Hello, I decided to share my knowledge and wisdom of Terran strategy, this well be a video series of replays I play and other pros. I will give my analysis of what I am thinking from a Terran's POV. I would consider my strategy and decision making as one of the best around. This is similiar to the concept behind Day9 Dailies, except exclusively for Terran players and more to-the-point explanation of strategy.
I played chess throughout my youth, and achieved a 2200+ ELO at the age of 15 (Near Grandmaster Status) I then started playing Poker online with great success to make money. I now play SC2 at a High Master/Low GM level.
I don't have a problem with you advertising your show at all, but the fact you claim yourself to be "pro" is a miss statement, no matter how good you are or think you are.
On May 26 2012 09:53 Josh_rakoons wrote: I don't have a problem with you advertising your show at all, but the fact you claim yourself to be "pro" is a miss statement, no matter how good you are or think you are.
I kind of meant it as a general term for the terran games I will look at. Not all the replays i will look at will involve me, I would say 30% games of me playing and 70% of korean/euro pros.
I just watched game vs SlayerSRyung and first of all , you are not a pro Analysis Secound thing.. its looks like you watched this re many times before and you just KNOW What he is doing. Its not Analysis , its Analysis cheating for me This kind of Analysis gives no feedback to player... because when you play game , you dont know for sure what opponent wil do , you dont show this as oportunity.. " maby he drop there.." you tell " he gonna drop there for sure etc" this dont work in "real" game.
Pro = making money form someting Pro players are full time pro and make money form gamming , its not the same as semi pro , who make money time to time. Same is for Analysis like Artosis , Apollo , Day9 they are pro , because they are making money from that
On May 26 2012 10:03 pallad wrote: I just watched game vs SlayerSRyung and first of all , you are not a pro Analysis Secound thing.. its looks like you watched this re many times before and you just KNOW What he is doing. Its not Analysis , its Analysis cheating for me
I haven't watched it in a month so I had more of a 'fresh perspective', I made some standard predictions, i don't think I was being suspiciously psychic at all...
I don't see why you would blatantly lie about 2200 elo being 'close to grandmaster' when in reality it isn't even close, like, its the difference from diamond to Grandmaster in sc2
On May 26 2012 10:52 Simbaaaa wrote: I don't see why you would blatantly lie about 2200 elo being 'close to grandmaster' when in reality it isn't even close, like, its the difference from diamond to Grandmaster in sc2
Inconsequential errors do not need to be corrected, even if your comparison was accurate.
Talk about the actual content, it's good information.
Hello, I like when people are giving to the community and as such I respect your contribution.
But a friendly advice; when you are trying to establishing yourself within a specific community, you need to be extremely aware of your behavior & manners. Not only do you bad manner Ruyng in a foolish pointless manner, but you also try to squeeze in and support the idea of yourself as a "really good player" by setting up a scenario in which one factor is completely impossible - that of the hidden battle cruisers. If you are going to say that you are a really good player, you should have something far more valuable to back that up. In the context of that game, you describing how extremely good you are (and I'm sure you felt proud after beating Ruyng) is truly representative of arrogance, and that is never a good notion to be attached to when trying to establish a fan base.
On May 26 2012 13:10 Chrobbus wrote: Hello, I like when people are giving to the community and as such I respect your contribution.
But a friendly advice; when you are trying to establishing yourself within a specific community, you need to be extremely aware of your behavior & manners. Not only do you bad manner Ruyng in a foolish pointless manner, but you also try to squeeze in and support the idea of yourself as a "really good player" by setting up a scenario in which one factor is completely impossible - that of the hidden battle cruisers. If you are going to say that you are a really good player, you should have something far more valuable to back that up. In the context of that game, you describing how extremely good you are (and I'm sure you felt proud after beating Ruyng) is truly representative of arrogance, and that is never a good notion to be attached to when trying to establish a fan base.
Anyway, good luck in your endeavors.
I would have liked to say this buy I'd be adding unnecessary snide comments.
On May 26 2012 10:52 Simbaaaa wrote: I don't see why you would blatantly lie about 2200 elo being 'close to grandmaster' when in reality it isn't even close, like, its the difference from diamond to Grandmaster in sc2
Inconsequential errors do not need to be corrected, even if your comparison was accurate.
Talk about the actual content, it's good information.
Actually it says alot about your credibility. What now should we make of your claim of "High Master/Low GM level" at SC2?
If you plan on doing more of this content there's a few things that will hold you back.
I won't mention the other comments that people have left but your entire cast was just depressing, I honestly felt quite sad after maybe 10 minutes of watching because of how you sound, in audio broadcasts the only connection we have to you is how you translate your thoughts, attempt to be more up beat and positive and people will listen.
If you're going to put yourself out there you don't lead off with "Pro Terran Replay Analysis". First impression is everything when it comes to spending time watching and learning. There are so many resources out there for people to learn and you very well could be the best but your name wont get out there because of the way you conduct yourself. Some people love it but the vast majority of people dislike it.
You're obviously of a high skill level and able to compete with some top players but this is a whole new world you're going into were you're starting from the lowest point, take the criticism in this thread seriously but don't listen to straight up nay sayers.
Goodluck, Have fun. I hope everything works out for you.
On May 26 2012 10:52 Simbaaaa wrote: I don't see why you would blatantly lie about 2200 elo being 'close to grandmaster' when in reality it isn't even close, like, its the difference from diamond to Grandmaster in sc2
Considering 2400 is classified as grandmasters in the chess world and 2600 up is world class. 2200 is equivilate to national masters.
Might help if you do research before you decide to make yourself look like a complete tool.
Despite all of that, this was regarding "analysis" not any history of chess he may have.
EPT![[image loading]](http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/8210/newgate.png)
