vVv Academy Re Launches - Page 16

On August 15 2011 00:50 rei wrote:
What I would like to see from an academy is

1) reward based on effort, not lan results. The reasoning behind this that your recruit managers have the responsibility to spot talents, and your coaching staff will be responsible to raise this talents, if they have done their job, the players with talents and effort will eventually yield results on lan. and if the players don't get the expected results, the one should take responsibility lies on the managers and coaches.

2)a challenge system that internally ranks your recruits, if a recruit places last they get remove after a week, this way you keep your recruit managers busy. In the same time this will result in competitiveness between recruits and pressure on them to preform internally. The idea is that if you don't get better faster than your peers you will be removed.

So you reward your top internal ranked players with traveling expenses, to lan to see if they yield results, if they don't then blame it on the coaches and your recruit managers. they obviously either failed at assessing the talents or didn't provide a solid coaching curriculum. Because it can't be the player's fault if your player have been playing 8 hours a day 7 days a week and ranked on top of your internal ranking. At that point you look for new coaches and new recruitment managers.

On August 15 2011 01:01 LordJerith wrote:


1)How do you quantify effort? Hours logged? Just wanting some clarification on how this would work.
2)Yes, we would have something like that, but monthly not weekly.
3)I do like the idea of holding the managers responsible, and we will use that. Great suggestion.

On August 15 2011 01:18 celious wrote:
I would like to know more about how the monthly placement tournament is going to be structured. Is it going to be a single bracket? What if I'm having an off day and lose to a lesser player first round, does that mean I'm out of academy until the next month?