Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 602

On July 26 2013 21:08 Ammanas wrote:
What do you guys think would happen, balance wise, if next patch would contain this:

-Worker (SCV, Drone, Probe) supply cost now 0.5 down from 1.

On July 26 2013 21:08 Ammanas wrote:
What do you guys think would happen, balance wise, if next patch would contain this:

-Worker (SCV, Drone, Probe) supply cost now 0.5 down from 1.

On July 26 2013 21:08 Ammanas wrote:
What do you guys think would happen, balance wise, if next patch would contain this:

-Worker (SCV, Drone, Probe) supply cost now 0.5 down from 1.

On July 26 2013 21:41 GreenGringo wrote:
Three pages of this thread devoted to discussing whether Terran is the most vulnerable race with respect to production facilities being harassed. Because presumably taking down 8 tech add-ons with zealots or zerglings is easier than marauders sniping a spire or a templar archives.

You know the Terrans are clutching at straws when they resort to arguments like these.

On July 26 2013 22:23 Pirfiktshon wrote:
I will say after last night me playing TvZ 3 games against Low masters and completely destroying them with 2 base widow mine play into 4 base Raven MMMM I have to start siding with zergs . Widow mines are giving me the option to Punish 3 base play to the point where 90% of the time I can win the game on micro alone with 2 bases right there and then..... IMHO Zerg should be able to hold 2 base play with a 10 min push with 3 bases with good defense but even with defense it seems like i steam roll them regardless .

Here is my proposal that mines stay the same but the production can only happen with a techlab as oppose to being able to make 2 at a time.... the production speed of widow mines seems to play a HUGE roll in this attack seeing how I can pretty much without let up attack zerg and drop his main and push creep all at the same time giving me at the very least a game winning advantage in the late game.... I honestly don't see how a zerg can beat this strategy So i'd like to put it up to someone who is Masters / GM that has played against this strat as zerg and won and how they did so.....

On July 26 2013 22:25 TheDwf wrote:

If your Zerg opponents are dying to simple 2-bases timings they're 100% doing something terribly wrong.

On July 26 2013 18:43 MTAC wrote:
Imo. Buff roaches, and buff tanks could lead to much more cool things in TvZ. CC first into 3CC double ebay should be a reactionnary play, or a really greedy one. Not the go-to. A few roaches in a Z comp is already good. (Different speeds give natural spread against splash), and more roaches/less lings give more unit attacking at a time. And btw, if the T is spread, even 10 Marines/marauders don't kill a lonely roach before the mine is launched.

For toss, everything that could be shield-bases and therefore harrassement-bases could be great and diversify toss play/techpaths (mix of GWsky comp, better stalkers etc...).

On July 26 2013 22:31 Pirfiktshon wrote:
So Dwf what do you think they do wrong? Or have you beaten this strategy playing zerg? If so describe how.....

On July 26 2013 22:39 ETisME wrote:

didn't stephano fall against Mvp to his 2 base marauder hellbat?
Ryung used to do the same build without going all in and had tonnes of damage done as well (GSTL)

On July 26 2013 21:43 Big J wrote:

could you please let stupid arguments die instead of fielding more stupid arguments against them. just for once...