EPT![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/KfKGu)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/MZJXC)
I'm posting for a friend these are the ss of his
mine works fine before and after update:\
edit:Notice how it says no profile but yet top left is his profile
Match Making Rating Tool - Page 43
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Protossprod
Australia5 Posts
I'm posting for a friend these are the ss of his mine works fine before and after update:\ edit:Notice how it says no profile but yet top left is his profile | ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On June 16 2012 00:54 Protossprod wrote: I'm posting for a friend these are the ss of his mine works fine before and after update:\ edit:Notice how it says no profile but yet top left is his profile fixed. reopen and install new patch | ||
|
Protossprod
Australia5 Posts
Edit: Fixed!!!! Great work with the tool its amazing  | ||
|
Scheme
United Kingdom210 Posts
| ||
|
Protossprod
Australia5 Posts
On June 16 2012 02:03 Scheme wrote: Will enabling the memory scanner risk me being banned? Its agianst TOS so possible | ||
|
Raven283
Netherlands18 Posts
"ERROR PRECHECK PLAYER: 0 Ladderpoints - No Data" in the log. It does say "OK Good Game!" at the end but none of them show up in the graph =/ | ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On June 16 2012 02:22 Raven283 wrote: I noticed that since v4.0 and later all my games have the "ERROR PRECHECK PLAYER: 0 Ladderpoints - No Data" in the log. It does say "OK Good Game!" at the end but none of them show up in the graph =/ 0 ladderpoints have more to do with new season start than 4.0  It say good game because he was able could collect data of your opponent. if someone have 0 ladderpoints after the game i can not tell how much he lost because its impossible to get - points. Yes possible, but i dont think so. the tos say:" you are not allowed to collect data over the client" this means all and nothing... However if they ban everyone who enable it, i better change my tl nickname But if they ban for reading the memory to get the nickname of your opponent to calculate your skill , this was the last blizzard game i buy... | ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
On June 16 2012 02:28 skeldark wrote: 0 ladderpoints have more to do with new season start than 4.0 It say good game because he was able could collect data of your opponent. if someone have 0 ladderpoints after the game i can not tell how much he lost because its impossible to get - points. Yes possible, but i dont think so. the tos say:" you are not allowed to collect data over the client" this means all and nothing... However if they ban everyone who enable it, i better change my tl nickname But if they ban for reading the memory to get the nickname of your opponent to calculate your skill , this was the last blizzard game i buy... To expand upon this: Blizzard isn't about to issue mass bans to everyone who uses a program to read from RAM. There's several useful programs that help streamers, and also this tool which helps players. It's in the TOS because it can be used to create various hacks for the game. Looking at Blizzard's current banning tread, they need hard proof that a player is cheating before issuing a ban to that player. | ||
|
Scheme
United Kingdom210 Posts
On June 16 2012 02:28 skeldark wrote: 0 ladderpoints have more to do with new season start than 4.0 It say good game because he was able could collect data of your opponent. if someone have 0 ladderpoints after the game i can not tell how much he lost because its impossible to get - points. Yes possible, but i dont think so. the tos say:" you are not allowed to collect data over the client" this means all and nothing... However if they ban everyone who enable it, i better change my tl nickname But if they ban for reading the memory to get the nickname of your opponent to calculate your skill , this was the last blizzard game i buy... On June 16 2012 02:42 InfCereal wrote: To expand upon this: Blizzard isn't about to issue mass bans to everyone who uses a program to read from RAM. There's several useful programs that help streamers, and also this tool which helps players. It's in the TOS because it can be used to create various hacks for the game. Looking at Blizzard's current banning tread, they need hard proof that a player is cheating before issuing a ban to that player. Thank you very much for the clarification. I will enable it as well. It makes sense what you guys said, blizzard has no reason to Ban people for using a program that would give them no unfair advantage during the game. Cheers. P.S.:Great Program by the way. I am and I know a lot of people are very thankful for it. | ||
|
snotboogie
Australia3550 Posts
| ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On June 16 2012 14:26 snotboogie wrote: Hi guys, what is E+ and E- in the display options? op post: theories for details. help - options -analyser for tldr | ||
|
andrewSC23
United States25 Posts
 | ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On June 16 2012 14:50 andrewSC23 wrote: I apologize if this has been answered, but does this work on Macs? I can get it to run in Windows, but when I go to the plugins page on sc2gears on Mac, it doesn't show the plugin, and I would prefer to continue to play SC on OS X if I can.. yes and no. It should show up as plugin. You have latest sc2gears version? the problem is the pretirgger and the memoryreader don't work on mac and this means that most games will have bad data. But he can still collect some games. | ||
|
andrewSC23
United States25 Posts
| ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On June 16 2012 15:12 andrewSC23 wrote: I updated sc2gears and loaded the folder in the plugins folder. When I go under the plugins manager, it isn't listed. you have the correct folders? Plugins\MMRPlugin\ MMR.jar ... anything under : help "view system messages"? will message the sc2gears create if he knows what it is. | ||
|
andrewSC23
United States25 Posts
| ||
|
Peleus
Australia420 Posts
On June 15 2012 19:09 skeldark wrote: which ratio? i have same screensize. its just no tool for fullscreen ^^ the problem is : the numbers are not for everyone so consisted. If you don't have it allways open or many bad games, it could look like this: 5 6 16 17 45. without skipping! Thats why i put the filter in, to watch only the last games. With this, would it be better / useful to actually number them as sequentially entered successful games? I.e. The second data point would be #2, even if it was the 7th game played. Considering the amount of 'bad data', games where MMR is not useful, sc2gears isn't open or simply playing on a different account I can't see the x-axis being very useful at the moment, ignoring the fact that after a certain period you can't read it at all due to '...'. I can't speak for everyone but I know I'd find it a lot more useful to be sequentially numbered 1, 2, 3... etc regardless of what game it actually was. This would also allow much nicer axis. P.s. I'm not suggesting any difference in the way the data is labelled internally, so you could still label a game via the current method for calculation purposes etc, purely for the display aspect of numbering down the bottom. Thanks again for all your work though | ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On June 16 2012 15:29 andrewSC23 wrote: I have it installed correctly. Like I said, I was able to get it working under my Windows 7 Partition. It shows up as intended. Not so much under OS X. There is nothing under the view system messages either. It simply does not seem to be recognized. will look into it On June 16 2012 16:41 Peleus wrote: With this, would it be better / useful to actually number them as sequentially entered successful games? I.e. The second data point would be #2, even if it was the 7th game played. Considering the amount of 'bad data', games where MMR is not useful, sc2gears isn't open or simply playing on a different account I can't see the x-axis being very useful at the moment, ignoring the fact that after a certain period you can't read it at all due to '...'. I can't speak for everyone but I know I'd find it a lot more useful to be sequentially numbered 1, 2, 3... etc regardless of what game it actually was. This would also allow much nicer axis. P.s. I'm not suggesting any difference in the way the data is labelled internally, so you could still label a game via the current method for calculation purposes etc, purely for the display aspect of numbering down the bottom. Thanks again for all your work though what is with the missing games? It very useful to know what games were played in a row and where a breaks. I dont use a numeric chart . I could label the missing games something else than numbers, but it must be unique. Also there is a problem with the opponent. Sometimes there is opponent data at a missing gamespot. There are many combinations of data i show at the moment. If i just numerate the displayed games. game nr 4 in garph A is not game nr 4 in graph B. This would be very confusing. I added the filter so you can see your last played games only if you have to much data. I know its not optimal but every solution have his problems. Sooner or later you will see ... anyways. I think about making the chart scrollable... | ||
|
Beren
United States514 Posts
| ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On June 16 2012 17:21 Beren wrote: Is there any way to have it count old ladder games from this season that were played while sc2gears was not running? No i can tell if two games are played in a row but not how much are missing. I could for masters because i know the win and loosecount but not for under master | ||
| ||
monitor running 1920x1080). 
