EPTIt would be stupid to remove that
In HOTS, low pylons no longer power high ground - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
It would be stupid to remove that | ||
|
Brotocol
243 Posts
On October 24 2011 19:08 CatNzHat wrote: OMG huuuuuge freaking boost to TvP..... stupid 4gate + voidray builds are far too powerful against 1 rax CC builds, even with 4 or 5 barracks of marines, protoss almost always ends up ahead after warping 4 zealots onto the high ground, and you can't ever kill the pylon due to low ground stalker support. So you want a risk-free fast expand? | ||
|
TheSwamp
United States1497 Posts
| ||
|
ondik
Czech Republic2908 Posts
On October 24 2011 18:50 dezi wrote: Awesome change - no more XNC Proxy Gates with Pylon on low ground, no more Warps on top of opponents ramp, No more DTs Warps without a Prism (Prisma kinda buffed due to this change). I like this change  Nice logic lol | ||
|
IIIOmegaIII
Sweden319 Posts
| ||
|
Terant
Malta60 Posts
| ||
|
Evilmystic
Russian Federation266 Posts
| ||
|
die.terran
United States18 Posts
| ||
|
Striding Strider
United Kingdom787 Posts
Why don't they just realise having warp gates so early is bad game design. Make it a later tech and buff gateway units to compensate. | ||
|
Tazerenix
Australia340 Posts
This removes basically all 1 base aggression against terran, stargate would have absolutely 0 viability against terran, absolutely zero. Hallucination pushes against protoss, terran and zerg and all now useless, and 5gates against zerg are seriously nerfed. It also makes any sort of blink rush significantly worse, and hinders protoss late game harass capabilities. As also stated it stops making buildings on high ground (which a lot of people do on the 4th on Tal'Darim, the gold on Antiga and the 3rd on XNC. This better not go through or I, and a lot of other protoss players will not be happy campers. | ||
|
ProxyKnoxy
United Kingdom2576 Posts
| ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
4G+VR weren't too common in PvT anyway. There are a lot more reliable and solid timings to beat a Terran FE (MC's Stalker Sentry for example). The expansion isn't risk free at all. | ||
Teoita
Italy12248 Posts
| ||
|
itchyrear
United States13 Posts
| ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
| ||
|
Tofugrinder
Austria899 Posts
| ||
|
Brotocol
243 Posts
On October 24 2011 19:13 Talin wrote: 4G+VR weren't too common in PvT anyway. There are a lot more reliable and solid timings to beat a Terran FE (MC's Stalker Sentry for example). The expansion isn't risk free at all. I was addressing his complaint that a 1base play with Stargate is "too strong" against his fast expand. Maybe he should scout better? I didn't say it became risk free after this nerf. But the poster clearly wishes it was risk free. | ||
|
Tazerenix
Australia340 Posts
On October 24 2011 19:13 Talin wrote: 4G+VR weren't too common in PvT anyway. There are a lot more reliable and solid timings to beat a Terran FE (MC's Stalker Sentry for example). The expansion isn't risk free at all. Actually 3g and 4g VR is very common in PvT. I do it all the time against marauder expands and wall off 1-1-1's, its going to be very bad after hots though. | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
| ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
| ||
