| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Evangelist
1246 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:18 Lukeeze[zR] wrote: Because there is no mech unit that can go toe-to-toe with the Ultralisk. Ultras aren't immune to stun anymore, I heard. So the 250mm cannons will vapourise them if true. | ||
|
Prillan
Sweden350 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:11 SolidMoose wrote: 2 minutes on preordain sounds like a really freaking long time. Also I'm surprised no ones mentioned the fact that the energy recharge makes templar broken. 8 templar can throw down initial storms, and then have up to another SIXTEEN. And if they get emp'd before an engagement, they can recharge after the EMPs are wasted. Special Ability – Energize (25 Energy): At a range of ~8 the Mship Core recharges the energy of any unit/building at the rate of about 25 per second. If energy is spent during this recharge time the building/unit will still recharge to maximum energy (Basic Application: Mass Chronoboost). It's still to early too say "X is broken". Are you at Anaheim? Have you tried it? | ||
|
AdrianHealey
Belgium480 Posts
| ||
|
AdrianHealey
Belgium480 Posts
| ||
|
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:34 AdrianHealey wrote: On the other hand, that quote basically means that within 8 range, with very good micro, a high templar can do infinity storm. :D Except the moship can run out of energy. ^ and yes it can give energy to nexus. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
It's like a Protoss version of the Planetary Fortess rush :D | ||
|
AdrianHealey
Belgium480 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:35 ReketSomething wrote: Except the moship can run out of energy. ^ and yes it can give energy to nexus. Then you read it different than me. I read it as it says that: when you cast it, it will keep on loading the energy of a specific unit untill it reaches max energy. (So one time energy cost on mothership thingy. And it will keep loading energy untill max is satisfied.) However; if the other unit uses energy during that period, it will keep on charging it up. That would imply infinity chronoboost/storm, if well done. No? | ||
|
Garmer
1286 Posts
| ||
|
Sapphire.lux
Romania2620 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:38 AdrianHealey wrote: Then you read it different than me. I read it as it says that: when you cast it, it will keep on loading the energy of a specific unit untill it reaches max energy. (So one time energy cost on mothership thingy. And it will keep loading energy untill max is satisfied.) However; if the other unit uses energy during that period, it will keep on charging it up. That would imply infinity chronoboost/storm, if well done. No? The main weakness of Storm is the cooldown, you can rarely cast 2 storms with a fully charged high templar. Either because the high templar dies to random shots, or because there are no more units to storm because they're all dead. | ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10344 Posts
| ||
|
DarKcS
Australia1237 Posts
| ||
|
Garmer
1286 Posts
abduct is basically like Spawn Broodling that cost 75 energy with consume lol....overpowered | ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10344 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:49 DarKcS wrote: ^ Won't happen. Battle hellions are no faster than immortals. Stalker 6 range will 1 shot every hellion. But tanks outrange the immortals/stalkers. So it's not like the immortals/stalkers can just kite all the hellions, and even so it would take forever to kill them all. And it would take forever for stalkers to kill hellions too. Sure they could engage and back off again, but ideally they don't want to have to do that because of the tanks. On June 09 2012 18:57 Garmer wrote: the cool thing about battle-hellion is that, they cost still the same abduct is basically like Spawn Broodling that cost 75 energy with consume lol....overpowered Yea, 135 hp is a pretty good tank, especially since stalker/immortal don't do extra damage, and gives them some more lategame power instead of being the food-inefficient hellions they are now (in battles i mean, of course they're still useful for harassing and such). 75 energy only? o.o i feel like it should be like 100 or 125. And yeah I don't like consuming buildings too much, even if it makes your extractor/defense/hatch/tech easier to snipe/kill. I think it was more interesting consuming units like in BW. | ||
|
Appendix
Sweden979 Posts
| ||
|
BrassMonkey27
Canada616 Posts
| ||
|
WhurreOdu
Austria1739 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:17 Bommes wrote: The Warhound is really boring from a design perspective. It also has misplaced visuals and looks more like something from a japanese cartoon and less like something what would be part of the Starcraft universe. Please replace it. I know you have worked a lot on this, but I think very few people like it. I think this is one of the few points most people agree on. The Warhound looks more than ugly. | ||
|
BrosephBrostar
United States445 Posts
| ||
|
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
On June 09 2012 18:38 AdrianHealey wrote: Then you read it different than me. I read it as it says that: when you cast it, it will keep on loading the energy of a specific unit untill it reaches max energy. (So one time energy cost on mothership thingy. And it will keep loading energy untill max is satisfied.) However; if the other unit uses energy during that period, it will keep on charging it up. That would imply infinity chronoboost/storm, if well done. No? Interesting...what happens if you use a unit that can cast many many things at once. I have a feeling that this wont work but if it does it will probably be patched anyways. (to give the units full mana amount only) Will test  | ||
|
AdrianHealey
Belgium480 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Afreeca Starleague
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
OSC
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
PiGosaur Monday
Afreeca Starleague
Mini vs TBD
Soma vs sSak
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
