• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:01
CEST 09:01
KST 16:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence2Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments0SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39
StarCraft 2
General
SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Playing StarCraft as 2 people on the same network [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence ASL20 General Discussion Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group C [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! Is there English video for group selection for ASL [ASL20] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1612 users

Your thoughts on new ZvT trend? (GSL 3 spoilers) - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 21 22 23 Next All
Moonling
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States987 Posts
November 23 2010 08:55 GMT
#41
On November 23 2010 16:59 Koshi wrote:
I think the next step will be 15 hatch inside the base. Popping some lings/blings, expand after that and saturate it instantly.


Really... thats intersting http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=155749
1% of koreans control 99% of starcraft winnings. #occupykorea.
Alay
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States660 Posts
November 23 2010 08:56 GMT
#42
On November 23 2010 17:42 IdrA wrote:
its not even an anti-fast expand build, its nearly as good vs pool first
they can have 7-9 marines at your choke before speed finishes even if you 14 gas 14 pool, means you have to make constant lings off of pool first to just barely defend the rush, and the thing is if they scout you making pure lings they just put down a command center and are way ahead. even if you completely stop the rush you have a bunch of useless zerglings and they have more workers than you, and you have a late hatch.

its a build that can punish anything thats not purely defensive, but it sacrifices like 1 scv of economy.


Do you think a fast baneling nest or a fast roach transition into reverse pressure with the roaches would be a viable response to this sort of pressure?
MavercK
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2181 Posts
November 23 2010 08:56 GMT
#43
i think this trend is disgusting. it makes me not even want to watch the GSL
Terrans seem to be even doing this against Protoss.
it's like Terran forgot how to expand or considers late game impossible to win.

none of these openings setup for an expansion. or atleast as IdrA put it. they only expand if you over commit to defending it.

so far. even tho it's only the 2nd day and it's the ro64. the games i've watched have been the worst games since beta. just marines marines. pull all scvs. it's ok i've got mules. more marines. all in. win or lose gg. next game.

i wish i had something more profound to say but i just feel sick in the stomach every game.
Brood War Remake - SC2BW - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145316
Sniffy
Profile Joined September 2010
Australia290 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 08:58:49
November 23 2010 08:56 GMT
#44
Its still strong vs 14 Pool 15 Hatch. The marines always get there before speed is done, so even if you scout it (which terrans can stop if they really want to) you have to throw stupid numbers of lings at it or you lose your Hatch.

If you dont scout it you lose even if you pool first.

Terrans wall off and kill the scouting overlord, since it's really easy to know where the OL will come from. Some maps you basically cant scout the entire base with a slow OL even if they dont try actively deny it

Edit: Im sitting at 2k and play terrans around the same range. Every ZvT I play is like this. I either scout it and throw tons of slow lings at the problem, or the T denies my scouting and walks over my base. I never 14 hatch.
busdriver
Profile Joined November 2010
United States49 Posts
November 23 2010 08:57 GMT
#45
Has anyone tried something like this as protoss? I feel like probes are weaker than SCVs, but maybe that's just because SCVs are all boxy and tough looking while probes look like...well...probes. Plus I don't think the "pew-pew-pew" stalkers shooting from behind the probes would really do very much damage. I guess zealots would be more appropriate. Be interesting to see.
klauz619
Profile Joined July 2010
453 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 08:59:37
November 23 2010 08:58 GMT
#46
On November 23 2010 17:56 MavercK wrote:
i think this trend is disgusting. it makes me not even want to watch the GSL
Terrans seem to be even doing this against Protoss.
it's like Terran forgot how to expand or considers late game impossible to win.

none of these openings setup for an expansion. or atleast as IdrA put it. they only expand if you over commit to defending it.

so far. even tho it's only the 2nd day and it's the ro64. the games i've watched have been the worst games since beta. just marines marines. pull all scvs. it's ok i've got mules. more marines. all in. win or lose gg. next game.

i wish i had something more profound to say but i just feel sick in the stomach every game.


You don't seem to mind when zerg wins 90% of the time just spamming mutas and banelings if terran doesn't all in.

Has anyone tried something like this as protoss? I feel like probes are weaker than SCVs, but maybe that's just because SCVs are all boxy and tough looking while probes look like...well...probes. Plus I don't think the "pew-pew-pew" stalkers shooting from behind the probes would really do very much damage. I guess zealots would be more appropriate. Be interesting to see.


Stalker damage vs light is atrocious. Zealots are melee so you don't get the meatshield benefit, it's possible you actually block the zealot out with probes.
IdrA
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States11541 Posts
November 23 2010 08:58 GMT
#47
On November 23 2010 17:56 Alay wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 17:42 IdrA wrote:
its not even an anti-fast expand build, its nearly as good vs pool first
they can have 7-9 marines at your choke before speed finishes even if you 14 gas 14 pool, means you have to make constant lings off of pool first to just barely defend the rush, and the thing is if they scout you making pure lings they just put down a command center and are way ahead. even if you completely stop the rush you have a bunch of useless zerglings and they have more workers than you, and you have a late hatch.

its a build that can punish anything thats not purely defensive, but it sacrifices like 1 scv of economy.


Do you think a fast baneling nest or a fast roach transition into reverse pressure with the roaches would be a viable response to this sort of pressure?

the problem with that is its so easy to nullify hatch tech aggression, they put the barracks at the choke anyway so they have a thick wallin ready for banelings and 1-2 bunkers makes offensive roaches useless. the whole point is that this build requires an overwhelming response from z and its really easy for t to just make that response a waste of money.
http://www.splitreason.com/product/1152 release the gracken tshirt now available
Craton
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States17251 Posts
November 23 2010 08:59 GMT
#48
It's not really that useful because stalkers come out much later and Protoss doesn't have a MULE. You're generally better off just doing some fast stalker aggression (until Z gets speed) if the map will permit it.
twitch.tv/cratonz
MavercK
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2181 Posts
November 23 2010 08:59 GMT
#49
On November 23 2010 17:58 klauz619 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 17:56 MavercK wrote:
i think this trend is disgusting. it makes me not even want to watch the GSL
Terrans seem to be even doing this against Protoss.
it's like Terran forgot how to expand or considers late game impossible to win.

none of these openings setup for an expansion. or atleast as IdrA put it. they only expand if you over commit to defending it.

so far. even tho it's only the 2nd day and it's the ro64. the games i've watched have been the worst games since beta. just marines marines. pull all scvs. it's ok i've got mules. more marines. all in. win or lose gg. next game.

i wish i had something more profound to say but i just feel sick in the stomach every game.


You don't seem to mind when zerg wins 90% of the time just spamming mutas and banelings if terran doesn't all in.


that wasn't a very interesting dynamic either. but atleast it was midgame and already multiple bases.
Brood War Remake - SC2BW - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145316
Piledriver
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1697 Posts
November 23 2010 08:59 GMT
#50
On November 23 2010 17:57 busdriver wrote:
Has anyone tried something like this as protoss? I feel like probes are weaker than SCVs, but maybe that's just because SCVs are all boxy and tough looking while probes look like...well...probes. Plus I don't think the "pew-pew-pew" stalkers shooting from behind the probes would really do very much damage. I guess zealots would be more appropriate. Be interesting to see.



If protoss had mules, then you would see this happening.
Envy fan since NTH.
Irrelevant
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States2364 Posts
November 23 2010 09:01 GMT
#51
As long as Z continues to 14/15hatch every game, and as long as 2rax gives above 50% chance of winning it will continue this way, unless either A) Zerg finds a way to stop this attack at least 70-80% of the time, or B) starts to 1base play and force T into a mid/late macro game.


or C) they start using bigger maps in which case all races will FE every game...
Sniffy
Profile Joined September 2010
Australia290 Posts
November 23 2010 09:01 GMT
#52
On November 23 2010 17:58 klauz619 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 17:56 MavercK wrote:
i think this trend is disgusting. it makes me not even want to watch the GSL
Terrans seem to be even doing this against Protoss.
it's like Terran forgot how to expand or considers late game impossible to win.

none of these openings setup for an expansion. or atleast as IdrA put it. they only expand if you over commit to defending it.

so far. even tho it's only the 2nd day and it's the ro64. the games i've watched have been the worst games since beta. just marines marines. pull all scvs. it's ok i've got mules. more marines. all in. win or lose gg. next game.

i wish i had something more profound to say but i just feel sick in the stomach every game.


You don't seem to mind when zerg wins 90% of the time just spamming mutas and banelings if terran doesn't all in.


There are lots of T's who know how to macro. Just because you dont doesnt mean its not possible. Late game Biomech terran is awesome and the ZvTs that end up like that are incredibly fun and are dead even
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
November 23 2010 09:02 GMT
#53
If you scout 2rax is it really that bad to get two spines instead of one? Yeah your econ isn't so great but I would assume you'd still be ahead considering it's 2rax and you're on two base (kinda like how vs 2gate you could cut drones for a long time until you drone pumped and would still be ahead). This is coming from a T who doesn't ever do this strat.
Bosu
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States3247 Posts
November 23 2010 09:03 GMT
#54
On November 23 2010 17:48 Piledriver wrote:


If zerg wants to be safe with early game expansions, they need to take late game nerfs. Otherwise they will continue winning tournaments left and right and only fools will believe this nonsense that "All zerg players are 10x more skilled than other races".




This is a terrible way to view the problem. If there are huge problems favoring zerg late game and terran early game then those problems don't balance eachother out. They both need to be fixed.
#1 Kwanro Fan
Gotmog
Profile Joined October 2010
Serbia899 Posts
November 23 2010 09:06 GMT
#55
On November 23 2010 17:25 Epoch wrote:
14 hatch is nonsense and I'm glad terrans found ways to punish it. For a while all zergs were doing is 14 hatch, being completely safe, make like 2 zerglings a million drones. Hatch zlings and banelings when terran pushes out, because they have to push or they will lose, as it is their responsibility to be the aggressor since their late game sucks. And then BAM, wipe your entire army if u make 1 micro mistake. Once that first armies gone its game over. Now that was lame.

Now zergs have to maybe make a spawning pool first occasionally, and when they make that spawning pool they need to produce units for defense. Sounds good 2 me.

You clearly have deep understanding of this game.


To others, i would wait for Idra actually...he is aware of this build, and he has been working on it. So i assume that we will see the right way to counter it from him, if no1 else before.
Zerg will have to keep going for hatch between 14-21 thats for sure and keep droning as hard as possible.

Banelings might not even be an easy answer to this build, because marine/scv micro is getting really good even at mid diamond lvl.
"When you play the game of drones, you win or you die. There is no middle ground"
Bosu
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States3247 Posts
November 23 2010 09:06 GMT
#56
On November 23 2010 18:02 FabledIntegral wrote:
If you scout 2rax is it really that bad to get two spines instead of one? Yeah your econ isn't so great but I would assume you'd still be ahead considering it's 2rax and you're on two base (kinda like how vs 2gate you could cut drones for a long time until you drone pumped and would still be ahead). This is coming from a T who doesn't ever do this strat.



I would say if you throw down 2 spines, and make some combination of speedling/roach/baneling in response to every time you see 2 early barracks yes zerg would be very far behind.
#1 Kwanro Fan
Thezzy
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands2117 Posts
November 23 2010 09:07 GMT
#57
On November 23 2010 17:59 MavercK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 17:58 klauz619 wrote:
On November 23 2010 17:56 MavercK wrote:
i think this trend is disgusting. it makes me not even want to watch the GSL
Terrans seem to be even doing this against Protoss.
it's like Terran forgot how to expand or considers late game impossible to win.

none of these openings setup for an expansion. or atleast as IdrA put it. they only expand if you over commit to defending it.

so far. even tho it's only the 2nd day and it's the ro64. the games i've watched have been the worst games since beta. just marines marines. pull all scvs. it's ok i've got mules. more marines. all in. win or lose gg. next game.

i wish i had something more profound to say but i just feel sick in the stomach every game.


You don't seem to mind when zerg wins 90% of the time just spamming mutas and banelings if terran doesn't all in.


that wasn't a very interesting dynamic either. but atleast it was midgame and already multiple bases.


Funny how it's fair if Terran loses badly in the midgame, but unfair and in need of fixing when Terran dominates in the early game.

Don't expect Terran players (myself included) to not be highly aggressive early game.
The current mid and late game dynamic just doesn't favor Terran so we have to compensate for that in the early game. Not doing that just so 'that there is a midgame' means 90% of the ZvT and PvT games would be incredibly one-sided. You play to win, not to cater to the opponent.

As for 14 hatch, it's an FE/Economic opening.
Regardless of race or even matchup, economic opening vs early aggression is always very risky.
The simple response is not to go 14 hatch and go something like 20 hatch instead.
Playing Terran is like flying down a MULE drop in a marine suit, firing a Gauss Rifle
StarcraftMan
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada507 Posts
November 23 2010 09:08 GMT
#58
Zerg gets to roaches = GG for Terran

Zerg gets to mid game = GG for Terran


It's sad that Terran has to gamble everything at the beginning to prevent Zerg from getting to roaches or mid-game. Blizzard really needs to do some tweaking because these Terran strats are simply gimmicks to avoid an inevtiable mid-game to late-game loss to Zerg.
Durn
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada360 Posts
November 23 2010 09:11 GMT
#59
On November 23 2010 17:58 IdrA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 17:56 Alay wrote:
On November 23 2010 17:42 IdrA wrote:
its not even an anti-fast expand build, its nearly as good vs pool first
they can have 7-9 marines at your choke before speed finishes even if you 14 gas 14 pool, means you have to make constant lings off of pool first to just barely defend the rush, and the thing is if they scout you making pure lings they just put down a command center and are way ahead. even if you completely stop the rush you have a bunch of useless zerglings and they have more workers than you, and you have a late hatch.

its a build that can punish anything thats not purely defensive, but it sacrifices like 1 scv of economy.


Do you think a fast baneling nest or a fast roach transition into reverse pressure with the roaches would be a viable response to this sort of pressure?

the problem with that is its so easy to nullify hatch tech aggression, they put the barracks at the choke anyway so they have a thick wallin ready for banelings and 1-2 bunkers makes offensive roaches useless. the whole point is that this build requires an overwhelming response from z and its really easy for t to just make that response a waste of money.

I think the real abuse stems from this point where T can just as easily punish the Z compensating so hard.
Do you think this will be as detrimental to gameplay as the 6rax reaper opening? It's hard for me to imagine a scenario where Zerg can go "oh ****, if I do A + B, it'll counter this marine/scv pressure." due to how early the pressure comes and how few tech options are open to Z at that time.
"Even if I lose 100 games, that's 100 different arrows pointing me in the wrong direction." - Sean Day[9] Plott
willeesmalls
Profile Joined March 2010
United States477 Posts
November 23 2010 09:11 GMT
#60
Just scout well and be prepared to pull drones for the bunkers at your ramp. Then crawlers with a few lings hold off any kind of marine aggression.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 21 22 23 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 59m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 158
ProTech75
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 354
Leta 320
sSak 54
Noble 38
Dewaltoss 6
League of Legends
JimRising 630
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K607
allub153
shoxiejesuss70
semphis_58
Other Games
C9.Mang0346
XaKoH 180
NeuroSwarm77
Mew2King58
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH325
• LUISG 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1397
• Lourlo969
• HappyZerGling134
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
2h 59m
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
3h 59m
OSC
16h 59m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 2h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 2h
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
PiGosaur Monday
1d 16h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Zoun vs Classic
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.