• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:54
CEST 00:54
KST 07:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
Behind the scenes footage of ASL21 Group E ASL21 General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM [ASL21] Ro24 Group F 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2226 users

SK MC's thoughts on the current state of SC2 - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 50 51 52 Next
banjoetheredskin
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
United States744 Posts
September 02 2013 04:30 GMT
#61
Hi Terry! Thanks a bunch for translating. I still support you 100% in your endeavors. MC makes some really good points and I really hope that his comments don't go unnoticed by all the important people. I love this game and the personalities i have met and seen throughout my time spent with it, and I hate to see all this negativity. I'm really glad that someone finally stepped up and said something like this.
Writer#1 CJ fan | http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/508947-wcs-dreamhack-austin-interviews
sparklyresidue
Profile Joined August 2011
United States5523 Posts
September 02 2013 04:31 GMT
#62
Thanks a lot Terry, I really enjoyed reading this. And thanks a lot to MC for writing it of course!
Like Tinkerbelle, I leave behind a sparkly residue.
hjkim1304
Profile Joined December 2010
Korea (South)105 Posts
September 02 2013 04:31 GMT
#63
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
Show nested quote +
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


I agree with you. I posted this on reddit, but I will post it here too. The problem with David Kim is not the fact that he's an evil person out to destroy all that is good in the Starcraft world. He's actually very competent, smart, and talented. The only problem is the fact that what HE sees and values in the game and what HE considers 'balanced' is different from what WE value in the game. I think he is way too hung up on statistics and numbers. In almost all the interviews that I have seen, he always talks about the win percentages and it really frustrates me. He doesn't think about the internal aspects of the game or the entertainment value, diversity, metagame. He only thinks, X amount of terran untis vs. Y amount of Zerg units, how is the engagement going to turn out? That is a very twisted way of designing a game in my opinion. But it is also a dilemma. If you start focusing too much on diversity, the balancing is going to be way too hard.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
September 02 2013 04:32 GMT
#64
I'm VERY jubilant that everyone here is agreeing with MC's words that SC2 should be more "inspired" by BW. I think we might have a bright future here.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
Holdenintherye
Profile Joined December 2012
Canada1441 Posts
September 02 2013 04:33 GMT
#65
Thanks for the translation Terry!
A very interesting read
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
September 02 2013 04:33 GMT
#66
I really wonder what pro-gamers who talk to David Kim on a regular basis really talk about, or rather how their conversations go. The problems that seem so obvious to us, and are regularly stated, either by random members of the community, or by SK.MC, it seems are still there and has no obvious signs of change.
zhurai
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States5660 Posts
September 02 2013 04:34 GMT
#67
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

the people who made SC1 aren't even in SC2 development team iirc as well rofl
Twitter: @zhurai | Site: http://zhurai.com
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
September 02 2013 04:34 GMT
#68
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

Honestly, SC2 is a damn good game that is really well balanced considering all of what is in the game is entirely intentional. I mean the only thing that was potentially not intended is FF donuts that squeeze a bunch of units together that wont attack.
Arco
Profile Joined September 2009
United States2090 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:36:31
September 02 2013 04:34 GMT
#69
It's kind of mind boggling how David Kim hasn't figured out the key to fixing TvZ without nerfing Terran lies in the Infestor.

It was a crucial unit in bridging the gap from Lair to Hive tech in WoL. Vortix has said the Infestor needs a buff for TvZ. Now MC says it. I think they could do something like add a +Biological damage tag to Fungal Growth. Funny thing is, that might help with reducing Mutalisk usage in ZvZ too, since that's what they wanted. Additionally, maybe they could make Fungal Growth prevent Widow Mines from firing. Maybe this will actually force Terran to build some Siege Tanks to deal with Infestors, like Lurkers forced Siege Tanks in BW.

They should also take the flying attack away from Widow Mines to encourage Mutalisk harassment and make engaging Bio/Mine armies with Mutalisks less risky. Terran already has Thors, Missle Turrets, and Marines. I don't think they need another defense against Mutalisks.

It'd be nice to buff/rework Zerg abilities/units that actually force Terran to build something other than Biomine. In Brood War once you reached the very late game, a mech transition was favorable so you could use Spider Mines and Siege Tanks to help deal with Ultralisks/Dark Swarm. Maybe do something so that Terran needs to incorporate Ravens into their composition earlier than

Finally, I'd like to see Scourge in LotV. This will allow for Zerg players to play more aggressive with their Mutalisks instead of having to take a map control/defensive stance to stop drops.
T.O.P
Profile Joined December 2012
469 Posts
September 02 2013 04:36 GMT
#70
hi terry!
I'm not the real T.O.P just a fan!
Die4Ever
Profile Joined August 2010
United States17727 Posts
September 02 2013 04:37 GMT
#71
MC is such a fucking boss
"Expert" mods4ever.com
pigmanbear
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Angola2010 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:40:05
September 02 2013 04:38 GMT
#72
On September 02 2013 13:34 zhurai wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

the people who made SC1 aren't even in SC2 development team iirc as well rofl

SC2 is what happens when you get a bunch of suits together and give them an unbelievably large heap of cash to make a video game. The art is good, the graphics are really, really nice, the programming is pretty good, the story is not bad, but the core of the GAME is uninspired and ham-handed.

And I'm not a BW elitist, I enjoy watching both, but almost exclusively SC2 these days: What can I say, even semi-full audiences, and decent purses, make the competition far more intriguing.
zJayy962
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
1363 Posts
September 02 2013 04:39 GMT
#73
this guy fuckin gets it.
pigmanbear
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Angola2010 Posts
September 02 2013 04:39 GMT
#74
On September 02 2013 13:34 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2013 13:29 BronzeKnee wrote:
On September 02 2013 13:24 pigmanbear wrote:
It's the wrinkles (like MC's dropship example) that made BW such a great game. Blizzard would have to make huge, sweeping changes to game mechanics and tech trees to even begin to rival the subtle and amazing design of BW. SC2 games are fun to watch, but the strength/weakness trade-offs feel like they were hacked together in a two week design phase:
hm, which unit will counter this unit? .... yea, sounds good, ok, which unit counters that unit? ok ... great. now let's see that these can be used in a composition ... ok, yea, makes sense.

great work guys, now let's get these requirements to the dev team and get some testers on it! we'll tweak a couple stats and stuff if something doesn't work and if anything feels imba


Frankly, Blizzard made SC1 and then got lucky everything worked out so nicely. It was not all planned, not even close.

And that is why I don't understand the blind faith so many people have for the SC2 development team.

Honestly, SC2 is a damn good game that is really well balanced considering all of what is in the game is entirely intentional. I mean the only thing that was potentially not intended is FF donuts that squeeze a bunch of units together that wont attack.

Plenty of video games are balanced and fun to play. That doesn't make them rich or able to stand the test of time.
ElMeanYo
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1032 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:41:51
September 02 2013 04:39 GMT
#75
Wow this is an EPIC EPIC post by MC.

I agree with EVERYTHING he posted here... and it shows how smart he is in regards to starcraft in general. My opinion of MC is now greatly elevated and you can count me as a fan (even though I'm zerg )

BTW Terry, thanks for translating. My wife is a translator and I can get how hard it can be to translate between different languages. It's something you can charge a good hourly fee for and you are doing it for free. Thanks for the 'pro bono'!
“The only man who never makes mistakes is the man who never does anything.” ― Theodore Roosevelt
stuchiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
September 02 2013 04:40 GMT
#76
Good enough time as any to re-elect MC as the president Toss.
Moderator
NoGasfOu
Profile Joined April 2012
United States1117 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-02 04:44:05
September 02 2013 04:40 GMT
#77
I disagree with having to learn English. If you're a Korean pro with personality and good English and can't win games, you will disappear sooner than those that win games but without personality. Nestea and MC both have won multiple Code S titles in the early days. As a result they received more opportunity to attend other tournaments, not because of their personalities. Seed and Jjakji each has gotten a Code S title. If they're were foreigner they would've gotten a ton more opportunity outside the GSL. If you're a Korean, you better dedicate yourself 100% into winning games. You're nothing if you can't win jack shit as Korean pro. As a pro, you don't want to be remembered because of your personality and English. You want to be remembered because of your skill.

Remember what God said...."I'm a person that doesn't know how to go out and have fun". He dedicates himself 100% into winning games and never gives a damn about learning English.

If it were me, I would want to be remembered as God, not Dragon.
Tassadar/TheBest/Jjakji/Rain(terran)/Heart
UnspokenOwl
Profile Joined August 2013
United States5 Posts
September 02 2013 04:40 GMT
#78
Nice, thanks for the post Terry
The difficult I can do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer.
Tobblish
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden6404 Posts
September 02 2013 04:41 GMT
#79
MC dropping bomb after bomb a really good read thanks Terry!

I agree with MC (except Zergs having no option against Terran) that the meta game is getting a tad tiring yet again and wishing that there were more room for different tactics and strategies.
Blizzard want a balanced game, maybe SC2 is too balanced with the current amount of units for each race?
The curse is real
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
September 02 2013 04:41 GMT
#80
That was an excellent interview
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 50 51 52 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 6m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ROOTCatZ 122
PiGStarcraft84
CosmosSc2 30
JuggernautJason5
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 9647
Artosis 616
Soma 300
Rush 208
Sexy 19
LancerX 17
NaDa 1
Dota 2
syndereN388
canceldota92
capcasts80
Counter-Strike
taco 292
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0195
PPMD33
Other Games
summit1g5271
tarik_tv5187
Liquid`Hasu169
ViBE109
Chillindude13
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick56
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 98
• RyuSc2 89
• musti20045 36
• Response 11
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21453
Other Games
• imaqtpie1111
• WagamamaTV365
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 6m
RSL Revival
11h 6m
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Big Brain Bouts
17h 6m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
RSL Revival
1d 11h
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
1d 20h
RSL Revival
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-31
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.