| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
LeLeech
United Kingdom211 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:23 jmbthirteen wrote: I find it funny that people think they deserve full transparency in situations where they aren't involved in at all. I think thats what they said about wikileaks, hmmmm. | ||
|
howLiN
Portugal1676 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:23 jmbthirteen wrote: I find it funny that people think they deserve full transparency in situations where they aren't involved in at all. This, so much. | ||
|
tsuxiit
1305 Posts
| ||
|
Aurdon
United States2007 Posts
It is like people look for this drama. Incontrol has limited time. He makes decisions on where he can spend that time. Yeah, he might make some of those decisions based off of who pays him, but don't all of us? It's not some grand move by anyone to screw over any one else. It's just that it's a hard decision on how Incontrol could spend his time and some people aren't going to be happy with that. Incontrol himself is probably not happy that time limitations make it so he can only do some of the things he wishes he could do. Back off and cut everyone some slack. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:25 LeLeech wrote: I think thats what they said about wikileaks, hmmmm. Wait, so knowing why my government and my tax dollars are going to is the same as me knowing why a pro sc2 player leaves a show? Oh wait, I have a personal investment in the whole wikileaks shit and don't with incontrol leaving sotg. | ||
|
Lysenko
Iceland2128 Posts
It's about people asking "so is it about EG sponsorship issues?" and sirscoots and djwheat going "LOL NO YOU GUYS ARE STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORISTS" and then it turns out to be complete horse caca. But the conflicts were resolved long before Geoff left the show. He left over the time issues and the idea that there might be an unforeseen sponsor conflict at some point in the future. | ||
|
HCastorp
United States388 Posts
it would be fascinating to hear JP's side of this. | ||
|
DrunkeN.
United States406 Posts
| ||
|
Nimic
Norway1360 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:28 Lysenko wrote: But the conflicts were resolved long before Geoff left the show. He left over the time issues and the idea that there might be an unforeseen sponsor conflict at some point in the future. That is literally what the guy you just quoted said it was about. | ||
|
Nimic
Norway1360 Posts
| ||
|
Synche
United States1345 Posts
| ||
|
Jayrod
1820 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:31 SimDawg wrote: I really don't like the answer I was given by the EG Alex guy. I don't think it's a polarizing as 5 page thread or obscure the truth. If they wanted to let us know they could have found a way. It wasn't EG's place to say the whole sponsorship thing with SotG. That was up to JP and COL. | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
Shit's happening, EG tries to deal with it the best way they can, more shit happens, decisions are made and in retrospect might seem "bad" BUT at the time made sense. You cant have EG and one of its members being sponsored by a competing company/sponsor. Thats just bad for the sponsors and then one of THEM might pull out instead so everyone chill out theres a business here so let it be a business :/ | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:30 Nimic wrote: 2300 viewers, I think that says it all. 2300 cause its lagging like shit | ||
|
FatkiddsLag
United States413 Posts
| ||
|
Domination
United States1177 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:31 SimDawg wrote: I really don't like the answer I was given by the EG Alex guy. I don't think it's a polarizing as 5 page thread or obscure the truth. If they wanted to let us know they could have found a way. Here's what you say. "We were uncomfortable about potential issues our sponsors might have and Geoff expressed desires to spend more time practicing. As such, Geoff is leaving SotG. It is deeply regettable and we wish SotG and it's host JP the best of luck in future." That first part can be anything and yet completely understandable. It's being transparent without actually being transparent. | ||
|
feebas
Finland268 Posts
Unless the voices of reason prevail, I can't help but feel that this whole affair is on track to a place where people are forced to pick sides. As much as EG has disappointed me again, that's something I'd rather not do. What an unfortunate series of events for all of us with an excessive sense of self-entitlement. | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:35 FatkiddsLag wrote: is there any reason that they decided to make the two shows on the same day right before each other? wheat has said that it was what idra/painuser/incontrol could work with with their scheduling. | ||
|
Lysenko
Iceland2128 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:29 Nimic wrote: That is literally what the guy you just quoted said it was about. An unforeseen future sponsor conflict is not a current sponsor conflict, which is what Scoots denied it was about. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
SKillous vs Nice
Cure vs Percival
Krystianer vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Ryung
MaNa vs ArT
Moja vs TBD
sOs vs HonMonO
NightMare vs UedSoldier
The PondCast
CranKy Ducklings
Maestros of the Game
Serral vs herO
Clem vs Reynor
[BSL 2025] Weekly
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
BSL Team Wars
Wardi Open
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
