EPTOn January 31 2011 10:38 bkrow wrote:
Last day of this thread? What happens tomorrow?
Last day of this thread? What happens tomorrow?
February happens
[January] Sc2 General Discussion - Page 10
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
February happens | ||
|
NPF
Canada1635 Posts
1) Build worker, split workers 2) Send workers, build peon, split workers. 3) Split workers, build worker This has just popped into my mind after seeing the 2003 thread where Jinro posted option #2 as the one he did in BW. | ||
|
da_head
Canada3350 Posts
| ||
|
RyanRushia
United States2748 Posts
you can get fast enough to split them before they get to minerals | ||
|
hugman
Sweden4644 Posts
| ||
|
Tryxtira
Sweden572 Posts
| ||
|
LambtrOn
United States671 Posts
On February 01 2011 05:14 Tryxtira wrote: Is it confirmed that HuK, Haypro and Ret are all invited to code A? If so, fucking amazing. Code A will then almost be more interesting than code S to me personally! Yes it is.  http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=188877 | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On January 31 2011 23:09 NPF wrote: So quick question for what to do at the start of a game: 1) Build worker, split workers 2) Send workers, build peon, split workers. 3) Split workers, build worker This has just popped into my mind after seeing the 2003 thread where Jinro posted option #2 as the one he did in BW. It has been tested and splitting in SC2 doesn't grant an advantage over letting the computer split them. It isn't a bad idea if you do it, but don't expect a mineral gain from it. Building the worker first or sending miners first has been tested as well and show no advantage either way. The result is that as long as you do one of these you are basically optimized since none of the methods have an advantage. I personally send workers and then build a probe. Edit - Link to the research | ||
|
ImmortalTofu
United States1254 Posts
| ||
|
Jeremy Reimer
Canada1223 Posts
| ||
|
sreid768
Australia2 Posts
http://starcraft2-wingsofliberty.featuremethis.com/ The site is still in development with a friend of mine but the aim is to have people vote on features they would like to see in the game. The highest ranked ones will appear at the top and game designers can get a proper feel on what the community wants in the next patch / expansion. | ||
|
Pimpin23
Canada5 Posts
| ||
|
sixfour
England11062 Posts
| ||
|
Bleak
Turkey3059 Posts
| ||
|
Overpowered
Czech Republic764 Posts
| ||
|
Zerglinger
Barbados1 Post
| ||
|
NexUmbra
Scotland3776 Posts
On February 03 2011 07:35 Zerglinger wrote: I im looking to get a better computer to play Starcraft on, do I need to buy a new copy in order to intall it on the new computer? Nope you can use the same account which still has Starcraft on it. If you threw away the CD you can torrent it, it will be a trillion times faster than regular download. | ||
|
j3cht
United States86 Posts
The ZvP matchup currently (often not always) ends up with a large fight with the Protoss having sentries for forcefields, colossus, and stalkers (sometimes zealots as well). The Zerg in response to this builds up a large roach force sometimes including hydras left over from dealing with immortals, and sometimes Speedlings, as well as a fleet of corrupters whose role is to simply take out the colossus. The Zerg's goal is to take out all of the colossus and to rebuild their army to overwhelm the Protoss soon afterwards. I think however that the mix between forcefields and colossus might be too threatening, so I want to propose a new idea. The infester does not see too much usage in the ZvP matchup, and its second ability Neural Parasite sees little action in any matchup. So I propose they change this ability. The new ability would be to throw a unit or a group of units into an area (similar to Tiny's throw ability from Dota). Why would this be useful? The Zerg could throw a few banelings into the Protoss death-ball softening it up substantially, or throw units that are unable to fight due to forcefields into the fight. I realize that changing a unit affects many match ups, but I think that as Terran are getting better at splitting and spreading marines this would be less of an issue in this matchup than people might think. Especially if there is a short period of time when the unit is in the air before it lands (1second?). A final few thoughts I had were on ways to balance it if it is too strong. The infester sticks its claw(?) that it used for neural parasite into the ground and flings the burrowed unit/s into target area. So this change would require burrow and the new ability to be upgraded and the unit/s to be burrowed. Also the range of how far the can be thrown could be adjusted. This is just a fun idea that I know will not happen, but I thought that it isn't as situational as neural parasite and could have application in all three Match ups, from dealing with death-balls and forcefields to harassing to crossing terrain. Thanks for your time and feedback. (remember this is mostly just for fun I don't expect this change to happen, nor do I think that it needs to happen in order for a match up to be balanced) | ||
|
Doomblaze
United States1292 Posts
The imbalance show thread seems to be getting a lot of hate, i suppose that is to be expected since it is a very touchy topic. | ||
|
srikanth94
India16 Posts
i live in india. i wanted to know whether the latency is good/bad for NA and SEA servers. i would like to buy that regions game whose latency is less. i am not able to find out how to check my latency without the game... please tell me which regions starcraft 2 will give me better gameplay........ thx... | ||
| ||
