• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:27
CEST 20:27
KST 03:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed10Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Starcraft in widescreen A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Future of Porn Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 758 users

[G] Comprehensive SC2 League and Ladder Guide - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 84 Next
Jago
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland390 Posts
March 12 2011 01:41 GMT
#181
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?
ChrysaliS_
Profile Joined January 2011
United States261 Posts
March 12 2011 05:11 GMT
#182
On March 12 2011 10:41 Jago wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?


did you read the OP? favored means your opponent's MMR is greater than your points......
Chrysalis.145
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-12 06:03:43
March 12 2011 05:17 GMT
#183
On March 12 2011 14:11 ChrysaliS_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 12 2011 10:41 Jago wrote:
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?


did you read the OP? favored means your opponent's MMR is greater than your points......



Oh man this brings up another thing

As MMR goes down and points go up your chances of being favored (i hope im doing this right) decrease over time?

Therefore as time goes on and MMR's depreciate favored points will become less frequent.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
March 12 2011 07:38 GMT
#184
On March 12 2011 14:17 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 12 2011 14:11 ChrysaliS_ wrote:
On March 12 2011 10:41 Jago wrote:
On February 22 2011 15:13 Excalibur_Z wrote:For example, let's say two players are matched together, Player A with 1500 MMR and 0 points and Player B with 1000 MMR and 0 points. Each player would see the other as Favored

Err, what? Why?

Why on earth would a 1500 MMR player see the lesser player as Favored?


did you read the OP? favored means your opponent's MMR is greater than your points......



Oh man this brings up another thing

As MMR goes down and points go up your chances of being favored (i hope im doing this right) decrease over time?

Therefore as time goes on and MMR's depreciate favored points will become less frequent.


Your adjusted points don't go up unless you're performing well. Your displayed points only go up because of bonus pool. You're way overthinking the MMR recalibration, it in no way is as drastic as that.

What happens is that the larger the gap between your MMR and your points, the more likely you will face favored opponents. That's common for new players who have just been placed because they start out with 0 and typically their MMR is still pretty far from that initial placement point. If they keep winning, their Favored opponent streak continues. What typically happens is players will gradually arrive at their MMR, and their match history will go something like this: +48 +48 +48 +46 +46 +44 +44 -1 +42 -1 +40 -2 +36 -4 +30 -5 +28 -8 +24 -10 +20 -11 +22 -11 +24 -13.
Moderator
alp1ne
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada4 Posts
March 12 2011 16:22 GMT
#185
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
March 12 2011 16:33 GMT
#186
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.
Moderator
RyuChus
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada442 Posts
March 12 2011 16:35 GMT
#187
Sweet thanks for the really hard work! I want to read more but for now i have things to do!!!! Thanks for this it's awesome
I have an announcement to make, "Moo!" That is all.
neriofrio1
Profile Joined March 2011
5 Posts
March 13 2011 06:51 GMT
#188
--- Nuked ---
Tamerlane
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada424 Posts
March 13 2011 16:51 GMT
#189
Very nice guide Excalibur, I see that my first attempts at "mapping" the bnet ladder system during the beta produced worthy offsprings!
nvrs
Profile Joined October 2010
Greece481 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-14 15:31:19
March 14 2011 15:26 GMT
#190
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!
IamOBESE
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States134 Posts
March 14 2011 15:33 GMT
#191
On March 15 2011 00:26 nvrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!


I believe the system picks your opponent first, then chooses a map that neither of you have vetoed
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-14 15:37:07
March 14 2011 15:36 GMT
#192
^^^^^ This is true also, your opponent is picked before the map. At least, that would be the logical way to do it...

On March 15 2011 00:26 nvrs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!


Yeah that's absolutely true. I think we may see some sharp differences once the new 1v1 map pool is out, too (the one rumored on the KR server). Zerg players will likely veto the non-macro maps, Terran players will likely veto the macro maps.
Moderator
Prinate
Profile Joined October 2010
United States182 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-14 15:48:53
March 14 2011 15:44 GMT
#193
On March 15 2011 00:33 IamOBESE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2011 00:26 nvrs wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:33 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 13 2011 01:22 alp1ne wrote:
Does anyone else seem to notice or is it just me that the ladder does not seem to be "random"? What I mean by that was that when I was playing Zerg, the majority of my games were ZvZ and now I switched to toss and the majority of my games are PvP. 5/7 of my games this morning were PvP. Which would be fine if it wasnt my worst MU so its crusing me in terms of trying to move up or maintain a better than 50% w/l ratio. Not to mention most pvps play out the same way I find at my level anyways.


That's just a coincidence. It's random.



One thing that many ppl seem to ignore regarding the frequency that they face X race opponents is that one's veto list may play a huge role to it.
From a personal experience, before the last patch and the new maps i had more TvPs as a Terran player than TvZs and that was for looong period of time (not just a couple of days). However i had no maps vetoed and the most TvPs i was playing were on Steppes of War and Blistering sands, which makes sense cause the Protosses seemed to like these maps The moment i voted against them i started getting less TvPs and a lot more TvZs!

edit: If you think about it, ti makes a lot of sense. If there are about equal number of players from each race searching for a game at a given moment and you have voted against 3 maps which you feel uncomfortable in / feel good (which may well be a race thing), then the chance of you facing another race that "likes" these maps is lesser that getting yourself a mirror!


I believe the system picks your opponent first, then chooses a map that neither of you have vetoed


I believe it's possible to play on a map that you have vetoed, so why would that happen if what you say is true? I am 90% certain I've played on a vetoed map before, and others have claimed the same.

Unless this only happens in 2v2 or larger, at which point it'd be possible after the 4 players are selected, all map choices could potentially be vetoed between the 4+ players. I can't remember if my memory of playing on a veto map was 1v1 or a team game. I only remember thinking WTF?
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
March 17 2011 20:52 GMT
#194
Okay all you Cool Dudes, some really important info was posted today about the Grandmaster League in a Battle.net blog post. Specifics are always great so here's the FAQ:

Q. How do I enter the Grandmaster League?
A. To enter the Grandmaster League:
* There needs to be an open slot within the ladder.
* You need to be in the top 200 players according to a rolling average of your skill rating.
* You must be eligible.

Q. What does eligible mean?
A. To be eligible, your unused bonus pool must be less than 180.

Q. Can I be removed from the top 200?
A. Yes. If your unused bonus pool exceeds 270, you will be removed from the Grandmaster League.

Q. Is there a way to see who is in the Grandmaster League?
A. Yes. Click on the in-game ladder icon, and then click "Grandmaster" to see the current season rankings.

Q. How active do I need to be to stay in the Grandmaster League?
A. Your unused bonus pool must remain under 270. This means you can't get three weeks behind. This is equivalent to roughly 45 games.


What do we take away from this?

- The "inactivity threshold" is probably 270. This probably applies to all leagues.
- Players really are "locked" into GM league based on their MMR's moving average for the entire season until they accumulate 270 bonus pool, at which point they're dropped and a slot opens up. If they stay below 270 they won't be removed even if better players emerge.
- The "45 games" figure means that with a 50% win rate you will win 22.5 even matches which would allow you to spend 12 bonus pool per win or 270 over 45 games.
Moderator
The Touch
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom667 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-21 13:55:02
March 21 2011 13:53 GMT
#195
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?
You Got The Touch
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
March 21 2011 17:26 GMT
#196
On March 21 2011 22:53 The Touch wrote:
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?


The moving average, by design, only encompasses the performance of your last X games. It could be last 5, 10, 15, we don't know.
Moderator
The Touch
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom667 Posts
March 21 2011 23:11 GMT
#197
On March 22 2011 02:26 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2011 22:53 The Touch wrote:
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?


The moving average, by design, only encompasses the performance of your last X games. It could be last 5, 10, 15, we don't know.


Fair enough. Do we have any info at all or is this something that is just likely to remain a mystery, so to speak?
You Got The Touch
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
March 22 2011 00:06 GMT
#198
On March 22 2011 08:11 The Touch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 02:26 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On March 21 2011 22:53 The Touch wrote:
So I've read the OP and scanned the thread (absolutely fantastic work, by the way. Truly outstanding), but I can't find an answer to the following question:

I'm a little hazy on exactly how the moving average stabilisation works. Do we have any idea how long your moving average needs to be stable (at a level worthy of promotion) in order for the system to be sufficiently convinced that your performances warrant that promotion? For example, does your moving average need to be sufficiently stable for 10 games; 25 games; 50 games; before you can be promoted?

Also, do we have any info on how many games are used when calculating your moving average? Does it take into account every game you have played since you started, or only a certain number of your most recent games?


The moving average, by design, only encompasses the performance of your last X games. It could be last 5, 10, 15, we don't know.


Fair enough. Do we have any info at all or is this something that is just likely to remain a mystery, so to speak?


We will very likely never know the interval of the moving average.
Moderator
Kambing
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1176 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-22 16:58:54
March 22 2011 16:58 GMT
#199
Something just struck me that would be nice to figure out during this lockdown period:

Does your MMR change during the lockdown period, or are you "stuck in place" until lock down ends?

In particular, if someone is in deep bronze during the lockdown period but then goes on a 100 game winning streak, will they be ready for promotion once the ladder is reset? Or did those 100 games not count for the purposes of their MMR/league placement. (Of course they certainly counted towards the person's final placement in their bronze league).

I can see the system working either way from a theoretical perspective. MMR may not change during lockdown so that your opponent skill levels stay consistent thus not gimping your opportunities to gain points if you go on a hot streak. On the other hand, the favored system may be the "slack" that makes up this difference (i.e., if you go on a hot streak and then get punted back down, you will gain more points going up the ladder and then lose less going down), so it is fine from a competition perspective if your MMR does change.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
March 22 2011 17:09 GMT
#200
On March 23 2011 01:58 Kambing wrote:
Something just struck me that would be nice to figure out during this lockdown period:

Does your MMR change during the lockdown period, or are you "stuck in place" until lock down ends?

In particular, if someone is in deep bronze during the lockdown period but then goes on a 100 game winning streak, will they be ready for promotion once the ladder is reset? Or did those 100 games not count for the purposes of their MMR/league placement. (Of course they certainly counted towards the person's final placement in their bronze league).

I can see the system working either way from a theoretical perspective. MMR may not change during lockdown so that your opponent skill levels stay consistent thus not gimping your opportunities to gain points if you go on a hot streak. On the other hand, the favored system may be the "slack" that makes up this difference (i.e., if you go on a hot streak and then get punted back down, you will gain more points going up the ladder and then lose less going down), so it is fine from a competition perspective if your MMR does change.


MMR still changes. If your skill level changes dramatically enough as compared to the rest of the population, then you may not find yourself in the same league after your Season 2 placement match.
Moderator
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 84 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Swiss Groups Day 4
ByuN vs uThermalLIVE!
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
WardiTV968
TKL 287
IndyStarCraft 266
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 468
TKL 296
IndyStarCraft 266
UpATreeSC 165
BRAT_OK 65
MindelVK 31
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 650
firebathero 631
Rush 601
BeSt 396
PianO 115
Mind 72
Movie 41
Aegong 31
JulyZerg 28
yabsab 15
[ Show more ]
sSak 11
sas.Sziky 9
Bale 5
SilentControl 5
Dota 2
qojqva4063
canceldota45
League of Legends
Grubby2379
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1068
flusha288
Other Games
FrodaN4533
ceh9690
Beastyqt661
Skadoodle157
oskar137
B2W.Neo133
C9.Mang0110
elazer106
ArmadaUGS72
Mew2King61
QueenE57
Trikslyr56
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3461
StarCraft 2
angryscii 0
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta17
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2350
League of Legends
• Nemesis3048
• Jankos2360
• TFBlade805
Other Games
• imaqtpie1450
• Shiphtur270
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
5h 33m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
21h 33m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
The PondCast
1d 15h
WardiTV European League
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CSO Contender
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Online Event
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
6 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.