• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:52
CEST 07:52
KST 14:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?102Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week6
StarCraft 2
General
Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over September World Ranking: herO leads, Serral climbs
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly SC2 INu's Battles#20 [BO.9]
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! ASL22 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: Calm's Big Brain Play Vs Mini
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group A [ASL22] Ro16 Group B [ASL22] Ro24 Group F [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Replay Review Process - What do you do? Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV EVE Corporation [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
F* the Children and Get Off …
TrAiDoS
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8094 users

Call to Action: Balance Testing (2012/11/20) - Page 32

Forum Index > SC2 General
1876 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 94 Next
Zenbrez
Profile Joined June 2012
Canada5973 Posts
November 21 2012 14:37 GMT
#621
Warp prisms immunes to fungal? Oh dear
Refer to my post.
Giantt
Profile Joined December 2010
Bulgaria82 Posts
November 21 2012 14:37 GMT
#622
That nerf to infestor is overdoing it. Imo it makes infestor not viable tech on 2 bases because it would fail against all pushes having sentries. Also it breaks ZvZ with infestors being immune to fungal
smidge
Profile Joined September 2012
United States25 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 14:38:13
November 21 2012 14:37 GMT
#623
So just in case anyone is curious, after Starport tech lab finishes:

~2:13 - +1 Seeker Missile
~2:28 - +1 Seeker Missile (if Corvid Reactor started right when tech lab finishes)

Edit: That is assuming you have stupid amounts of gas
For the random!
m0ck
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
4194 Posts
November 21 2012 14:37 GMT
#624
On November 21 2012 23:32 Shiori wrote:
Change is good. Warp Prisms being immune to Fungal is a good thing because it means that Infestor/BL's innate weakness (immobility) can actually be feasibly exploited. There shouldn't BE a god composition that just crushes everything, and now even Infestor/BL will have one big thing to worry about: Warp Prism harassment that isn't easily deflectable. This means that you can't slow push across the map oblivious to any harassment. This is a good thing. It means that Protoss can force the Zerg player to delay their push until the Warp Prism harassment has been dealt with. It means that Zerg can't just go 30 Infestor and 20 Broods and be safe against everything. It means that they need to invest in more static defense. These are all good things because they open up viable options against the Infestor/BL composition.

People who are arguing that it will be "impossible" to deal with WPs now are hilarious. You can deal with them the same way everyone else deals with doom drops: by pulling back. If the Protoss player has 2 Prisms, each with 10 warpins, then he's devoting a hell of a lot of supply to those drops. You better have to actually pull back to defend them. 2 or 3 Infestors should not nullify any and all harassment of undefended bases. You should need to actually, you know, make combat units and static defense to do that like everyone else generally does.

I'm indifferent to the Sentry-immunity. It seems unnecessary, but I don't think it will matter much since Sentries are pretty bad lategame and because holding Immortal/Sentry has more to do with baiting out FFs than with blindly going Infestors (unless you're Suppy). As for the rest, I'm hoping it makes lategame PvZ a little more even. Kinda disappointed that Blizzard didn't give a correspondingly large buff to Terrans, though. The HSM buff is near-enough useless.

So, the changes forces zergs into even heavier turtling. How is that good for the game again?
Lysanias
Profile Joined March 2011
Netherlands8351 Posts
November 21 2012 14:38 GMT
#625
I feel like Blizzard is making things rather complicated with this change.
It all feels somewhat wanky.
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24422 Posts
November 21 2012 14:38 GMT
#626
On November 21 2012 23:35 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 23:35 coko wrote:
Unsure if this hasn't been mentioned but the biggest thing in my opinion from the warp prism and HT being immune to fungal is reaver style play against zerg.

This is micro intensive, dropping high templar, storming or feedbacking all those infestors and if possible leaping back into the warp prism immediately

Which is awesome.


It is indeed.

On November 21 2012 23:36 iHirO wrote:
Would DT/Pheonix be a decent build now in PvZ? Seeing as the Zerg's only mobile detection is the Overseer.



It could be viable midgame and it's super cool. Infestors would still be strong against it by fungaling phoenixes but it sure as hell would be a strong map-control based composition as DT/Corsair was in BW.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
FakeDeath
Profile Joined January 2011
Malaysia6060 Posts
November 21 2012 14:40 GMT
#627
On November 21 2012 23:37 m0ck wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 23:32 Shiori wrote:
Change is good. Warp Prisms being immune to Fungal is a good thing because it means that Infestor/BL's innate weakness (immobility) can actually be feasibly exploited. There shouldn't BE a god composition that just crushes everything, and now even Infestor/BL will have one big thing to worry about: Warp Prism harassment that isn't easily deflectable. This means that you can't slow push across the map oblivious to any harassment. This is a good thing. It means that Protoss can force the Zerg player to delay their push until the Warp Prism harassment has been dealt with. It means that Zerg can't just go 30 Infestor and 20 Broods and be safe against everything. It means that they need to invest in more static defense. These are all good things because they open up viable options against the Infestor/BL composition.

People who are arguing that it will be "impossible" to deal with WPs now are hilarious. You can deal with them the same way everyone else deals with doom drops: by pulling back. If the Protoss player has 2 Prisms, each with 10 warpins, then he's devoting a hell of a lot of supply to those drops. You better have to actually pull back to defend them. 2 or 3 Infestors should not nullify any and all harassment of undefended bases. You should need to actually, you know, make combat units and static defense to do that like everyone else generally does.

I'm indifferent to the Sentry-immunity. It seems unnecessary, but I don't think it will matter much since Sentries are pretty bad lategame and because holding Immortal/Sentry has more to do with baiting out FFs than with blindly going Infestors (unless you're Suppy). As for the rest, I'm hoping it makes lategame PvZ a little more even. Kinda disappointed that Blizzard didn't give a correspondingly large buff to Terrans, though. The HSM buff is near-enough useless.

So, the changes forces zergs into even heavier turtling. How is that good for the game again?


Exactly.
Now zergs will just keep pumping out more static defense and do the boring slow push.

Play your best
Hryul
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Austria2609 Posts
November 21 2012 14:40 GMT
#628
On November 21 2012 23:27 Corvi wrote:
on a sidenote: this kills mech in highlevel tvz because ghosts are now too important to miss and pretty much need the bio infrastructure and upgrades. makes me very sad.

so I need the +3 armor upgrade to snipe infestors? didn't know that.
Countdown to victory: 1 200!
Qikz
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United Kingdom12054 Posts
November 21 2012 14:43 GMT
#629
Warp prisms being immune to fungal is AWESOME!

It means you could even feasably doom drop ON TOP of Infestor clumps. Either that or you can actually get around the map as protoss in a way that doesn't leave you completely open. That's a perfect, perfect change.
FanTaSy's #1 Fan | STPL Caster/Organiser | SKT BEST KT | https://twitch.tv/stpl
mythandier
Profile Joined January 2011
United States828 Posts
November 21 2012 14:44 GMT
#630
On November 21 2012 23:02 DurandaL917 wrote:
Sorry to deviate the conversation away from fungals for a moment, but does this change to the seeker missile make it suddenly a favored option for harassing mineral lines considering the splash damage?

Absolutely not.

HSM is generally terrible at worker harass and you will usually only get 2-3 worker kills at best with a single HSM (for 125 energy that's very bad).

As far as worker harass is concerned you're better off throwing down 2 auto turrets (which is less energy anyway) and flying out. Even if the turrets don't kill workers due to reaction they will delay mining (usually quite a bit at undefended bases).
S_SienZ
Profile Joined September 2011
1878 Posts
November 21 2012 14:45 GMT
#631
On November 21 2012 23:40 Hryul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 23:27 Corvi wrote:
on a sidenote: this kills mech in highlevel tvz because ghosts are now too important to miss and pretty much need the bio infrastructure and upgrades. makes me very sad.

so I need the +3 armor upgrade to snipe infestors? didn't know that.

0/0 ghosts will get shredded by 3/3 broodlings
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
November 21 2012 14:46 GMT
#632
On November 21 2012 23:37 m0ck wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 23:32 Shiori wrote:
Change is good. Warp Prisms being immune to Fungal is a good thing because it means that Infestor/BL's innate weakness (immobility) can actually be feasibly exploited. There shouldn't BE a god composition that just crushes everything, and now even Infestor/BL will have one big thing to worry about: Warp Prism harassment that isn't easily deflectable. This means that you can't slow push across the map oblivious to any harassment. This is a good thing. It means that Protoss can force the Zerg player to delay their push until the Warp Prism harassment has been dealt with. It means that Zerg can't just go 30 Infestor and 20 Broods and be safe against everything. It means that they need to invest in more static defense. These are all good things because they open up viable options against the Infestor/BL composition.

People who are arguing that it will be "impossible" to deal with WPs now are hilarious. You can deal with them the same way everyone else deals with doom drops: by pulling back. If the Protoss player has 2 Prisms, each with 10 warpins, then he's devoting a hell of a lot of supply to those drops. You better have to actually pull back to defend them. 2 or 3 Infestors should not nullify any and all harassment of undefended bases. You should need to actually, you know, make combat units and static defense to do that like everyone else generally does.

I'm indifferent to the Sentry-immunity. It seems unnecessary, but I don't think it will matter much since Sentries are pretty bad lategame and because holding Immortal/Sentry has more to do with baiting out FFs than with blindly going Infestors (unless you're Suppy). As for the rest, I'm hoping it makes lategame PvZ a little more even. Kinda disappointed that Blizzard didn't give a correspondingly large buff to Terrans, though. The HSM buff is near-enough useless.

So, the changes forces zergs into even heavier turtling. How is that good for the game again?

Because now Protoss will actually have time to make an air transition and have a strong enough army (with unfungleable temps) to actually have a real chance at winning an engagement. Turtling still sucks, but at least turtling isn't as massively Z favoured anymore.
Wildmoon
Profile Joined December 2011
Thailand4189 Posts
November 21 2012 14:46 GMT
#633
This change is in test map. Go play it and give real feedback. Don't just fucking whine about everthing. I am terran but i am curious why DT can't be fungaled is that bad. Can't zerg just build 1 spore each base then have 1 overseer with their army? I could be wrong though.
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24422 Posts
November 21 2012 14:48 GMT
#634
On November 21 2012 23:40 FakeDeath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 23:37 m0ck wrote:
On November 21 2012 23:32 Shiori wrote:
Change is good. Warp Prisms being immune to Fungal is a good thing because it means that Infestor/BL's innate weakness (immobility) can actually be feasibly exploited. There shouldn't BE a god composition that just crushes everything, and now even Infestor/BL will have one big thing to worry about: Warp Prism harassment that isn't easily deflectable. This means that you can't slow push across the map oblivious to any harassment. This is a good thing. It means that Protoss can force the Zerg player to delay their push until the Warp Prism harassment has been dealt with. It means that Zerg can't just go 30 Infestor and 20 Broods and be safe against everything. It means that they need to invest in more static defense. These are all good things because they open up viable options against the Infestor/BL composition.

People who are arguing that it will be "impossible" to deal with WPs now are hilarious. You can deal with them the same way everyone else deals with doom drops: by pulling back. If the Protoss player has 2 Prisms, each with 10 warpins, then he's devoting a hell of a lot of supply to those drops. You better have to actually pull back to defend them. 2 or 3 Infestors should not nullify any and all harassment of undefended bases. You should need to actually, you know, make combat units and static defense to do that like everyone else generally does.

I'm indifferent to the Sentry-immunity. It seems unnecessary, but I don't think it will matter much since Sentries are pretty bad lategame and because holding Immortal/Sentry has more to do with baiting out FFs than with blindly going Infestors (unless you're Suppy). As for the rest, I'm hoping it makes lategame PvZ a little more even. Kinda disappointed that Blizzard didn't give a correspondingly large buff to Terrans, though. The HSM buff is near-enough useless.

So, the changes forces zergs into even heavier turtling. How is that good for the game again?


Exactly.
Now zergs will just keep pumping out more static defense and do the boring slow push.



Except now they'll lose if they've taken enormous harrassment damage before - as they should.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
AfricanPsycho
Profile Joined December 2011
South Africa158 Posts
November 21 2012 14:53 GMT
#635
No slow of air units, instead of the projectile thing? What you guys think?

Poll: Add no slow on air units instead of projectile fungal

No, no air root AND projectile (7)
 
100%

Yes, but then projectile fungsl not implemented (0)
 
0%

No, air root is too vital (0)
 
0%

7 total votes

Your vote: Add no slow on air units instead of projectile fungal

(Vote): Yes, but then projectile fungsl not implemented
(Vote): No, no air root AND projectile
(Vote): No, air root is too vital



give a reason too
gg no re
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 21 2012 14:54 GMT
#636
On November 21 2012 23:37 m0ck wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 23:32 Shiori wrote:
Change is good. Warp Prisms being immune to Fungal is a good thing because it means that Infestor/BL's innate weakness (immobility) can actually be feasibly exploited. There shouldn't BE a god composition that just crushes everything, and now even Infestor/BL will have one big thing to worry about: Warp Prism harassment that isn't easily deflectable. This means that you can't slow push across the map oblivious to any harassment. This is a good thing. It means that Protoss can force the Zerg player to delay their push until the Warp Prism harassment has been dealt with. It means that Zerg can't just go 30 Infestor and 20 Broods and be safe against everything. It means that they need to invest in more static defense. These are all good things because they open up viable options against the Infestor/BL composition.

People who are arguing that it will be "impossible" to deal with WPs now are hilarious. You can deal with them the same way everyone else deals with doom drops: by pulling back. If the Protoss player has 2 Prisms, each with 10 warpins, then he's devoting a hell of a lot of supply to those drops. You better have to actually pull back to defend them. 2 or 3 Infestors should not nullify any and all harassment of undefended bases. You should need to actually, you know, make combat units and static defense to do that like everyone else generally does.

I'm indifferent to the Sentry-immunity. It seems unnecessary, but I don't think it will matter much since Sentries are pretty bad lategame and because holding Immortal/Sentry has more to do with baiting out FFs than with blindly going Infestors (unless you're Suppy). As for the rest, I'm hoping it makes lategame PvZ a little more even. Kinda disappointed that Blizzard didn't give a correspondingly large buff to Terrans, though. The HSM buff is near-enough useless.

So, the changes forces zergs into even heavier turtling. How is that good for the game again?


It doesn’t lead to turtling, it leads to more protoss harass and pushing more multi tasking on the zerg. It allows the protoss to create situations where they can make efficient trades and cut into the zerg economy. Then when they confront the super army, the zerg cannot instant replace it due to a massive, unstoppable bank of funds.

Somewhere out there, LiquidHero eyes are filled with wonder.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Insoleet
Profile Joined May 2012
France1806 Posts
November 21 2012 14:54 GMT
#637
i'd like to see some games from pros with this patch in ZvP. Especially some games from stephano. Because it look likes the turtle metagame won't be viable anymore.
malaan
Profile Joined September 2010
365 Posts
November 21 2012 14:56 GMT
#638
Been playing this extensively all day so far and here are my thoughts:

It makes warp prism harass incredible in the mid game. You can start using Broodwar esque strategy like someone mentionned earlier mimicing reaver play which is very very awesome I think.

In both TvZ and PvZ, if the zerg takes huge economic damage and / or loses bases, the option to spend all money on infestors and pray is no longer an option. They are still great units, but you just can't roll the dice to win a pretty much lost game with them as much as you could previously.

Heat seaking missile shut down my brood lord corruptor infestor composition pretty well in 2 straight late game scenarios. I cant help but feel this might be too much of a buff, as he moved out with a 140 supply air terran / mech mix and beat my 200/200 +3 tier upgraded army with relative ease.

Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24422 Posts
November 21 2012 14:57 GMT
#639
On November 21 2012 23:54 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 23:37 m0ck wrote:
On November 21 2012 23:32 Shiori wrote:
Change is good. Warp Prisms being immune to Fungal is a good thing because it means that Infestor/BL's innate weakness (immobility) can actually be feasibly exploited. There shouldn't BE a god composition that just crushes everything, and now even Infestor/BL will have one big thing to worry about: Warp Prism harassment that isn't easily deflectable. This means that you can't slow push across the map oblivious to any harassment. This is a good thing. It means that Protoss can force the Zerg player to delay their push until the Warp Prism harassment has been dealt with. It means that Zerg can't just go 30 Infestor and 20 Broods and be safe against everything. It means that they need to invest in more static defense. These are all good things because they open up viable options against the Infestor/BL composition.

People who are arguing that it will be "impossible" to deal with WPs now are hilarious. You can deal with them the same way everyone else deals with doom drops: by pulling back. If the Protoss player has 2 Prisms, each with 10 warpins, then he's devoting a hell of a lot of supply to those drops. You better have to actually pull back to defend them. 2 or 3 Infestors should not nullify any and all harassment of undefended bases. You should need to actually, you know, make combat units and static defense to do that like everyone else generally does.

I'm indifferent to the Sentry-immunity. It seems unnecessary, but I don't think it will matter much since Sentries are pretty bad lategame and because holding Immortal/Sentry has more to do with baiting out FFs than with blindly going Infestors (unless you're Suppy). As for the rest, I'm hoping it makes lategame PvZ a little more even. Kinda disappointed that Blizzard didn't give a correspondingly large buff to Terrans, though. The HSM buff is near-enough useless.

So, the changes forces zergs into even heavier turtling. How is that good for the game again?


It doesn’t lead to turtling, it leads to more protoss harass and pushing more multi tasking on the zerg. It allows the protoss to create situations where they can make efficient trades and cut into the zerg economy. Then when they confront the super army, the zerg cannot instant replace it due to a massive, unstoppable bank of funds.

Somewhere out there, LiquidHero eyes are filled with wonder.


And so are mine. It's a huge step in the right direction.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
Gladiator6
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden7024 Posts
November 21 2012 14:59 GMT
#640
Cant just people who post in this thread have some real feedback from the map instead of theorycrafting 101?
Flying, sOs, free, Light, Soulkey & ZerO
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 94 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 8m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft677
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2409
GuemChi 1570
Hm[arnc] 59
Bale 52
soO 39
IntoTheRainbow 8
Yoon 7
Icarus 7
Dota 2
febbydoto36
League of Legends
JimRising 777
Other Games
summit1g6422
XaKoH 434
Happy121
NeuroSwarm117
Maynarde102
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH317
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2200
League of Legends
• Rush1432
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
4h 8m
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
GSL
5h 8m
PiGosaur Cup
18h 8m
Kung Fu Cup
1d 5h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
Escore
3 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
5 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-02
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.