It is not fair then.Why would I buy a ticket when there are hundreds of free tournaments with same players in there.
You cant expect people to waste their money to watch some pros a only 2 year old not perfectly balanced RTS game.
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Criticism is allowed. Undue flaming is not. Take a second to think your post through before you submit. Bans will be handed out. Should go without saying, but don't link restreams here either. | ||
Silentenigma
Turkey2037 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:28 krisss wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2012 12:27 Silentenigma wrote: Is there a low quality free stream aswell? no It is not fair then.Why would I buy a ticket when there are hundreds of free tournaments with same players in there. You cant expect people to waste their money to watch some pros a only 2 year old not perfectly balanced RTS game. | ||
canikizu
4860 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:03 iky43210 wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2012 11:50 Jibba wrote: On February 14 2012 11:38 iky43210 wrote: This is simply not true. 5-10 years is a short term outlook. All of the recent housing bubbles happened within that timeframe.On February 14 2012 11:35 Jibba wrote: On February 14 2012 11:31 iky43210 wrote: Youtube lost money because streaming videos is extremely expensive. It's incomparable to Facebook and Google because they don't do that. The streaming services are reliant on their investors right now.On February 14 2012 11:23 Jibba wrote: On February 14 2012 11:12 dsousa wrote: You know who survives on ads.... Google, Facebook, Zynga, Yahoo, 500 television channels, Football, basketball, baseball, tennis, and every other SC2 tournament out there. So don't cry that the ad model is broken.... maybe your cost structure is broken! Youtube lost billions of dollars for years and has only relatively recently begun to make money for Google. Most football, basketball and baseball teams are losing money, which is why they have revenue sharing from the giants. Television is dying with advertising, media is dying with advertising. And the actual truth is that SC2 is dying with advertising. People have been fed a vision of mainstream ESPORTS for too long, and they don't realize people are just taking loss leaders on a hope that's never going to happen. Even the giants in BW have been falling for years. It's a bubble and a niche, and there will never be a viewership that can sustain an advertising based/free system. Never. Alot of what you said isn't true. Youtube isn't losing money because of its ad based model, but rather its poor business management and plan. TV and Media isn't dying because of advertisement. Its the decline of viewership that is killing them, ever heard of internet? Also I don't think you understand what "bubble" means. Are you trying to claim that 10+ years of BW competitive gaming is just a "bubble"? I guess google must just be a bubble too then The viewership model IS the advertising model. SC2 has yet to break 100,000 unique viewers, and somehow an advertising/viewership model is sustainable here? Yes, it is a bubble. MBC is dead and the OSL/PL have been losing viewership for 5 years now. You can't have 10 years of bubble, that is just a plain silly claim. Secondly, sc2 have broken 100k unique viewers multiple times already, I'm surprised you don't know about it. Particularly MLG and GSL, and perhaps there are some more that I have missed. No, they massaged bad statistics about how many streams were opened (usually because the stream crashed), that never featured unique viewers. GSL may have broken that many, though.Lastly youtube losing money IS because of poor business management. If viewership model is not sustainable, would you like to clarify WHY youtube is profitting now? Because they have finally capitalize and changed their ad model, starts to show preload ads and banner instead of nothing We don't know what Youtube did in 2011. They didn't run a profit in 2010. They did begin running a lot more live events and partnerships last year so we'll see but even without a profit, it ties into Google's overall system. And that's with economies of scale to its advantage.I agree with everyone who says MLG should curve costs by not having more audience-less NYC live events, but I don't agree that the current system is working for everyone else, or anyone at all. Maybe MLG could incorporate a much larger, open LAN system like Dreamhack, but it probably won't work so well in NA. You don't understand what bubble means, I suggest you stop using it. A bubble would imply a sudden crash such as in prices. Nobody knows whether something is in bubble or not until after retrospect. In BW case, the viewership, gamer salaries and competitive gaming tournament, sponsorship and nearly everything with it in general has been in a steady rise, stabilized, and decline throughout its 10 year period. Its laughable how you're still trying to quantify that as bubble He mistakes bubble for cycle. Every business model or everything will have a cycle. There's virtually no stable business model whatsoever. New business model will rise together with new technology and everything. Old business model which was created to adapt to old technology and era will die out, that's normal thing. Youtube can't make money before because it didn't have a clue what it was supposed to do, how to generate revenue, as in some interviews said when Google just bought Youtube and literally brought debt to Google. The same thing shortly happened to Facebook, and Twitter, they couldn't figure out how to make money from their content, and had to rely on private investors. TV model is dead, not because of the ad revenue model is dying, but because internet streaming is taking off, and how do people make money from internet streaming? Ad revenue. But the beautiful thing of ads on internet is they cater to your hobbies, your choice, so that the ads are less annoying (kinda). That's simply the new business model adapting to new technology. But I agree on one thing, although I hate it too, but BW was running on a bubble. The scene was subsidized by the government, government paid for it. The competitive scene revolves around 8 professional teams(?) and branches. There were not enough tournaments to go around, there're not enough money for every professional beside salary. I'm not saying that it doesn't work, but it's clearly risky. One country can only support 1 unique industry for so long, without interacting globally, it's like playing dollhouse, the kid is gonna get tired one day. | ||
Whatson
United States5356 Posts
I guess I'm not very into ESports then. I have other FAR more important priorities in life besides SC2. Besides, it's not like SC2 is the only ESport out there. And at the end of the day, as Kennigit once told me, it is still a video game. | ||
Irave
United States9965 Posts
Neither you nor the operator of any website where your Production(s) may be viewed can force a viewer to pay a "fee" to be able to view your Production(s). We understand that many third party websites have a "free" method to see their video content, as well as a 'premium' membership service that allows for speedier viewing. For clarity, please note that as long as the website that hosts your Production provides a free method to allow viewers to see the Production, Blizzard Entertainment will not object to your Production being hosted on that site, regardless of the site's "for pay" premium service plans. | ||
Chronicler
6 Posts
As for people saying "just go to one less movie per month, or don't eat out, or don't drink, or don't (this, or that)" aren't seeing the whole picture. Throwing aside the "I don't have $20 to spend" (and that is $20 for one arena, if you want HD streams for all of MLG's events this year, you are looking at $140 for Arenas and $30 for a Gold Membership, meaning you will spend $170 this year on HD MLG streams). When you start charging (or charging more) for what used to be free (or cheap), you lose viewers. For personal examples: I went to more movies when they were $5-$7/movie, now that they are at least $10, I don't go to as many. I used to buy more movies before they started being $30. Now I'm happy to wait 28 days for Redbox/Netflix. | ||
Papulatus
United States669 Posts
| ||
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
I don't buy a product to "support" a specific cause, I don't buy a bad album to "support my favourite band", I'll buy their album when it's damn good, that's all there is to it. When MLG is better than GSL, I'll buy it instead. That should be enough, there's no need for all this explaining about how hard your economic life is, who cares except yourself. | ||
Carbonthief
United States289 Posts
| ||
agile_legs
Philippines348 Posts
However, I disagree with the pricing. I don't know what kind of study they did in order to come up with $20, but they should know that a majority of the SC2 fanbase are teenagers --- students who don't earn much and are scrimping cash for a whole lot of other things. It might be better if they will price it first at $5 - $10, see how the market responds, and then adjust the price accordingly. Sure, you will only get about 50% less money per person, but the volume will make up for it Given that, I will not pay for this and will focus more on Assembly. I'll just follow the live reports and forums for 4-5 star matches :D Just my 2 cents | ||
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
IamPryda
United States1186 Posts
| ||
![]()
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:30 CEPEHDREI wrote: am i gettin this right? There will be 4 streams covering all the games? So maybe i have to decide between 4 matches played at the same time with (sry beta casters but i dont like watching u guys) beta casters? I dont like that. If i pay 20$ then give me one game after another with premium casters. I agree with this too. Two would be better, but I don't think 4 adds to the game experience. Regardless of the caster, it's too much to follow. Now, if the extra 2 streams are purely non-game content streams, then that could work, but you could probably save that content for the downtime too. | ||
bluQ
Germany1724 Posts
| ||
Silentenigma
Turkey2037 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:30 gladsheim wrote: Not sure if people are cheap or are just poor, but spending $20 for a whole weekends worth of non-stop entertainment is pretty much a bargin. So i personally don't see what the problem here is. Do you want e-sports to grow at all? Sports don't grow unless viewers pay, whether it be attending or watching it from home on your tv with foxtel (or whatever American/European pay-tv is called). It is not when there are similar quality tournaments absolutely free. | ||
Lupita
United States290 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:30 gladsheim wrote: Not sure if people are cheap or are just poor, but spending $20 for a whole weekends worth of non-stop entertainment is pretty much a bargin. So i personally don't see what the problem here is. Do you want e-sports to grow at all? Sports don't grow unless viewers pay, whether it be attending or watching it from home on your tv with foxtel (or whatever American/European pay-tv is called). On the topic of growth, good luck on getting people who are new to watching sc2 online / new to the game to spend 20$ on an event. I'm confused as to how you think this promotes growth. This promotes more money for MLG, nothing more. | ||
boxturtle
United States224 Posts
| ||
ulan-bat
China403 Posts
And the Dr Pepper MLG Ultimate Access Stream (more info on this soon) will be free to all, without an Arena pass, all weekend long. The Dr Pepper MLG Ultimate Access Stream? .... what? Anyway, any info on this free stream? | ||
Chytilova
United States790 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:27 hp.Shell wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2012 12:26 Chytilova wrote: On February 14 2012 12:00 Jojo131 wrote: On February 14 2012 11:56 nvs. wrote: On February 14 2012 11:46 Plansix wrote: On February 14 2012 11:42 jarf1337 wrote: It's $20 to support the best tournament in NA. It's $20 to pay for the flights and accomodations of 32 progamers. It's $20 for a weekend of fun in my own home. It's $20 to prove Esports is not a joke! It's $20 well spent. Exactly. This is when we separate the people who love E-sports from the others. Sundance has provided a preview of the service and I bet we will see more in the weeks coming. If anyone can sell a $20 tournament, it is Sundance. Having $20.00 of disposable income is what separates people who love e-sports from others? ok. I can't imagine that 20$ is a monumental sum of money for people playing a 60$ game that requires an internet service on a PC that can run it. It's not like they're taking your money every weekend, how often do MLGs come around? I totally get it that there are people struggling financially wherever they are around the world, but my gut is telling me that a lot of the people complaining are probably not these people... could be just me though. $20 dollars adds up and if you make 20 grand a year or so, like me at the moment, you have to make tough decisions everyday. I need to save money for future, I have to pay for the necessities and I have other things I like to do. Every month I must decide what I can and can't do. I can't watch MLG for the entire weekend (and personally don't want to) so paying 20 dollars for parts I would want to watch probably isn't going to be worth it. I would do it for 10 dollars, but 20 dollars right now is a little steep. I can imagine a lot of people in my situation who make between 15 to 40 grand a year and depending on bills (I keep mine as low as possible) 20 dollars is a lot for them. It's not monumental, but you have to prioritize or you end up literally broke. 20k is a lot, I live on about 10k Completely depends where you live. In the middle of nowhere 20k is a ton of money, but I don't live in the middle of nowhere. | ||
sewergoat
United States97 Posts
| ||
![]()
ZeromuS
Canada13379 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:32 Irave wrote: Since this thread is still moving pretty fast, anyone have insight on what the Blizzard rules will do to this PPV? Show nested quote + Neither you nor the operator of any website where your Production(s) may be viewed can force a viewer to pay a "fee" to be able to view your Production(s). We understand that many third party websites have a "free" method to see their video content, as well as a 'premium' membership service that allows for speedier viewing. For clarity, please note that as long as the website that hosts your Production provides a free method to allow viewers to see the Production, Blizzard Entertainment will not object to your Production being hosted on that site, regardless of the site's "for pay" premium service plans. since the vods are free a week in advance the "production" is not entirely behind a pay wall. Furthermore, by paying the PPV the person who pays has "speedier" viewing and those that dont see the prodcution one week later. So as far as I know its allowed. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Stormgate Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g7415 Grubby4390 FrodaN2011 shahzam930 Day[9].tv762 Liquid`Hasu180 Maynarde147 ViBE70 JuggernautJason38 Trikslyr10 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH161 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya ![]() • musti20045 ![]() • davetesta32 • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • Laughngamez YouTube • AfreecaTV YouTube • LaughNgamezSOOP • intothetv ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs TriGGeR
Cure vs SHIN
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] SOOP Global
ByuN vs Zoun
Rogue vs Bunny
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|