5 tries averaged out to 183.4. Mid diamond.

edit: this site has a fun ear-training test as well, not that it's very relevant to the thread but I'm having fun with it lol.

DEF.Sins

Ireland22 Posts

March 28 2011 05:09 GMT

#22

183 mid masters

Chicane

United States7875 Posts

March 28 2011 05:09 GMT

#23

227.6. I'm going to try again when I'm awake because this is kind of fun.

Pufftrees

2449 Posts

March 28 2011 05:09 GMT

#24

197.8 average, and I didn't understand at first lol.

I don't ladder just play customs vs other high rankd.

ReketSomething

United States6012 Posts

March 28 2011 05:10 GMT

#25

I have 260/270 and I'm masters league

Apparently reaction time doesn't matter.

holy_war

United States3590 Posts

March 28 2011 05:11 GMT

#26

193.6 average

Yoshi Kirishima

United States10343 Posts

March 28 2011 05:11 GMT

#27

after about 7 tries, i got 194.4 xD

edit: masters

Zlasher

United States9129 Posts

March 28 2011 05:12 GMT

#28

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/userstats.php?uid=2132594

Low masters...not like you need reaction time that differs by .02 seconds in starcraft.

Edit: I was the 191.8 201.8 and 203.4, other tests i've done got me at 190 or so, but its getting late, blahblahexcuses

HolyArrow

United States7116 Posts

March 28 2011 05:12 GMT

#29

Has anyone here played around Cal-M/CEVO level Counterstike, or just high-level competitive FPS in general? I'm curious if there's any correlation there.

Grildrak

Sweden44 Posts

March 28 2011 05:13 GMT

#30

Average of 270 (high diamond). Is it possible for me to blame that on the fact I got a ~5$ mouse? Feels like this is a thing that could be quite affected by what mouse you have.

Zlasher

United States9129 Posts

March 28 2011 05:13 GMT

#31

On March 28 2011 14:12 HolyArrow wrote:
Has anyone here played around Cal-M/CEVO level Counterstike, or just high-level competitive FPS in general? I'm curious if there's any correlation there.

I used to, and you'll find that most people are around 190-200 ms in CS. Doesn't matter much though unless you're an awper.

Antiochus

Canada548 Posts

March 28 2011 05:13 GMT

#32

I did the test a couple times and was getting anywhere from 200-240.

neobowman

Canada3324 Posts

March 28 2011 05:14 GMT

#33

Lol, Starcraft doesn't really have anything to do with reaction time at the milisecond level. Got 250 high masters.

Tabbris

Bangladesh2839 Posts

March 28 2011 05:14 GMT

#34

Im top 8 YAY!@!!

185

KaRath_

Australia245 Posts

March 28 2011 05:17 GMT

#35

On March 28 2011 14:12 HolyArrow wrote:
Has anyone here played around Cal-M/CEVO level Counterstike, or just high-level competitive FPS in general? I'm curious if there's any correlation there.

I'm roughly CAL-M level in CSS without the broken hand at the moment. With my left hand, reaction time is like 238ms T_T

But reaction time doesn't play a MASSIVE role in how good you are, it's also about clue and aim, much like SC2 is about clue and clicks ^^

partisan

United States783 Posts

March 28 2011 05:18 GMT

#36

On March 28 2011 14:03 OmgIRok wrote:
Lol, just imagine for red-green colorblind people..... ><

Yea, now imagine us dealing with some of the sc2 map textures/colors. I hate shattered temple :-(

zyglrox

United States1168 Posts

March 28 2011 05:18 GMT

#37

250 avg...wtf...low masters

skyR

Canada13817 Posts

March 28 2011 05:19 GMT

#38

245 )=, low masters

Zlasher

United States9129 Posts

March 28 2011 05:20 GMT

#39

Well, 3 runs and I've played in top 20 all three times so good enough for me. Would like to see other people in top 10 or so actually do it more than once.