• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:16
CEST 00:16
KST 07:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy13
Community News
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments2Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris50Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!15
StarCraft 2
General
Production Quality - Maestros of the Game Vs RSL 2 Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Pros React To: herO's Baffling Game BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Is there English video for group selection for ASL Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Ro24 Group F
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1092 users

SK MC's thoughts on the current state of SC2 - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 50 51 52 Next
banjoetheredskin
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
United States744 Posts
September 02 2013 04:30 GMT
#61
Hi Terry! Thanks a bunch for translating. I still support you 100% in your endeavors. MC makes some really good points and I really hope that his comments don't go unnoticed by all the important people. I love this game and the personalities i have met and seen throughout my time spent with it, and I hate to see all this negativity. I'm really glad that someone finally stepped up and said something like this.
Writer#1 CJ fan | http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/508947-wcs-dreamhack-austin-interviews
sparklyresidue
Profile Joined August 2011
United States5523 Posts
September 02 2013 04:31 GMT
#62
Thanks a lot Terry, I really enjoyed reading this. And thanks a lot to MC for writing it of course!
Like Tinkerbelle, I leave behind a sparkly residue.
hjkim1304
Profile Joined December 2010
Korea (South)105 Posts
September 02 2013 04:31 GMT
#63
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
Show nested quote +
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


I agree with you. I posted this on reddit, but I will post it here too. The problem with David Kim is not the fact that he's an evil person out to destroy all that is good in the Starcraft world. He's actually very competent, smart, and talented. The only problem is the fact that what HE sees and values in the game and what HE considers 'balanced' is different from what WE value in the game. I think he is way too hung up on statistics and numbers. In almost all the interviews that I have seen, he always talks about the win percentages and it really frustrates me. He doesn't think about the internal aspects of the game or the entertainment value, diversity, metagame. He only thinks, X amount of terran untis vs. Y amount of Zerg units, how is the engagement going to turn out? That is a very twisted way of designing a game in my opinion. But it is also a dilemma. If you start focusing too much on diversity, the balancing is going to be way too hard.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
September 02 2013 04:32 GMT
#64
I'm VERY jubilant that everyone here is agreeing with MC's words that SC2 should be more "inspired" by BW. I think we might have a bright future here.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
Holdenintherye
Profile Joined December 2012
Canada1441 Posts
September 02 2013 04:33 GMT
#65
Thanks for the translation Terry!
A very interesting read
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
September 02 2013 04:33 GMT
#66
I really wonder what pro-gamers who talk to David Kim on a regular basis really talk about, or rather how their conversations go. The problems that seem so obvious to us, and are regularly stated, either by random members of the community, or by SK.MC, it seems are still there and has no obvious signs of change.
zhurai
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States5660 Posts
September 02 2013 04:34 GMT
#67
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

the people who made SC1 aren't even in SC2 development team iirc as well rofl
Twitter: @zhurai | Site: http://zhurai.com
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
September 02 2013 04:34 GMT
#68
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

Honestly, SC2 is a damn good game that is really well balanced considering all of what is in the game is entirely intentional. I mean the only thing that was potentially not intended is FF donuts that squeeze a bunch of units together that wont attack.
Arco
Profile Joined September 2009
United States2090 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:36:31
September 02 2013 04:34 GMT
#69
It's kind of mind boggling how David Kim hasn't figured out the key to fixing TvZ without nerfing Terran lies in the Infestor.

It was a crucial unit in bridging the gap from Lair to Hive tech in WoL. Vortix has said the Infestor needs a buff for TvZ. Now MC says it. I think they could do something like add a +Biological damage tag to Fungal Growth. Funny thing is, that might help with reducing Mutalisk usage in ZvZ too, since that's what they wanted. Additionally, maybe they could make Fungal Growth prevent Widow Mines from firing. Maybe this will actually force Terran to build some Siege Tanks to deal with Infestors, like Lurkers forced Siege Tanks in BW.

They should also take the flying attack away from Widow Mines to encourage Mutalisk harassment and make engaging Bio/Mine armies with Mutalisks less risky. Terran already has Thors, Missle Turrets, and Marines. I don't think they need another defense against Mutalisks.

It'd be nice to buff/rework Zerg abilities/units that actually force Terran to build something other than Biomine. In Brood War once you reached the very late game, a mech transition was favorable so you could use Spider Mines and Siege Tanks to help deal with Ultralisks/Dark Swarm. Maybe do something so that Terran needs to incorporate Ravens into their composition earlier than

Finally, I'd like to see Scourge in LotV. This will allow for Zerg players to play more aggressive with their Mutalisks instead of having to take a map control/defensive stance to stop drops.
T.O.P
Profile Joined December 2012
469 Posts
September 02 2013 04:36 GMT
#70
hi terry!
I'm not the real T.O.P just a fan!
Die4Ever
Profile Joined August 2010
United States17677 Posts
September 02 2013 04:37 GMT
#71
MC is such a fucking boss
"Expert" mods4ever.com
pigmanbear
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Angola2010 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:40:05
September 02 2013 04:38 GMT
#72
On September 02 2013 13:34 zhurai wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

the people who made SC1 aren't even in SC2 development team iirc as well rofl

SC2 is what happens when you get a bunch of suits together and give them an unbelievably large heap of cash to make a video game. The art is good, the graphics are really, really nice, the programming is pretty good, the story is not bad, but the core of the GAME is uninspired and ham-handed.

And I'm not a BW elitist, I enjoy watching both, but almost exclusively SC2 these days: What can I say, even semi-full audiences, and decent purses, make the competition far more intriguing.
zJayy962
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
1363 Posts
September 02 2013 04:39 GMT
#73
this guy fuckin gets it.
pigmanbear
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Angola2010 Posts
September 02 2013 04:39 GMT
#74
On September 02 2013 13:34 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

Honestly, SC2 is a damn good game that is really well balanced considering all of what is in the game is entirely intentional. I mean the only thing that was potentially not intended is FF donuts that squeeze a bunch of units together that wont attack.

Plenty of video games are balanced and fun to play. That doesn't make them rich or able to stand the test of time.
ElMeanYo
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1032 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:41:51
September 02 2013 04:39 GMT
#75
Wow this is an EPIC EPIC post by MC.

I agree with EVERYTHING he posted here... and it shows how smart he is in regards to starcraft in general. My opinion of MC is now greatly elevated and you can count me as a fan (even though I'm zerg )

BTW Terry, thanks for translating. My wife is a translator and I can get how hard it can be to translate between different languages. It's something you can charge a good hourly fee for and you are doing it for free. Thanks for the 'pro bono'!
“The only man who never makes mistakes is the man who never does anything.” ― Theodore Roosevelt
stuchiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
September 02 2013 04:40 GMT
#76
Good enough time as any to re-elect MC as the president Toss.
Moderator
NoGasfOu
Profile Joined April 2012
United States1117 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:44:05
September 02 2013 04:40 GMT
#77
I disagree with having to learn English. If you're a Korean pro with personality and good English and can't win games, you will disappear sooner than those that win games but without personality. Nestea and MC both have won multiple Code S titles in the early days. As a result they received more opportunity to attend other tournaments, not because of their personalities. Seed and Jjakji each has gotten a Code S title. If they're were foreigner they would've gotten a ton more opportunity outside the GSL. If you're a Korean, you better dedicate yourself 100% into winning games. You're nothing if you can't win jack shit as Korean pro. As a pro, you don't want to be remembered because of your personality and English. You want to be remembered because of your skill.

Remember what God said...."I'm a person that doesn't know how to go out and have fun". He dedicates himself 100% into winning games and never gives a damn about learning English.

If it were me, I would want to be remembered as God, not Dragon.
Tassadar/TheBest/Jjakji/Rain(terran)/Heart
UnspokenOwl
Profile Joined August 2013
United States5 Posts
September 02 2013 04:40 GMT
#78
Nice, thanks for the post Terry
The difficult I can do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer.
Tobblish
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden6404 Posts
September 02 2013 04:41 GMT
#79
MC dropping bomb after bomb a really good read thanks Terry!

I agree with MC (except Zergs having no option against Terran) that the meta game is getting a tad tiring yet again and wishing that there were more room for different tactics and strategies.
Blizzard want a balanced game, maybe SC2 is too balanced with the current amount of units for each race?
The curse is real
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
September 02 2013 04:41 GMT
#80
That was an excellent interview
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 50 51 52 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 395
ProTech109
CosmosSc2 47
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16213
Dewaltoss 101
sSak 24
NaDa 12
League of Legends
JimRising 384
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K492
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor121
Other Games
tarik_tv5561
summit1g3513
Grubby2740
Nathanias1053
fl0m912
C9.Mang0167
ViBE82
Maynarde72
Livibee55
JuggernautJason46
PPMD25
shahzam20
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 30
Other Games
BasetradeTV14
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 34
• davetesta17
• Reevou 5
• Kozan
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix15
• Pr0nogo 10
• iopq 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22358
League of Legends
• Doublelift5635
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur183
Other Games
• imaqtpie668
• Scarra385
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
11h 44m
RSL Revival
11h 44m
GuMiho vs Cham
ByuN vs TriGGeR
Cosmonarchy
15h 44m
TriGGeR vs YoungYakov
YoungYakov vs HonMonO
HonMonO vs TriGGeR
Maestros of the Game
18h 44m
Solar vs Bunny
Clem vs Rogue
[BSL 2025] Weekly
19h 44m
OSC
23h 44m
RSL Revival
1d 11h
Cure vs Bunny
Creator vs Zoun
Maestros of the Game
1d 18h
Maru vs Lambo
herO vs ShoWTimE
BSL Team Wars
1d 20h
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
The PondCast
5 days
Online Event
6 days
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-02
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025: Warsaw LAN
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.