• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:24
CEST 14:24
KST 21:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror4[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 20264Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)77Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)
Tourneys
ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Grand Finals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble
Brood War
General
Fantasy returning? BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Sagi.gg Launcher Released SC4ALL II Brood War Complete Invited Player Lineup
Tourneys
[ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8635 users

Patch 1.3 on PTR - Page 151

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 149 150 151 152 153 186 Next
Offhand
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1869 Posts
March 01 2011 22:01 GMT
#3001
On March 02 2011 06:51 Reborn58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players


False...there have been numerous pros to comment in this thread saying that it should not be put through in the way that it currently is on test.


Kiwikaki has said there's no way in hell it will go through. I don't see where people have got this "universally agreed upon by top players that it's OP" idea.
mousepad
Profile Joined April 2010
United States136 Posts
March 01 2011 22:03 GMT
#3002
On March 02 2011 06:59 PXShaman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 06:58 TheCookieMonster wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:51 Reborn58 wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players


False...there have been numerous pros to comment in this thread saying that it should not be put through in the way that it currently is on test.



Yeah I'd really like to know where you're getting your "universally agreed" information from. My observation is based on the 90% of players on the forums who are in disagreement. This isn't high-level response by any means, though I would love to see a poll of pros only.


Day9 posted on his twitter:
omg plz let me keep my khaydarin amulet. PLZPLZPLZPLZPLZ???? >.<
I mean if day9 puts that many Plz's in a post I think their might be something wrong


Its twitter. The blurb of opinions.
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
March 01 2011 22:03 GMT
#3003
On March 02 2011 06:58 TheCookieMonster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 06:51 Reborn58 wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players


False...there have been numerous pros to comment in this thread saying that it should not be put through in the way that it currently is on test.



Yeah I'd really like to know where you're getting your "universally agreed" information from. My observation is based on the 90% of players on the forums who are in disagreement. This isn't high-level response by any means, though I would love to see a poll of pros only.


From the posts from actual pros I've seen here on TL, Catz's podcast discussing the new maps/patch with several other players, and the last SotG with iNc, Tyler, and Painuser, it seems like the general pro consensus is that a nerf is reasonable but removing the amulet altogether is not. I personally favor a BW style amulet upgrade that gives +12.5 starting energy and +50 max energy, but somewhere between +12.5 and +20 initial energy is generally agreed upon as a nice range.
DreamSailor
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada433 Posts
March 01 2011 22:09 GMT
#3004
Charging Zealots getting an extra hit is pretty cool, but it doesn't really assist with the pre-Charge kiting of them.

The Archon Toilet nerf is justified, but I think it makes the Mothership too much of a niche thing (As if it wasn't a niche thing already), then 1.5 seconds of immunity could be game breaking. Most players will throw the rest of their units into the vortex to avoid fighting potentially a maxed army with their remaining units. I think they could've handled that better. The Mothership itself was always a bad idea as soon as they didn't implement the Planet Cracker from that initial video.

Most of the other things I don't agree with, but I will have to see how things play out.

Bunker salvage needs to be nerfed, I could care less about build time, but even if it only gave back 90% it would still be worth it to drop Bunkers down.
Where ever you go, there you are.
dark fury
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden426 Posts
March 01 2011 22:46 GMT
#3005
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players

No its not, Everyone thinks a nerf is justified (because it is) but i havent heard of a single pro player who thinks a complete removal is a good idea (because its NOT)
NicolBolas
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1388 Posts
March 01 2011 23:19 GMT
#3006
On March 02 2011 07:01 Offhand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 06:51 Reborn58 wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players


False...there have been numerous pros to comment in this thread saying that it should not be put through in the way that it currently is on test.


Kiwikaki has said there's no way in hell it will go through. I don't see where people have got this "universally agreed upon by top players that it's OP" idea.


In which case Blizzard's work is done.

See, I get the feeling that Blizzard puts one red herring change into every PTR, just so that the community spends its time complaining about that and not complaining about the other things. Then when they take it out, they can say, "See? We're listening to the fans!"
So you know, cats are interesting. They are kind of like girls. If they come up and talk to you, it's great. But if you try to talk to them, it doesn't always go so well. - Shigeru Miyamoto
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
March 01 2011 23:22 GMT
#3007
On March 02 2011 08:19 NicolBolas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 07:01 Offhand wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:51 Reborn58 wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players


False...there have been numerous pros to comment in this thread saying that it should not be put through in the way that it currently is on test.


Kiwikaki has said there's no way in hell it will go through. I don't see where people have got this "universally agreed upon by top players that it's OP" idea.


In which case Blizzard's work is done.

See, I get the feeling that Blizzard puts one red herring change into every PTR, just so that the community spends its time complaining about that and not complaining about the other things. Then when they take it out, they can say, "See? We're listening to the fans!"


Never attribute to malice what can equally be explained by incompetence.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Redmark
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada2129 Posts
March 01 2011 23:23 GMT
#3008
On March 02 2011 08:19 NicolBolas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 07:01 Offhand wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:51 Reborn58 wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players


False...there have been numerous pros to comment in this thread saying that it should not be put through in the way that it currently is on test.


Kiwikaki has said there's no way in hell it will go through. I don't see where people have got this "universally agreed upon by top players that it's OP" idea.


In which case Blizzard's work is done.

See, I get the feeling that Blizzard puts one red herring change into every PTR, just so that the community spends its time complaining about that and not complaining about the other things. Then when they take it out, they can say, "See? We're listening to the fans!"

And what do they gain? A warm fuzzy feeling in the bottom of their hearts? Please. Skip the conspiracy theories.
"Listening to the community" is not a hard thing. Everyone and his mother seems to think that their opinion means something. Figuring out which parts of the community reaction are worth listening to is the hard part, and I think Blizzard has proved that it's not too good at that.
NuKedUFirst
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada3139 Posts
March 01 2011 23:24 GMT
#3009
Any other terran players on PTR having some issues with stim not being up in time to hold attacks?

Early game T is going to change alot. All previous stim timings are down the drain..
FrostedMiniWeet wrote: I like winning because it validates all the bloody time I waste playing SC2.
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10382 Posts
March 01 2011 23:57 GMT
#3010
Hey for those of you who haven't seen, or noticed.

Remember how we complained when we saw the new Masters Icon in Patch 1.2? How we were wondering, wtf why does it looks shitty compared to what they showed at Blizzcon?

Well, what I guessed back then was right; the higher you are in your icon, the more stuff there is

This applies to ALL icons. This is also why some of the icons looked quite uglier in 1.2 too. For Icons below Masters, they too have more stuff on them the higher rank you are. They look cooler now; the reason why they looked stubby in 1.2 is probably to make it so that the higher icons looked more artistically "balanced".

They look REALLY cool now. So happy about this!



Go to about 0:50 and you will see!
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
Doppelganger
Profile Joined May 2010
488 Posts
March 02 2011 00:24 GMT
#3011
Why indicate the top 8 and not the top 10 players in a division? This is so random. I do not get it.
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-02 00:57:14
March 02 2011 00:56 GMT
#3012
On March 02 2011 09:24 Doppelganger wrote:
Why indicate the top 8 and not the top 10 players in a division? This is so random. I do not get it.

top 8 could be in a tournament format unlike top 10. IE war3 style tournaments but with the top 8 of your division or something.
GinDo
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
3327 Posts
March 02 2011 01:05 GMT
#3013
On March 02 2011 08:24 NuKedUFirst wrote:
Any other terran players on PTR having some issues with stim not being up in time to hold attacks?

Early game T is going to change alot. All previous stim timings are down the drain..


Well i always felt Stim to be a crutch. You can still put tones of pressure just with Conc. But i still don;t get the nerf, Stim pushes are really easy to hold.

i think this is catered to lower levels.
ⱩŦ ƑⱠẬ$Ħ / ƩǤ ɈƩẬƉØƝǤ [ɌȻ] / ȊṂ.ṂṼⱣ / ẬȻƩɌ.ȊƝƝØṼẬŦȊØƝ / ẬȻƩɌ.ϟȻẬɌⱠƩŦŦ ϟⱠẬɎƩɌϟ ȻⱠẬƝ
Offhand
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1869 Posts
March 02 2011 01:45 GMT
#3014
On March 02 2011 08:19 NicolBolas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 07:01 Offhand wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:51 Reborn58 wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:33 Kokujin wrote:
On March 02 2011 06:20 TheCookieMonster wrote:
I'd be pretty surprised if the amulet Nerf actually went through. There's just too much public outcry and the games would become so colossi-heavy that the game would lose a lot of it's dynamic. Similar to the Fungal nerf proposed last patch (couldnt hit air units), which would have VERY seriously affected ZvZ (would have been a complete Muta-spam battle)


the amulet nerf is almost universally agreed upon by top players


False...there have been numerous pros to comment in this thread saying that it should not be put through in the way that it currently is on test.


Kiwikaki has said there's no way in hell it will go through. I don't see where people have got this "universally agreed upon by top players that it's OP" idea.


In which case Blizzard's work is done.

See, I get the feeling that Blizzard puts one red herring change into every PTR, just so that the community spends its time complaining about that and not complaining about the other things. Then when they take it out, they can say, "See? We're listening to the fans!"


This is mostly true. But if it weren't for the times Blizzard went through with a completely stupid balance idea, I wouldn't be worried.

Protoss only has one strong tech tree mid-late game without amulet. Collosus are probably still the best tech choice in all match ups even when templar have amulet. Toss air tech still sucks and there's almost no reason to get a fleet beacon unless it's super late game PvT or you're doing a mothership gimmick build (ironically also gone in 1.3).
Offhand
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1869 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-02 01:51:21
March 02 2011 01:48 GMT
#3015
On March 02 2011 09:24 Doppelganger wrote:
Why indicate the top 8 and not the top 10 players in a division? This is so random. I do not get it.


Top 8 is generally the cutoff for prizes in a lot of tournaments. It would be complete wild speculation to say that Blizzard's adding some kind of ladder tournament system, but it's a possibility. More likely they went with it because "Top 8" in some competitions it's normally the important figure.
Reborn8u
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1761 Posts
March 02 2011 01:59 GMT
#3016
I say just ditch vortex all together. Instead give the mothership the ability to charge shields of other units with its energy (maybe more energy total too), give it an enormous guardian shield (2x the radius of sentry guardian shield), let it act as a nexus to mine minerals/gas (like an emergency nexus if one gets sniped). Would be really useful to have around late game with such abilities, would definitely make up for the loss of amulet and the vortex nerf for toss late game. Might even make the fleet beacon tech path useful since they got rid of void speed, and carriers get rofl stomped by hydra/corrupter or marine/viking (which are exactly what T and Z already make vs toss in standard games)
:)
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
March 02 2011 02:47 GMT
#3017
On March 02 2011 10:48 Offhand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2011 09:24 Doppelganger wrote:
Why indicate the top 8 and not the top 10 players in a division? This is so random. I do not get it.


Top 8 is generally the cutoff for prizes in a lot of tournaments. It would be complete wild speculation to say that Blizzard's adding some kind of ladder tournament system, but it's a possibility. More likely they went with it because "Top 8" in some competitions it's normally the important figure.

i wouldn't say complete wild speculation, since they said they had plans to do it during beta.
Trentelshark
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada385 Posts
March 02 2011 17:54 GMT
#3018
Question on the Infestor Fungal Change since I don't play on PTR. Being a missle based attack, if I get a Raven, does a Raven's PDD blast it down?
ToastieNL
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands845 Posts
March 02 2011 17:59 GMT
#3019
I've always thought the Mothership should be having effect on Real Protoss things; Shield recharge and warping in; Double recharge of shields and half of the warp in time underneath the Mothership seems quite cool. It's the mothership after all!?
Zerg lategame is imbalanced as shit. Also: "Protoss is really strong recently. Perhaps, it's time for there to be some changes for Terran." -MMA. Even MMA asks for buffs. Srsly Blizzard. Srsly.
lolocaust_US
Profile Joined December 2010
United States20 Posts
March 02 2011 18:19 GMT
#3020
no amulet makes me cry tears of pure joy
craftingstar 474 (NA)
Prev 1 149 150 151 152 153 186 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
INu's Battles
20:00
INu's Battles#21
Zoun vs herOLIVE!
SHIN vs TBD
IntoTheiNu 1207
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 238
Rex 81
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 54492
Calm 3791
Shuttle 2813
Bisu 1321
FanTaSy 1296
firebathero 389
Stork 275
Hyuk 263
Zeus 252
actioN 250
[ Show more ]
Mini 237
Soma 232
Rush 223
EffOrt 208
Soulkey 145
Last 139
Light 128
ZerO 114
Snow 110
Mong 71
Dewaltoss 64
PianO 64
Pusan 56
Sea.KH 56
Killer 45
JYJ 44
NotJumperer 37
hero 36
Barracks 36
Free 35
Shinee 34
ToSsGirL 31
Yoon 30
Bale 29
Aegong 27
Sharp 22
Shine 20
sorry 20
HiyA 19
yabsab 19
Sacsri 18
Noble 16
Dota 2
Gorgc6421
Dendi520
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1328
kRYSTAL_97
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King97
Heroes of the Storm
Lowko425
Other Games
gofns33593
singsing1994
B2W.Neo660
crisheroes245
DeMusliM213
hiko152
Livibee98
byalli14
ZerO(Twitch)5
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV206
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream18
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
[ Show 9 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
OSC
36m
OSC
9h 51m
Replay Cast
10h 36m
OSC
1d 10h
Big Brain Bouts
1d 21h
Rex vs INexorable
GgMaChine vs HeRoMaRinE
Reynor vs herO
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Patches Events
3 days
BSL Open Qualifier
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSB
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
HCC Season 3
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.