EPTOn July 20 2010 04:48 Belegorm wrote:
Maybe he'll be Grrr's successor
Maybe he'll be Grrr's successor
NO.
HuK: "I want to be the next Lim Yo Hwan for SC2" - Page 13
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
GuerrillaRepublik
United States34 Posts
NO. | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Butigroove
Seychelles2061 Posts
On July 21 2010 12:05 Telcontar wrote: HuK get the range upgrade for crying out loud. Maybe hes Kim Taek Yong instead? | ||
NonY
8750 Posts
You mean Song Byung Goo | ||
|
DemiSe
883 Posts
| ||
|
cucumber
United States116 Posts
| ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
| ||
|
nanaoei
3358 Posts
On July 21 2010 12:48 floor exercise wrote: He's already revolutionizing SC2 like the Emperor with his 6 gate -> nexus build oh, so mean :D | ||
|
tipakee
United States127 Posts
On July 21 2010 12:02 setzer wrote: SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER DOWN BELOW + Show Spoiler + I love how you write this after going 9gate 2base on BS and 6gate on Steppes of War during Day9's tournament. You are not really fooling many people when you say things like this and then proceed to do all the things people accuse you of. You are a talented player and can be one of the top NA SC2 players but I don't see why you constrain yourself to this style of play instead of improving upon other areas. + Show Spoiler + Huk expanded before he threw down the 9 warpgates on BS, just like he explained in the previous post. I do agree the 6 warpgates on 1 base is not the best strategy. Please dont be quick to judge warpgate pushes they can work in all 3 matchups. Also Huk keep at it, alot of these other people have had a major headstart on you and that fact that you are now competing with them goes to show the progress you have made thus far. Keep up the good work. | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On July 21 2010 11:46 Artosis wrote: hard work > talent haters gonna hate. actually no, and sc2 will show you that very quickly but you can keep hating if you'd like | ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
| ||
|
Noxie
United States2227 Posts
I think if HuK really goes back to his aggressiveness that we use to see a little bit more I think he will get good results. Even though the "all in" players such as dimaga play with very high risk. You see that their win rate is always around 75%... much better than more conservative players. | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Channel56k
United States413 Posts
On July 21 2010 12:57 Rekrul wrote: actually no, and sc2 will show you that very quickly but you can keep hating if you'd like I dont know which part you are disagreeing with, however, hard work is indeed "greater than" talent especially at high levels where all players are highly talented. imo As far as Huk goes as a player, he himself said he struggles staying focused. He played a great game against IdrA, however, IdrA is all focus and hes living in a society of focus. He's commented a couple times on whether or not the korean training style is more effective than others, but he has never downgraded their rigorous training schedules, aka lots of hard work. t the very least, hard work over came.[/spoiler] | ||
|
Cedstick
Canada3336 Posts
On July 21 2010 11:46 Artosis wrote: hard work > talent Ok there, Rock Lee. ![[image loading]](http://i29.tinypic.com/2v9c9jk.jpg) | ||
|
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
| ||
|
ilbh
Brazil1606 Posts
On July 21 2010 07:48 nihlon wrote: If you want people to take you seriously you really should start using capital letters (moreover spelling Boxer). And since when is ambition something that is exclusive for 5 year olds? everyone should have dreams, but boxer is not only a good player or creative player. he is the symbol of a new era in E-Sports, when a simply PC game became what is in korea. its just impossible for someone else to accomplish that, no matter how talented or skilled he is. if you can't understand the meaning Boxer had to E-Sports you won't understand my point of view. | ||
|
NonFactor
Sweden698 Posts
On July 21 2010 13:26 konicki wrote: [/spoiler]I dont know which part you are disagreeing with, however, hard work is indeed "greater than" talent especially at high levels where all players are highly talented. imo As far as Huk goes as a player, he himself said he struggles staying focused. He played a great game against IdrA, however, IdrA is all focus and hes living in a society of focus. He's commented a couple times on whether or not the korean training style is more effective than others, but he has never downgraded their rigorous training schedules, aka lots of hard work. t the very least, hard work over came. While I'd agree with your statement in BW, I don't think this is absotely true for SC2. SC2 is just so much easier, it's so ridicolously easy to become good at it on the mechanics department, where in BW it required tons and tons of never ending practise to get your mechanics solid, especially on pro levels. While in SC2, the interface makes the mechanics department easier. Now, hard work still of course helps a lot, but I think people will reach the top levels much faster in this game, not only because of the interface, but also because we have BW as a foothold. I think people will agree that having solid mechanics in SC2 is probably a 1000 times easier then in BW. And what is the strenght of hard work? You get solid mechanics. In BW solid mechanics was probably one of the most important things to have, which is why Koreans practised so much, the same builds over and over. While in SC2 reaching that same level of mechanics wont take nearly as long I'm quite sure. Actually, a few months after release I'm sure the most active players will reach mechanics so high that it can barely go up anymore, and if it can it will be a minimal different so it won't matter, when performing certain builds. SC2 requires like 100 APM to play at high levels, compare that to BW where Terrans and Zergs especially usually went up 250-300 APM and still had stuff they couldn't find a chance to do. So talented people imo will have an edge, now, if a talented person plays a shit ton, then you have a winning combination. Now what does ''talent'' contain and how does it help can be discussed. Some might say that having good mechanics is being talented, some might say the fact you can read your opponent really well is also talent. Anyways, just my 2 cents. | ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
On July 21 2010 13:26 konicki wrote: I dont know which part you are disagreeing with, however, hard work is indeed "greater than" talent especially at high levels where all players are highly talented. imo Sorry, in general we can say that give or take a few hours a week, they all work "about equally hard." What makes Bisu Bisu, Flash Flash, and Jaedong Jaedong, is superior talent. | ||
|
FindingPride
United States1001 Posts
i believe anyone has the ability to learn in extreme given the right mindset and passion. if thats talent | ||
| ||
