• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:52
CEST 17:52
KST 00:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China8Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL65Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 699 users

A fundamental issue about forcefield - Page 23

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 31 Next All
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 18:59:51
November 19 2012 18:59 GMT
#441
@malaan
Well, thinking back to the first Beta when Protoss weren't very good at FF's, I'd imagine stim timings would become quite powerful. Zealot and Stalker would probably have to be compensated somehow- without in turn making Warp-Gate timings too powerful.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
KawaiiRice
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States2914 Posts
November 19 2012 18:59 GMT
#442
Even sun Tzu couldn't account for constantly changing terrain
@KawaiiRiceLighT
MinimalistSC2
Profile Joined April 2011
United States121 Posts
November 19 2012 19:02 GMT
#443
The bold is my suggestion for FF change.

Actually, I enjoy FF because they introduce a great dynamic to the game where it depends on where and when you fight, similar to stopping a terran siege push. It also punishes "blobbing" and not spreading units. And it requires fast thinking and reflexes by protoss. THis way the game doesn't come down to just BO, macro ability, and timing.
Reducing the time FF is active is the only plausible answer to your issue, and I think it would be a great change for the better. As a top 8 masters Zerg 3 seasons now, What holds me back from GM is protoss FF based all ins. but its not that i think FF is broken, I understand that pros can deal with it and its only my own shortcomings that limit me.

However. FF is extremely strong. With the ability to warp in, its possible to perpetually block a ramp with a single FF. FF can completely negate zerg units from attacking or running away, really its the equivalent of a (much) harder to execute fungal spell, that can also deny the ability to attack, along with move. So, regardless of how difficult it is to execute, it is executable. Toss has no problem getting up ample sentries for ample FF. The issue at hand is that they get such a powerful spell so early on.
I think that sentries were originally designed for early and late game; respectively, for holding ramps vs rushes and used in mass late game to carve up wide open battle spaces. With the advent of FFE and mid game pushes, toss gets that "late game" mass of sentries well before zerg gets mid game tech. So the problem here is that the duration of the FF spell, designed to hold a ramp for another warp in, or to endure the length of a large late game battle, is introduced to the mid game.
As a zerg I feel like FF simply lasts too long. Toss is (and should be) able to cut off and neutralize parts of my army with FF, or box in his own army to defend vs lings. But the amount of FF energy available due to FFE means that Toss can "Spam" FF to trap large chunks of my army into tiny spaces where they cant even move around, and then just sit there and pick off all of them, utilizing just one round of FF.
Enter the FF duration nerf. with a duration nerf, toss still has the ability to section off troops, putting FF behind and infront of and to the sides of troops, as well as use them defensively. BUT, now toss most likely has to spend a little bit more FF energy as the initial FF wears off to either ensure complete losses on my part, or no losses on his part.
Now battles will not be so one sided based solely on a toss player's micro ability. Or rather one or two battles still can be, but because of the chance for extra FF needed, the continuous battles will not be as one sided. Meaning that Zerg is not only rewarded more for engaging the toss push much like a siege push, distracting, threatening along the way across the map, etc, but is also less liable to get screwed over completely if toss manages to trap and kill a bunch of units for "free", and still has plenty of FF energy for other battles.

In overview,
Energy for FF is not increased, so toss can still throw up critical FF on warp in, or with very low energy.
FF size is not changed, which for obv reasons is pretty necessary to maintain balance. (pretty much ramps, but other things too)
FF cast range is not reduced, which would make inf even more of a hard coutner to FF and introduce many issues.
FF time duration is reduced so that IF the toss deems it valuable, he must spend additional FF to abuse trapping techniques, extended ramp holds, etc. but in a pinch, Toss can still execute any and all of the same actions as he would be able to before the nerf with the same amount of energy.

The alternative to this is channeling the spell, which would be terrible because sometimes FF is used to retreat.

I also have no idea how much the duration should be changed by, I only just came up with this on the spot.

Hopefully this post is considered, thank you.
There is no such thing as perfection, only improvement.
malaan
Profile Joined September 2010
365 Posts
November 19 2012 19:06 GMT
#444
On November 20 2012 04:02 MinimalistSC2 wrote:
The bold is my suggestion for FF change.

Actually, I enjoy FF because they introduce a great dynamic to the game where it depends on where and when you fight, similar to stopping a terran siege push. It also punishes "blobbing" and not spreading units. And it requires fast thinking and reflexes by protoss. THis way the game doesn't come down to just BO, macro ability, and timing.
Reducing the time FF is active is the only plausible answer to your issue, and I think it would be a great change for the better. As a top 8 masters Zerg 3 seasons now, What holds me back from GM is protoss FF based all ins. but its not that i think FF is broken, I understand that pros can deal with it and its only my own shortcomings that limit me.

However. FF is extremely strong. With the ability to warp in, its possible to perpetually block a ramp with a single FF. FF can completely negate zerg units from attacking or running away, really its the equivalent of a (much) harder to execute fungal spell, that can also deny the ability to attack, along with move. So, regardless of how difficult it is to execute, it is executable. Toss has no problem getting up ample sentries for ample FF. The issue at hand is that they get such a powerful spell so early on.
I think that sentries were originally designed for early and late game; respectively, for holding ramps vs rushes and used in mass late game to carve up wide open battle spaces. With the advent of FFE and mid game pushes, toss gets that "late game" mass of sentries well before zerg gets mid game tech. So the problem here is that the duration of the FF spell, designed to hold a ramp for another warp in, or to endure the length of a large late game battle, is introduced to the mid game.
As a zerg I feel like FF simply lasts too long. Toss is (and should be) able to cut off and neutralize parts of my army with FF, or box in his own army to defend vs lings. But the amount of FF energy available due to FFE means that Toss can "Spam" FF to trap large chunks of my army into tiny spaces where they cant even move around, and then just sit there and pick off all of them, utilizing just one round of FF.
Enter the FF duration nerf. with a duration nerf, toss still has the ability to section off troops, putting FF behind and infront of and to the sides of troops, as well as use them defensively. BUT, now toss most likely has to spend a little bit more FF energy as the initial FF wears off to either ensure complete losses on my part, or no losses on his part.
Now battles will not be so one sided based solely on a toss player's micro ability. Or rather one or two battles still can be, but because of the chance for extra FF needed, the continuous battles will not be as one sided. Meaning that Zerg is not only rewarded more for engaging the toss push much like a siege push, distracting, threatening along the way across the map, etc, but is also less liable to get screwed over completely if toss manages to trap and kill a bunch of units for "free", and still has plenty of FF energy for other battles.

In overview,
Energy for FF is not increased, so toss can still throw up critical FF on warp in, or with very low energy.
FF size is not changed, which for obv reasons is pretty necessary to maintain balance. (pretty much ramps, but other things too)
FF cast range is not reduced, which would make inf even more of a hard coutner to FF and introduce many issues.
FF time duration is reduced so that IF the toss deems it valuable, he must spend additional FF to abuse trapping techniques, extended ramp holds, etc. but in a pinch, Toss can still execute any and all of the same actions as he would be able to before the nerf with the same amount of energy.

The alternative to this is channeling the spell, which would be terrible because sometimes FF is used to retreat.

I also have no idea how much the duration should be changed by, I only just came up with this on the spot.

Hopefully this post is considered, thank you.


Take it to the blizzard forums and hots beta forums bro. No one is gonna read that wall of text after 200+ pages of other people doing the same.
Lobotomist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1541 Posts
November 19 2012 19:11 GMT
#445
We'll see how the viper does in hots. could make for interesting scenarios where zerg relies more on long range units (hydras, etc) and not on closing the distance and getting in, which could alleviate some of that frustration. Alternatively, the viper could spawn the same frustrations (can't do anything against abduct, similar to FF).
Teching to hive too quickly isn't just a risk: it's an ultrarisk
JKM
Profile Joined November 2011
Denmark419 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 19:16:59
November 19 2012 19:15 GMT
#446
I agree that forcefields needs to be fixed, but I am having some trouble seeing how it should be done.
--> Buffing other gw units (eg. zealot / stalker) causes problems for terran and revives blinkstalker allin vs zerg.
--> Making forcefield work only defensive (however possible) causes zerg supermacro mode, because they no longer have to defend against a potential timing.
--> Outright removing forcefields causes various reactionary early and midgame timings to just kill the protoss if he wanted a third base.

I could be wrong about the flaws of various solutions, but overall I think we should wait for Hots and see how it works when zergs have a stronger midgame army.

If we don't want to wait for Hots I think buffing hydras could be a solution, they'd give stronger attacking power, they have a longer range (not sure it's long enough to truly shoot over forcefields, but meh), anti-air (warp prism can die), and they're not armored!
Examples of stuff that could be buffed about it:
- Range buff (remove range upgrade, make this range the new standard).
- Slight HP increase (without looking at numbers, something that would make them survive 1 more hit from stalkers/zealots), since they would largely replace roaches in the midgame.
- Something else.
1338, one upping 1337
Lobotomist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1541 Posts
November 19 2012 19:20 GMT
#447
Projectile on force field? Has this been discussed? This would be beneficial for offensive ff, but defensively its probably not viable
Teching to hive too quickly isn't just a risk: it's an ultrarisk
Tommie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
China658 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 19:48:39
November 19 2012 19:42 GMT
#448
I can't help but feel like the roach should have been lair tech. 2 supply, cost more gas and with more hp and a bigger model size. That would have made it a very interesting unit. Now it's just the staple tier 1 massable unit and the hydra would have been much better for that ( susceptible to aoe, bigger range, able to shoot air units). The roach and hydra's roles should be reversed, with the hydra being the staple tier 1 ranged unit that is susceptible to aoe damage and the roach a tier 2 heavy hitter with some special abilities ( burrow move/regeneration ) that isn't massable because of its model size/range.

Force field is pretty ok but it's too strong against tier-1 zerg because of zerg's low range/melee units. Units with a longer range aren't as weak against force fields. I would like to see force fields last a little bit shorter and perhaps be smaller in one direction but I don't have any fundamental problems with it. I think they need a slight nerf so they don't determine the outcome of battles the way they do now.

For TvP, reducing the casting range of forcefields and decreasing it's size in one direction would help dramatically. By that I mean making it more of a wall instead of a field. This would help because a wall is narrow and units from behind the wall can still shoot over it. Also, there is more room to micro. Instead of being squeezed together the units are just being cut off. Reducing the casting range would make sentries snipeable by, for example a quick stim of a few marines. This would make toss earlygame a bit weaker but that can be compensated by tweaking a few stats slightly ( such as sentry damage ). This really won't make gateway rushes too strong I think, especially when you do what's sane and make warpin time increase with distance from nexus or cybercore.

As for zerg, switching the roach and the hydra is the best thing you can do. The inreased range would work wonders against force fields and a tier 2 roach with a lot of hp and a big model size would be a lot more interesting than the tier 1 "mass me im cheap" roach. The hydra would give way to swarm hosts with roaches to cover their movement across the map once big aoe hits the field.

As for infestors, the problem is simple. Root and aoe should not be combined in spell. And a root spell should be limited to ground units. I don't care about the stats of fungal, whether it's balanced or not. It's the principle of root and aoe being one spell.
Maelstrom + storm was the most exiting thing in the game we all loved. It was rare, a big investment and it was avoidable by good muta micro and being on the ball with your mutas. Fungal is just shit and boring. I don't care if they nerf it to balance it. Root and AOE shouldn't be one spell. End of of discussion.

The infestor should get a spell to slow down movement+ attack speed of ground units which covers TERRAIN and does not stick to units. Then another unit must get an AOE spell. Or the AOE spell has to be researched on the infestor. Personally, I'd prefer another spellcaster. The reduced attack speed + slow will definitely affect stalker balls that hit before hive enough to replace fungal as it stands now. Zerg still has a zoning unit that can buy time and set traps, which is in my opinion what an infestor should be. Chain fungals are over. Roaches can enter the field during lair tech and they will protect vital units soak the first rounds of damage while the infestors and swarm hosts set up. Banelings are a threat again. Zerg relies on infestors because it's other midgame units are too crap. That's the problem. Zerg's other midgame units don't make much sense.

Zerg right now is a race that tries to survive the early and midgame with as few larvae as possible in order to buy time until infestors are out. Only at tier 3 zerg units become interesting ( and too strong, too turtly, too boring in combat. Not imba, boring ). The economic fundamentals of zerg only stimulate zerg to take that path. Zerg right now is all about defending with as few larvae as possible ( stupid queens ) and nothing happens until late lair tech with 3 saturated bases vs 2 for the other race. Zerg's economy is already geared toward the late game, so are the units. Only when the infestor hits the field things become interesting.

Oh, and the colossus should be slow and should stop before it shoots and charge the shot so it can be dodged. Range = 8 or 7 no range increase research. Cliff walk is researchable.

Siege tank get more damage please but slower siege time and it should scale better with upgrades.

Immortal please increase shield recharge time by a factor of 2. And reduce it's damage output. It's ridiculous. It's an immortal that means it doesn't die, it doesnt mean it rapes everything armored.

Mules can't oversaturate a base anymore. And please give terran a lategame instead of +3+3 MMM + support. That means buffing the raven and changing the thor. I like the idea of a unit with a weak AOE air attack and a strong ground attack but the thor is just kiddo game design. It's cool when you first see it and then it's just big and generic and dull. A 3/4 supply unit with some kind of useful special ability would be nice. Like being able to carry 2 scv's with him, but it would have a relatively small amount of hitpoints.

Mothership core please shield battery. Please. And warpgate warp time increases with distance from cybercore.

Now the game is awesome.

That's it for tonight.
Being a ho doesn't automatically make you "immoral" or a bad person, but it does make you a ho.
Mithridates
Profile Joined June 2011
United States446 Posts
November 19 2012 19:50 GMT
#449
[QUOTE]On November 20 2012 00:13 Shiori wrote:
Frankly I'm not sure why Code S Koreans taking down foreigners is any sort of convincing indication that Forcefield is a problem. It's an uninspired, boring mechanic, but it's far less of a problem than Fungal or BL/Infestor is. [/QUOTE/]

I agree with this completely. Why is it that the better players winning (Koreans) beating inferior players (foriegners) a sign that PvZ is in favor of protoss. Yes, its silly and frustrating for Zerg but I dont think anyone can say that Suppy, Sen and co. are better than the likes of Rain or Parting.
fighter2_40
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States420 Posts
November 19 2012 19:55 GMT
#450
This is how you fix toss:

Remove forcefield from the game and make it a slow field.

Buff protoss gateway units, increase warp gate cool down, decrease build time in normal gateway slightly.

Remove colossus. They blow. Replace with Reaver.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 20:07:30
November 19 2012 20:04 GMT
#451
On November 20 2012 00:13 Shiori wrote:
Frankly I'm not sure why Code S Koreans taking down foreigners is any sort of convincing indication that Forcefield is a problem. It's an uninspired, boring mechanic, but it's far less of a problem than Fungal or BL/Infestor is. [/QUOTE/]

I agree with this completely. Why is it that the better players winning (Koreans) beating inferior players (foriegners) a sign that PvZ is in favor of protoss. Yes, its silly and frustrating for Zerg but I dont think anyone can say that Suppy, Sen and co. are better than the likes of Rain or Parting.


Agreed. Parting and Rain are two of the best protoss in the world. The fact that Parting created an extremely refined, sharp and deadly all-in that to punish the greed of zerg is nothing to complain about. The fact that he was able to do it three times in a row is the fault of his opponent. While other whine about balance and game design, Partings and Rain refine builds down to a razors edge and win OSL and BWC.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
aZealot
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
New Zealand5447 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 21:48:05
November 19 2012 21:46 GMT
#452
Not sure what to make of the OP, although I have yet to read all of it - will do so a little later. (I'm at work, atm.)

It seems yet another Protoss qq - although well veiled. Parting and Rain are streaks ahead of Sen - no disrespect to Sen.

(I'm also not surprised to see WG being brought out of the ground in the thread either. We'll never be rid of that one...)
KT best KT ~ 2014
YyapSsap
Profile Joined September 2010
New Zealand1511 Posts
November 19 2012 21:53 GMT
#453
I still think making the FF like destructive rocks (enough hitpoints to not get one shotted by a whole bunch of units) is one of the ways to go in conjunction with a high AOE damage dealing unit that replaces the colossus.

If we take TvP out of the picture (I really think this matchup needs a big makeover) and have the reaver in its place, protoss dont suddenly need to rely on mass FFs anymore because the reavers can dent big holes into the roach compositions that murder protoss ground units. Obviously things like FF duration (+ on top of having hitpoints) and the ability to warp in a gazillion units from the warp prism needs to be nerfed incase you go for a reaver harass playstyle w/ sentries.

And the immortal sentry all in needs to be nerfed (or zerg buffed here somehow e.g. hydra) along with the BL/infestor composition. Its exactly like the 1-1-1 in the sense that a player can do it over and over and still win. Unlike 1-1-1 the immortal sentry all in is up to the protoss to make the mistake, i.e. its his game to lose which is what Morrow is getting at due to the nature of FFs.
Serthius
Profile Joined December 2010
Samoa226 Posts
November 19 2012 22:01 GMT
#454
Thanks for a well thought out post, Morrow. As someone who doesn't actually play the game anymore, I can only give the spectator's view: I think force fields in ZvP are terrible for entertainment value, exactly because of the things you outlined.

Two things can happen in any given fight:

a.) The protoss messes up the force fields and loses, in which case I think: "Well, that sucked. He only lost because he messed up his FF".
b.) The protoss places perfect force fields and wins, in which case I think: "Well, that wasn't very fair. The zerg couldn't do much."

Neither case is very entertaining.
YyapSsap
Profile Joined September 2010
New Zealand1511 Posts
November 19 2012 22:04 GMT
#455
@Morrow did you post this in the pro forums? What are their thoughts on this issue btw?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 19 2012 22:10 GMT
#456
On November 20 2012 06:46 aZealot wrote:
Not sure what to make of the OP, although I have yet to read all of it - will do so a little later. (I'm at work, atm.)

It seems yet another Protoss qq - although well veiled. Parting and Rain are streaks ahead of Sen - no disrespect to Sen.

(I'm also not surprised to see WG being brought out of the ground in the thread either. We'll never be rid of that one...)


Every time protoss wins and there is some sentry based aggression, this thread will return. Or its sister thread, the fundamental problem with warpgate.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
danl9rm
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States3111 Posts
November 19 2012 22:14 GMT
#457
Remove force fields and buff the heck out of gateway units please.

Thank you,
zerg player
"Science has so well established that the preborn baby in the womb is a living human being that most pro-choice activists have conceded the point. ..since the abortion proponents have lost the science argument, they are now advocating an existential one."
GeneralSnoop
Profile Joined February 2011
United States142 Posts
November 19 2012 23:16 GMT
#458
forcefields (actually, why not, lets say all sentry spells) should be attached to the oracle in HOTS and the sentry and current oracle spells should be removed. It would be really fun to see a couple fast, flying support units darting around putting down forcefields in the late-midgame (hard to do early attacks with stargate) from the sky and be able to retreat when they are out of energy. This would make forcefields unable to be massed as they would come from a non-attacking, fairly expensive unit, and would get rid of a lot of the early protoss immortal sentry timings as every unit would come from a different tech path (every tried a 2-base phoenix collosus all-in? or an immortal + storm rush? i didn't think so). Also, being a fast flying unit, they would be much better and more exciting lategame and would help deal with infestor broodlord greatly.
"I could probably live in trees" - LiquidJinro
Bellazuk
Profile Joined December 2011
Canada146 Posts
November 19 2012 23:39 GMT
#459
I really feel the way people complain about toss, how easy it is to play, how low apm you can have and be very successful, it's just because of warp gates. Zerg has to inject non stop and that's what makes the apm, toss chrono while fighting can slip off, then warp in units and still slip off because they aren't penalize as other races would be.

People can argue and say well, toss upgrades are important and that's where if you slip off you lose. That's wrong, I've seen many many pros with nexus full energy cuz they slipped off but race allow them to. Catch up the macro by adding 5 more gates and wap more units, just as if it was really difficult to play like other races are.

Solution : Buff gateways, nerf warp gate.

I'd really love to see units like thor, colo, broodlords, units that are game changer when you have too much of them and just a-move your opponent. That's silly, I think everyrace should have a t1 and t2 new unit and that would make the whole game very dynamic, new cheses, new meta games, new strategy. I don't know why blizz wants Z to have more t3 units when it doesn't matter because we already had what was needed to win games as T3 but nothing to win as T2 ( ZvP)
“The only thing standing between you and your goal is the bullshit story you keep telling yourself as to why you can't achieve it.”
freetgy
Profile Joined November 2010
1720 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 23:46:18
November 19 2012 23:45 GMT
#460
stacking Chrono adds flexibility in tougher situations, where you need many units fast.
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 31 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 826
MaxPax 352
Hui .267
RotterdaM 263
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3928
Jaedong 2458
Flash 2354
EffOrt 932
Hyuk 689
Soulkey 523
Snow 391
ZerO 384
Stork 372
actioN 310
[ Show more ]
Soma 273
firebathero 204
GuemChi 178
Mind 140
sSak 62
TY 59
JulyZerg 55
Sharp 54
Barracks 49
hero 46
PianO 41
Terrorterran 33
Yoon 32
JYJ31
sorry 24
soO 23
Rock 20
Aegong 20
HiyA 20
yabsab 16
IntoTheRainbow 8
Shine 7
GoRush 7
Dota 2
Gorgc6048
qojqva3028
League of Legends
singsing2391
Dendi1194
Counter-Strike
fl0m827
markeloff154
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King207
Other Games
hiko1576
B2W.Neo1255
Beastyqt802
Lowko321
crisheroes292
Liquid`VortiX145
ArmadaUGS132
KnowMe88
Trikslyr51
ZerO(Twitch)24
ceh91
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick45247
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis7043
• TFBlade705
Other Games
• Shiphtur18
Upcoming Events
RotterdaM Event
8m
RotterdaM263
Replay Cast
8h 8m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
18h 8m
WardiTV European League
1d
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 8h
The PondCast
1d 18h
WardiTV European League
1d 20h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.