• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 00:43
CET 06:43
KST 14:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros9[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win62025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!10BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION3Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams12Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest5
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four DreamHack Open 2013 revealed Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros
Tourneys
SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Kirktown Chat Brawl #9 $50 8:30PM EST 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
Map pack for 3v3/4v4/FFA games BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ladder Map Matchup Stats What's going on with b.net?
Tourneys
BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION [ASL20] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Dating: How's your luck? US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Big Reveal
Peanutsc
Challenge: Maths isn't all…
Hildegard
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1475 users

Situation Report: August 31, 2012 by David Kim - Page 12

Forum Index > SC2 General
950 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 48 Next All
Sajaki
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada1135 Posts
August 31 2012 18:29 GMT
#221
On September 01 2012 03:27 n0ise wrote:
about one in five battle reports actually make sense, crossing my fingers for the next one ^^


:D

Im hoping for a TvP battle report thing next time :D
Inno pls...
pallad
Profile Joined September 2010
Poland1958 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-31 18:30:04
August 31 2012 18:29 GMT
#222
People that post in this thread should post own battle net account link.. that we all can see , what skill lv they are.
80% of post here sound like bronze-plat players.. its insane.
SC 2 -LingsLover- EU -- Jaedong , NesTea , Nerchio , DRG , Moon , Oz , Tarson , Scarlett -- Dota 2 Pallad EU- NaVi - LGD
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
August 31 2012 18:32 GMT
#223
absolutly RIGHT
gsl code S most players are terrans now and if you gave a look to REALITY ... he 2-0 EVERY zerg ... shine symbol yugioh he dont care 2-0 over and over, if other players start play like reality ... damn terran is so strong
perfect balance for me right now

you all seems want a tvz buff while there is a player with a 100000-0 record in tvz ... perhaps terrans have to addept ?
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
Mr Showtime
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-31 18:35:17
August 31 2012 18:34 GMT
#224
On September 01 2012 03:29 Sajaki wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:27 n0ise wrote:
about one in five battle reports actually make sense, crossing my fingers for the next one ^^


:D

Im hoping for a TvP battle report thing next time :D


They just did a TvP battle report. Are you talking about the situation reports like this?
pallad
Profile Joined September 2010
Poland1958 Posts
August 31 2012 18:35 GMT
#225
On September 01 2012 03:32 CoR wrote:
absolutly RIGHT
gsl code S most players are terrans now and if you gave a look to REALITY ... he 2-0 EVERY zerg ... shine symbol yugioh he dont care 2-0 over and over, if other players start play like reality ... damn terran is so strong
perfect balance for me right now

you all seems want a tvz buff while there is a player with a 100000-0 record in tvz ... perhaps terrans have to addept ?


True.. if SOMEONE CAN make good strategy or build working.. NEED TO PLAY more.. and NOT WHINE at balance .. some players show that is possible to win vs zergs players ez..
SC 2 -LingsLover- EU -- Jaedong , NesTea , Nerchio , DRG , Moon , Oz , Tarson , Scarlett -- Dota 2 Pallad EU- NaVi - LGD
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-31 18:37:02
August 31 2012 18:35 GMT
#226
On September 01 2012 03:32 CoR wrote:
absolutly RIGHT
gsl code S most players are terrans now and if you gave a look to REALITY ... he 2-0 EVERY zerg ... shine symbol yugioh he dont care 2-0 over and over, if other players start play like reality ... damn terran is so strong
perfect balance for me right now

you all seems want a tvz buff while there is a player with a 100000-0 record in tvz ... perhaps terrans have to addept ?

Adapt* Adept means proficient or expert like (which these QQers clearly are not)
Unless of course you want to say they are adept at balance whining.
Wingblade
Profile Joined April 2012
United States1806 Posts
August 31 2012 18:36 GMT
#227
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


Your anecdotes are not evidence. I'm sorry but any one person trying to claim that their experience somehow makes balance complaints valid is hilarious. You might play the game of starcraft in a manner that suites other races more than Terran. Just because one random masters player says it, doesn't mean its true.
PartinG fanboy to the max, Rain/Squirtle/Dear/Scarlett/Bbyong are cool too. I don't always watch Dota2 but when I do I have no clue what's going on. GOGO POWER RANGERS
Iyerbeth
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
England2410 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-31 18:39:19
August 31 2012 18:36 GMT
#228
On the principal of not changing things until they're sure they need to, good job Blizzard.

The thing though in this thread that has surprised me the most is the amount of people who seem to have no idea why the Queen buff happened. It's true, the match up was close to balanced stats wise at that point, but that has literally nothing to do with why they made that change, as they've said repeatedly. Blizzard felt like it was too easy to do something early game to a Zerg like a Hellion run by and too difficult (relatively speaking) to defend it. It literally had nothing to do with whether the match up as a whole was balanced, but rather, Blizzard's interpretation of the game in that moment.

That said though, for the same reason as above, I think it's odd Blizzard chose to leave the Raven as is whilst also saying it needs further exploration. I think a lot of people see that unit could be more fun and simpler to use and maybe even to get in to play.
♥ Liquid`Sheth ♥ Liquid`TLO ♥
Phoenix2003
Profile Joined August 2012
126 Posts
August 31 2012 18:37 GMT
#229
Well, this what happens when you take candy from a baby. My God, terran players are so spoiled it's downright criminal. Nice going, Blizzard.
omnic
Profile Joined July 2010
United States188 Posts
August 31 2012 18:37 GMT
#230
On September 01 2012 03:29 pallad wrote:
People that post in this thread should post own battle net account link.. that we all can see , what skill lv they are.
80% of post here sound like bronze-plat players.. its insane.


I think that would be a wise thing to include in all balance related threads.
sertman
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States540 Posts
August 31 2012 18:39 GMT
#231
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


so you play all three races, have the same amount of points in master league with all three, and then turn around and say it's completely lopsided? shouldn't you have much less points with terran if that was the case?

it's not about what's easier to do or not. you don't see baseball players debating whether it's harder to pitch or to hit, do you?
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25553 Posts
August 31 2012 18:40 GMT
#232
On September 01 2012 03:39 sertman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


so you play all three races, have the same amount of points in master league with all three, and then turn around and say it's completely lopsided? shouldn't you have much less points with terran if that was the case?

it's not about what's easier to do or not. you don't see baseball players debating whether it's harder to pitch or to hit, do you?


WELL, he did say he plays twice as much terran, so you'd expect him to be much better/higher rated with terran. The fact that he's not, in his mind, is an indication that terran is more difficult.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
August 31 2012 18:41 GMT
#233
On September 01 2012 03:39 sertman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


so you play all three races, have the same amount of points in master league with all three, and then turn around and say it's completely lopsided? shouldn't you have much less points with terran if that was the case?

it's not about what's easier to do or not. you don't see baseball players debating whether it's harder to pitch or to hit, do you?

He's clearly a bullshitter that is trying to use some invented rank to validate his opinion. Much like a vast majority of TL... I can't count how many time I've read in a balance or strategy thread with posts that started off with "xx Master level here" or "I am a 1700 Diamond Protoss and..."
DebtSC2
Profile Joined August 2012
United States20 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-31 18:47:11
August 31 2012 18:43 GMT
#234
On September 01 2012 03:36 Wingblade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


Your anecdotes are not evidence. I'm sorry but any one person trying to claim that their experience somehow makes balance complaints valid is hilarious. You might play the game of starcraft in a manner that suites other races more than Terran. Just because one random masters player says it, doesn't mean its true.


It would be nice if there was neat way to summarize why Terran is more difficult than the other two races, rather than using (as you correctly pointed out) flawed anecdotal evidence. If there was, I would certainly do it instead of trying to rely on the relatively weak arguments currently at my disposal. I can point out how Terran representation is lacking in all but the highest levels of play and the lowest levels of play. I can show statistics that clearly indicate a decline of foreign terrans, but success among the most skilled and practiced korean terrans. Alas, all of these are incomplete arguments.

Nevertheless I doubt many pro players would disagree that Terran has more skills to perfect than the other two races. They benefit more from practice and are punished more severely for not practicing. I think the other two races should be brought in line, if not all three have substantial increases in their respective skill caps.

Edit: 1100 pt Master is also nothing to give my arguments credence, I'm just saying where I'm coming from. 1100 pt master to pro is almost as large a gap as platinum to pro, so yeah. My rank isn't really supposed to justify what I'm saying.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25553 Posts
August 31 2012 18:44 GMT
#235
On September 01 2012 03:41 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:39 sertman wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


so you play all three races, have the same amount of points in master league with all three, and then turn around and say it's completely lopsided? shouldn't you have much less points with terran if that was the case?

it's not about what's easier to do or not. you don't see baseball players debating whether it's harder to pitch or to hit, do you?

He's clearly a bullshitter that is trying to use some invented rank to validate his opinion. Much like a vast majority of TL... I can't count how many time I've read in a balance or strategy thread with posts that started off with "xx Master level here" or "I am a 1700 Diamond Protoss and..."



For what it's worth, in strategy threads at least it's nice to let people know where you're coming from. A lot of the times, I see people open their posts with "I'm only in plat, so take this with a grain of salt, but here are my thoughts"-- it's just common courtesy.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
August 31 2012 18:45 GMT
#236
On September 01 2012 03:36 Iyerbeth wrote:
On the principal of not changing things until they're sure they need to, good job Blizzard.

The thing though in this thread that has surprised me the most is the amount of people who seem to have no idea why the Queen buff happened. It's true, the match up was close to balanced stats wise at that point, but that has literally nothing to do with why they made that change, as they've said repeatedly. Blizzard felt like it was too easy to do something early game to a Zerg like a Hellion run by and too difficult (relatively speaking) to defend it.

Yes, it was and still is sooo difficult to get an Evolution Chamber/Spine/Queen wall to prevent Hellions from running in... The Queen range changed nothing in this regard. Zergs still need proper building placement—and still lose many drones to Hellions raids when failing to do so.
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
August 31 2012 18:46 GMT
#237
On September 01 2012 03:43 DebtSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:36 Wingblade wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


Your anecdotes are not evidence. I'm sorry but any one person trying to claim that their experience somehow makes balance complaints valid is hilarious. You might play the game of starcraft in a manner that suites other races more than Terran. Just because one random masters player says it, doesn't mean its true.


It would be nice if there was neat way to summarize why Terran is more difficult than the other two races, rather than using (as you correctly pointed out) flawed anecdotal evidence. If there was, I would certainly do it instead of trying to rely on the relatively weak arguments currently at my disposal. I can point out how Terran representation is lacking in all but the highest levels of play and the lowest levels of play. I can show statistics that clearly indicate a decline of foreign terrans, but success among the most skilled and practiced korean terrans. Alas, all of these are incomplete arguments.

Nevertheless I doubt many pro players would disagree that Terran has more skills to perfect than the other two races. They benefit more from practice and are punished more severely for not practicing. I think the other two races should be brought in line, if not all three have substantial increases in their respective skill caps.

The funny thing is that if you were actually as proficient in all races as you claim to be, you would be able to give more than just anecdotal evidence. You would have stats on your climb as a Terran player and the decline as your other two races increased. No, you just say "I play more Terran. It's MOAR DIFFICULT!!!11!"
ACrow
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6583 Posts
August 31 2012 18:46 GMT
#238
On September 01 2012 03:29 pallad wrote:
People that post in this thread should post own battle net account link.. that we all can see , what skill lv they are.
80% of post here sound like bronze-plat players.. its insane.

Maybe I missed it, but where did you post the link to your account?
Get off my lawn, young punks
bokchoi
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Korea (South)9498 Posts
August 31 2012 18:47 GMT
#239
Love the comments of how TvZ and the game should be balanced/made easier for non-pro level play. BNet forums are funny :D
omnic
Profile Joined July 2010
United States188 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-31 18:48:14
August 31 2012 18:47 GMT
#240
On September 01 2012 03:40 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 03:39 sertman wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:23 DebtSC2 wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:16 ZeromuS wrote:
On September 01 2012 03:13 DebtSC2 wrote:
Someone answer me this:

What's wrong with making Zerg and Protoss as difficult as Terran? Obviously at the top level the races can all be competitive, but it's clear that Zerg and Toss players below the top .1% have a much easier time in their matchups than Terran.

It's stupid to make Terran easier or stronger, yes. Very stupid.

It's also stupid to leave Zerg and Protoss the way they are -- virtually microless, with simple, 1 route tech paths.


Yes, 1 route tech path because Terrans don't get barracks -- factory -- starport every game?

Look, Terran requires some more micro, its different than the micro of the other races. Protoss relies on spell micro, terran on large army control, and zerg on positioning. Nothing wrong with asymmetric design.


Except its not asymmetric, its completely lopsided. I play P and Z and T all at the master level, all around 1100 pt in master. I play terran at least twice as much as the other races combined. It is orders of magnitude easier to win with Z and P, because they are vastly simpler mechanically compared to Terran.

It's not asymmetric. For two races it's very easy. For one race its difficult.


so you play all three races, have the same amount of points in master league with all three, and then turn around and say it's completely lopsided? shouldn't you have much less points with terran if that was the case?

it's not about what's easier to do or not. you don't see baseball players debating whether it's harder to pitch or to hit, do you?


WELL, he did say he plays twice as much terran, so you'd expect him to be much better/higher rated with terran. The fact that he's not, in his mind, is an indication that terran is more difficult.



Too many variables still. He could naturally be better at zerg/protoss mechanics. The fact that he plays terran so much also gives him quite a large advantage over other terran players that he would face as Zerg or protoss. He could be playing zerg or protoss after going on a harsh losing streak as terran so his MMR has tanked. These types of variables that can easily be overlooked (and if I wasnt so pressed for time atm i'm sure I could come up with quite a few more easily.) make anecdotal evidence that his argument is based on anything but concrete.
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 48 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 141
NeuroSwarm 112
Ketroc 42
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 10614
Nal_rA 2809
actioN 272
Snow 148
Noble 51
Icarus 10
Dota 2
XaKoH 480
League of Legends
JimRising 1118
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1142
C9.Mang0408
Mew2King35
Other Games
summit1g12807
WinterStarcraft459
ViBE47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1879
Counter-Strike
PGL250
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki12
• Diggity4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1552
• Lourlo872
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 17m
Wardi Open
6h 17m
Monday Night Weeklies
11h 17m
Replay Cast
17h 17m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 4h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 6h
LAN Event
1d 9h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
LAN Event
2 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
LAN Event
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
LAN Event
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
LAN Event
5 days
IPSL
5 days
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
LAN Event
6 days
IPSL
6 days
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.