EPTOn September 21 2010 22:58 ToastieNL wrote:
^ Where proven fake, IIRC
^ Where proven fake, IIRC
you just pulled the "proven" statement out of your ass.
Patch 1.1 Is Coming 09.22 - Page 26
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
decemvre
Romania639 Posts
you just pulled the "proven" statement out of your ass. | ||
|
Mikilatov
United States3897 Posts
On September 21 2010 22:52 TechDeft wrote: I don't have the link handy, but I swear I saw "confirmation" that there were "confirmed unconfirmed changes" coming in the patch. Mmm, unsourced confirmation on confirmed unconfirmed changes. Hahahaha =) | ||
|
Gentso
United States2218 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:01 Pekkz wrote: What if they actually released it by "misstake" just to see what the community thought of the changes, and then do final changes after they see the feedback, that would be pretty smart  Blizzard doesn't listen community opinion, and thank god for that. | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On September 21 2010 22:58 ToastieNL wrote: ^ Where proven fake, IIRC yup - blizzard would never release patchnotes that say "general" two times; this would be retarded btw. I have also heard that the "preview" were only those changes that were 100% certain that they WOULD be in fact implemented; stuff blizz wasn't sure about yet wasn't posted, but there will definitely be additional changes to the ones already confirmed | ||
|
Gentso
United States2218 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:01 decemberTV wrote: you just pulled the "proven" statement out of your ass. don't carriers already spawn with 4 interceptors? | ||
|
EnderCN
United States499 Posts
They always end up being 95% not SC2 related anyway. People spouting whatever political views they happened to see on TV this week, some teenager spamming racial slurs because he thinks it is funny. People making sexual jokes out of achievement names. People telling chuck norris jokes or whatever lame joke of that type is popular that day. Then the 5% of SC2 related stuff is mostly bronze players advertising their poorly made custom game or arguing how VR just can't be stopped or blaming their failings on their race instead of their terrible macro. 1% of the chat will actually be useful but that gets drowned out by the rest until those players realize how terrible public chat channels are and just turns them off. I'd rather they spend man hours elsewhere than trying to moderate that junk. Private chat channels are good though. | ||
|
Grummler
Germany743 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:01 decemberTV wrote: you just pulled the "proven" statement out of your ass. These fake changes are missing some stuff blizzard already mentioned they will change. For example: "Friendly units no longer provide vision when killed. Enemy units previously revealed cannot be targeted." The "leaked" changes dont say a word on this. And seriously, how can patch changes "leak"? | ||
|
decemvre
Romania639 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:03 Gentso wrote: don't carriers already spawn with 4 interceptors? Would someone making up fake patch notes make such a retarded mistake and not double check ? Its more than likely a blizzard employee who hasn't got a clue about carriers wrote the patch notes. Moreover the new overlord speed is EXACTLY the same as queen offcreep. A noob making up fake patch notes would not think of that in a million years. | ||
|
Ishi
Sweden3 Posts
| ||
|
ZoomDog
Australia25 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:06 decemberTV wrote: Would someone making up fake patch notes make such a retarded mistake and not double check ? Its more than likely a blizzard employee who hasn't got a clue about carriers wrote the patch notes. If it's a choice between a random Internet user cocking it up or a Blizzard employee stuffing it, I know which I'd put money on.  | ||
|
ensis
Germany340 Posts
yup, i also dont understand why blizzard is keeping it a secret. perhaps because they dont want people to theorycraft about it though they never played the actual version. btw. do you also have this feeling that you just do not want to play sc2 right now, because you know, that everything you could learn could just be in vain in some hours? | ||
|
vrok
Sweden2541 Posts
| ||
|
mangsky
51 Posts
dammit all these maphackers are getting irritating | ||
|
decemvre
Romania639 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:08 ZoomDog wrote: If it's a choice between a random Internet user cocking it up or a Blizzard employee stuffing it, I know which I'd put money on. You obviously dont know what sort of people blizzard employs. Enough of this i'm wasting my time. | ||
|
Gigaudas
Sweden1213 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:06 Ishi wrote: Why cant blizz just post the real patch notes?? =< Well, maybe they did? Except their too inadequate to believe so no one does. | ||
|
kickinhead
Switzerland2069 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:06 decemberTV wrote: Would someone making up fake patch notes make such a retarded mistake and not double check ? Its more than likely a blizzard employee who hasn't got a clue about carriers wrote the patch notes. Moreover the new overlord speed is EXACTLY the same as queen offcreep. A noob making up fake patch notes would not think of that in a million years. Or it was a mistake when translating from russian? | ||
|
TechDeft
United States211 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:09 ensis wrote: yuhuuuuuuuu no longer banned!!! sry again to admins yup, i also dont understand why blizzard is keeping it a secret. perhaps because they dont want people to theorycraft about it though they never played the actual version. btw. do you also have this feeling that you just do not want to play sc2 right now, because you know, that everything you could learn could just be in vain in some hours? Any WoW players here know why they want the changes to be a secret. Every F'ing patch that comes along(I quit months ago, bored waiting for Cata) is published, then the community cheers and whines before they ever experience how the changes work together and ACTUALLY affect gameplay. Look at how much speculation came from them posting just a part of the notes. (If it is just a part, and not the whole thing.) I personally believe there is more, because this early there are always little bugs to fix. Things like the 7.1 surround and such from last patch. | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:06 decemberTV wrote: Would someone making up fake patch notes make such a retarded mistake and not double check ? Its more than likely a blizzard employee who hasn't got a clue about carriers wrote the patch notes. Moreover the new overlord speed is EXACTLY the same as queen offcreep. A noob making up fake patch notes would not think of that in a million years. If it's the set of notes I think you're talking about, then the carrier part is more likely to be a translation error since it was translated from english, to russian, and back again  | ||
|
miltondtf
Portugal50 Posts
| ||
|
Agh
United States1081 Posts
On September 21 2010 23:06 Grummler wrote: These fake changes are missing some stuff blizzard already mentioned they will change. For example: "Friendly units no longer provide vision when killed. Enemy units previously revealed cannot be targeted." The "leaked" changes dont say a word on this. And seriously, how can patch changes "leak"? They can be leaked the same way everything else can be. Open FTP, careless employees, in rarer cases hacked and accessed. You have to realize that they do a great amount of internal testing, and that the information has to be shared by some means. | ||
| ||
