• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:12
CEST 01:12
KST 08:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy12ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple5Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research3Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Build Order Practice Maps [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches [ASL21] Ro24 Group D
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1867 users

sneak probe through pylon wallin - bug or legit - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
summerloud
Profile Joined March 2010
Austria1201 Posts
November 27 2010 16:13 GMT
#21
On November 28 2010 00:47 garbanzo wrote:
I think it should be kept in there. I don't know how hard it is to do in SC2, but anyone who has watched (or played) enough BW knows that it is not that easy to pull off.


so basically you said "i have no idea what the fuck im talking about but in bw this went unfixed so it should stay", srsly, gtfo

its not hard to pull off, it doesnt require any additional micro, you just have to pick the right spot for your probe to be in

im simply amazed how many ppl think this should stay in the game for the sole reason that it was possible in BW
ALPINA
Profile Joined May 2010
3791 Posts
November 27 2010 16:16 GMT
#22
They should definately remove this bug, it adds nothing good to the game, and it removes the choice on which side to leave the probe.

Imo it's just unfair.
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity
done
Profile Joined January 2009
Germany70 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-27 16:32:34
November 27 2010 16:32 GMT
#23
they should fix it, of course. As long as only one race can abuse a bug, while the other races can not the bug needs to be fixed! I mean come on peolpe, why should protoss be able to slide through walls, when drones cant? Isnt it the purpose of a wall, not to let units through?
-{Cake}-
Profile Joined October 2010
United States217 Posts
November 27 2010 16:32 GMT
#24
On November 28 2010 01:16 Alpina wrote:
They should definately remove this bug, it adds nothing good to the game, and it removes the choice on which side to leave the probe.

Imo it's just unfair.



They should definitely not remove this bug, it adds additional possibilities to the game, and it removes nothing good.

Imo it's just fair.
Ksyper
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Bulgaria665 Posts
November 27 2010 16:46 GMT
#25
I want more of these things, they add more fun for the people watching the game.
setzer
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3284 Posts
November 27 2010 16:51 GMT
#26
Working as intended, imo.
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
November 27 2010 16:53 GMT
#27
if probes can hop pylons I want better ling surround...
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
MichaelJLowell
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States610 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-27 19:47:20
November 27 2010 19:46 GMT
#28
The question is: Does it increase the available amount of interesting options for both players? If the answer is "It gives the attacking player an extra option for early-game wall-ins without giving the defending player any recourse", then no, it doesn't. Remove it.
http://www.learntocounter.com - I'm a "known troll" so please disconnect your kid's computer when I am on the forums.
OmniscientSC2
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States713 Posts
November 27 2010 19:56 GMT
#29
Gsl spoiler + Show Spoiler +
idras opponent did it to him and saw that idra was going roaches, but still wasn't able to stop him. I think it's a very important scouting mechanical as far as the pylon/cannon rush goes. Zerg can have overlords over toss' base, why can't toss sneak a probe into zerg's? :D
"Did you know about Day and the Wicker Basket?" - Harem "Hi, I'm from Texas." -TLO
Shizuru~
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Malaysia1676 Posts
November 27 2010 22:26 GMT
#30
On November 27 2010 23:47 gongryong wrote:
Indeed. i dont understand why blizzard gives the probe that AI in the first place. Why does it have to move after warping something? When it is snugged on a corner, perhaps yes (in fact it's used in many a great ways, especially in ums games xd). but on an open field??? Probes have one of the worst AI in SC.

On November 27 2010 23:48 Danze wrote:
I think they should fix it and similar bugs. I'm all for using and abusing game mechanics to the best of your ability, but when it comes to things that aren't working as intended; it just comes down to ethics.

We've all seen vids of probes being able to pass through 100% building wall offs and abusing similar bugs. If a player goes to the effort of walling off to deny scouting (insert similar example here) and you're able to sneak a probe in abusing a design error, it's not really ethical is it? What should the walling player do, find a way to stack buildings?

Do players have to resort to exploiting bugs themselves to combat being exploited against? Of course not, it's silly. I know this might just be my illusion of grandeur. I know it sounds crazy but here it goes:

Let's try to play fair eh?

On November 28 2010 00:39 Elwar wrote:
Given its only use is to facilitate cheese, absolutely they should remove it. Oh you can wall someone in then abuse a bug in the game engine to get through yourself, thats logical... Even if it had a greater purpose, glitching probes through wall-offs is just not something that should ever factor into any strategic play.

Just because something was in BW and/or is a bug that has potential to do something Blizzard didn't intend doesn't mean it should automatically be left alone.



let me take a wild guess, all of u drones/scv/probes posters that cry "FIX BUG THIS IS AN EXPLOIT QQQQQQQQ"

never watched a single game in the map outsider in SC1 before? fact is that alot of bugs that probably wasn't intended by blizzard stuck in BW like hold position lurker, air units bugging out turrets, workers can glitch through minerals patches, and yet all those bugs were actually utilised by players and produce whacky strategies and games which are freaking awesome. actually made the game AWESOME!

these may not look pretty or some times doesn't look like how its suppose to work, bu these stuff adds a deeper level of depth to the game, and before u cry about exploits and unfair, similiar bugs were present in old starcraft and it did not broke the game at all, infact it improved it.
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
November 27 2010 22:28 GMT
#31
leave it in!
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
LWr
Profile Joined October 2010
60 Posts
November 27 2010 22:33 GMT
#32
On November 28 2010 07:26 Shizuru~ wrote:
fact is that alot of bugs that probably wasn't intended by blizzard stuck in BW like hold position lurker, air units bugging out turrets, workers can glitch through minerals patches, and yet all those bugs were actually utilised by players and produce whacky strategies and games which are freaking awesome. actually made the game AWESOME!


'I think it's awesome' isn't an argument against how illogical it is that 2 pylons block one player from getting probes out but let the other player get probes in.

I think 5 rax reaper and roaches with a range of 3 is awesome! Let me guess, you QQ'ingers didn't play beta?!
mprs
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada2933 Posts
November 27 2010 22:33 GMT
#33
its part of the game so keep it in. Only change it if it ruins the gameplay. Protoss don't exactly own everyone right now anyway.
We talkin about PRACTICE
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
November 27 2010 22:34 GMT
#34
You could do something similar to this in WC3, patching it out would be breaking tradition
Writerptrk
MICHELLE
Profile Joined June 2010
Korea (South)199 Posts
November 27 2010 22:36 GMT
#35
On November 28 2010 00:39 Elwar wrote:
Given its only use is to facilitate cheese, absolutely they should remove it. Oh you can wall someone in then abuse a bug in the game engine to get through yourself, thats logical... Even if it had a greater purpose, glitching probes through wall-offs is just not something that should ever factor into any strategic play.

Just because something was in BW and/or is a bug that has potential to do something Blizzard didn't intend doesn't mean it should automatically be left alone.


you clearly just started playing this game and have absolutly no idea how it could make game interesting in BW
Artosis, he's like that moss that grows on a tree that lets you know where the sun is
DamnCats
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1472 Posts
November 27 2010 22:37 GMT
#36
im simply amazed how many ppl think this should stay in the game for the sole reason that it was possible in BW


seriously.
Disciples of a god, that neither lives nor breathes.
BrickTop
Profile Joined May 2009
United States37 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-27 22:43:01
November 27 2010 22:40 GMT
#37
On November 27 2010 23:39 LittleeD wrote:
Part of the game.
End of story

On November 27 2010 23:43 Mutaahh wrote:
it aint a bug, its how the engine works.
stop calling it a bug


This argument makes absolutely no sense. Based on your logic, nothing is a bug.

Almost all strategy games try to model some kind of 'real' battle, so they try to model the laws of physics (in a sci-fi sense), etc, so we don't end up with some weird game with completely arbitrary and counterintuitive rules.

A probe jumping over obstacles does not make sense at all and is obviously a bug in the sense that is a probably unintended 'feature' that is caused by sloppy handling of a probe's position after it builds something. It does not correspond to anything real (in the starcraft universe). So from this point of view, this is definitely a bug and should be fixed.

You could argue that they shouldn't fix it because it makes the game more interesting, and that is entirely a matter of opinion, but I think the future of starcraft is pretty bleak if you feel that it needs bugs to make games interesting. Let's hope that Blizz and the players can make sc2 matches interesting enough without weird gimmicks, because this probe jump is nothing more than that.
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-27 22:46:15
November 27 2010 22:43 GMT
#38
On November 27 2010 23:48 Danze wrote:
I think they should fix it and similar bugs. I'm all for using and abusing game mechanics to the best of your ability, but when it comes to things that aren't working as intended; it just comes down to ethics.

We've all seen vids of probes being able to pass through 100% building wall offs and abusing similar bugs. If a player goes to the effort of walling off to deny scouting (insert similar example here) and you're able to sneak a probe in abusing a design error, it's not really ethical is it? What should the walling player do, find a way to stack buildings?

Do players have to resort to exploiting bugs themselves to combat being exploited against? Of course not, it's silly. I know this might just be my illusion of grandeur. I know it sounds crazy but here it goes:

Let's try to play fair eh?


It's not a bug, it's not a design error, it's not a question of ethics. Suck it up, it's completely fine. Just because some people aren't exactly great at scouting/holding off a Cannon rush doesn't mean we need to bitch and moan about it. If we keep dumbing down SC2 like this pretty soon we'll have nothing interesting left.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
MDew
Profile Joined November 2010
United States256 Posts
November 27 2010 22:45 GMT
#39
Should it be removed? Yes. It's a bug. No argument can deny this. It doesn't matter if it was in BW or War3, it's a bug. It should not be there.


Do I care if it gets removed? No.


That's the thing. A lot of things in this world SHOULD be fixed, but won't be because nobody cares, and this is an example.
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
November 27 2010 22:47 GMT
#40
On November 28 2010 07:45 MDew wrote:
Should it be removed? Yes. It's a bug. No argument can deny this. It doesn't matter if it was in BW or War3, it's a bug. It should not be there.


Do I care if it gets removed? No.


That's the thing. A lot of things in this world SHOULD be fixed, but won't be because nobody cares, and this is an example.


That's a terrible argument. Just because it's a bug doesn't mean you should remove it. Remove any of the bugs in BW and that game's balance is completely thrown out the window. There are strategies that revolve around the exploitation of bugs because they have become an integral part of play.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 48m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft185
SpeCial 132
JuggernautJason41
ForJumy 39
CosmosSc2 33
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 963
Artosis 557
Dota 2
monkeys_forever725
Counter-Strike
tarik_tv4337
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0116
PPMD24
Other Games
summit1g14082
Grubby2673
Fnx 2031
shahzam481
Day[9].tv236
Maynarde66
ViBE35
minikerr4
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick404
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta98
• musti20045 29
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4780
Other Games
• Scarra842
• imaqtpie765
• Day9tv236
• Shiphtur89
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
48m
Replay Cast
9h 48m
Afreeca Starleague
10h 48m
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Kung Fu Cup
11h 48m
Replay Cast
1d
The PondCast
1d 10h
OSC
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs MaxPax
[ Show More ]
BSL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS6
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Proleague 2026-03-31
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.