EPTHow to fix TvZ Mech - Page 32
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Zurles
United Kingdom1659 Posts
| ||
|
Dog22
United States140 Posts
| ||
|
JreL209
United States78 Posts
| ||
|
DougJDempsey
747 Posts
| ||
|
lolastic
23 Posts
| ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
Marauder imba! Remove Concussive Shells ... nerf Viking range! Reapers are sooo OP now! Remove Salvage! Remove Repair! Planetary Fortress spamming is gay. Sensor Towers are nub. Hey!? ... The tanks still kill my units!? nerf their range! PDD unbeatable! HSM too cheap! Marines? No, those are just fine, i just make zerglings and a1  Except when they have stim, stim's an insta- win button and butt-cheap too.PS. nerf Thor speed, they're all over the place! | ||
|
numberThirtyOne
United States294 Posts
Artosis: On June 02 2010 23:43 iCCup.Diamond wrote: I don't know if this means anything but I asked Artosis last night if he wanted to play in the KOTH and he would not even play because of TvZ mech. TheLittleOne: On June 03 2010 20:04 TheLittleOne wrote: I will accept any challenge by a Top Terran player saying mech is too strong. Lets do some games and I will try to change your mind. Regardless of the outcome of said games, <3 <3 <3 TLO. | ||
|
weeeee
Australia71 Posts
| ||
|
Lithose
United States31 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On June 04 2010 09:58 Lithose wrote: The most significant part of this is that tanks will no longer 2shot roaches when they reach +3a. They will still 2shot hydras, oneshot lings and banelings, and 2shot infestors. They will also take a few more shots to kill ultras, which might be what blizzard intends for this patch.I don't see how this nerf, even as large as it is (17% Damage reduction) is going to affect things all that much...The threshold of damage/splash is still so high in comparison to average unit HP, that I doubt it will take many more shots to kill anything. | ||
|
Koffiegast
Netherlands346 Posts
On June 04 2010 10:13 Alsn wrote: The most significant part of this is that tanks will no longer 2shot roaches when they reach +3a. They will still 2shot hydras, oneshot lings and banelings, and 2shot infestors. They will also take a few more shots to kill ultras, which might be what blizzard intends for this patch. Luckily there is AOE. | ||
|
Fizbin
Canada202 Posts
| ||
|
Tarman
3 Posts
On June 03 2010 20:04 TheLittleOne wrote: I will accept any challenge by a Top Terran player saying mech is too strong. Lets do some games and I will try to change your mind. Long story short, you're wrong. Name a time. | ||
|
Lefnui
United States753 Posts
On June 03 2010 20:04 TheLittleOne wrote: I will accept any challenge by a Top Terran player saying mech is too strong. Lets do some games and I will try to change your mind. He's the one who would have his mind changed, after being thoroughly dominated. | ||
|
fdsdfg
United States1251 Posts
4xSiege Tank: 600/500, 12 supply 2xThor: 600/400, 12 supply 6xRoach 450/150, 12 supply 6xHydralisk 600/300, 12 supply I'm willing to call this the backbone units of each army. Granted the Hydra difference is not that large, but the Roach is very apparent. Add this to the fact that Zerg needs to invest more supply into mining (no mules) and it's pretty apparent why lategame Zerg always gets stomped by Terran. | ||
|
jamesr12
United States1549 Posts
On June 04 2010 12:09 Lefnui wrote: He's the one who would have his mind changed, after being thoroughly dominated. even if he gets worked he is still going about it the right way, don't worry about balence changes and qq all day. Play the game your given and see what you can do, mech has only been really popular for a week or two, it might be to strong (personally I think it most likely it is), but its to early to tell for sure | ||
|
Lefnui
United States753 Posts
On June 04 2010 12:41 jamesr12 wrote: even if he gets worked he is still going about it the right way, don't worry about balence changes and qq all day. Play the game your given and see what you can do, mech has only been really popular for a week or two, it might be to strong (personally I think it most likely it is), but its to early to tell for sure Zerg players aren't 'qqing all day'. They're complaining because there is a matchup which is extremely imbalanced. That's completely logical and the correct response. It's quite frustrating when you dominate a game and still get rolled over by a newb because of tanks. It's not too early to tell, and it's not a case of whether or not mech "might be too strong". It's quite clear. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On June 04 2010 12:44 Lefnui wrote: Zerg players aren't 'qqing all day'. They're complaining because there is a matchup which is extremely imbalanced. That's completely logical and the correct response. It's quite frustrating when you dominate a game and still get rolled over by a newb because of tanks. It's not too early to tell, and it's not a case of whether or not mech "might be too strong". It's quite clear. Complaining is never the "correct" response (though it's certainly logical). Either try to find a way to beat it, or play more games such that it impacts the matchup statistics (either as Terran owning Zergs, or as Zerg getting roflstomped by Terran). Blizzard is going to respond more to statistical reflections of imbalance than people whining about it on the forums. | ||
|
Lefnui
United States753 Posts
On June 04 2010 12:48 TheYango wrote: Complaining is never the "correct" response (though it's certainly logical). Either try to find a way to beat it, or play more games such that it impacts the matchup statistics (either as Terran owning Zergs, or as Zerg getting roflstomped by Terran). Blizzard is going to respond more to statistical reflections of imbalance than people whining about it on the forums. That's not true at all. Blizzard has time and time again been responding to specific criticisms made on forums. Statistics have little to do with their decisions. | ||
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
| ||
| ||
