EPTNew HotS Units/Abilities in Blizzcon - Page 156
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Math.random();
433 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12248 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:25 Ares[Effort] wrote: The new maps are absolutely retarded Is it me or the second one is actually slag pits 2.0? | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:28 JiYan wrote: so disappointing...instead of adding 1-2 solid units which they shouldve done, theyre adding 3 seemingly gimmicky units and taking out the epic ones. the zerg units seem to overlap too much with the infestor / brood lord. Can you define "gimmicky" and "epic" to me, thanks. | ||
|
SpikeStarcraft
Germany2095 Posts
this viper pulling massive units just seems ridiculous. all of the new units are imba! except the terran ones. they are kinda lame | ||
|
Zoraque
Canada120 Posts
| ||
|
Kanuck
Canada50 Posts
seriously, those terran units are disgustingly ugly. Also, i had to laugh in the preview whent eh mutas got hit with 3 "major aoe" attacks, and not one died, no did we see health bars lol | ||
|
Bodhi
United States180 Posts
| ||
|
Erik.TheRed
United States1655 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + turn it into TvT | ||
|
GenesisX
Canada4267 Posts
| ||
|
dezi
Germany1536 Posts
Erm NO? Map 1 Looks like you can shell the main (CC/...) from the 3rd with Tanks - also a possible 4th is really far away (even taking a 3rd is kinda dumb if you opponent is CW of you. Map 2 If there's close spawn (i think there'll be) - one base play. Map 3 This one indeed looks kinda good. | ||
|
YandereQT
United Kingdom7 Posts
| ||
|
Pipeline
Sweden1673 Posts
| ||
|
Veritask
260 Posts
| ||
|
vaporizor
United States53 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:27 clever_us wrote: If you're going to remove the thor, REMOVE THE THOR. Don't just make it into another "one only" unit "a la mothership" and then take it out when Legacy of the Void comes out because it was a dumb gimmicky idea massive thor is gonna pwn | ||
|
Treble557
United States221 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:29 Math.random(); wrote: Hydra speed <3 Is that the ONLY change made to them? | ||
|
Bibdy
United States3481 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:29 syllogism wrote: Can you define "gimmicky" and "epic" to me, thanks. Gimmicky usually means a unit that doesn't do damage, or only does damage in very specific ways (e.g. the Terran Whirlwindy thing that only does damage if YOU come to IT). | ||
|
PuroStrife
Korea (North)199 Posts
Yeah, gg. | ||
|
oRacLeGosu
Norway151 Posts
 ..but alot of the units look maby a little too specialized to serve a real purpouse, when you most of the time just need to get more stuff to win.Let's hope i'm sead wrong! Hope it's no C&C hijacking og SC2 either. I like the burrowed siege-lurker kinda unit. Containment for all races should be possible midgame like in bw with tank, reaver and lurker. | ||
|
wildstyle1337
Poland514 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:27 VegaNZ wrote: It's unbelievable how many people are whinging about things they've never used or seen in any action. You people will moan about anything!!! As a Protoss player I'm really excited by the Tempest, seems much more viable as a unit than the Carrier... 2 of them to counter a muta flock - curious about the ground weapon though, is it similar to a void ray? Also the replicant offers so many possible options, really interested to see how that plays out Grats to the Zerg! Some awesome sounding units there. I'm so excited about HoTS. Up until today it really wasn't on my rader, but we're essentially getting a whole new SC2 experience! And in a few years, people will refer to "Vanilla" SC2 in horror I'm sure. Thanks Blizzard for continuing to develop this wonderful game counter mutas ? it costs 300/300 need stargate/fleetbacon, you will build this only in late game, zerg dont build mass muta in late game to many changes for me, remember bw changes no removed units just added 2 for each race | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tS6uGh.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/y7K4ah.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/UtGqVh.jpg)
