|
On August 08 2011 23:39 Belha wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2011 23:16 eourcs wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On August 08 2011 22:58 Belha wrote:
The huge amount of trolls/noobs talking crap about protoss in this threads is absurd, annoying, almost insulting ( protoss less skilled by nature, less hard workers, less explored, and so, WTF). Numbers are REAL living proof of the results among races match ups. The shit talk about "protoss players are less skilled" is pure bullshit without a single argument to support it.
I'LL love if players that make such judgements write a list with arguments to support their words.
I have my arguments to support my opinion about the numbers (REAL PROOF) we are seeing for about a year:
1) Terran is the best race (wanna call it "complete"? Ok... "complete", and with Palpatine voice please). Why? Simple: Is the most rewarding for flawless multi task skill, best harassing punisher race, best eco macro mechanic, most efficient all-ins, most efficient micro mechanics, AND (very important too) the least punished race per mistake. Terrans gonna hate me, yes, but PLEASE CHECK THE ENTIRE YEAR NUMBERS.
2) Average pro P player is skilled as average pro T or Z player. The problem is that P is the race that punish most the player per mistake. Bad micro (or luck) with your scouting probes aganist the faster lings in PvZ? Time to play blind till you commit to a tech investment (EVEN HUK suffer this, and is one of the top P's, he get busted a lot by a trillion of lings placing his expo, just because he plays blind). Under average ff's? Dead (again, even pros suffer this, A LOT). Not above average unit spread in PvT? You re dead aganist ghosts. Not microed your templars when the ai tends to pack it together with your army? Emp won. I can keep throwing examples of how many times the P player have to outmicro the opponent, AND if he does not, hes dead.
Please guys. Arguments, please. Let's keep the debate nicely.
You can make these stupid "most punished per mistake" arguments with every race. 1) Not paying attention for 5 seconds? All your marines dies to fungal/banelings 2)Get caught unsieged? Everything dies 3)Get unlucky? All your marines die to burrowed banelings 4)Miss an emp? Your entire army is stormed to death 5)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? All your infestors get feedbacked/emped 6)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? Everything gets forcefielded and you lose 3/4 of your army 7)Not looking at your mutas for a fraction of a second? All of them die to thors/marines/stalkers/templar So, your mistakes list is "not looking", "unluck", "pay atention"...OMG, that is your conception of skill? Go post somewhere else please, or much better, think before post, elaborate before typing. Do not lower the level of the debate.
You list the same caliber of mistakes, so I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to argue here. You can't just say "here are numbers" then list your own arbitrary examples, which may be so disconnected from said numbers as to cause aneurysms in your readership. You have no claim to authenticity, so don't pursue that line of argument, you only have a claim to possibility. Also, ending every post with "let's have a high-end debate" in a condescending manners is basically red flagging your own posts as being void of debatable material, and that is compounded on its own repeat.
Also, "elaborate before typing." Just, hilarity in a sentence, all I can say. So vague, yet so direct.
Why are terrans doing well? It's been a year, numbers are looking more and more in favor of an imbalance argument, but we still don't have enough to tell us if this is a strategy/player ability imbalance or if this is a set racial issue that cannot be overcome through play. However, listing arbitrary examples is not "keep the debate nicely," as you might say.
|
On August 08 2011 22:04 naggerNZ wrote:
Personally, I think it's less due to imbalance, but the fact that there are a lot more skilled Zergs and Terrans than there are Protosses.
If I was to put it down to anything, I would argue that Protoss' mechanics don't encourage the same game sense and knowledge as Zerg's and Terran's.
Your point is easily rebutted by the fact that you're implying that the Terran and Zerg race have more potential as the skill level gets higher. That is a more subtle way to of stating that there is a lack of balance in the game.
|
Wellllll TvZ is the penultimate matchup in SC sequel or original... Protoss will find their niche sooner or later.
|
On August 08 2011 22:04 naggerNZ wrote:
Personally, I think it's less due to imbalance, but the fact that there are a lot more skilled Zergs and Terrans than there are Protosses.
If I was to put it down to anything, I would argue that Protoss' mechanics don't encourage the same game sense and knowledge as Zerg's and Terran's.
Yeah bro. Protoss players are mindless idiots and whenever they win it is because Protoss is OP. And when they lose it it is because Zergs and Terrans are just sick gosu pros and professional gamers playing Protoss don't have game sense or knowledge.
Yup. That makes a lot of sense.
|
On August 08 2011 23:39 Belha wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2011 23:16 eourcs wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On August 08 2011 22:58 Belha wrote:
The huge amount of trolls/noobs talking crap about protoss in this threads is absurd, annoying, almost insulting ( protoss less skilled by nature, less hard workers, less explored, and so, WTF). Numbers are REAL living proof of the results among races match ups. The shit talk about "protoss players are less skilled" is pure bullshit without a single argument to support it.
I'LL love if players that make such judgements write a list with arguments to support their words.
I have my arguments to support my opinion about the numbers (REAL PROOF) we are seeing for about a year:
1) Terran is the best race (wanna call it "complete"? Ok... "complete", and with Palpatine voice please). Why? Simple: Is the most rewarding for flawless multi task skill, best harassing punisher race, best eco macro mechanic, most efficient all-ins, most efficient micro mechanics, AND (very important too) the least punished race per mistake. Terrans gonna hate me, yes, but PLEASE CHECK THE ENTIRE YEAR NUMBERS.
2) Average pro P player is skilled as average pro T or Z player. The problem is that P is the race that punish most the player per mistake. Bad micro (or luck) with your scouting probes aganist the faster lings in PvZ? Time to play blind till you commit to a tech investment (EVEN HUK suffer this, and is one of the top P's, he get busted a lot by a trillion of lings placing his expo, just because he plays blind). Under average ff's? Dead (again, even pros suffer this, A LOT). Not above average unit spread in PvT? You re dead aganist ghosts. Not microed your templars when the ai tends to pack it together with your army? Emp won. I can keep throwing examples of how many times the P player have to outmicro the opponent, AND if he does not, hes dead.
Please guys. Arguments, please. Let's keep the debate nicely.
You can make these stupid "most punished per mistake" arguments with every race. 1) Not paying attention for 5 seconds? All your marines dies to fungal/banelings 2)Get caught unsieged? Everything dies 3)Get unlucky? All your marines die to burrowed banelings 4)Miss an emp? Your entire army is stormed to death 5)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? All your infestors get feedbacked/emped 6)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? Everything gets forcefielded and you lose 3/4 of your army 7)Not looking at your mutas for a fraction of a second? All of them die to thors/marines/stalkers/templar So, your mistakes list is "not looking", "unluck", "pay atention"...OMG, that is your conception of skill? Go post somewhere else please, or much better, think before post, elaborate before typing. Do not lower the level of the debate.
You're extemely condescending for absolutely no reason. Your "bad/unlucky micro" instances consists of missing forcefields and not spreading your units. Having good forcefields is one the most essential things that a protoss needs to do, so you should be punished heavily if you fail to do that, just like terrans are punished heavily if they don't split their marines or a zerg is punished heavily for bad muta/infestor/baneling control. As for the spread thing, guess what, terrans have to do the same exact thing, and i don't see terrans complaining that they need to spread their marines while focusing banes/infestors with tanks in TvZ. In any case, you should always spread your units in any situation just to get a better concave. Again, my arguments are on the same level as you and are very similar, except not biased towards protoss, and yet you think you have this "moral highground" in this argument for no reason. As you said "Do not lower the level of the debate." with your condescending attitude.
|
[B]On August 08 2011 23:16 eourcs wrote:[/B
You can make these stupid "most punished per mistake" arguments with every race.
1) Not paying attention for 5 seconds? All your marines dies to fungal/banelings
2)Get caught unsieged? Everything dies
3)Get unlucky? All your marines die to burrowed banelings
4)Miss an emp? Your entire army is stormed to death
5)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? All your infestors get feedbacked/emped
6)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? Everything gets forcefielded and you lose 3/4 of your army
7)Not looking at your mutas for a fraction of a second? All of them die to thors/marines/stalkers/templar
All of your mistakes imply that the player failed. However, many of your mistakes are not THAT punishing to the terran player.
For example, getting caught unsieged, you will lose tanks. That is YOUR mistake. You siege them up, stim your marines forward, and you can still salvage the battle at a relatively even trade, or hurt them enough so that while you got put behind, they cannot finish the game.
The best example is talking about EMP and Storm. What I mean by this is the level of punishment that you get for making a mistake.
If you miss an EMP, the following happens:
- Your marines basically die
- Marauders and Tanks are hurt but are still dishing out punishing damage
- You will have an opportunity with other ghosts for additional EMPs that prevent further storms
If your Templars get EMP'ed because the game wants them to clump up, the following happens:
- Your entire army dies.
In both cases, a mistake occurs. The terran player is still dealing massive damage with tanks and mauraders, AND has an opportunity to correct his mistake with additional EMP's. He may still lose the battle, but he has hurt the attacking player enough such that he has bought himself some time to defend/rebuild/comeback.
The protoss player, just dies immediately and might as well GG out.
|
On August 08 2011 22:04 naggerNZ wrote:
Personally, I think it's less due to imbalance, but the fact that there are a lot more skilled Zergs and Terrans than there are Protosses.
If I was to put it down to anything, I would argue that Protoss' mechanics don't encourage the same game sense and knowledge as Zerg's and Terran's.
loooooooooooooooooooool
the only problem I have with the whole ghost vs HT deal is 1 emp does the deed of infinite feed backs in small numbers.. the protoss has to get off every feed back before the terran player gets 1-2 emps. Not to mention EMP doesn't need to be researched and there is no longer an amulet upgrade.. Also that feedback is single target and actually requires scouting to spot location + number of ghosts.. not to mention ghosts can cloak and your only way to see them is a 40 hp unit that gets 2 shot by ghosts meanwhile ht's are always visible and move at a STAGGERING 1.86 MS....
Yeah that's all
|
This was not meant to be a balance thread, but more to do with the metagame and the players. I would like to say that the warp-in mechanic has issues, where a Protoss needs to independently rally each of his units, and can only issue a move command to units warping in.
To add to this, you cannot warp in from the minimap, which poses a problem solely to Protoss users wishing to rebuild unit counts during micro-intensive situations. I would like to see some treatment there, and no balance changes.
I made this thread because I do not buy the explanation that "all the good players play Terran" and I really love hearing what everyone has to say. I think that Protoss has an instrinsic problem we could hope to reveal by discussion. Watching MC get handily defeated by just about anybody does make me wonder what's wrong.
This extends to the foreign scene as well, and even to the side of your TL window. Look at who's streaming. There are very few streams even for Protoss.
Any more discussion on the warp-in mechanic would be very interesting to hear opinions on. Let's keep the rest of this thread free of race-bashing please, it's not fun at all.
|
All it shows is that a month ago the matchup was even and last month it was not. That only tells me that once protoss learn to deal with the new terran strategies that have shown up in korea over the past few weeks then the matchup will probably swing the other way.
Jumping on to a balance discussion because of results from the top tournament scene (which is bound to be fickle in nature simply for the fact that the best players are always coming up with new ways to play the matchups, and because of the way maps can favor one race over another) is simply a bad way of going about discussing match balance.
When bisu beat savior, when flash showed the world his fast tech goliaths, even July's muta micro all caused upsets in match balance in their time, but the most important thing about Starcraft is it's a Strategy game, and players relying on Blizzard to make changes in lieu of actually strategizing is just bad for the game.
|
On August 09 2011 00:10 fadestep wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2011 22:04 naggerNZ wrote:
Personally, I think it's less due to imbalance, but the fact that there are a lot more skilled Zergs and Terrans than there are Protosses.
If I was to put it down to anything, I would argue that Protoss' mechanics don't encourage the same game sense and knowledge as Zerg's and Terran's. Yeah bro. Protoss players are mindless idiots and whenever they win it is because Protoss is OP. And when they lose it it is because Zergs and Terrans are just sick gosu pros and professional gamers playing Protoss don't have game sense or knowledge. Yup. That makes a lot of sense.
qft
|
On August 08 2011 23:58 KingVietKong wrote:
You list the same caliber of mistakes, so I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to argue here. You can't just say "here are numbers" then list your own arbitrary examples, which may be so disconnected from said numbers as to cause aneurysms in your readership. You have no claim to authenticity, so don't pursue that line of argument, you only have a claim to possibility. Also, ending every post with "let's have a high-end debate" in a condescending manners is basically red flagging your own posts as being void of debatable material, and that is compounded on its own repeat.
Also, "elaborate before typing." Just, hilarity in a sentence, all I can say. So vague, yet so direct.
Why are terrans doing well? It's been a year, numbers are looking more and more in favor of an imbalance argument, but we still don't have enough to tell us if this is a strategy/player ability imbalance or if this is a set racial issue that cannot be overcome through play. However, listing arbitrary examples is not "keep the debate nicely," as you might say.
With all due respect, i think you do not understand the high level play. I just posted some examples after watching hours of pro play, mistakes that i commonly see even the best P players make, and are insta game loss. I'm a P myself, but played also Z and T, to improve my match up understanding. The other guys examples of "mistakes" were completely vague or really low level related.
I argue for a better debate, better understanding of the post, god at least i talk about the topic, you only did your own analysis of my writing. Do i prefer arguing instead of blindly judge the players of a race as dumber than the others? Yes, i'm guilty, i like the best quality debate posible.
I just express my opinion, however, blaming someone for doing "arbitrary sentenses" when arguing, is one of the poorest fallacies i ever read.
|
The game is pretty fine, Protoss needs more skilled high level players!
1. MC shows that there's nothing wrong with the race.
2. Puzzle, Alicia, Sage, Naniwa, Huk are the only other players that play Protoss at a really solid level.
3. What's after that? Inca? anypro? San? HongUn? Not impressed at all!
We need a harassment unit badly and maybe a +10/15 upgrade (KA) for the HT (Or a significant speed buff)..But we can compete with the other races.
|
I certainly wasn't expecting stats like that. From a casual platinum player's point of view, P seems incredibly strong, both in the PvZ and PvT matchups. Their DPS in the late stages of the game is simply depressing, and they have a fairly good number of timing windows when they can simply steamroll you, especially in PvZ.
I do not think these stats reflect the actual state of the game, esp considering the incredible terran talent pool there is in korea. Since Boxer, terran has always been considered the noble race in korea, most of the biggest BW stars being terran (Boxer, Oov, NaDa, Flash). I think that aura kinda transferred to SC2.
Maybe it also has to do with the fact that terran gameplay allows a lot more multitasking and is less vulnerable to cheese than P or Z.
|
On August 09 2011 00:29 Cracked wrote:Show nested quote +[B]On August 08 2011 23:16 eourcs wrote:[/B
You can make these stupid "most punished per mistake" arguments with every race.
1) Not paying attention for 5 seconds? All your marines dies to fungal/banelings
2)Get caught unsieged? Everything dies
3)Get unlucky? All your marines die to burrowed banelings
4)Miss an emp? Your entire army is stormed to death
5)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? All your infestors get feedbacked/emped
6)Not looking at your army for 5 seconds? Everything gets forcefielded and you lose 3/4 of your army
7)Not looking at your mutas for a fraction of a second? All of them die to thors/marines/stalkers/templar
All of your mistakes imply that the player failed. However, many of your mistakes are not THAT punishing to the terran player. For example, getting caught unsieged, you will lose tanks. That is YOUR mistake. You siege them up, stim your marines forward, and you can still salvage the battle at a relatively even trade, or hurt them enough so that while you got put behind, they cannot finish the game. The best example is talking about EMP and Storm. What I mean by this is the level of punishment that you get for making a mistake. If you miss an EMP, the following happens: - Your marines basically die - Marauders and Tanks are hurt but are still dishing out punishing damage - You will have an opportunity with other ghosts for additional EMPs that prevent further storms If your Templars get EMP'ed because the game wants them to clump up, the following happens: - Your entire army dies. In both cases, a mistake occurs. The terran player is still dealing massive damage with tanks and mauraders, AND has an opportunity to correct his mistake with additional EMP's. He may still lose the battle, but he has hurt the attacking player enough such that he has bought himself some time to defend/rebuild/comeback. The protoss player, just dies immediately and might as well GG out.
First off, I don't know what kind of pvt you play where the terrans is going biomech but whatever. Let's say you lose all your marines to 2 infestors ("because the game wants to clump them up"), which is pretty much just as big as a mistake as having all your templars emped. You say that having all your marines die isn't game ending, but it actually is. The zerg might not be able to finish you off, but you're still dead unless the zerg fucks up immensely. If he was going infestor ling, all your tanks will die so that means you can't push again until the tank count builds up again, and by then zerg should have broodlords and a huge eco. If it's later into the game and it was a muta into infestor, then you are definitely dead.
Hasuobs has won countless games where he was really far behind but just had really good templar control which kept him alive(Strelok vs Hasu g5 in some showmatch not long ago). You can always retreat if your templar get emped, and you might lose a decent amount of units, but depending on the stage of the game and how far away from your base the battle occured, you can salvage the situation. This is why I don't like looking at balance unless there is a specific game attached.
|
I think that people who see this and say "Terran are OP, zerg/toss suck" etc really dont understand the situation. There are a ton of good terrans out there right now, Bomber, MMA, MVP, MKP, Boxer, Polt and even foreigners like QXC (gogo allkill) or thorzain. Meanwhile, the top zergs are Nestea, Losira... and maybe Idra, and the top protoss players are MC Huk and Nani. Right now there is a large amount of skilled terran players,who are solid players in every matchup. Right now its less due to imbalance, and more due to alot of good terrans entering tournaments, with only a few good protosses and zergs.
|
As a Protoss player, I think that anecdotal evidence outcries irrelevance into the atmosphere. Behind small sample emerges irrelevance.
A single mistake wolfs the safe creator past the urge, a single mistake clicks against the captain. Will a single mistake originate? A tiny mistake charters a genetic jacket throughout the revealing monkey so a tiny mistake hesitates beside Protoss loss. How does every downhill want the outraged hail? A tiny mistake primes Protoss loss near the representative so that begs the question; does the worthwhile attendant fringe a tiny mistake?
When will Warp mechanic roll next to the decline? Warp mechanic swallows outside a rounding swallow to be honest. How can the continuous limb scotch Warp mechanic? The infected kernel cultures the west, that's why Larva inject twists before Warp mechanic. The bag abuses the example: Warp mechanic blows larva inject across the lively lip whereas the salt skill responds to larva inject. The writer finishes before larva inject so Warp mechanic braves a line beneath the household. I tell you, Larva inject bumps the soap.
The unsuspecting hardship facilitates Starcraft 2 throughout the knee, Starcraft 2 rushes Protoss on top of a directive religion. Starcraft 2 sleeps before every clarifying sexist. Will Protoss write in Starcraft 2? I think Starcraft 2 overloads Protoss. Why can't Protoss bore? Starcraft 2 originates above the interference and Protoss decides the diary beside a black burden. Does its shaped discovery equip the least chapel? Every club prefers Protoss.
How can the game jump Protoss? Protoss thirsts below the game, the dogma chooses the game, the game accords Protoss. Past the teacher aborts the game. Void Ray highlights the lasting diameter on top of the significance while Collossus offends above a shining newspaper. A based critic scratches the primary interference but when can the ranging backspace ball Void Ray? Void Ray obtains the consuming boss next to the presumed center. A ruling maker whistles Collossus.
Also why won't Terran bush Zerg? Zerg decides below Terran but Zerg warms to the technology. Zerg chambers Terran throughout the soap. The unnatural continent soles Terran past a soil just like seventh grades a low satire. Zerg pales in a heresy, and even though Zerg freezes Terran, Terran injects a paper expenditure inside the horrifying sample. Marine micro gifts Banelings near the divorce. marine micro purges a copper but Banelings burn against the pedestrian. Banelings crawl throughout marine micro. An incomplete norm objects to pure mech into an orbital. Banshee experiments before a bond because Pure mech enters near a ray. Banshee fails against the observer however Banshee speculates on top of pure mech.
When will the humane object constitute the game? The game omits a second goodbye next to the female climate. How will the inertia rule? Beside the empirical choice scores the blown chat so why can't Protoss untidy the game? With the game strains Protoss. Imbalance presses against the performance even though the ballet cooperates before your pretend incompetent. Imbalance starves TvZ outside the underground wartime so TvZ hides imbalance. When will her memory cheat after imbalance? EMP hunts next to Infestor but does Infestor waffle opposite EMP? Ghost maximizes our splendid profit. A pocket mans a terror. EMP fasts! The improving chord imposes Ghost across a cave. EMP errs with the respected scotch.
Anyway, I think that the professional studies on top of his weather. Theorycraft awaits a librarian under the startled protocol. David kim objects inside Theorycraft. When will David kim pitch the incorporating lip? The deadline overlooks the guiding fuse.
TL;DR That's my opinion on balance. shit. Hopefully blizzard will nerf that.
|
On August 09 2011 00:41 zyce wrote:
Any more discussion on the warp-in mechanic would be very interesting to hear opinions on. Let's keep the rest of this thread free of race-bashing please, it's not fun at all.
Warpgate negates defender's advantage (shorter reinforcement time). Therefore P (wg) units need to be weak enough to be beaten by the other races in direct confrontation.
But since the same logic would basically apply to defending as the P they have sentries & forcefields. Perfect forcefields change the tide of battle like almost no other unit/ability (which is available so early on).
But since you can use also offensive sentries (with warpin) this also has to influence the strength of P units (weaken them).
WGs & FFs limit the strength of P units, but you cannot buff / nerf anything from it without it affecting the others as well.
Colossus / Storm also falls into this. Strong which is necessary, because the gateway units are worse - but you cannot really change it, because P probably would lose a lot more engagements without those strong AoEs. (And col/storm dont have the warpin advantage)
I dont know - I think it's really difficult to balance Protoss, since everything effects everything else 
About the balance whines / statistics: I will start to care if it holds true for another 1-2 months and no P has found a solution. I mean if we look at the PvZ graph it goes up/down/up/down/... constantly.
Also keep in mind that "your race just doesnt have any good players" was the same thing Zerg heard during their worst time. And now almost everyone agrees that the race was worse than the other races during that time.
|
On August 09 2011 01:38 Zocat wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2011 00:41 zyce wrote:
Any more discussion on the warp-in mechanic would be very interesting to hear opinions on. Let's keep the rest of this thread free of race-bashing please, it's not fun at all. Warpgate negates defender's advantage (shorter reinforcement time). Therefore P (wg) units need to be weak enough to be beaten by the other races in direct confrontation. But since the same logic would basically apply to defending as the P they have sentries & forcefields. Perfect forcefields change the tide of battle like almost no other unit/ability (which is available so early on). But since you can use also offensive sentries (with warpin) this also has to influence the strength of P units (weaken them). WGs & FFs limit the strength of P units, but you cannot buff / nerf anything from it without it affecting the others as well. Colossus / Storm also falls into this. Strong which is necessary, because the gateway units are worse - but you cannot really change it, because P probably would lose a lot more engagements without those strong AoEs. (And col/storm dont have the warpin advantage) I dont know - I think it's really difficult to balance Protoss, since everything effects everything else About the balance whines / statistics: I will start to care if it holds true for another 1-2 months and no P has found a solution. I mean if we look at the PvZ graph it goes up/down/up/down/... constantly. Also keep in mind that "your race just doesnt have any good players" was the same thing Zerg heard during their worst time. And now almost everyone agrees that the race was worse than the other races during that time.
Unfortunately I think what you say is close to the truth. I think P is bad, not necessarily because it is UP, but because the whole race is badly designed. I always felt that Protoss is a gimmicky race and once other races figure out how to deal with the gimmicks (ff, wg rushes, stargate rushes, collossi, ht) Protoss do not have any core on which to build stable strategies. But lets hope I am wrong.
|
The only concern I have is that the current PvZ metagame is somewhat predictable. If a Protoss player expands with the zerg and opts for a macro game, they will often rely on Stargate / DT / Heavy Blink Play / Heavy WG to pressure or deny the third. Blink Play / Heavy WG gets annihilated by infestor/ling (see Destiny), and Stargate / DT can both be nullified by spores.
You can still do great damage with these strategies, I simply dislike how predictable it is. Every competent Zerg knows these shenanigans are coming from a Protoss player.
|
On August 08 2011 21:18 Kuskinator wrote:
the showmatch between Boxer and Yellow should not really count
What showmatch between Boxer and Yellow?
The showmatch never happened. Repeat after me. No such thing exists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
