• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:26
CEST 03:26
KST 10:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)2BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
flash bitcoin software Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL19] Grand Finals
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Who’s Getting the Effortless-Chic Look Just Right?
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 18458 users

Best graphic settings for optimized play? - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Dirkinity
Profile Joined November 2012
Germany409 Posts
January 20 2013 17:13 GMT
#21
High/Ultra... whatever your PC can handle.
Whatson
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States5356 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-20 17:29:13
January 20 2013 17:22 GMT
#22
LOL good luck spotting burrowed units on any setting. Maybe ultra. You can spot invisible units pretty easily on low anyways, the new texture settings make it so easy as long as they're moving even a little bit.
¯\_(シ)_/¯
Targe
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom14103 Posts
January 20 2013 20:50 GMT
#23
On January 21 2013 02:22 Whatson wrote:
LOL good luck spotting burrowed units on any setting. Maybe ultra. You can spot invisible units pretty easily on low anyways, the new texture settings make it so easy as long as they're moving even a little bit.


Usually it's an observer I'm looking for and they are always above your army, so just zoom in and out to check if its there then scan and let the marines do their work
11/5/14 CATACLYSM | The South West's worst Falco main
llIH
Profile Joined June 2011
Norway2142 Posts
January 20 2013 20:50 GMT
#24
Everything on LOW. (2d as well)
The graphics don't even look bad. It is crisp with no unnecessary glare as well.
And of course the frames are smooth.
MichaelJLowell
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States610 Posts
January 20 2013 20:58 GMT
#25
On January 21 2013 01:19 kuruptt wrote:
Again people I don't care what looks best to me. I just want to see cloaked and burrowed units easier without going to super ultra high because I feel as the lower the settings the more responsive it is. So I want to know the best way to do this. As stated from many people in this thread koreans use mostly medium settings! The hybridic settings from existor is something like this. Need more input and conclusive information!

I'll just say this: If you're playing a video game and passing on the most aesthetically appealing graphics for any reason other than "my computer cannot comfortably run the game at that graphics setting", you're doing it wrong. The goal of a video game is to get sucked into the game world, not to marginalize the art design so it gives you a better chance of winning.
http://www.learntocounter.com - I'm a "known troll" so please disconnect your kid's computer when I am on the forums.
MichaelDonovan
Profile Joined June 2011
United States1453 Posts
January 20 2013 21:08 GMT
#26
On January 21 2013 05:58 MichaelJLowell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 01:19 kuruptt wrote:
Again people I don't care what looks best to me. I just want to see cloaked and burrowed units easier without going to super ultra high because I feel as the lower the settings the more responsive it is. So I want to know the best way to do this. As stated from many people in this thread koreans use mostly medium settings! The hybridic settings from existor is something like this. Need more input and conclusive information!

I'll just say this: If you're playing a video game and passing on the most aesthetically appealing graphics for any reason other than "my computer cannot comfortably run the game at that graphics setting", you're doing it wrong. The goal of a video game is to get sucked into the game world, not to marginalize the art design so it gives you a better chance of winning.


Casual perspective on a competitive game.
zhurai
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States5660 Posts
January 20 2013 21:10 GMT
#27
On January 21 2013 05:58 MichaelJLowell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 01:19 kuruptt wrote:
Again people I don't care what looks best to me. I just want to see cloaked and burrowed units easier without going to super ultra high because I feel as the lower the settings the more responsive it is. So I want to know the best way to do this. As stated from many people in this thread koreans use mostly medium settings! The hybridic settings from existor is something like this. Need more input and conclusive information!

I'll just say this: If you're playing a video game and passing on the most aesthetically appealing graphics for any reason other than "my computer cannot comfortably run the game at that graphics setting", you're doing it wrong. The goal of a video game is to get sucked into the game world, not to marginalize the art design so it gives you a better chance of winning.

maybe if you're playing for screwing around rather than getting better... maybe
Twitter: @zhurai | Site: http://zhurai.com
Comadevil
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany214 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-20 21:15:13
January 20 2013 21:14 GMT
#28
I use this

[image loading]

settings. U can reduce effects still if u want. It looks good but there are not so many effects which distract you
deo1
Profile Joined April 2010
United States199 Posts
January 20 2013 21:16 GMT
#29
One thing I do that is not related to in game settings, and that I've never really heard anyone talk about or do, is play with 4x SSAA. If you have a beastly computer and never drop frames (below 60 fps) then this creates the most clear and least artifact-y view for any settings.

Basically, what SSAA does is render the entire scene (textures, geometry and all) at 2, 4, or 8 times the default resolution. It then averages the color of all of the pixels at the higher resolution that fit in the same area as the pixel, and uses this color in the downsampled image that gets displayed. The result is a crisp, clear, ultra-smooth image without artifacts or blurring of other cheaper anti-aliasing methods (e.g. FXAA which is an image post-process, or even MSAA which only works on polygons).

I think in the world of pro play where every advantage matters, more teams should look into ultra high spec PCs that can do this kind of fancy processing. Combine SSAA with one of the custom graphics settings like in this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=350426 and SC2 can be super crisp and clean.
Poooooor Protoss.
MichaelJLowell
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States610 Posts
January 20 2013 21:30 GMT
#30
On January 21 2013 06:08 MichaelDonovan wrote:
Casual perspective on a competitive game.

Lol. Let's replace all the in-game models with crudely-shaped, single-color, low-poly game models, because that will make them more visually distinctive and easier to manipulate towards positive ends. That will make the game more immersive. Do you know how much of an idiot you sound like?

On January 21 2013 06:10 zhurai wrote:
maybe if you're playing for screwing around rather than getting better... maybe

You play the game (and all games) because it is supposed to be enjoyable. Satisfying, visceral visual feedback should be a chief goal of any good real-time strategy game. If you are lowering the graphical settings for the purpose of "getting better", you are doing it at a detriment to your own enjoyment of the game. This is something that really should have stopped when players were doing it in Quake III Arena, or Unreal Tournament, or whatever game community pioneered it.
http://www.learntocounter.com - I'm a "known troll" so please disconnect your kid's computer when I am on the forums.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-20 21:47:56
January 20 2013 21:47 GMT
#31
On January 21 2013 06:30 MichaelJLowell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 06:08 MichaelDonovan wrote:
Casual perspective on a competitive game.

Lol. Let's replace all the in-game models with crudely-shaped, single-color, low-poly game models, because that will make them more visually distinctive and easier to manipulate towards positive ends. That will make the game more immersive. Do you know how much of an idiot you sound like?

Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 06:10 zhurai wrote:
maybe if you're playing for screwing around rather than getting better... maybe

You play the game (and all games) because it is supposed to be enjoyable. Satisfying, visceral visual feedback should be a chief goal of any good real-time strategy game. If you are lowering the graphical settings for the purpose of "getting better", you are doing it at a detriment to your own enjoyment of the game. This is something that really should have stopped when players were doing it in Quake III Arena, or Unreal Tournament, or whatever game community pioneered it.

Some people just don't care that much about the graphics - after all, it's the actual gameplay that should be most interesting in a game, the graphics only serve to make the gameplay more pretty to look at. For instance, people still play Brood War despite it using 2D sprites, because it is a very well designed and balanced game.
vibeo gane,
MichaelJLowell
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States610 Posts
January 20 2013 21:59 GMT
#32
On January 21 2013 06:47 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Some people just don't care that much about the graphics - after all, it's the actual gameplay that should be most interesting in a game, the graphics only serve to make the gameplay more pretty to look at. For instance, people still play Brood War despite it using 2D sprites, because it is a very well designed and balanced game.

Aesthetics (graphics, sound, music, narrative and worldbuilding) are all a justification and extension of the game mechanics. Visually-appealing aesthetics may not be necessary for a great game, but they make a good game better, and there's plenty of examples within the real-time strategy genre (Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness, Commander and Conquer: Tiberian Sun, Supreme Commander) to justify that. The salaried players may be lowering all of their game settings in order to enhance their performance, but they do it because their job is to play the game at the highest level possible. They play the game for reasons completely different than the typical player, and it has nothing in common with amateur, recreational play. There's no reason to deny yourself a visually-appealing game because you're more preoccupied with the final outcome of the game than what's happening during the game.
http://www.learntocounter.com - I'm a "known troll" so please disconnect your kid's computer when I am on the forums.
kuruptt
Profile Joined August 2012
Canada168 Posts
January 21 2013 00:13 GMT
#33
On January 21 2013 06:30 MichaelJLowell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 06:08 MichaelDonovan wrote:
Casual perspective on a competitive game.

Lol. Let's replace all the in-game models with crudely-shaped, single-color, low-poly game models, because that will make them more visually distinctive and easier to manipulate towards positive ends. That will make the game more immersive. Do you know how much of an idiot you sound like?

Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 06:10 zhurai wrote:
maybe if you're playing for screwing around rather than getting better... maybe

You play the game (and all games) because it is supposed to be enjoyable. Satisfying, visceral visual feedback should be a chief goal of any good real-time strategy game. If you are lowering the graphical settings for the purpose of "getting better", you are doing it at a detriment to your own enjoyment of the game. This is something that really should have stopped when players were doing it in Quake III Arena, or Unreal Tournament, or whatever game community pioneered it.


Casual indeed. Most people that play sc2 play it for competitive reasons. When money is on the line every edge counts and most people don't play sc2 for the "nice graphics". Including me, I was playing on low before because it was much more responsive and less distracting for me which generally made it more fun to me. Don't get me wrong I have a beastly computer that can max out this game no problem, I just much prefer good settings to see invisble units better to give me an edge even if it looks shitty.

Fortunately, most people in this thread recommend the same exact settings in the Hybridic thread which makes the game look AMAZING while maintaining all the benefits of easy eyeing of cloaked units.

Right now I have this:

Texture: Ultra
Shaders: Medium
Shadows: Medium
Models: High
Effects: Ultra

Can we all agree this is the best settings right now? Again, don't care about looking the best I just care about best setting invisble units!




Erik.TheRed
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1655 Posts
January 21 2013 00:24 GMT
#34
I like using medium settings (high for models) and then putting the unit textures on low. I find that with the unit textures on anything higher than low it looks kind of jaggy and less clean. I think it's because most units are rather small and cramming a large texture onto it looks funny (and I play on 1920x1080 resolution)
"See you space cowboy"
kuruptt
Profile Joined August 2012
Canada168 Posts
January 21 2013 00:53 GMT
#35
Alright so I just came back from testnig and indeed the best settings are the one I listed to see cloaked units. I can't really test seeing burrowed units right now but if anyone can test would be great. Try it out guys and see it for yourself!

I also didn't get to try effects that much either, but for now I am leaving that on low until more testing and whatnot.
MichaelJLowell
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States610 Posts
January 21 2013 01:06 GMT
#36
On January 21 2013 09:13 kuruptt wrote:

Casual indeed.

> Commits his time and energy to becoming good at one single video game, a slightly-above-average RTS.
> Describes himself as a "low silver player".
> Calls other people casual.

On January 21 2013 09:13 kuruptt wrote:
Most people that play sc2 play it for competitive reasons. When money is on the line every edge counts and most people don't play sc2 for the "nice graphics".

Thank you for not reading my post. This was addressed. The grand majority of the people playing this game will never taste any level of play where "I gotta win this tournament so I can feed my family" trumps visually pleasing graphics. You are included in that group. The sooner you recognize this, the more interesting your game experience will be.
http://www.learntocounter.com - I'm a "known troll" so please disconnect your kid's computer when I am on the forums.
DusTerr
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
2520 Posts
January 21 2013 01:14 GMT
#37
On January 21 2013 05:58 MichaelJLowell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2013 01:19 kuruptt wrote:
Again people I don't care what looks best to me. I just want to see cloaked and burrowed units easier without going to super ultra high because I feel as the lower the settings the more responsive it is. So I want to know the best way to do this. As stated from many people in this thread koreans use mostly medium settings! The hybridic settings from existor is something like this. Need more input and conclusive information!

I'll just say this: If you're playing a video game and passing on the most aesthetically appealing graphics for any reason other than "my computer cannot comfortably run the game at that graphics setting", you're doing it wrong. The goal of a video game is to get sucked into the game world, not to marginalize the art design so it gives you a better chance of winning.


Lowering the graphics so you can see something important better is exactly the same as lowering graphics so your computer can run the game "better". The fault lies with the art designers, not the end users.

Secondly, how does any of this apply to other games such as basketball or darts? It's not about getting sucked into another world, but allowing your mind to forget the current one by fully focusing on something else. Playing the single player campaign on highest possible settings or playing competitively on low can both do that.

johnny123
Profile Joined February 2012
521 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-21 01:32:01
January 21 2013 01:14 GMT
#38
i want to debunk some myths people seem to have about playing sc2 on high settings and performance issues.

Let me clarify by first saying. Starcraft 2 is a way more CPU bound than GPU bound in regards to delivering the best performance possible.


Everytime i see somebody write . i play on all low except for models set to high. I just sigh because that accomplishes nothing basically if the cpu is your bottleneck ( more than likely the cpu is the bottleneck for most performance issues people face playing this game)

If your system can play the game when models are set too high. It makes hardly any difference in performance.
Let me explain what i mean . Take idra for example. A while back he said his reasoning for playing on All low settings was that it increases performance. What i have to say about that is, Its not the graphic settings that are causing performance issues. ITS THE CPU BOUND nature of the game. sc2 doesnt require a powerful gpu by any stretch of the imagination. You can play this game of integrated hd 3000 hd 4000 intel graphics .

My point is, idra's performance increase comes from the fact that the cpu settings are set to low under very intense times of the games where tons of units are on the screen. If idra puts all high graphic settings on high and sets all the cpu settings on low. He will see no performance issues at all. The graphic card will deliever its full potiential because sc2 requires hardly any gpu performance.

If you have a processor that is an i5 or a latest i3. You actually will never be cpu bottlenecked under intense battles. Therefore if you graphic card was made in the last 5 years and costed atleast $75 dollars. You can run this game in ultra with absolutely perfect frame rates.


The biggest settings that have impact on cpu performance?
-setting models to high ( yes that sounds wierd, but it also has impact on cpu)
-setting game physics to high
-having reflections on.

( sc2 is pretty good about telling you what setting taxes what).



If at the start of the game you experience a huge boost in framerates and as the game goes along, you see those frame rates start declining. Believe me it has nothing to do with the graphical settings. To keep the performance strong, turn down the cpu only setttings ( that includes setting model quality to low as it affects cpu as well)


So for the guys that have medicore graphic cards, and i5 processors. Stop turning down your graphics to low. As your computer is FULLY capable of delivering solid performance the entire game. Use a cpu monitoring program such as CORE TEMP to see how loaded your cores are during the game. If any hit 100% start turning down CPU settings. Dont bother with turning down the graphics as it will make minimal difference.


My point is, Just make sure you know what your bottleneck is.

If the bottleneck is the cpu, It makes no difference to turn down your graphic settings. As it will still slow down when all settings are at low.

If the bottleneck is the gpu. Then only turn down the graphic settings. You can go ahead and leave the cpu settings on high.
Favorite players,Stephano/MVP/Nestea/Gumiho/Life/Jaedong/MMA
Grimmyman123
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada939 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-21 01:19:43
January 21 2013 01:19 GMT
#39
I went for a more performance group of settings.

I wanted to be able to see cloaked units, burrowed units easier, AND have models high so I can see what kind of unit is warping in, as it warps in for vs protoss.

Wings of Liberty: All LOW settings including Low shaders, Models on High. Everything else on LOW.

Hots does not allow low settings for shaders and another one, for models on high, as they are tethered. So I increased the 2 settings so I can have models on high, but I see a frame rate drop because it if, from the high frame rate in WoL I enjoy.
Win. That's all that matters. Win. Nobody likes to lose.
CPTBadAss
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States594 Posts
January 21 2013 01:21 GMT
#40
I run everything on Ultra. I don't play on any amazing level, just mainly competitive fun. So if I miss a DT or something, whatever.

It seems like Medium is a setting a lot of pros like but I'm just guessing. I don't know what people like and I think it's a bit subjective.
I'll keep on struggling, 'cause that's the measure of a man | "That was the plan: To give him some hope, and then crush him" -Stephano
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
LunaSea vs BabymarineLIVE!
Mixu vs Moja
ArT vs INexorable
HiGhDrA vs Shameless
TBD vs ArT
xJustxJordanx1
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
uThermal 2v2 Circuit: May
CranKy Ducklings76
Liquipedia
OSC
21:00
Mid Season Playoffs
ArT vs ReBellioN
HonMonO vs Ziomek
Shameless vs LunaSea
MilkiCow vs GgMaChine
Moja vs HiGhDrA
Jumy vs TBD
Demi vs NightPhoenix
Solar vs Cham
SteadfastSC111
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft328
RuFF_SC2 146
SteadfastSC111
ROOTCatZ 68
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3426
Artosis 771
Sharp 80
Icarus 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever337
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K621
taco 538
Other Games
summit1g11859
tarik_tv6260
C9.Mang02574
shahzam1264
ViBE263
ToD125
UpATreeSC74
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream5652
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH280
• Hupsaiya 50
• davetesta28
• HeavenSC 15
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift6056
Other Games
• Scarra1042
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
9h 34m
HiGhDrA vs Nicoract
MaNa vs HiGhDrA
HiGhDrA vs Reynor
Nicoract vs Reynor
MaNa vs Nicoract
MaNa vs Reynor
MaxPax vs Spirit
Krystianer vs Spirit
OSC
11h 34m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
17h 34m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 1h
SOOP
1d 7h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 8h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 9h
Cheesadelphia
1d 13h
CSO Cup
1d 15h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 16h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
[ Show More ]
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.