EPT[February] SC2 General Discussion - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
mothergoose729
United States666 Posts
| ||
|
Tgee
Denmark54 Posts
Drone: A risk of drones. Overlord: A fluther of overlords. Overseer: A smack of overseers. Queen: A clutter of queens. Zergling: A pack of zerglings. Speedling: A crackle of speedlings. Baneling: A troup of banelings. Roach: An intrusion of roaches. Infestor: A rout of infestors. Hydralisk: A slither of hydralisks. Mutalisk: A skein of mutalisks. Corruptor: A venue of corruptors Ultralisk: A crash of ultralisks. Broodlord: An ostentation of broodlords | ||
|
GinDo
3327 Posts
Does anyone know were i can look up my winrate in each specific match up? Can seem to find how to do it. | ||
|
Tgee
Denmark54 Posts
On February 25 2011 00:00 GinDo wrote: I always see people quoting thier win rates for specific match-ups, does anyone know where I can look up my winrate in each specific match-up? Can't seem to find how to do it. ![[image loading]](http://sites.google.com/site/sc2gears/_/rsrc/1282206924789/config/5d9f5cae23acbc84.png) | ||
|
Essentia
1150 Posts
| ||
|
BladeRunner
United States407 Posts
| ||
|
nrage
Netherlands75 Posts
On February 24 2011 01:11 nrage wrote: Hey, when I have a ghost out with full energy and I press R for sniper round, then hold shift and click on targets, it will not sniper round them. This means I have to target my ghost, press r, click target, repeat. That's a pretty painful thing to do and it's easy to fail if you're trying to do it fast. What can I do? Anyone? | ||
|
Tgee
Denmark54 Posts
Holding R should do the trick | ||
|
Deity
France2 Posts
I'm staying in Korea for 4 months and I would like to play SC2 on their servers. Of course I failed to login with my european account, but I failed to find a topic explaining which are the steps how to get a korean account. Do I need just to buy a korean copy of SC2? Do I need to buy a Korean SC2 AND to open a korean b.net account? And in this last case, what is the best tutorial explaining how to get one? Thank you. | ||
|
rolfe
United Kingdom1266 Posts
On February 24 2011 18:43 Tgee wrote: Larva : A bryce or knot of larvae. Drone: A risk of drones. Overlord: A fluther of overlords. Overseer: A smack of overseers. Queen: A clutter of queens. Zergling: A pack of zerglings. Speedling: A crackle of speedlings. Baneling: A troup of banelings. Roach: An intrusion of roaches. Infestor: A rout of infestors. Hydralisk: A slither of hydralisks. Mutalisk: A skein of mutalisks. Corruptor: A venue of corruptors Ultralisk: A crash of ultralisks. Broodlord: An ostentation of broodlords surely its always been a flock of mutalisks, a gaggle of banelings sounds pretty good too. why would larvae be a bryce? is it something to do with machine? | ||
|
antikk
15 Posts
http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/1776588662#1 Any feedback on the idea would be appreciated. | ||
|
Gman1216
United States97 Posts
Video | ||
|
Mariester
Canada12 Posts
| ||
|
Defilie
Russian Federation28 Posts
I wanna know if there's an Iphone app for watching starcraft replays on my Iphone/Ipod out - free or paid. I don't want vods watching, cause majorly i wanna look at my own stuff. | ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10318 Posts
What was the point of making it so 2 pylons couldnt wall off a ramp when 3 can? fucking retarded blizz. Uh, because a 2 pylon wall is cheaper than a 3 pylon wall? | ||
|
Rascal65
United States4 Posts
On February 25 2011 09:50 antikk wrote: I dont think this deserves it own thread in general but I have posted a thread on battle.net official forums suggesting a layout editor for the games UI. http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/1776588662#1 Any feedback on the idea would be appreciated. cool idea in my opinion and on top of having a good idea you also brought to my attention that for some reason the blizzard forums say that i do not have a starcraft 2 "character" that i must create in game when i know that i do does anyone know what this problem has arisen from the forums on blizz wont let me post because of this and it is kind of annoying | ||
|
Mynthus
United Kingdom1 Post
| ||
|
Robqxz
Germany78 Posts
What if there were different mappools, depending on what league you are in? If you just altered the mappool by 1 to 3 maps each step, you would still have enough maps in common for seeing matches between leagues, but it would most probably make more people happy. For example, diamond and up can have a mappool designed for the top level play, whereas the bronze league mappool could have maps that e.g. encourage players to try and learn to do anything but 6pool, because from what I've read and heard there is a LOT of cheese happening in bronze leagues. How about the Maps with the extra destructible rocks? That wouldn't be bad maybe. Or it could just be maps that are more suitable for the casual player, but tend to have imbalances when really good players are playing on it. In one of the threads concerning the new maps someone pointed out that maybe shakuras was removed because many people (on bnet forums, I suppose) complained about it. But I've hardly ever heard any very good player complain about shakuras. What are your thoughts on this? | ||
|
rolfe
United Kingdom1266 Posts
On February 26 2011 20:13 Robqxz wrote: A thought that came to my mind when I read about the new laddermaps: What if there were different mappools, depending on what league you are in? If you just altered the mappool by 1 to 3 maps each step, you would still have enough maps in common for seeing matches between leagues, but it would most probably make more people happy. For example, diamond and up can have a mappool designed for the top level play, whereas the bronze league mappool could have maps that e.g. encourage players to try and learn to do anything but 6pool, because from what I've read and heard there is a LOT of cheese happening in bronze leagues. How about the Maps with the extra destructible rocks? That wouldn't be bad maybe. Or it could just be maps that are more suitable for the casual player, but tend to have imbalances when really good players are playing on it. In one of the threads concerning the new maps someone pointed out that maybe shakuras was removed because many people (on bnet forums, I suppose) complained about it. But I've hardly ever heard any very good player complain about shakuras. What are your thoughts on this? yeah i quite like that but i think the beginner versions of the maps with being completely walled off from the other guy would be a little much, but something else which is a bad cheese proof would be quite nice, getting GSL maps at the top end would be bloody lovely too | ||
|
quicky
1 Post
| ||
| ||
