• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:03
CEST 22:03
KST 05:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202551RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams5Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 797 users

Reluctance to Re-Introduce BW-Units - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 41 42 43 Next All
pinball777
Profile Joined January 2011
United States134 Posts
June 16 2012 17:28 GMT
#81
They don't want to admit their own mistakes they've made so they're trying to fix it. I wish they'd let the game settle itself though and balance less often, but its up to them.
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
June 16 2012 17:29 GMT
#82
On June 17 2012 02:27 corumjhaelen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:25 SarcasmMonster wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:21 corumjhaelen wrote:
The subject of the thread is interesting and all, but I'd just like to state that the Viper's ability has nothing to do with Dark Swarm. In fact, it's pretty much disruption web which was on the corsair. If people could stop making that comparison I'd feel much better reading this.


Disruption web - nothing can attack in it
Blinding cloud - range reduced to 1. Zerglings, ultras, broodlings unaffected. Locusts slightly affected (since they only have 2 range to begin with)

Yes, I said it's "pretty much" disruption web. Very different from dark swarm. In less good. I somehow have doubts it will be seen really often.


As long as you know the difference. I thought the difference is more than "pretty much disruption web" because the strategy around the spell is very different since composition is much more important with the Viper spell.
MMA: The true King of Wings
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
June 16 2012 17:29 GMT
#83
On June 17 2012 02:21 corumjhaelen wrote:
The subject of the thread is interesting and all, but I'd just like to state that the Viper's ability has nothing to do with Dark Swarm. In fact, it's pretty much disruption web which was on the corsair. If people could stop making that comparison I'd feel much better reading this.


Noone cares how you feel when your reading this thread.

+ Show Spoiler +
If your last sentence is a product of bad wording, I apologise
.
sorry for dem one liners
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 17:34:01
June 16 2012 17:33 GMT
#84
On June 17 2012 02:27 canikizu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:15 Bagi wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:09 a176 wrote:
On June 17 2012 01:51 Azzur wrote:
I agree with Dustin Browder's stance - if you want BW units, go play BW. It is already theoretically possible to make BW units in the SC2 editor - if there's demand for it, it would've already happened.


the units in HotS essentially mimic their BW counterparts, but are not their bw counterparts. viper for example (dark swam, consume). so why do we still have old units like templar, hydra, etc, but not the rest of the units?

What about the fact that it flies?

The fact that abduct is a completely new skill?

The fact that its cloud ability works in very different ways (only affects bio, reduces range but allows them to deal damage)?

The fact that its "consume" also works in fundamentally different way, since you need to be in your own base to use it?

It's ridiculous how people are resorting to such exaggerations to make a point. Same with the warhound, its a mech walker so it must be the same thing as a goliath, right?

lol you don't know? When it comes out of factory, if it rolls, it's a tank micmic, if it's 4 wheel, it's vulture micmic, if it's walk on 2 leges, it's goliath. SIlly blizzard, should have made war hound to walk on 4 legs, Terran need a unit like that.

The sad part is that making it 4-legged and not resemble goliaths probably would've reduced the amount of complaints by a lot.
lorkac
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2297 Posts
June 16 2012 17:34 GMT
#85
On June 17 2012 02:27 TanKLoveR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:21 corumjhaelen wrote:
The subject of the thread is interesting and all, but I'd just like to state that the Viper's ability has nothing to do with Dark Swarm. In fact, it's pretty much disruption web which was on the corsair. If people could stop making that comparison I'd feel much better reading this.

It is very similar but not quite the same, remember the corsair ability would disable units inside of it AND structures like turrets/spores/sunken/bunkers etc so it was good to take care of static defence and forced people to move out of it if they could, which is just like the blind thing the viper has. But i dont think it affects buildings.


It really isn't similar to either dark swarm OR disruption web...
By the truth we are undone. Life is a dream. Tis waking that kills us. He who robs us of our dreams robs us of our life --Orlando: A Biography
castlewise
Profile Joined August 2010
31 Posts
June 16 2012 17:34 GMT
#86
On June 17 2012 02:13 R3DT1D3 wrote:
The BW units don't fit into the style of game SC2 is. The lurker for instance, would be incredibly hard to balance as a splash damage unit because there's very little squad tactics in SC2 compared to BW so splash hits the most of the army. Likewise goliaths would only really matter in TvT because of how SC2 air is balanced.

I'd love to see the game become more like BW but SC2 is just designed to take that kind of gameplay out of the equation.


Browder said something like this in his gamespot interview. Specifically he said that the old units from BW were really hard to balance because they *had* to have a certain look and feel to them. Psionic storm was the example he used but it applies to a lot of the BW units.

Off Topic, I find the whole pathing thing to be deliciously ironic. Pathing is kind of a challenging/computationally complex problem in general and RTS pathing where lots of little units all have to run around and get from point a to point b in an intelligent fashion is even tougher. Getting pathing from BW to where it is in SC2 must have taken a lot of work.
Azriel
Profile Joined December 2010
Mexico462 Posts
June 16 2012 17:40 GMT
#87
Pretty sure they took out the lurker because it ripped the tester's Terran balls to shreds. And thus its replacement the swarm host gets no AOE in order to remain balanced.

This game would be more interesting with automatic formation spreading or something similar.
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
June 16 2012 17:41 GMT
#88
On June 17 2012 02:40 Azriel wrote:
Pretty sure they took out the lurker because it ripped the tester's Terran balls to shreds. And thus its replacement the swarm host gets no AOE in order to remain balanced.

This game would be more interesting with automatic formation spreading or something similar.


That would make the game so much easier.
MMA: The true King of Wings
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
June 16 2012 17:41 GMT
#89
On June 17 2012 02:40 Azriel wrote:
Pretty sure they took out the lurker because it ripped the tester's Terran balls to shreds. And thus its replacement the swarm host gets no AOE in order to remain balanced.

This game would be more interesting with automatic formation spreading or something similar.


Or you could actually spread out your marines and units. It separates good players from great players. Same goes for the Baneling. They are negated by great micro and play. The same goes for the Lurker.
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
thurst0n
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States611 Posts
June 16 2012 17:42 GMT
#90
On June 17 2012 00:57 kafkaesque wrote:
Hey guys,

having had a look at the new units introduced in HotS, I'm really curious about one thing:

Why is Blizzard so reluctant to bring back some of the units from Brood War?

Take for instance the War Hound:

When first it was announced, it seemed to have an Anti-Air missile and operated very much like the Goliath. Back then I was kind of puzzled by how they did not just bring back the Goliath, with the awesome sound any animation of their Anti-Air rockets.

Also strange seems the Swarm Host.

People asked for the Lurker, people got the Lurker. Well, kind of.
A burrowed siege unit that can be used to break fortified positions?
Alright, but why give Zerg a unit that's so shockingly similar to the Brood Lord instead of the sleek, horrifying Lurker people love?

I am now die hard Broodwar fan, only having heard from it once SC2 was out, only having played ~50 games vs. the computer, only having a very vague idea about how units work.
So please don't crucify me if I got something wrong.

What do you think?

Probably mainly because this is SC2 not SC. If they wanted to make the same game with better graphics they could have easily done that. They wanted to make a new game, that's what they did.

I'm not too worried about it, BW will always be around, and people will always make BW units with the custom editor sooo..
P.S. I'm nub. If you'd like you can follow me @xthurst but its not worth it ill be honest
toiletCAT
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
Qatar284 Posts
June 16 2012 17:42 GMT
#91
On June 17 2012 02:40 Azriel wrote:
Pretty sure they took out the lurker because it ripped the tester's Terran balls to shreds. And thus its replacement the swarm host gets no AOE in order to remain balanced.

This game would be more interesting with automatic formation spreading or something similar.


Let's not turn the game into WarCraft 3 where everything is automated.
alone
Profile Joined September 2010
Poland410 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 17:47:54
June 16 2012 17:44 GMT
#92
On June 17 2012 02:34 castlewise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:13 R3DT1D3 wrote:
The BW units don't fit into the style of game SC2 is. The lurker for instance, would be incredibly hard to balance as a splash damage unit because there's very little squad tactics in SC2 compared to BW so splash hits the most of the army. Likewise goliaths would only really matter in TvT because of how SC2 air is balanced.

I'd love to see the game become more like BW but SC2 is just designed to take that kind of gameplay out of the equation.


Browder said something like this in his gamespot interview. Specifically he said that the old units from BW were really hard to balance because they *had* to have a certain look and feel to them. Psionic storm was the example he used but it applies to a lot of the BW units.

Off Topic, I find the whole pathing thing to be deliciously ironic. Pathing is kind of a challenging/computationally complex problem in general and RTS pathing where lots of little units all have to run around and get from point a to point b in an intelligent fashion is even tougher. Getting pathing from BW to where it is in SC2 must have taken a lot of work.


Remember that ur talking about the guys who keep on saying "the technologuy is not there yet" when otheres have that "technology"...so dont take mr Browder worlds too seriously.

About the whole "bring back BW units" i think its not that ppl want sc bw in 3d, its that new units we got are just...boring (roach, marauder, colosus, coruptor). If starcraft 2 introduced some other, more interesting ideas (not like it didnt introduce any) we wouldnt probably even talk about units that much and focus our complains on something else, like LAN (cuz we always have to complain).
CrazyF1r3f0x
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2120 Posts
June 16 2012 17:44 GMT
#93
Because they want to make the game their own creative beast; if they just copied Brood War, why even make a new game? And they are "taking hints" from Brood War, look at the Widow mine (spider mine), and look at the Swarm host--they may not be perfect at the moment, but they have huge potential to be awesome, to be new, and to breathe some life into the game. The Brood War units were cool, but why not give these new ones a chance? Why not take the risk to have something potentially awesome?

Even from the testing now, we are seeing more variety; you compared the swarm host to the brood lord--yet I remember beta testers saying that Hydralisks, with their speed upgrade (also from Brood War) were great in combination with these new units--the Brood Lord never did that; not to mention the Swarm host is available much earlier, allowing for many different types of pushes and aggression by Zerg. The Swarm Host gives Zerg a "cloaking threat" as well.

I could say stuff about the others, but I think you get my point, these units have potential; why not see how it plays out?
"Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the overcompensations for misery."
ixi.genocide
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States981 Posts
June 16 2012 17:46 GMT
#94
On June 17 2012 01:06 Solidarity wrote:
I mean, I loved Brood War, and I'm glad many of the units and mechanics of the game are in this one, but why are we clamoring for units that we've used time and again in a game released almost 15 years ago? I'm not interested in still using the Lurker or Goliath. It would just come off as laziness to bring back a bunch of old units.


You could say the same thing about the tank >.> or a bunch of other units.
decaf
Profile Joined October 2010
Austria1797 Posts
June 16 2012 17:50 GMT
#95
I don't want BW units, I want good units. If they end up being BW units I don't mind it, but keep in mind that SC2 is an extremely different game still, so adding the exact same units may not work out as well as making up new ones.
I do think though that blizzard's creativity is lacking a bit.
SaturnAttack
Profile Joined September 2010
United States125 Posts
June 16 2012 17:57 GMT
#96
On June 17 2012 02:41 SarcasmMonster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:40 Azriel wrote:
Pretty sure they took out the lurker because it ripped the tester's Terran balls to shreds. And thus its replacement the swarm host gets no AOE in order to remain balanced.

This game would be more interesting with automatic formation spreading or something similar.


That would make the game so much easier.


Having them clump less would extend the engagements instead of having everything melt in seconds. Prolonged engagements, more reliance on spacing, more focus on unit control to overcome size deficits are all noble goals.

Those are inherent engine problems though, and its difficult to imagine how to can overcome them no matter what units they put in.
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
June 16 2012 17:58 GMT
#97
On June 17 2012 01:22 Grobyc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 01:00 jalstar wrote:
It's lose-lose for Blizzard. If they bring back exact copies they get flamed for lacking creativity. If they add new units they get flamed because there was nothing wrong with BW units, so why change them?

This reply seems the most logical to me. Kind of a shame. I, personally, would be one of the people that would not mind BW units being brought back. The lack of creativity doesn't really bother me.

Its not you as much as it is the popular gaming media. If they were to do that, everyone in the BW forums of this site would have rejoiced most likely, but then what would be the point of the game? they could just play brood war instead, it would be like CS:source, a game that is literally the same as the original with some minor tweaks that failed hard because people didn't like the new system. The fact is that the new layout and design has brought many new fans, SC2 is much larger than BW ever was in the foreign field really, if it had just been the same game over again, there would be far fewer new fans, just the old crowd all over again.
User was warned for too many mimes.
L3gendary
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1470 Posts
June 16 2012 18:11 GMT
#98
On June 17 2012 02:42 thurst0n wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 00:57 kafkaesque wrote:
Hey guys,

having had a look at the new units introduced in HotS, I'm really curious about one thing:

Why is Blizzard so reluctant to bring back some of the units from Brood War?

Take for instance the War Hound:

When first it was announced, it seemed to have an Anti-Air missile and operated very much like the Goliath. Back then I was kind of puzzled by how they did not just bring back the Goliath, with the awesome sound any animation of their Anti-Air rockets.

Also strange seems the Swarm Host.

People asked for the Lurker, people got the Lurker. Well, kind of.
A burrowed siege unit that can be used to break fortified positions?
Alright, but why give Zerg a unit that's so shockingly similar to the Brood Lord instead of the sleek, horrifying Lurker people love?

I am now die hard Broodwar fan, only having heard from it once SC2 was out, only having played ~50 games vs. the computer, only having a very vague idea about how units work.
So please don't crucify me if I got something wrong.

What do you think?

Probably mainly because this is SC2 not SC. If they wanted to make the same game with better graphics they could have easily done that. They wanted to make a new game, that's what they did.

I'm not too worried about it, BW will always be around, and people will always make BW units with the custom editor sooo..


I think you, and a lot of people, are missing the point of this thread. OP is saying that blizz are reluctant to bring back the true bw units themselves despite many of the new units sharing a lot of their features and resemblances. Each of the new units borrows many things from a specific bw unit.

viper ->defiler
swarm host -> lurker
warhound -> goliath
battlehelion ->firebat
widow mine -> spider mine
oracle/mothership ->arbiter

The only exception is the tempest.

This is in contrast to blizzard's WoL units (that arent exact copies ofc like lings, marines etc), such as colo, roach, marauder, sentry, reaper, corrupter, raven, thor etc etc that don't share similarities to bw units. Only units from WoL that have a similar bw counter part are stalkers and broodlords, at least that i can think of.

The question is then, if you're are basically taken the same idea why not just make it the same as the original unit altogether?

Watching Jaedong play purifies my eyes. -Coach Ju Hoon
wcr.4fun
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium686 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 18:15:48
June 16 2012 18:13 GMT
#99
You should not have to fight an engine. an engine should be doing exactly what you say it to do. In broodwar you had the magic box which counted for everything basically. If you wanted your units to be spread, they would stay spread. If you wanted your units to clump up, you had to give them the order to clump up. Units doing what you want them to do, is too much asked from sc2, where your units ALWAYS clump up.

So you have to be active about spreading your units? You had to do that in brood war anyways.
You just spread your units and give a new move command? Too bad, we're clumped up again. In brood war however, they wouldn't clump up, unless you want them too. I guess this also has to do with the faster game pace, ridiculous aoe/firepower of collussus and with the fact that you can select your entire army in one control group. But I blame the lack of collision size/clumping up a lot more. And also the gliding physics (units being able to push others around) removes the ability to precisely control your army. And the lack of moving shot for mutalisks and other air units is so goddamn hateable. (also ground units).

/rant

edit: also if the speed of the fights get reduced and clumping up gets reduced (power of aoe), the better player with better micro is more likely to win because the longer a fight goes on, the more good decisions the more experienced player can make.
Veldril
Profile Joined August 2010
Thailand1817 Posts
June 16 2012 18:13 GMT
#100
On June 17 2012 02:40 Azriel wrote:
Pretty sure they took out the lurker because it ripped the tester's Terran balls to shreds. And thus its replacement the swarm host gets no AOE in order to remain balanced.

This game would be more interesting with automatic formation spreading or something similar.


If one of the things that tells great BW players apart from good is stacking, then in SC2 is the splitting the army manually.
Without love, we can't see anything. Without love, the truth can't be seen. - Umineko no Naku Koro Ni
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 41 42 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .274
Nathanias 134
BRAT_OK 111
ForJumy 110
ProTech76
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 553
ivOry 5
Dota 2
monkeys_forever35
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K3158
Fnx 1012
Foxcn438
oskar230
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu515
Other Games
FrodaN3229
Gorgc2805
qojqva936
Dendi696
C9.Mang0170
QueenE87
Trikslyr84
Sick45
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22114
• WagamamaTV706
Other Games
• imaqtpie1605
• Shiphtur378
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
14h 58m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
17h 58m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 13h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 17h
CSO Cup
1d 19h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 21h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.