|
On June 12 2010 08:09 -orb- wrote: Simple:
Terran - Most OP but still takes skill
Zerg - Not OP but skilless
Protoss - Not OP and takes skill What does OP mean?
|
On June 13 2010 04:56 Yme wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 08:09 -orb- wrote: Simple:
Terran - Most OP but still takes skill
Zerg - Not OP but skilless
Protoss - Not OP and takes skill What does OP mean?
it has too definitions:
a) overpowered (imbalanced) b) "I didnt figure out how to beat a certain strategy because I do the same things over and over again."
|
and c) I tried almost everything,can somebody tell me how to beat that strategy?
|
and d) I'm trolling everyone here.
|
I was a protoss player in BW, but switched to zerg because I LOVE spreading zergy goop everywhere. I love getting in my opponents face, create false expectations, mess with their pyschology. All those things seem easier to do when my race is, at least in terms of game lore, evil and conniving =D
|
What are random players? People with personality disorders?
|
On June 13 2010 03:04 Azarthis wrote: anyone noticed how all the responses are:
Other race: OP Other Race: For idiots My race: Totally Fucking Awesome dude!
I would say: Protoss: Slightly elitist, "my units are more powerful therefore i'm better", also easily impressed by shiny objects.
Zerg: Slightly megalomaniac, "all your map are belong to me", also probably turned on by tentacle anime
Terran:Slightly Pyromaniac, "Duuh i has a boomstick", also probably thinks the other races are for elitist idiots or anime tentacle lovers.
also probably turned on by tentacle anime maybe... *shifty eyes*
 but anyways. I love zerg. I fell in love with thta race the moment i saw them. There's something beautiful about the way the way they assimilate or eradicate all lifeforms they come across in their neverending goal of biological perfection. Also studying zoology might have biased me a little.
I play random though. Know thy enemy and all that jazz
|
On June 13 2010 05:41 Deathstar wrote: What are random players? People with personality disorders?
lolol
|
I like versatility.
Originally, in SCBW, I played Terran, because I percieved that they were the most versatile. After getting more comfortable with the controls of the game, I figured that Zerg would actually fit my playstyle more. There are so many different strategies available for ZvT and ZvP, and figuring out when you can squeeze an extra drone or two is a crucial skill. And ZvZ is just so much fun anyways.
Having watched a few streams of SC2, I figured Terran was the most versatile race. And, having played ~100 games over the course of the beta, I figured I made the right choice. There are so many options available.
|
If you are a defensive, yet harass-happy player, terran is for you. They are the most vulnerable race when "moving out" so a lot of their actions are heavily dependent on positioning and recon. Loads of harass options from start to endgame. Their units are in my opinion most versatile in general.
Protoss on the other hand offer the most specialized units. If you like to micro, protoss is for you because a lot of success is based on your ability to use force fields, storms, blinks etc. The mentality of protoss in a non-rush game is this - get a unit combination that crushes the enemy opposition, and employ it before the enemy gets the chance to counter it. This can be said for any race but I feel it's most pronounced with protoss.
The Zerg is for people who like to be passive and macro up. You also get early map control, which is nice. Zerg require you to know when to cut workers for army production and vice versa. This is what the early map control can help a lot with. Opposite to protoss, generally zerg require very little micro. If you like to expand all over the place and outproduce your opponent, this is the race for you.
|
On June 12 2010 22:21 IdrA wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 22:20 LittleeD wrote:On June 12 2010 12:39 IdrA wrote:On June 12 2010 12:37 kRow wrote: no race takes skill in sc2, my 8 year old sister beat 3 ppl , when in sc1 i tried to teacher she couldnt even beat the computer.... why arent you good then? bad players are not allowed to say a game is easy. Have you ever heard the saying 'A day to learn, a lifetime to master' ? It applies for SC2 then it isnt easy... Best post(s) in the thread.. -To me I find alot of people who first pick up the game play protoss and then switch once they get bored / feel comfortable with other races. Random is also good to use because like Day[9] said..He doesn't go "OMG This strategy is so imbalanced" he goes "Oh, i'm going to use this strategy next time in this matchup.."
|
I started out playing toss. Sooo shiny and golden and woooow forcefields! I was new to Starcraft in general so the flashy blue energy beams seemed quite impressive. But really getting to play the race, it seemed a little rigid. Most units had a very specific and defined purpose (HTs, DTs, Immortals, Phoenixes, Sentries, etc), e.g. phoenixes are great vs. Zerg for air control and harassment, but outside of that, they're pretty useless. Most of the tech buildings are dead-ends, so you need a clear plan at the start of every match of what you're going to build.
Terran looked quite different. It seemed like every time I lost to a terran, it was to a different army composition or playstyle. MMM, mech, rine/raven, mass vikings... Terran can make almost anything work in almost any matchup. Being able to switch the functionality of buildings, and having a very dynamic teching system, makes it an incredibly versatile race. Plus, mech looks badass. I snapped off of toss and caught on to terran almost immediately. Toss just didn't fit how I play RTS.
Moral of the story: If you don't feel comfortable with your race, switch. Learning new races isn't hard at all if they're more suited to your playstyle, and you'll have way more fun. Toss is for more calculated, chessboard type players. Terran is for reactionary, quick thinking players. And Zerg is for the overpowering, macro-until-you-break sort of player.
|
On June 12 2010 07:47 cocosoft wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 07:44 WCH wrote: I actually want to be putting pressure on the opponent at all times, I feel as zerg sometimes I lack the ability to do so. Then I would say Terran (IMO). But also Zerg, (zerglings)... mostly referring to a game TLO vs some protoss player (I think it was in Europe VS Asia, where TLO continuously harassed the protoss player to death, with speedlings finding weak points and immobility).
That was actually cerra-werra .
|
On June 13 2010 05:41 Deathstar wrote: What are random players? People with personality disorders?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no.1 post in this thread
|
On June 13 2010 04:56 Yme wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 08:09 -orb- wrote: Simple:
Terran - Most OP but still takes skill
Zerg - Not OP but skilless
Protoss - Not OP and takes skill What does OP mean?
I've also heard it referred to as "original post" like in a thread. Am I mistaken?
Protoss - Flashy
Terran - BIG GUNS
Zerg - Sneaky sneaky
|
It's all about your looks.
Terran - Overweight, Unliked.
Zerg - Major acne. Probably sports a bowl cut.
Protoss. Arrogant. Overly gels hair.
|
On June 13 2010 14:09 FaTLiP wrote: It's all about your looks.
Terran - Overweight, Unliked.
Zerg - Major acne. Probably sports a bowl cut.
Protoss. Arrogant. Overly gels hair.
LIAR i play zerg and I'm completely arrogant and overgel my hair every day
|
On June 12 2010 08:29 Cerion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 08:14 Creek wrote:On June 12 2010 08:09 -orb- wrote: Simple:
Terran - Most OP but still takes skill
Zerg - Not OP but skilless
Protoss - Not OP and takes skill I don't think it's that simple, this might be true if this was being applied to 500apm players and such, but in lower level leagues Protoss is easiest, as it requires least apm as well as easiest macro. Protoss macro was easier in SC1 but that's not true in SC2, since you actually have to go to the pylon and click for each unit you warp in, while terran and zerg can produce from hotkeyed buildings while controlling their units
I like the probe at the top left hand corner of your screen.
Protoss macro is more difficult in SC2? What?
Really wish people had the ability to take a step back and be objective once in a while. Not that this thread isn't silly to begin with, but goll-EEE! ~._.~
It comes down to, as people have said, what you're most comfortable with. After 20 or so games it should be pretty apparent. I played random until Zerg clicked in--also interested in Terran but don't like the mirror at all. Also isn't as my style as I would have thought. Played Zerg in BW, too.
|
I play Terran cause I'm AWESOME!
|
My girl friend's personality-race explanation:
Protoss - People who are noble and proud, a little bit arrogant, play this race.
Zerg - People who faced and learned the harsh conditions of life and went to bottom but still had the skill to rise up against all obstacles, play this race.
Terran - Like Zerg players, people who know the harsh conditions of life and get used to it but on the other hand who are so arrogant, play this race.
|
|
|
|