|
On February 28 2012 04:32 hunts wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:30 AysiktiriX wrote: Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days.
Your argument fails badly. Why? Because you can watch the VoDs on the same day and without any spoilers, if you are careful enough, because GSL has way less games/day than the marathon type MLG. I pay for GSL and even though I can watch the live stream, I prefer watching the "fresh" vods in the evening(skipping all the downtime too). Your argument fails badly too. MLG had VODs available within minutes of the games being played.
Try watching them spoiler-free within a day, please. Some people actually do work/study.
|
On February 28 2012 04:26 RinconH wrote: I'm all for experimentation and capitalism but I don't understand why I'd pay $20 for this when I can buy GSL for $15 which has way more content and superior production...
i dont get why people defend it anyways.
"OMG sc2 split in 3 parts we might pay 20-30$ more then usual! MADNESS FUCK BLIZZARD!"
"20$ for 2 days of other guys playing, BUY IT OR YOU HURT ESPORTS!"
well whatever. i will never pay that much for a stream and dont see a reason why i should. let them make evrything PPV who cares... there is more then enough other content and restreams whatever will also always exist.
watched about an hour of it(mostly just listening and playing dcss) and gotta say without a crowd of any kind i wasnt exactly impressed.
|
It doesn't even matter guys. The idea is that they need to be flexible. At the moment they are as rigid as they can get.
|
On February 28 2012 04:33 AysiktiriX wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:32 hunts wrote:On February 28 2012 04:30 AysiktiriX wrote: Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days.
Your argument fails badly. Why? Because you can watch the VoDs on the same day and without any spoilers, if you are careful enough, because GSL has way less games/day than the marathon type MLG. I pay for GSL and even though I can watch the live stream, I prefer watching the "fresh" vods in the evening(skipping all the downtime too). Your argument fails badly too. MLG had VODs available within minutes of the games being played. Try watching them spoiler-free within a day, please. Some people actually do work/study.
Thank you for implying that I don't work or go to school, it's a good way to argue. I do in fact go to college and work, and I happen to work on weekends when MLG happens. I actually have no problem watching MLG VODs of the games that I missed while at work when I come home from work, without getting spoiled.
|
On February 28 2012 04:27 ceaRshaf wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:24 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 04:18 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 04:15 Klondikebar wrote:On February 28 2012 04:09 Chenz wrote:On February 28 2012 04:04 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 03:56 Chenz wrote: I'll pay for MLG events (or rather, start paying again) the day that they start airing their finals one or two hours earlier. Isn't the amount of European viewers you would gain by doing that worth it, or is Europe such a small market? how early do you want them to start? They started at 10:30am local time after going pretty late the night before. You really want players starting early in the morning after playing late into the night? Don't show all games, start earlier on the Friday, start on Thursday or reduce downtime. It's not impossible, but I'm not saying it's feasible either. All I know is that it's quite hard to motivate yourself to spend $20 on an event and then being unable to watch the finals. Also, it might be possible to have the event go Thursday to Saturday, that would also make the events more EU friendly. Just for the record, MLG is an American tournament so their schedule is probably always going to be tailored for American audiences. This is true for every continent. Assembly wasn't exactly American friendly and GSL requires us to be nocturnal. Not trying to say "screw the Euros!" but just saying that tournament schedules are going to be tailored for a specific audience. Don't care when it starts but don't charge me the same as the target audience. Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days. GSL is not complaining about not making money so they might not care since they already are the best tournament. MLG is far from GLS so they shouldn't be in a position where they don't treat their clients with interest. Also GSL is not as rare as MLG so the live experience is a more important aspect that should cost more. If I am watching vods ( vods mind you, nor rebroadcast cause MLG doesn't do that) why should I pay the same as USA that felt the hype in the middle of the day?
IPL, GSL, NASTL and MLG are all losing money. MLG is just the only one publicly reaching out to the audience.
|
On February 28 2012 03:56 Chenz wrote: I'll pay for MLG events (or rather, start paying again) the day that they start airing their finals one or two hours earlier. Isn't the amount of European viewers you would gain by doing that worth it, or is Europe such a small market? Note that MLG has terrible strategy concerning non-English speaking countries in general. They did not have any possibility and support for non-English streamers like ever. Basically anyone who does not speak reasonable English, which is a LOT of SC2 players are not able to watch MLG at all even if they did have the money and were willing to spend it, that includes places like Korea, China, Russia,....
Normally I would say that it should not be hard to cooperate with some non-English casters and still have safe PPV, but considering the complete failure that their PPV web-design was with the whole "workaround" they have a lot of work to do before they can think about it.
|
LOL not surprised people found a workaround to get the streams. This is the same MLG that messed up with the Dr. Pepper promotion afterall. MLG has a long way to go if they really want to be successful.
|
On February 28 2012 04:11 Hrrrrm wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 03:11 Doodsmack wrote:On February 28 2012 03:09 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 03:05 00Visor wrote:On February 28 2012 03:00 Lunares wrote:On February 28 2012 02:55 ceaRshaf wrote: I can't wait to hear some numbers from MLG. I think this is a fail event tbh. According to this poll you had ~25% of people pay to watch. MLG was expecting (according to adam on SotG) about a 10-15% pay rate. So as long as these is even slightly representative of the broader population, MLG did what they wanted to do. Its totally not representative: - if you didnt watch you probably don't click this thread - there is another poll with 18% barcraft, so a big amount of the paying viewers shared the pass And even so, 25% out of what? The rumors have it somewhere around 30k viewers. That's 7.5k people paying 20$ (or 15$) so they gathered at most 150.000 $. That barely can cover the event. Sundance told us it was a success and as a result, two arenas will be held in the spring. I think that means it was a success. Can people please stop with this? You think Sundance is going to go on stream right before the Finals and say it was a complete failure or they didn't meet expectations? Fact is, a single Arena that also conflicted with Assembly doesn't really prove anything. They were always going to hold more Arena's no matter what because they need more data points to know if this is actually viable. The only way they weren't going to hold more Arena's is if they got a really small number of purchases and that wasn't going to be the case since there's easily 1k+ people that would blindly throw money at MLG anyways. You'll know if this is successful if you see it in 2013 and the price remains high(10$-15$). Once that new car smell wears off and people are having to pay more and more just to access some SC2 events will tell the true tale of this PPV model.
Love to hear the "There are some things Sundance could say that would benefit him, therefore Sundance will say those things" arguments. If the event wasn't a success, Sundance wouldn't need to go on air saying it was a failure. He just wouldn't make an announcement (not that hard to figure out bud). And no, they wouldn't plan additional future arenas if this one had proven it wouldn't be financially viable. You really think they took it as a guarantee that a $20 PPV event in a market saturated with free events would be a success? Um, no. This was a pilot run. If the first one failed, there's little chance that future ones would succeed.
You should at least try to come up with something more than assumptions before accusing someone of lying.
|
Pretty cute how lots of people scammed MLG and sits here bragging about it like internet heroes. If you dont support what they are doing don't watch it at all.
|
On February 28 2012 04:36 hunts wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:33 AysiktiriX wrote:On February 28 2012 04:32 hunts wrote:On February 28 2012 04:30 AysiktiriX wrote: Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days.
Your argument fails badly. Why? Because you can watch the VoDs on the same day and without any spoilers, if you are careful enough, because GSL has way less games/day than the marathon type MLG. I pay for GSL and even though I can watch the live stream, I prefer watching the "fresh" vods in the evening(skipping all the downtime too). Your argument fails badly too. MLG had VODs available within minutes of the games being played. Try watching them spoiler-free within a day, please. Some people actually do work/study. Thank you for implying that I don't work or go to school, it's a good way to argue. I do in fact go to college and work, and I happen to work on weekends when MLG happens. I actually have no problem watching MLG VODs of the games that I missed while at work when I come home from work, without getting spoiled. Point taken, sorry for getting offensive. Anyway, I meant that you can't compare a "weekend marathon" type of tournament like ASUS ROG/MLG to GSL. To me at least they are totally different.
|
On February 28 2012 02:58 Jack_ wrote: I went to MLG site and watched the stream for free. I didn't use any trick, i don't know how this was possible
A lot of people experienced the same thing and it's disappointing to see that the poll doesn't have this option.
|
United States1843 Posts
On February 28 2012 04:04 jmbthirteen wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 03:56 Chenz wrote: I'll pay for MLG events (or rather, start paying again) the day that they start airing their finals one or two hours earlier. Isn't the amount of European viewers you would gain by doing that worth it, or is Europe such a small market? how early do you want them to start? They started at 10:30am local time after going pretty late the night before. You really want players starting early in the morning after playing late into the night?
Logic would dictate that they would end earlier if they would want to start earlier... Which, as an east coaster, I wouldn't mind one bit.
|
On February 28 2012 04:44 AysiktiriX wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:36 hunts wrote:On February 28 2012 04:33 AysiktiriX wrote:On February 28 2012 04:32 hunts wrote:On February 28 2012 04:30 AysiktiriX wrote: Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days.
Your argument fails badly. Why? Because you can watch the VoDs on the same day and without any spoilers, if you are careful enough, because GSL has way less games/day than the marathon type MLG. I pay for GSL and even though I can watch the live stream, I prefer watching the "fresh" vods in the evening(skipping all the downtime too). Your argument fails badly too. MLG had VODs available within minutes of the games being played. Try watching them spoiler-free within a day, please. Some people actually do work/study. Thank you for implying that I don't work or go to school, it's a good way to argue. I do in fact go to college and work, and I happen to work on weekends when MLG happens. I actually have no problem watching MLG VODs of the games that I missed while at work when I come home from work, without getting spoiled. Point taken, sorry for getting offensive. Anyway, I meant that you can't compare a "weekend marathon" type of tournament like ASUS ROG/MLG to GSL. To me at least they are totally different.
I do kind of see your point I guess. With something like GSL you can watch VODs a few days later and not be spoiled if you avoid the 5 or so TL threads that will spoil it for you. With something like MLG by a few days later the tournament will be over and the winner declared.
|
On February 28 2012 04:37 Talack wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:27 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 04:24 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 04:18 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 04:15 Klondikebar wrote:On February 28 2012 04:09 Chenz wrote:On February 28 2012 04:04 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 03:56 Chenz wrote: I'll pay for MLG events (or rather, start paying again) the day that they start airing their finals one or two hours earlier. Isn't the amount of European viewers you would gain by doing that worth it, or is Europe such a small market? how early do you want them to start? They started at 10:30am local time after going pretty late the night before. You really want players starting early in the morning after playing late into the night? Don't show all games, start earlier on the Friday, start on Thursday or reduce downtime. It's not impossible, but I'm not saying it's feasible either. All I know is that it's quite hard to motivate yourself to spend $20 on an event and then being unable to watch the finals. Also, it might be possible to have the event go Thursday to Saturday, that would also make the events more EU friendly. Just for the record, MLG is an American tournament so their schedule is probably always going to be tailored for American audiences. This is true for every continent. Assembly wasn't exactly American friendly and GSL requires us to be nocturnal. Not trying to say "screw the Euros!" but just saying that tournament schedules are going to be tailored for a specific audience. Don't care when it starts but don't charge me the same as the target audience. Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days. GSL is not complaining about not making money so they might not care since they already are the best tournament. MLG is far from GLS so they shouldn't be in a position where they don't treat their clients with interest. Also GSL is not as rare as MLG so the live experience is a more important aspect that should cost more. If I am watching vods ( vods mind you, nor rebroadcast cause MLG doesn't do that) why should I pay the same as USA that felt the hype in the middle of the day? IPL, GSL, NASTL and MLG are all losing money. MLG is just the only one publicly reaching out to the audience.
Thoses are the facts... according to MLG... :S
|
I watched some stream from russia or poland. It was good quality
|
as the number says, having to pay for sc2 will wither the viewer numbers down. if they're willing to keep the minority of customers while disregarding the rest of viewers, even if they end up profiting more from 1000 subscribers vs 10000 ad viewers, over time the people willing to pay will not increase and it'll end up dead until they make it free again. i guess its a win-win for them, they can charge and make more money or make it free and still make money.
just saying, many sc2 fans weren't able to watch it, isn't viewership important? and wasn't mlg proud of "record breaking viewership" stuff? in my opinion, it seems 10,000 free viewers is more important than 100 paid viewers, not from business perspective but from someone who is observing and curious of how sc2 esports will turn out.
|
On February 28 2012 04:37 Talack wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:27 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 04:24 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 04:18 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 04:15 Klondikebar wrote:On February 28 2012 04:09 Chenz wrote:On February 28 2012 04:04 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 03:56 Chenz wrote: I'll pay for MLG events (or rather, start paying again) the day that they start airing their finals one or two hours earlier. Isn't the amount of European viewers you would gain by doing that worth it, or is Europe such a small market? how early do you want them to start? They started at 10:30am local time after going pretty late the night before. You really want players starting early in the morning after playing late into the night? Don't show all games, start earlier on the Friday, start on Thursday or reduce downtime. It's not impossible, but I'm not saying it's feasible either. All I know is that it's quite hard to motivate yourself to spend $20 on an event and then being unable to watch the finals. Also, it might be possible to have the event go Thursday to Saturday, that would also make the events more EU friendly. Just for the record, MLG is an American tournament so their schedule is probably always going to be tailored for American audiences. This is true for every continent. Assembly wasn't exactly American friendly and GSL requires us to be nocturnal. Not trying to say "screw the Euros!" but just saying that tournament schedules are going to be tailored for a specific audience. Don't care when it starts but don't charge me the same as the target audience. Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days. GSL is not complaining about not making money so they might not care since they already are the best tournament. MLG is far from GLS so they shouldn't be in a position where they don't treat their clients with interest. Also GSL is not as rare as MLG so the live experience is a more important aspect that should cost more. If I am watching vods ( vods mind you, nor rebroadcast cause MLG doesn't do that) why should I pay the same as USA that felt the hype in the middle of the day? IPL, GSL, NASTL and MLG are all losing money. MLG is just the only one publicly reaching out to the audience.
And you know because Mr.Bitter said so?
|
On February 28 2012 04:49 Merlimoo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 04:37 Talack wrote:On February 28 2012 04:27 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 04:24 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 04:18 ceaRshaf wrote:On February 28 2012 04:15 Klondikebar wrote:On February 28 2012 04:09 Chenz wrote:On February 28 2012 04:04 jmbthirteen wrote:On February 28 2012 03:56 Chenz wrote: I'll pay for MLG events (or rather, start paying again) the day that they start airing their finals one or two hours earlier. Isn't the amount of European viewers you would gain by doing that worth it, or is Europe such a small market? how early do you want them to start? They started at 10:30am local time after going pretty late the night before. You really want players starting early in the morning after playing late into the night? Don't show all games, start earlier on the Friday, start on Thursday or reduce downtime. It's not impossible, but I'm not saying it's feasible either. All I know is that it's quite hard to motivate yourself to spend $20 on an event and then being unable to watch the finals. Also, it might be possible to have the event go Thursday to Saturday, that would also make the events more EU friendly. Just for the record, MLG is an American tournament so their schedule is probably always going to be tailored for American audiences. This is true for every continent. Assembly wasn't exactly American friendly and GSL requires us to be nocturnal. Not trying to say "screw the Euros!" but just saying that tournament schedules are going to be tailored for a specific audience. Don't care when it starts but don't charge me the same as the target audience. Well then I don't want to pay the same thing for GSL. It starts at 1 a.m for me and is over by 6 a.m. on long days. GSL is not complaining about not making money so they might not care since they already are the best tournament. MLG is far from GLS so they shouldn't be in a position where they don't treat their clients with interest. Also GSL is not as rare as MLG so the live experience is a more important aspect that should cost more. If I am watching vods ( vods mind you, nor rebroadcast cause MLG doesn't do that) why should I pay the same as USA that felt the hype in the middle of the day? IPL, GSL, NASTL and MLG are all losing money. MLG is just the only one publicly reaching out to the audience. Thoses are the facts... according to MLG... :S
NASL is most definitely losing money. Without doubt.
They had enough funding to do three seasons and therefore they're doing them. but if you look at who sponsors them, the quality of their production and the number of people who bought their HD passes / paid to come to the venue they cannot be making money to cover the prize pool, let alone hire venues and pay casters... How many casters did the NASL Season 2 final have? Day9, Wheat, Rotti, Bitter, Husky, orb, gretorp, thegunrun and diggity... 9 casters and 16 players?
IPL is also clearly losing money. Hosting a 20k online tournament which is watched (at peak!) by 20k people (for something like EG/Liquid) and around 10k all other times while only making money from chucking ads up... As others have said, total loss leader for IGN
MLG has honestly admitted they are losing money and I think they definitely are from their championship events, why on earth they decided to pick up Halo for another year is beyond me, that thing is dead and buried. However from this event I honestly do think they've made money. I would conservatively estimate at least 10,000 people paid. So that's $200k in with expenditures being the $26k prize pool, paying the casters, setting their office up to host the event (not renting a venue!) and finally player transport and accommodation costs. I would also expect they got a bit of extra cash from sponsorships, NOS performance station this, NOS analysis centre that.
I do not think GSL is losing money, given the number of people that pay, the size of the prize pool and their relatively low costs along with additional income from being on TV in Korea.
Although not mentioned here I am unsure on IEM / Assembly / DreamHack... as all three have a LAN side attached I guess this heavily subsidizes the cost.
I think it is important to have a foreign based tournament that is sustainable and the model for MLG Arenas seems exactly that. If they were to lower the price a bit and tighten up loopholes so people have to actually pay to watch then I see a bright future for Arena events, especially if they manage to get a location outside of NY and get spectators in.
|
I paid 20 bux but i kinda regret it. I watched sunday at a barcraft and watched friday and saturday at home, but honestly next time il just watch the sunday at a barcraft again.. 20 bux for the games was not worth it.. especially if you can watch it for free 3 days later.. or whatever they said they were releasing the vods out.
All this talk about hurting esports is rediculious. The market will move naturally if everyone is just honest about their feelings. If you dont want to pay then dont pay, if you find it worth it then pay. The market will adapt to whatever happends. If MLG stops doing tournaments then another tournamanet will find value in whatever people decide to pay. Dont force it and dont complain. Do what you feel is right.
|
I really wanted to watch MLG winter, but i will never pay to see a streamed tournament or something like that! i watched team arena instead :p
|
|
|
|