The quality is kind of dark but it's watchable.
Day[9] interview at WCG
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Karakaxe
Sweden585 Posts
The quality is kind of dark but it's watchable. | ||
Bluedraqy
Denmark496 Posts
| ||
Apollys
United States278 Posts
| ||
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
That logic actually brings a lot more concern than relief because once protoss/terran figure out good macro builds with harrassment options the imbalances will manifest themselves even worse. And also wc3 is a horrible example of blizzard knowing how to balance a game;( | ||
![]()
Wunder
United Kingdom2950 Posts
| ||
brn4meplz
Canada98 Posts
Example. when I say stuff like this On August 22 2010 07:49 brn4meplz wrote: Starcraft isn't what it is today without Brood War(original Starcraft has an immensity of failings) Alot of things seen in current Sc1 play were introduced with the Brood War expansion. The same can be said for War3 RoC and TFT. TFT balanced alot of units and introduced some needed niche units. I purchased SC2 knowing Full well that it would take an expansion to settle the score on balance and gameplay. | ||
TedJustice
Canada1324 Posts
On September 12 2010 16:43 Sfydjklm wrote: how can zergs start winning once they figure out how to open safely if zerg 200/200 is inferior to every other race by a large margin? They'll figure out ways to not let their opponent get to 200/200, if that's what it takes to win. They'll also probably figure out more neat tricks like the muta magic boxing, etc. that will give them smaller edges in battles. | ||
Edso
Canada112 Posts
| ||
Damnesiac
United States53 Posts
| ||
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
On September 12 2010 16:57 TedJustice wrote: They'll figure out ways to not let their opponent get to 200/200, if that's what it takes to win. They'll also probably figure out more neat tricks like the muta magic boxing, etc. that will give them smaller edges in battles. Yeah In BW a Terran 200/200 beats a Protoss 200/200 but that matchup is still pretty balanced. I still think T is a little overpowered in Sc2 though. | ||
DarkspearTribe
568 Posts
On September 12 2010 17:02 Damnesiac wrote: So who do i listen to... Day[9].. hasn't won anything in sc2 really, and supposedly barely plays at all, OR players who were better than him in sc1 and are far better than him in sc2 with more knowledge. I like day9 in sc1 because he had credibility and experience to back up whatever you said. In sc2 he is just some sort of master of extrapolation with no evidence what so ever. IdrA gives solid reasoning for all his points and his predictions in every field have super accurate results. Not only that but many top level players including some terrans agree that there is imbalance. I guess I am just too demanding of people who make pretty ballsy claims when there arguement is ' We are going to see this happen then this happen and then this will happen ' The thoughthammer has spoken and you shall not question his opinion. | ||
boprandem
Kazakhstan37 Posts
| ||
godzillathrilla
Nauru75 Posts
...and predictable second question Day[9] with the baller answers to save it; he's right, P is already considered the strongest in Korea. | ||
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
On September 12 2010 17:02 Damnesiac wrote: So who do i listen to... Day[9].. hasn't won anything in sc2 really, and supposedly barely plays at all, OR players who were better than him in sc1 and are far better than him in sc2 with more knowledge. I like day9 in sc1 because he had credibility and experience to back up whatever you said. In sc2 he is just some sort of master of extrapolation with no evidence what so ever. IdrA gives solid reasoning for all his points and his predictions in every field have super accurate results. Not only that but many top level players including some terrans agree that there is imbalance. I guess I am just too demanding of people who make pretty ballsy claims when there arguement is ' We are going to see this happen then this happen and then this will happen ' I think Day9 has still a lot of credibility in SC2 too because he is just good in RTS and SC2 isn't that different from BW. Also he has just shown that he still has knowledge about the game and is widely respected by pro players. That said I still hope he would play more just because I followed him in BW and love him x) I want to see him in tournaments and I would love to see him do well. | ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
| ||
Crushgroove
United States793 Posts
On September 12 2010 17:02 Damnesiac wrote: So who do i listen to... Day[9].. hasn't won anything in sc2 really, and supposedly barely plays at all, OR players who were better than him in sc1 and are far better than him in sc2 with more knowledge. I like day9 in sc1 because he had credibility and experience to back up whatever you said. In sc2 he is just some sort of master of extrapolation with no evidence what so ever. IdrA gives solid reasoning for all his points and his predictions in every field have super accurate results. Not only that but many top level players including some terrans agree that there is imbalance. I guess I am just too demanding of people who make pretty ballsy claims when there arguement is ' We are going to see this happen then this happen and then this will happen ' I agree with you, but Sean's a good kid, and he's entitled to his opinion. When asked, I'd expect nothing less from anyone but to give it. | ||
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
On September 12 2010 17:03 Wargizmo wrote: Yeah In BW a Terran 200/200 beats a Protoss 200/200 but that matchup is still pretty balanced. I still think T is a little overpowered in Sc2 though. So zerg has to figure out something protoss and terrans already know about zerg? How to not let a zerg get to 200/200. The problem is that zerg is dominated in all aspects of the game. | ||
Blackhawk13
United States442 Posts
| ||
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
On September 12 2010 17:09 Piski wrote: I think Day9 has still a lot of credibility in SC2 too because he is just good in RTS and SC2 isn't that different from BW. Also he has just shown that he still has knowledge about the game and is widely respected by pro players. That said I still hope he would play more just because I followed him in BW and love him x) I want to see him in tournaments and I would love to see him do well. What day says is not necessarily what day thinks either. he is just trying to be as neutral and as inspiring for his fans as he can be. | ||
ShaperofDreams
Canada2492 Posts
On September 12 2010 16:43 Sfydjklm wrote: how can zergs start winning once they figure out how to open safely if zerg 200/200 is inferior to every other race by a large margin? That logic actually brings a lot more concern than relief because once protoss/terran figure out good macro builds with harrassment options the imbalances will manifest themselves even worse. And also wc3 is a horrible example of blizzard knowing how to balance a game;( have you watched bw? terran has the best 200\200 army ez. by a large margin. the other races have to do cutesy shit all the time. +15 attack upgrade for siege tanks by 3\3? holy fucksickle. | ||
| ||