• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 17:40
CET 23:40
KST 07:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder SCHNAIL now supports Remastered The End Of An Era Rollback Netcode in Brood War How SKT1 S-Tiers Felt To Be Swept By Flash
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2v2v2v2 Tournament Stage 1: Community Poll [$1250] International ShieldBattery League New Worlds Star League
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Deus Ex 3!? Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10311 users

Official State of the Game Podcast Thread - Page 2693

Forum Index > SC2 General
54608 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2731 Next
SCST
Profile Joined November 2011
Mexico1609 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-17 21:54:43
May 17 2013 21:53 GMT
#53841
On May 18 2013 06:51 USvBleakill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:50 SCST wrote:
"We want maps to be imbalanced" David Kim 2013... please tell me he's joking


No he says Fun>Balance on maps on ladder. And no one forcing tournaments to use them.



Whoa what? He started off his comment by saying "we are talking to all the tournaments about map changes" and then said "we don't think all maps should be balanced" . . .
"The weak cannot forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the strong." - Gandhi
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
May 17 2013 21:54 GMT
#53842
God incontrol shut the hell up and let us listen to what the man has got to say.
geno
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States1404 Posts
May 17 2013 21:55 GMT
#53843
On May 18 2013 06:53 SCST wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:51 Qikz wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:50 SCST wrote:
"We want maps to be imbalanced" David Kim 2013... please tell me he's joking


I hope he isn't. Every map in WoL played out the exact same. It was awful.


Yes, the tournaments are luckily going to fight to the death to avoid this as they at least understand that "not always being fair" is actually a bad idea.

Actually, even a child understands that playing a game that is not fair is a bad idea.

This is the problem with too much pro feedback. A lot of the time, the interests of fans and spectators do not align with the interest of pro players, and it's really important that Blizzard / tournaments realize this. Of course a player is going to be fine with a map staying in the pool for 1-2+ years at a time, especially if they are good at the map and confident in it's balance.

More frequent map turnover is one of those issues that is hard for most pros to deal with, but is really really important for the spectators.
Qikz
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United Kingdom12071 Posts
May 17 2013 21:55 GMT
#53844
Tyler: "What're you thinking about...."

David Kim: Are you coming on to me?
FanTaSy's #1 Fan | STPL Caster/Organiser | SKT BEST KT | https://twitch.tv/stpl
aZealot
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
New Zealand5447 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-17 21:59:30
May 17 2013 21:56 GMT
#53845
On May 18 2013 06:51 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:49 aZealot wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:42 flodeskum wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:33 aZealot wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:29 Exarl25 wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:28 a176 wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:27 Exarl25 wrote:
I actually really liked his justification for the Colossus. I see the unit in a new light now. Imagine PvT if Colossi couldn't be hit by AA. Would Protoss ever make Stalkers? Wouldn't you just keep making Colossi with Zealots to tank? A core unit of your army being vulnerable to a different kind of attack forces you to diversify your unit composition, to take terrain into account when engaging, and to not just blindly mass Colossi because they can be so effectively countered.


Or they could just not have colossus in the first place?


And have just purely ground vs ground armies? The point of the Colossus is that it forces air and anti-air.


Huh, what's wrong with that?

Moreover, that's not a sufficient justification for the Colossus. In WOL, Protoss air sucked because Corruptors and Vikings had to be better (either through damage or range) than Protoss air. Don't get me wrong, I think the Colossus is a cool unit. But, it needs to be re-imagined. Lower range, siege mode, less damage, different attack etc. There are many options.

While vikings are good I think marines are are far bigger deterrent for protoss air than vikings can ever be.


True, but the range of the Viking (which is needed to counter Colossus range) means that no Protoss air unit can have a comparable range (with the exception of the expensive + slow to build Carrier). If they did, they could take out the Vikings; and Protoss could cut the usually ineffectual Stalker, and build ground armies purely out Colossus/Zealot etc.

The Colossus is an interesting unit, but it's current incarnation leaves a lot more to be desired, I think.

Tempests?


The wannabe Carrier? ;-)

I can't recall the stats, but isn't the Tempest a dedicated anti-Massive unit? It does little damage to anything else. You may be right, though. In time, Protoss may add Tempests to the traditional Colossus based deathball. You'd need to be on 3+ bases though to make it work. I doubt if it will be feasible as a staple of future PvT play (similar to another late tech, the Carrier).

Hahaha, Geoff trolling DK a little with the Bunker. DK not giving a shit.
KT best KT ~ 2014
SCST
Profile Joined November 2011
Mexico1609 Posts
May 17 2013 21:57 GMT
#53846
On May 18 2013 06:55 geno wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:53 SCST wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:51 Qikz wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:50 SCST wrote:
"We want maps to be imbalanced" David Kim 2013... please tell me he's joking


I hope he isn't. Every map in WoL played out the exact same. It was awful.


Yes, the tournaments are luckily going to fight to the death to avoid this as they at least understand that "not always being fair" is actually a bad idea.

Actually, even a child understands that playing a game that is not fair is a bad idea.

This is the problem with too much pro feedback. A lot of the time, the interests of fans and spectators do not align with the interest of pro players, and it's really important that Blizzard / tournaments realize this. Of course a player is going to be fine with a map staying in the pool for 1-2+ years at a time, especially if they are good at the map and confident in it's balance.

More frequent map turnover is one of those issues that is hard for most pros to deal with, but is really really important for the spectators.


I think that fans will will hate/complain/whine constantly if pros are playing on unfair maps. I can't even imagine.

Kim must not have meant this - I must be misinterpreting what he said when he stated "we are working with tournaments . . . we think fun is more important than balance"
"The weak cannot forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the strong." - Gandhi
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
May 17 2013 21:58 GMT
#53847
Indeed, putting his neck on the line by going on a show like this is an awesome step. Gj!
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
Sated
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
England4983 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-17 21:59:52
May 17 2013 21:58 GMT
#53848
--- Nuked ---
Myles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5162 Posts
May 17 2013 22:00 GMT
#53849
On May 18 2013 06:57 SCST wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:55 geno wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:53 SCST wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:51 Qikz wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:50 SCST wrote:
"We want maps to be imbalanced" David Kim 2013... please tell me he's joking


I hope he isn't. Every map in WoL played out the exact same. It was awful.


Yes, the tournaments are luckily going to fight to the death to avoid this as they at least understand that "not always being fair" is actually a bad idea.

Actually, even a child understands that playing a game that is not fair is a bad idea.

This is the problem with too much pro feedback. A lot of the time, the interests of fans and spectators do not align with the interest of pro players, and it's really important that Blizzard / tournaments realize this. Of course a player is going to be fine with a map staying in the pool for 1-2+ years at a time, especially if they are good at the map and confident in it's balance.

More frequent map turnover is one of those issues that is hard for most pros to deal with, but is really really important for the spectators.


I think that fans will will hate/complain/whine constantly if pros are playing on unfair maps. I can't even imagine.

Kim must not have meant this - I must be misinterpreting what he said when he stated "we are working with tournaments . . . we think fun is more important than balance"

Look at BW Proleague. Constant new maps with constant changes made to those maps to fix slight imbalances made it far more interesting imo.
Moderator
SCST
Profile Joined November 2011
Mexico1609 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-17 22:02:04
May 17 2013 22:00 GMT
#53850
On May 18 2013 06:58 Sated wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:53 SCST wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:51 USvBleakill wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:50 SCST wrote:
"We want maps to be imbalanced" David Kim 2013... please tell me he's joking


No he says Fun>Balance on maps on ladder. And no one forcing tournaments to use them.



Whoa what? He started off his comment by saying "we are talking to all the tournaments about map changes" and then said "we don't think all maps should be balanced" . . .

If a map is imbalanced then it will get vetoed by players, or teams will only send out players who are good on it in team leagues (which adds a level to "sniper" strategies and the like). As long as there are some standard maps, it is okay to have some zany maps alongside them.


I think this is a bad precedent. What if we end up with over 50% zany maps? What if some can't be veto'd? I agree it should be ok to have some fun maps on ladder. . . getting tournaments to play those maps, that's the scary part of what Kim seemed to be implying.

I honestly don't think the spectator community has any problems with the relatively balanced tournament maps? I haven't heard a single complain about the current map pool in LR threads, stream chats, anywhere.
"The weak cannot forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the strong." - Gandhi
dcsoda
Profile Joined June 2011
United States583 Posts
May 17 2013 22:00 GMT
#53851
Cool episode. GM level dodge on that weakest race question. Loved it.
Exarl25
Profile Joined November 2010
1887 Posts
May 17 2013 22:02 GMT
#53852
On May 18 2013 06:57 SCST wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:55 geno wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:53 SCST wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:51 Qikz wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:50 SCST wrote:
"We want maps to be imbalanced" David Kim 2013... please tell me he's joking


I hope he isn't. Every map in WoL played out the exact same. It was awful.


Yes, the tournaments are luckily going to fight to the death to avoid this as they at least understand that "not always being fair" is actually a bad idea.

Actually, even a child understands that playing a game that is not fair is a bad idea.

This is the problem with too much pro feedback. A lot of the time, the interests of fans and spectators do not align with the interest of pro players, and it's really important that Blizzard / tournaments realize this. Of course a player is going to be fine with a map staying in the pool for 1-2+ years at a time, especially if they are good at the map and confident in it's balance.

More frequent map turnover is one of those issues that is hard for most pros to deal with, but is really really important for the spectators.


I think that fans will will hate/complain/whine constantly if pros are playing on unfair maps. I can't even imagine.

Kim must not have meant this - I must be misinterpreting what he said when he stated "we are working with tournaments . . . we think fun is more important than balance"


You just aren't comprehending the nuances of what he means when he is talking about map balance. A map may seem unfair for a race at first but they will adapt and figure out how to play on it. Did you listen to his Daybreak example? We had the problem in WoL where the "balanced" maps were selected and nothing but those maps were ever used again. No tournament would take the risk of introducing a new map because it may not be "balanced". We need fresh maps, we need to encourage innovation, we need to combat stagnancy. We have the example of BW to follow and the example of WoL to avoid.
geno
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States1404 Posts
May 17 2013 22:02 GMT
#53853
On May 18 2013 06:57 SCST wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2013 06:55 geno wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:53 SCST wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:51 Qikz wrote:
On May 18 2013 06:50 SCST wrote:
"We want maps to be imbalanced" David Kim 2013... please tell me he's joking


I hope he isn't. Every map in WoL played out the exact same. It was awful.


Yes, the tournaments are luckily going to fight to the death to avoid this as they at least understand that "not always being fair" is actually a bad idea.

Actually, even a child understands that playing a game that is not fair is a bad idea.

This is the problem with too much pro feedback. A lot of the time, the interests of fans and spectators do not align with the interest of pro players, and it's really important that Blizzard / tournaments realize this. Of course a player is going to be fine with a map staying in the pool for 1-2+ years at a time, especially if they are good at the map and confident in it's balance.

More frequent map turnover is one of those issues that is hard for most pros to deal with, but is really really important for the spectators.


I think that fans will will hate/complain/whine constantly if pros are playing on unfair maps. I can't even imagine.

Kim must not have meant this - I must be misinterpreting what he said when he stated "we are working with tournaments . . . we think fun is more important than balance"

He's not talking about throwing 80/20 balanced maps into all the map pools. He's just saying, don't focus too much on balance at the cost of fun. It's the same thing with the design of the game, too. As someone else above mentioned, it's much MUCH more difficult to make a balanced game fun and exciting to watch than it is to make a fun game balanced.

And for reference, if you look at BW, this was pretty much entirely how the scene was run in the korean scene. Players were forced to learn new maps every season or individual league, many of the maps being out-there and innovative. Some of them didn't work out and would need to be recalled for being too imbalanced, but it was worth it to get the ones that ended up better than expected and produced really exciting games. It also forced the metagame to change and react a lot quicker than it otherwise would.
InspiredFrog
Profile Joined February 2009
Finland522 Posts
May 17 2013 22:02 GMT
#53854
On May 18 2013 07:00 dcsoda wrote:
Cool episode. GM level dodge on that weakest race question. Loved it.

He probably did that to see Geoff's reaction. Sly bastard. <3
Good show, albeit a little short one.
Much | Iris | July --- TaeJa | HerO | TLO
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
May 17 2013 22:03 GMT
#53855
Why did they end the show as WCS ends? >.> They should start it when WCS ends.
Micro_Jackson
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany2002 Posts
May 17 2013 22:03 GMT
#53856
So 1 hour of political correct talking and 98% answers with press release character.

But at least Incontrol saves it with a different opinion on some things and the quick questions. And that weakest race dodge was Code S level interviewing skill
darkscream
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada2310 Posts
May 17 2013 22:03 GMT
#53857
I'm normally pretty positive about sotg but I feel like this show was a blunder. Having 3 protoss players ask david kim softball questions for an hour just seems like a waste. And they literally didn't press him on his dodges at all.

Ling/bane takes more micro than scourge/muta in bw? Really david kim? Really?

They did a decent job of asking racially diverse questions at the start but most of them were like "why does the colossus get hit by anti-air" "why don't pheonixes have the ability to clear a mineral line like hellbat drops" "why are swarmhosts so good"

Really, really weak. I hope David Kim does more community talks like that, but hopefully next time people don't go full racebabby and pull punches.
Zenbrez
Profile Joined June 2012
Canada5973 Posts
May 17 2013 22:04 GMT
#53858
Going to be a lot of dumb comments here nit picking DK's words.
Refer to my post.
AntiGrav1ty
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2310 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-17 22:07:44
May 17 2013 22:04 GMT
#53859
It's like people chose to deliberately misunderstand. Everything Kim said makes a lot of sense if you think about it from a designers and lead-balancer point of view.

What he means with map-imbalance is that they are fine with certain strategies being more viable or stronger on certain maps than on others because it leads to variety. He does not want people to play the same strategy regardless of map. If people always play the same strat no matter what map then why even have different maps? Figuring out what is strong for specific maps is what makes it fun. Of course he didnt mean he wants a map to be 70% Zerg favored for more fun...

www.twitch.tv/antigrav1ty
Absentia
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom973 Posts
May 17 2013 22:08 GMT
#53860
Great show: it was good to see Geoff and Tyler putting some hard questions to David Kim. Having said that, I think David Kim came across very well in the discussion. There's always going to be some disagreement with Blizzard's approach to balance/design but all his statements were reasonable and well expressed.

Thanks for the show JP.
Prev 1 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2731 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 449
Nathanias 81
EmSc Tv 9
StarCraft: Brood War
ProTech41
Shinee 40
LuMiX 1
Dota 2
syndereN513
League of Legends
Doublelift4210
JimRising 533
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1299
byalli467
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox477
C9.Mang0176
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu373
Other Games
summit1g9935
tarik_tv5900
Grubby2515
PiGStarcraft228
mouzStarbuck226
ToD177
Pyrionflax158
Fuzer 94
ViBE52
ZombieGrub43
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL113
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 9
EmSc2Tv 9
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 62
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki73
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3304
• Jankos3241
Other Games
• imaqtpie255
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
20m
The PondCast
11h 20m
KCM Race Survival
11h 20m
OSC
15h 20m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
herO vs Rogue
IPSL
2 days
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
IPSL
3 days
Azhi_Dahaki vs ggnore13
Double vs WIZARD
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-03
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Proleague 2026-11-04
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.