mean WCS Challenger League - if Revival ends 1st or 2nd, they are tied. And since Taeja reportedly forfeited that group, well... Pretty sure its only if Revival comes in first in the group, I definitely could be wrong though
25 extra points if you get 1st or 2nd in the group
On October 29 2013 08:30 General Nuke Em wrote:
So what prevents:
1. Revival and other player to reach agreement
2. Revival throws game
3. Revival and other player splits $500
The part where you get $5000 for being in the main blizzcon tournament or something like that.
Also he-who-must-not-be-named
|
On October 29 2013 08:30 General Nuke Em wrote:
So what prevents:
1. Revival and other player to reach agreement
2. Revival throws game
3. Revival and other player splits $500
If Revival wins and then beats Naniwa at BlizzCon, he gets $5,000.
That's slightly better than $500.
Edit: 5k, not 10k
|
|
|
On October 29 2013 08:30 General Nuke Em wrote:
So what prevents:
1. Revival and other player to reach agreement
2. Revival throws game
3. Revival and other player splits $500
The automatic $5000 Revival gets if he beats Naniwa in the tie breaker.
Also, pride, sportsmanship and the risk of being DQed from WCS throwing matches for money?
|
|
|
On October 29 2013 08:30 General Nuke Em wrote:
So what prevents:
1. Revival and other player to reach agreement
2. Revival throws game
3. Revival and other player splits $500
because if revival wins and then wins a bo5 against naniwa, he gets at least 5,000 dollars...
|
On October 29 2013 08:30 General Nuke Em wrote:
So what prevents:
1. Revival and other player to reach agreement
2. Revival throws game
3. Revival and other player splits $500
1. Revival does not want to get kicked out of EG
2. If he makes it to blizz con he wins 5grand just for showing up
3. Who the fuck risk their whole carrier for anything less then 322? 250 wont cut it man!
|
To the people saying that Naniwa should just man up and beat Revival in the tiebreaker, remember that this also puts Naniwa at a disadvantage for the the rest of Day 1 of the tournament. Everyone who he plays afterwards will have played one less set than him.
Sorry if someone else mentioned this and I missed it.
|
On October 29 2013 08:35 angrybacon wrote:
To the people saying that Naniwa should just man up and beat Revival in the tiebreaker, remember that this also puts Naniwa at a disadvantage for the the rest of Day 1 of the tournament. Everyone who he plays afterwards will have played one less set than him.
Sorry if someone else mentioned this and I missed it.
he will be up vs Soulkey, do you think it will make a difference lol....
|
Haha that's quite funny 
|
That's so nice. :D
For every won bo3?
But I guess he can afford it, since he is 5000$ granted if he makes it to Blizzcon main tourney.
Love players like Nani!
|
On October 29 2013 08:38 mikumegurine wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 08:35 angrybacon wrote:
To the people saying that Naniwa should just man up and beat Revival in the tiebreaker, remember that this also puts Naniwa at a disadvantage for the the rest of Day 1 of the tournament. Everyone who he plays afterwards will have played one less set than him.
Sorry if someone else mentioned this and I missed it. he will be up vs Soulkey, do you think it will make a difference lol....
I'm an absolute Faniwa, but I'm afraid you might be right.
|
|
|
Honestly, in this specific situation I don't see anything wrong with this.
There are a lot of situations where added incentives might encourage fixing matches, but this isn't one of them.
|
Well, if it's true about Taeja throwing, I don't think it will make much of a difference...
I don't like it much, but I can't see a reason it should not be allowed...
|
On October 29 2013 08:38 mikumegurine wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 08:35 angrybacon wrote:
To the people saying that Naniwa should just man up and beat Revival in the tiebreaker, remember that this also puts Naniwa at a disadvantage for the the rest of Day 1 of the tournament. Everyone who he plays afterwards will have played one less set than him.
Sorry if someone else mentioned this and I missed it. he will be up vs Soulkey, do you think it will make a difference lol....
Whaddaya mean? All nani has to do is play *almost* standard like Dear
|
On October 29 2013 08:38 mikumegurine wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 08:35 angrybacon wrote:
To the people saying that Naniwa should just man up and beat Revival in the tiebreaker, remember that this also puts Naniwa at a disadvantage for the the rest of Day 1 of the tournament. Everyone who he plays afterwards will have played one less set than him.
Sorry if someone else mentioned this and I missed it. he will be up vs Soulkey, do you think it will make a difference lol....
Well, it will make a $5000 difference, the Winner of Revival/Naniwa gets 5k for the honour of losing to Soulkey
|
On October 29 2013 08:38 mikumegurine wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 08:35 angrybacon wrote:
To the people saying that Naniwa should just man up and beat Revival in the tiebreaker, remember that this also puts Naniwa at a disadvantage for the the rest of Day 1 of the tournament. Everyone who he plays afterwards will have played one less set than him.
Sorry if someone else mentioned this and I missed it. he will be up vs Soulkey, do you think it will make a difference lol....
+ Show Spoiler + (1806) Soulkey 0-0 NaNiwa (1734)
-------------------------------------------
15.04% 3-0 0-3 10.26%
21.13% 3-1 1-3 16.37%
19.78% 3-2 2-3 17.41%
-------------------------------------------
55.95% 44.05%
Median outcome: Soulkey 3-2 NaNiwa
Aligulac says it should be close.
==edit==
While I'm here, predictions for Soulkey vs Revival and for Naniwa vs Revival.
+ Show Spoiler + (1843) Soulkey 0-0 Revival (1535)
-------------------------------------------
25.48% 3-0 0-3 4.90%
27.98% 3-1 1-3 9.33%
20.48% 3-2 2-3 11.83%
-------------------------------------------
73.94% 26.06%
Median outcome: Soulkey 3-1 Revival (1734) NaNiwa 0-0 Revival (1503)
-------------------------------------------
21.79% 3-0 0-3 6.32%
26.03% 3-1 1-3 11.41%
20.74% 3-2 2-3 13.73%
-------------------------------------------
68.55% 31.45%
Median outcome: NaNiwa 3-2 Revival
|
On October 29 2013 08:31 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2013 08:30 General Nuke Em wrote:
So what prevents:
1. Revival and other player to reach agreement
2. Revival throws game
3. Revival and other player splits $500 The automatic $5000 Revival gets if he beats Naniwa in the tie breaker. Also, pride, sportsmanship and the risk of being DQed from WCS throwing matches for money?
Yep, good thing I have no ties to the players anymore. I'm allowed to make whatever bets I want. 
|
I wonder if it counts if Revival defeats himself..
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
