• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:59
CEST 23:59
KST 06:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard"2ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!20Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)89Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format17
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters
Tourneys
IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly INu's Battles#18 - Cure, herO, Rogue & ByuN RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Summer Cup 2026
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Industrial Park New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion How Famous was FlaSh before his Debut? Animated Gateway BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ HORROR STARCRAFT MOVIE
Tourneys
Escore Tournament - Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo IV
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Games can Help with Majo…
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2416 users

[G] Comprehensive SC2 League and Ladder Guide - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 84 Next
Jago
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland390 Posts
March 12 2011 01:41 GMT
#181
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?
ChrysaliS_
Profile Joined January 2011
United States261 Posts
March 12 2011 05:11 GMT
#182
On March 12 2011 10:41 Jago wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?


did you read the OP? favored means your opponent's MMR is greater than your points......
Chrysalis.145
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-12 06:03:43
March 12 2011 05:17 GMT
#183
On March 12 2011 14:11 ChrysaliS_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 12 2011 10:41 Jago wrote:
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?


did you read the OP? favored means your opponent's MMR is greater than your points......



Oh man this brings up another thing

As MMR goes down and points go up your chances of being favored (i hope im doing this right) decrease over time?

Therefore as time goes on and MMR's depreciate favored points will become less frequent.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12248 Posts
March 12 2011 07:38 GMT
#184
On March 12 2011 14:17 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 12 2011 14:11 ChrysaliS_ wrote:
On March 12 2011 10:41 Jago wrote:
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?


did you read the OP? favored means your opponent's MMR is greater than your points......



Oh man this brings up another thing

As MMR goes down and points go up your chances of being favored (i hope im doing this right) decrease over time?

Therefore as time goes on and MMR's depreciate favored points will become less frequent.


Your adjusted points don't go up unless you're performing well. Your displayed points only go up because of bonus pool. You're way overthinking the MMR recalibration, it in no way is as drastic as that.

What happens is that the larger the gap between your MMR and your points, the more likely you will face favored opponents. That's common for new players who have just been placed because they start out with 0 and typically their MMR is still pretty far from that initial placement point. If they keep winning, their Favored opponent streak continues. What typically happens is players will gradually arrive at their MMR, and their match history will go something like this: +48 +48 +48 +46 +46 +44 +44 -1 +42 -1 +40 -2 +36 -4 +30 -5 +28 -8 +24 -10 +20 -11 +22 -11 +24 -13.
Moderator
alp1ne
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada4 Posts
March 12 2011 16:22 GMT
#185
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12248 Posts
March 12 2011 16:33 GMT
#186
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.
Moderator
RyuChus
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada442 Posts
March 12 2011 16:35 GMT
#187
Sweet thanks for the really hard work! I want to read more but for now i have things to do!!!! Thanks for this it's awesome
I have an announcement to make, "Moo!" That is all.
neriofrio1
Profile Joined March 2011
5 Posts
March 13 2011 06:51 GMT
#188
--- Nuked ---
Tamerlane
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada426 Posts
March 13 2011 16:51 GMT
#189
Very nice guide Excalibur, I see that my first attempts at "mapping" the bnet ladder system during the beta produced worthy offsprings!
nvrs
Profile Joined October 2010
Greece481 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-14 15:31:19
March 14 2011 15:26 GMT
#190
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!
IamOBESE
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States134 Posts
March 14 2011 15:33 GMT
#191
On March 15 2011 00:26 nvrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!


I believe the system picks your opponent first, then chooses a map that neither of you have vetoed
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12248 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-14 15:37:07
March 14 2011 15:36 GMT
#192
^^^^^ This is true also, your opponent is picked before the map. At least, that would be the logical way to do it...

On March 15 2011 00:26 nvrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!


Yeah that's absolutely true. I think we may see some sharp differences once the new 1v1 map pool is out, too (the one rumored on the KR server). Zerg players will likely veto the non-macro maps, Terran players will likely veto the macro maps.
Moderator
Prinate
Profile Joined October 2010
United States182 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-14 15:48:53
March 14 2011 15:44 GMT
#193
On March 15 2011 00:33 IamOBESE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2011 00:26 nvrs wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!


I believe the system picks your opponent first, then chooses a map that neither of you have vetoed


I believe it's possible to play on a map that you have vetoed, so why would that happen if what you say is true? I am 90% certain I've played on a vetoed map before, and others have claimed the same.

Unless this only happens in 2v2 or larger, at which point it'd be possible after the 4 players are selected, all map choices could potentially be vetoed between the 4+ players. I can't remember if my memory of playing on a veto map was 1v1 or a team game. I only remember thinking WTF?
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12248 Posts
March 17 2011 20:52 GMT
#194
Okay all you Cool Dudes, some really important info was posted today about the Grandmaster League in a Battle.net blog post. Specifics are always great so here's the FAQ:

Q. How do I enter the Grandmaster League?
A. To enter the Grandmaster League:
* There needs to be an open slot within the ladder.
* You need to be in the top 200 players according to a rolling average of your skill rating.
* You must be eligible.

Q. What does eligible mean?
A. To be eligible, your unused bonus pool must be less than 180.

Q. Can I be removed from the top 200?
A. Yes. If your unused bonus pool exceeds 270, you will be removed from the Grandmaster League.

Q. Is there a way to see who is in the Grandmaster League?
A. Yes. Click on the in-game ladder icon, and then click "Grandmaster" to see the current season rankings.

Q. How active do I need to be to stay in the Grandmaster League?
A. Your unused bonus pool must remain under 270. This means you can't get three weeks behind. This is equivalent to roughly 45 games.


What do we take away from this?

- The "inactivity threshold" is probably 270. This probably applies to all leagues.
- Players really are "locked" into GM league based on their MMR's moving average for the entire season until they accumulate 270 bonus pool, at which point they're dropped and a slot opens up. If they stay below 270 they won't be removed even if better players emerge.
- The "45 games" figure means that with a 50% win rate you will win 22.5 even matches which would allow you to spend 12 bonus pool per win or 270 over 45 games.
Moderator
The Touch
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom667 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-21 13:55:02
March 21 2011 13:53 GMT
#195
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?
You Got The Touch
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12248 Posts
March 21 2011 17:26 GMT
#196
On March 21 2011 22:53 The Touch wrote:
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?


The moving average, by design, only encompasses the performance of your last X games. It could be last 5, 10, 15, we don't know.
Moderator
The Touch
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom667 Posts
March 21 2011 23:11 GMT
#197
On March 22 2011 02:26 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2011 22:53 The Touch wrote:
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?


The moving average, by design, only encompasses the performance of your last X games. It could be last 5, 10, 15, we don't know.


Fair enough. Do we have any info at all or is this something that is just likely to remain a mystery, so to speak?
You Got The Touch
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12248 Posts
March 22 2011 00:06 GMT
#198
On March 22 2011 08:11 The Touch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 02:26 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 21 2011 22:53 The Touch wrote:
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?


The moving average, by design, only encompasses the performance of your last X games. It could be last 5, 10, 15, we don't know.


Fair enough. Do we have any info at all or is this something that is just likely to remain a mystery, so to speak?


We will very likely never know the interval of the moving average.
Moderator
Kambing
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1176 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-22 16:58:54
March 22 2011 16:58 GMT
#199
Something just struck me that would be nice to figure out during this lockdown period:

Does your MMR change during the lockdown period, or are you "stuck in place" until lock down ends?

In particular, if someone is in deep bronze during the lockdown period but then goes on a 100 game winning streak, will they be ready for promotion once the ladder is reset? Or did those 100 games not count for the purposes of their MMR/league placement. (Of course they certainly counted towards the person's final placement in their bronze league).

I can see the system working either way from a theoretical perspective. MMR may not change during lockdown so that your opponent skill levels stay consistent thus not gimping your opportunities to gain points if you go on a hot streak. On the other hand, the favored system may be the "slack" that makes up this difference (i.e., if you go on a hot streak and then get punted back down, you will gain more points going up the ladder and then lose less going down), so it is fine from a competition perspective if your MMR does change.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12248 Posts
March 22 2011 17:09 GMT
#200
On March 23 2011 01:58 Kambing wrote:
Something just struck me that would be nice to figure out during this lockdown period:

Does your MMR change during the lockdown period, or are you "stuck in place" until lock down ends?

In particular, if someone is in deep bronze during the lockdown period but then goes on a 100 game winning streak, will they be ready for promotion once the ladder is reset? Or did those 100 games not count for the purposes of their MMR/league placement. (Of course they certainly counted towards the person's final placement in their bronze league).

I can see the system working either way from a theoretical perspective. MMR may not change during lockdown so that your opponent skill levels stay consistent thus not gimping your opportunities to gain points if you go on a hot streak. On the other hand, the favored system may be the "slack" that makes up this difference (i.e., if you go on a hot streak and then get punted back down, you will gain more points going up the ladder and then lose less going down), so it is fine from a competition perspective if your MMR does change.


MMR still changes. If your skill level changes dramatically enough as compared to the rest of the population, then you may not find yourself in the same league after your Season 2 placement match.
Moderator
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 84 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 1m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub95
StarCraft: Brood War
HiyA 40
League of Legends
Doublelift3631
KnowMe26
Counter-Strike
minikerr42
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu481
Other Games
gofns10713
summit1g5547
tarik_tv4587
Grubby2927
Mlord435
shahzam434
XaKoH 423
Livibee226
ToD171
UpATreeSC167
C9.Mang0157
elazer100
NeuroSwarm56
ROOTCatZ48
ViBE34
Trikslyr33
SteadfastSC28
JuggernautJason19
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV243
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 74
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 48
• iopq 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade1007
Other Games
• imaqtpie669
• Shiphtur418
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 1m
Escore
12h 1m
CrankTV Team League
13h 1m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
14h 1m
Big Brain Bouts
18h 1m
Soulspirit vs goblin
TriGGeR vs Bunny
OSC
1d
Korean StarCraft League
1d 5h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 6h
RSL Revival
1d 11h
Serral vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Online Event
1d 17h
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
INu's Battles
4 days
Cure vs herO
ByuN vs Rogue
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Patches Events
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-07-22
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #2
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.