• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:12
CEST 06:12
KST 13:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles5[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 618 users

a really specific Ninja ZvP nerf (1.4.0 PTR) - Page 8

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 20 Next All
InstantKarma
Profile Joined November 2010
United States205 Posts
September 12 2011 17:44 GMT
#141
To those of you justifying this change with -

"This is a bug fix. Banelings shouldn't be able to drop if there is no landing zone."

No! Just fucking no. That's a terrible reason to remove a strategy path.
Banelings drops were a unique zerg strategy that made the game more dynamic. This "bug" fix only makes the game more one-dimensional. With changes such as these we will end up just a-moving one giant ball of units at each other.
crms
Profile Joined February 2010
United States11933 Posts
September 12 2011 17:44 GMT
#142
On September 13 2011 02:19 Chill wrote:
Crazy. These changes are getting more and more absurd. It seems we should just go to 200/200 and a move into each other.


im so glad to see a highly respected member of the community speak out about these changes.

while i won't speak for you, the direction these changes are taking (for all races) are just simply dumbing down gameplay and reducing traditional RTS tennants such as engagement decisions, positioning, micro etc. The way they are headed with SC2 is fearful to me and I'm not usually an alarmist.

http://i.imgur.com/fAUOr2c.png | Fighting games are great
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-12 17:45:02
September 12 2011 17:44 GMT
#143
On September 13 2011 02:43 Alejandrisha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:41 DoomsVille wrote:
To be fair, why should banelings need ground space to drop? Logically, the banelings are just dropping on top of units and exploding. Not the same as a unit landing on the ground and than attacking.

And I'm talking from a purely practical perspective. Not a gameplay or SC2 perspective. If you drop a bomb on top of someone, you don't need it to hit the ground first lol


Their attack is exploding. They are not bombs. They are units. Just because something is called a bomb in a game (by spectators, not designers, mind you) because it looks like something in the real world doesn't mean that it has to take the form of that specific thing. How do you know what it was intended to be or look like?


Balance/Bug Fixes aside, the entire concept of a baneling having to have to have space to land is completely retarded in and of itself.
boretusmax
Profile Joined August 2011
Finland75 Posts
September 12 2011 17:45 GMT
#144
I have never understand why forcefields can push units back or you can put them on top of units fix that next then blizz. sounds about as logical as this change.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
September 12 2011 17:45 GMT
#145
On September 13 2011 02:42 ohampatu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:40 Blazinghand wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:38 ohampatu wrote:
Sorry blazing. Somehow quote got messed up, logged me out.


Do this test:

Make a square of 8 gw's.
Try and use Terran dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Protoss dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Zerg dropshiops on top of the gw.

Only the zerg's will work. This is not fair.


I'm fairly sure that the problem with baneling drops isn't bane drops being used to attack Gateways, but rather, its interaction with protoss deathball.



You misunderstand. The test above proves that Zerg drops aren't following the same 'rules' that Terran and Protoss's are. I dont care how long its been being used. If i can't duplicate the same drop pattern you can do on a different race, its bugged. Get off your high horse. Too many zerg have been doing ez drops on us thinking is ok, and its not. Also, this is ptr. They are prolly working on the code to perfect it how they want.

They dont care 'how youve been playing for months'.


Specifically, it's baneling drops. In theory, as zerg, you could NP a probe, make a nexus, pylon, gateway, cyber core, robo, then warp prism, and use warp prisms to drop banelings in the same way. Baneling dictates this behavior, not overlord.

In any case, it seems like this was a somewhat balanced mechanic that might have needed a nerf, and got over-nerfed, or something. You make a good point in that it's PTR: they might have made a mistake in the adjustment and will fix this going forwards. I hope that threads like this help spread the word about it.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Probe1
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States17920 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-12 19:59:24
September 12 2011 17:45 GMT
#146
I guess it was just a false alarm then.
우정호 KT_VIOLET 1988 - 2012 While we are postponing, life speeds by
ohampatu
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1448 Posts
September 12 2011 17:45 GMT
#147
On September 13 2011 02:44 InstantKarma wrote:
To those of you justifying this change with -

"This is a bug fix. Banelings shouldn't be able to drop if there is no landing zone."

No! Just fucking no. That's a terrible reason to remove a strategy path.
Banelings drops were a unique zerg strategy that made the game more dynamic. This "bug" fix only makes the game more one-dimensional. With changes such as these we will end up just a-moving one giant ball of units at each other.



I repeat:


You misunderstand. The test above proves that Zerg drops aren't following the same 'rules' that Terran and Protoss's are. I dont care how long its been being used. If i can't duplicate the same drop pattern you can do on a different race, its bugged. Get off your high horse. Too many zerg have been doing ez drops on us thinking is ok, and its not. Also, this is ptr. They are prolly working on the code to perfect it how they want.

They dont care 'how youve been playing for months'.
I am become death, for I am the destroyer of worlds.....You will be missed KT Violet!!!
Logros
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands9913 Posts
September 12 2011 17:45 GMT
#148
Why do people keep posting like baneling drops aren't possible anymore? Multiple people have tried it out on PTR and it's still fine.
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-12 17:48:01
September 12 2011 17:45 GMT
#149
On September 13 2011 02:42 ohampatu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:40 Blazinghand wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:38 ohampatu wrote:
Sorry blazing. Somehow quote got messed up, logged me out.


Do this test:

Make a square of 8 gw's.
Try and use Terran dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Protoss dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Zerg dropshiops on top of the gw.

Only the zerg's will work. This is not fair.


I'm fairly sure that the problem with baneling drops isn't bane drops being used to attack Gateways, but rather, its interaction with protoss deathball.



You misunderstand. The test above proves that Zerg drops aren't following the same 'rules' that Terran and Protoss's are. I dont care how long its been being used. If i can't duplicate the same drop pattern you can do on a different race, its bugged. Get off your high horse. Too many zerg have been doing ez drops on us thinking is ok, and its not. Also, this is ptr. They are prolly working on the code to perfect it how they want.

They dont care 'how youve been playing for months'.


Sorry but you're completely brain dead. Sc2 isn't a game where races are equivalent when considering an isolated facet of that race. One race can have better X and this is balanced by the other race having better Y. Equilibrium is reached and it matters not if X is not possessed by the opposite race, ONLY THAT EQUILIBRIUM EXISTS AND THAT THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RACES ARE CONDUCIVE TO BETTER GAMEPLAY. Use your brain god damn.

Zerg hatcheries can't be upgraded to have a massive cannon on top that does splash and can be repair. Do you want this nerfed because there's not equality in this one aspect among races? of course not.. Jesus.
hugman
Profile Joined June 2009
Sweden4644 Posts
September 12 2011 17:46 GMT
#150
On September 13 2011 02:42 ohampatu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:40 Blazinghand wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:38 ohampatu wrote:
Sorry blazing. Somehow quote got messed up, logged me out.


Do this test:

Make a square of 8 gw's.
Try and use Terran dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Protoss dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Zerg dropshiops on top of the gw.

Only the zerg's will work. This is not fair.


I'm fairly sure that the problem with baneling drops isn't bane drops being used to attack Gateways, but rather, its interaction with protoss deathball.



You misunderstand. The test above proves that Zerg drops aren't following the same 'rules' that Terran and Protoss's are. I dont care how long its been being used. If i can't duplicate the same drop pattern you can do on a different race, its bugged. Get off your high horse. Too many zerg have been doing ez drops on us thinking is ok, and its not. Also, this is ptr. They are prolly working on the code to perfect it how they want.

They dont care 'how youve been playing for months'.


It's a different unit.
Different rules for different units.

Besides, balance > all. Removing baneling drops is a huge balance change that's not warranted.
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
September 12 2011 17:46 GMT
#151
On September 13 2011 02:45 Logros wrote:
Why do people keep posting like baneling drops aren't possible anymore? Multiple people have tried it out on PTR and it's still fine.


I've read this whole thread and remember 1 person, and this was disputed.

Do you have quotations of other people testing this?
Alejandrisha
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States6565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-12 17:46:46
September 12 2011 17:46 GMT
#152
On September 13 2011 02:44 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:43 Alejandrisha wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:41 DoomsVille wrote:
To be fair, why should banelings need ground space to drop? Logically, the banelings are just dropping on top of units and exploding. Not the same as a unit landing on the ground and than attacking.

And I'm talking from a purely practical perspective. Not a gameplay or SC2 perspective. If you drop a bomb on top of someone, you don't need it to hit the ground first lol


Their attack is exploding. They are not bombs. They are units. Just because something is called a bomb in a game (by spectators, not designers, mind you) because it looks like something in the real world doesn't mean that it has to take the form of that specific thing. How do you know what it was intended to be or look like?


Balance/Bug Fixes aside, the entire concept of a baneling having to have to have space to land is completely retarded in and of itself.


Why? Is it not a moving unit that occupies space? Where are my exception units that are allowed to bend the rules of the game (and physics for that matter...)
get rich or die mining
TL+ Member
pksens
Profile Joined July 2010
United Kingdom156 Posts
September 12 2011 17:47 GMT
#153
On September 13 2011 02:46 arbitrageur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:45 Logros wrote:
Why do people keep posting like baneling drops aren't possible anymore? Multiple people have tried it out on PTR and it's still fine.


I've read this whole thread and remember 1 person, and this was disputed.

Do you have quotations of other people testing this?

Just read every single post of his, he's talking non stop rubbish throughout the thread. If only there was an "ignore poster" feature...
Alejandrisha
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States6565 Posts
September 12 2011 17:48 GMT
#154
On September 13 2011 02:45 arbitrageur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:42 ohampatu wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:40 Blazinghand wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:38 ohampatu wrote:
Sorry blazing. Somehow quote got messed up, logged me out.


Do this test:

Make a square of 8 gw's.
Try and use Terran dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Protoss dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Zerg dropshiops on top of the gw.

Only the zerg's will work. This is not fair.


I'm fairly sure that the problem with baneling drops isn't bane drops being used to attack Gateways, but rather, its interaction with protoss deathball.



You misunderstand. The test above proves that Zerg drops aren't following the same 'rules' that Terran and Protoss's are. I dont care how long its been being used. If i can't duplicate the same drop pattern you can do on a different race, its bugged. Get off your high horse. Too many zerg have been doing ez drops on us thinking is ok, and its not. Also, this is ptr. They are prolly working on the code to perfect it how they want.

They dont care 'how youve been playing for months'.


Sorry but you're completely brain dead. Sc2 isn't a game where races are equivalent when considering an isolated facet of that race. One race can have better X and this is balanced by the other race having better Y. Equilibrium is reached and it matters not if X is not possessed by the opposite race, ONLY THAT EQUILIBRIUM EXISTS AND THAT THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RACES ARE CONDUCIVE TO BETTER GAMEPLAY. Use your brain god damn.


Similarly, the game is balanced because while terran is not the strongest race, it is certainly the most "robust."

head splodes
get rich or die mining
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 12 2011 17:48 GMT
#155
On September 13 2011 02:42 See.Blue wrote:
I love the rage when people cannot even replicate the video... In fact are able to do drops just fine on PTR.


Well everyone is assuming that the bug fix made it so banelings no longer damaged protoss units. Really, it just says you can't drop where there is no space to land. I don't think it will come up that much, unless the overlord is hovering over a colossi and 12 stalkers that just blinked.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TolEranceNA
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada434 Posts
September 12 2011 17:48 GMT
#156
On September 13 2011 02:45 ohampatu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:44 InstantKarma wrote:
To those of you justifying this change with -

"This is a bug fix. Banelings shouldn't be able to drop if there is no landing zone."

No! Just fucking no. That's a terrible reason to remove a strategy path.
Banelings drops were a unique zerg strategy that made the game more dynamic. This "bug" fix only makes the game more one-dimensional. With changes such as these we will end up just a-moving one giant ball of units at each other.



I repeat:


You misunderstand. The test above proves that Zerg drops aren't following the same 'rules' that Terran and Protoss's are. I dont care how long its been being used. If i can't duplicate the same drop pattern you can do on a different race, its bugged. Get off your high horse. Too many zerg have been doing ez drops on us thinking is ok, and its not. Also, this is ptr. They are prolly working on the code to perfect it how they want.

They dont care 'how youve been playing for months'.


Get off YOUR high horse first plz.

If every race is the same, then we will have zerg mules, protoss marines, terran overlords. Please go play Red Alert 2/3 if you want every race to be almost identical. And for argument sake,"Oh terran can get mules(miner) for free, we should too!"
Arotsis:"Nestea, what do you think about Zerg?" Nestea:"...Sad."
NotSorry
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States6722 Posts
September 12 2011 17:49 GMT
#157
So many crying while having absolutely no clue about what's happening. No wonder the BW crowd hate sc2.
We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. - Orwell
Logros
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands9913 Posts
September 12 2011 17:49 GMT
#158
On September 13 2011 02:46 arbitrageur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:45 Logros wrote:
Why do people keep posting like baneling drops aren't possible anymore? Multiple people have tried it out on PTR and it's still fine.


I've read this whole thread and remember 1 person, and this was disputed.

Do you have quotations of other people testing this?

On September 13 2011 02:22 NotSorry wrote:
Have done this countless times on PTR in real game scenarios and it still works just the same, just have to get vision with first ovie and then issue the commands. The video posted is pointless because never in a game will you see shit that perfectly clumped to allow no spacing so stop the crying.



On September 13 2011 02:37 EmilA wrote:
I went on the EU PTR and I was unable to replicate the bug in the OP - drop command went through when I had vision without any problems whatsoever

[image loading]

Edit: This was with the zealots all put to follow on the center zealot


and what he said:

On September 13 2011 02:33 NotSorry wrote:
Unless the protoss is constantly clicking move to a center point the units will be spread more than enough to not effect baneling drops. Stop crying before you even test it, the video is invalid because you're never going to see 60zealots standing in a perfect square not moving at all, and if you do then laugh as you 1a them with roaches then proceed to bane-rain uninterrupted the second he moves a step with any of them.


You are not gonna have an entire army standing still doing nothing in a real game. There are gonna be gaps in the army unless you keep spamming move so you can still baneling drop.
ohampatu
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1448 Posts
September 12 2011 17:49 GMT
#159
On September 13 2011 02:45 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:42 ohampatu wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:40 Blazinghand wrote:
On September 13 2011 02:38 ohampatu wrote:
Sorry blazing. Somehow quote got messed up, logged me out.


Do this test:

Make a square of 8 gw's.
Try and use Terran dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Protoss dropships on top of the gw.
Try and use Zerg dropshiops on top of the gw.

Only the zerg's will work. This is not fair.


I'm fairly sure that the problem with baneling drops isn't bane drops being used to attack Gateways, but rather, its interaction with protoss deathball.



You misunderstand. The test above proves that Zerg drops aren't following the same 'rules' that Terran and Protoss's are. I dont care how long its been being used. If i can't duplicate the same drop pattern you can do on a different race, its bugged. Get off your high horse. Too many zerg have been doing ez drops on us thinking is ok, and its not. Also, this is ptr. They are prolly working on the code to perfect it how they want.

They dont care 'how youve been playing for months'.


Specifically, it's baneling drops. In theory, as zerg, you could NP a probe, make a nexus, pylon, gateway, cyber core, robo, then warp prism, and use warp prisms to drop banelings in the same way. Baneling dictates this behavior, not overlord.

In any case, it seems like this was a somewhat balanced mechanic that might have needed a nerf, and got over-nerfed, or something. You make a good point in that it's PTR: they might have made a mistake in the adjustment and will fix this going forwards. I hope that threads like this help spread the word about it.



As a toss player, i dont mind if they can drop on my army actually. LOL, i was just proving it is indeed a bug fix.

Ideally, i think they should keep it in, and mebe tweak code untill its working as intended. Something like, 'banes can drop when 'this much' space is open'. So like, if theres even just a small amount, banes will still work. That way it still prevents other units from abusing this. Cuzz currently you can abuse this mechanic with different units as zerg.
I am become death, for I am the destroyer of worlds.....You will be missed KT Violet!!!
FrodaN
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
754 Posts
September 12 2011 17:49 GMT
#160
So...Blizzard meant to put in an intelligent nerf, but instead broke it to make baneling drops useless. I just hope they don't treat this like the phoenix bugs...
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 20 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#39
PiGStarcraft479
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft479
WinterStarcraft373
Nina 201
RuFF_SC2 119
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 203
Sharp 61
Icarus 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever679
League of Legends
JimRising 835
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox538
Other Games
summit1g6571
shahzam890
ViBE199
Maynarde170
Trikslyr44
CosmosSc2 21
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick43838
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH298
• Hupsaiya 53
• practicex 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1913
• masondota2398
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
5h 48m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
11h 48m
WardiTV European League
11h 48m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
19h 48m
RSL Revival
1d 5h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 19h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.