In HOTS, low pylons no longer power high ground - Page 52
Forum Index > SC2 General |
VPCursed
1044 Posts
| ||
0neder
United States3733 Posts
| ||
Chriscras
Korea (South)2812 Posts
On August 10 2012 07:25 VPCursed wrote: god forbid warp-in gets a tiny nerf. Warpgates already got a tiny nerf, their build time was increased over a year ago. | ||
GinDo
3327 Posts
On June 22 2012 08:49 ChristianS wrote: No one uses DT's with a warp prism. That would "reek of ignorance." link: Squirtle vs. Thorzain Guess Squirtle also "reeks of ignorance." Okay. Them being "separate builds" is besides the point. Of course they're separate builds. One of them hits faster and doesn't use a warp prism. If that one is removed because it can't warp to the high-ground, that leaves the slower one that uses a warp prism. So instead of using the first build with high-ground warp-in, they're forced to use the second one (or they walk the DTs up the ramp, which is often less effective against Terran. Or they could stop going DTs entirely.). Sorry for "wasting your time" by forcing you to go on a discussion board and discuss. It's really awful how you had no choice in the matter. The only issue that DT's face as an opening is the fact that it's such a large resource and time investment to then Tech to Storm. You pretty much have to rely on Archons and Chargelots, that although good, get countered by alot of MMM. Really the Chargelots only becomes a really good unit in TvP once exchanges occur and Terran loses the critical mass of MM. I wish Blizzard would add to the DT Tech and stop concentrating so much on Stargate. | ||
jackalope1234
122 Posts
| ||
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
| ||
Jakkerr
Netherlands2549 Posts
On August 10 2012 07:31 Xiphos wrote: I just love how the entire SC2 metagames relies on its parent company instead of letting the players evolve their own strategy and other invent a counter to it and so forth. It's gonna be like that until the last SC2 expansion releases. | ||
HyyeRforAiuR
United States20 Posts
Sincerely, A crushed Protoss | ||
Doubting
Canada981 Posts
| ||
thurst0n
United States611 Posts
To all those saying pylon radius should be increased, you are wrong. It was originally too big. You have to think logically about where you put them, plan ahead etc. Obviously harder now. | ||
| ||