EPT"Stalife Drops" - micro trick in tvz - Page 14
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Cedstick
Canada3336 Posts
| ||
|
Griffith`
714 Posts
| ||
|
Zombo Joe
Canada850 Posts
| ||
|
InsaniaK
Sweden120 Posts
The likelyhood of someone A-moving into an army is a lot larger when it's just a marine ball. Thus: Zerg sees only marines, A-moves and goes back to macro. I'm not saying that it's always going to happen that way but a pure marine ball isn't that threatening to a zerg. | ||
|
Supamang
United States2298 Posts
On January 06 2011 06:31 InsaniaK wrote: To the people who are saying: Most zergs dont A-move with blings. The likelyhood of someone A-moving into an army is a lot larger when it's just a marine ball. Thus: Zerg sees only marines, A-moves and goes back to macro. I'm not saying that it's always going to happen that way but a pure marine ball isn't that threatening to a zerg. even with marines, i almost never a-move my blings. if get killed, they do their explosive damage anyway, so why not move them to get a nice surround and soak up damage while theyre at it? | ||
|
SamGamgee
79 Posts
On January 06 2011 06:31 InsaniaK wrote: To the people who are saying: Most zergs dont A-move with blings. The likelyhood of someone A-moving into an army is a lot larger when it's just a marine ball. Thus: Zerg sees only marines, A-moves and goes back to macro. I'm not saying that it's always going to happen that way but a pure marine ball isn't that threatening to a zerg. nobody a-moves their banelings, i dont know what you are watching. | ||
|
koppik
United States676 Posts
But it's obviously not something critical. | ||
|
Cade
Canada1420 Posts
On January 06 2011 06:31 InsaniaK wrote: To the people who are saying: Most zergs dont A-move with blings. The likelyhood of someone A-moving into an army is a lot larger when it's just a marine ball. Thus: Zerg sees only marines, A-moves and goes back to macro. I'm not saying that it's always going to happen that way but a pure marine ball isn't that threatening to a zerg. I don't think this is true at all, A-moving banelings is almost never done, even in your hypothetical situation most people would still not A-move banes. | ||
|
Joroth
United States318 Posts
| ||
|
K3NDR1C
United States28 Posts
| ||
|
InsaniaK
Sweden120 Posts
On January 06 2011 08:00 Cade wrote: I don't think this is true at all, A-moving banelings is almost never done, even in your hypothetical situation most people would still not A-move banes. Just moving your banelings then moving away cant be that good considering the marines can just stim and run until the banelings stop moving. I'm not completely sure if A-move stops as well. If they do I am completely wrong ^_^ | ||
|
holynorth
United States590 Posts
On September 11 2010 08:02 SoFFacet wrote: TL posters are always super worried that some other poster might get become respected before they do, therefore they must make sure that no one ever gets credit for contributing to the community. Just wanted to quote this to comment on how true this people. Countless people commenting on how they did it first or something. Who cares? And the thor version of this is quite disgusting. | ||
|
Denzil
United Kingdom4193 Posts
| ||
|
Beneather
Canada451 Posts
| ||
|
VoiceOfDecember
Australia206 Posts
| ||
|
Kewlots
Australia534 Posts
people still arguing whether or not this is viable should just watch the game and see how epicly good it worked in the boxer game and just except its a nice situational trick that can be quite nice if pulled off correctly | ||
|
LeCastor
France234 Posts
| ||
|
Scio
Germany522 Posts
On January 06 2011 02:38 BouBou.865 wrote: That reasoning makes no sense at all; if BoxeR went fast Bcruiser, that doesn't make it good. If HuK mothership rushes, that doesn't make it good. Will they win? Maybe, but then it won't be due to the build/trick, but due to them outplaying their opponent. Better example: Boxer has 5 seconds Idling before each game. Is it good? No, ofcourse not. Will he still win most games on ladder? Yeah, he probably will. Well your comment doesnt really make sense either. You cant compare a little trick to whole BOs or some nonsense that is known to be bad/cheesy. Of course you are right when you say that this trick isnt getting usefull out of nowhere only if boxer uses it. But this always was usefull and some people saying it isnt are just proven wrong if boxer uses it with great effect in a GSL match. | ||
|
Mashes
Canada441 Posts
now, I only need to get the control necessary to pull this off >_> | ||
|
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
On January 06 2011 09:25 InsaniaK wrote: Just moving your banelings then moving away cant be that good considering the marines can just stim and run until the banelings stop moving. I'm not completely sure if A-move stops as well. If they do I am completely wrong ^_^ the problem with a-move is that banelings will overkill with a-move, and you waste banelings you wouldn't've had u just moved them. nobody a-moves anymore, ever. | ||
| ||
