• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:45
CEST 00:45
KST 07:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis EWC 2025 details: $700k total prize; GSL, DH Dallas confirmed Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 667 users

The Archon - Page 9

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 15 Next All
Ballistixz
Profile Joined January 2010
United States1269 Posts
July 18 2010 05:55 GMT
#161
archons arnt bad as everyone think. in pvz for example i see toss players making like 20+ templars at times to storm the shit out of me. usually im able to dodge them to the point my entire army doesnt get wiped out but im still barely left with any units after all the storms. in those situations im still able to hold off there army because they rly dont have many units left either usually. so they just retreat till they can gain energy back for storm and regroup.

BUT if they simply merged all those templar into archons they would be able to easily clean me up after those storms. zergs entire army is bio and archons do insane dmg to bio. even zerg buildings are bio. archons work very well in zvp honestly. but luckily no one has caught on to this yet otherwise zvp would get alot harder.

archons also are pretty damn good against ultras. its a simple matter of actually recycling the templars after they exhausted energy on storms instead of rushing to templars and instantly making archons soon as the templars warp in...
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
July 18 2010 05:59 GMT
#162
On July 18 2010 13:51 ToxNub wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2010 10:37 indczn wrote:
Ill fess up, I use archons just about every pvt and pvz. They are really good bridge while researching storm/energy upgrade. Zealot/Archon/sentry holds off most annoying terran bio attacks, is a good followup after 10gate pressure on a zerg xp. Archons are definitely useful, tanky, do good damage to bio, and are available before storm, and open up the templar tech tree, which in other threads, people are conflicted on which is better. Being cheap on minerals allows for more XP, more zealots, more warpgates.



I think archon/zealot is the hardest counter to the roach in the game. It is stupid how effective archon + zealot is at killing roaches. They are also THE best damage absorber in the game if you are able to micro them since they can regenerate their entire enormous health pool, and they are quite fast.

A raiding party with a couple of archons that never overcommits is a very strong force. But it's cool, none of you have to use them, I'll make it my signature build :p


You obviously have no idea what yo'ure talking about if you think archon/zealot is a harder counter to roaches than Immortals or stimmed marauders with medivacs.
Shuffleus
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Australia764 Posts
July 18 2010 06:10 GMT
#163
On July 18 2010 14:59 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 13:51 ToxNub wrote:
On June 02 2010 10:37 indczn wrote:
Ill fess up, I use archons just about every pvt and pvz. They are really good bridge while researching storm/energy upgrade. Zealot/Archon/sentry holds off most annoying terran bio attacks, is a good followup after 10gate pressure on a zerg xp. Archons are definitely useful, tanky, do good damage to bio, and are available before storm, and open up the templar tech tree, which in other threads, people are conflicted on which is better. Being cheap on minerals allows for more XP, more zealots, more warpgates.



I think archon/zealot is the hardest counter to the roach in the game. It is stupid how effective archon + zealot is at killing roaches. They are also THE best damage absorber in the game if you are able to micro them since they can regenerate their entire enormous health pool, and they are quite fast.

A raiding party with a couple of archons that never overcommits is a very strong force. But it's cool, none of you have to use them, I'll make it my signature build :p


You obviously have no idea what yo'ure talking about if you think archon/zealot is a harder counter to roaches than Immortals or stimmed marauders with medivacs.


ToxNub, In the Nicest possible way; You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
| QuanticGaming.com | There is no greater feeling then to find order in the chaos, as you slip the puzzle pieces in place.
Sentenal
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States12398 Posts
July 18 2010 06:15 GMT
#164
Archons would be alot better if Ranged units weren't so good in this game. Zerg gets tons of Hydras PvZ, which are good vs Archons. Terran is still pretty much a nightmare for Archons to. EMP does 100 damage in a single shot to them, plus ALL Terran armies consist of stuff like Marine Marauder Tank, which rapes them.

Zealots can do alright vs ranged stuff because of Charge, but Archon's can't close the distance like that. IMO the best thing to do would be to give Archons some sort of spell. Archons would be great if they could cast Maelstrom, for example lol
"Apparently, Sentenal is a paragon of friendship and tolerance. " - Ech0ne
IronV
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada14 Posts
July 18 2010 06:18 GMT
#165
Archons are amazing vs zerg, but are more "janitors" than "core units". I call them janitors, because after a large battle againts a roach/hydra mix, the archons clean up any roach or hydra that are left with little hp after the storms. The only time I ever morphed 2 DTs into an archon was when two of my DTs were very low on hp and I actually noticed it, and morphed them to "save" them.

Note: If I want to make archons, Id rather spend the 50 extra gas for 2 HTs and save 200 minerals and use it to warp in 2 zealots. Plus as I mentioned, there are basicly very few instances where it's worth morphing DTs into archons.
mess with the best, die like the rest
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
July 18 2010 06:21 GMT
#166
they cost 100/300, making them one of the most expensive units in the game, and they take the time of two templars and the archon time to create. Going for archons for the purpose of archons is not viable, but after you finish storming, getting archons out is a great way to clean up.
Ideas
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States8097 Posts
July 18 2010 06:38 GMT
#167
i was doing a lot of thinking about it and i think archons would actually be useful in a matchup if they were considered massive units. that way in PvP they can be used to bust through forcefields.
Free Palestine
Brokengamer
Profile Joined April 2010
Philippines116 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 07:30:16
July 18 2010 06:59 GMT
#168
Archons will soon be popular for countering ultralisks. They might be useless now but sit tight and watch as how the metagame shifts.

Also: those who have been saying that ultralisks are still useless must have been living under a rock
leejas
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States440 Posts
July 18 2010 07:10 GMT
#169
I believe archons are still pretty viable. Tanks and Ghosts are both incredibly gas intensive.

A larger issue involves the cost. Archons are either:

250-250 = 2 DTs
175-275 = 1 DT/1 HT
50-300 = 2 HTs

This in theory is great! but rarely do we see people tech to both templar types. It isn't practical to develop so much midtier (especially when immortals and colossi are almost a requirement). You'd basically never have enough for both the templar archives and the dark shrine.
Phisk
Profile Joined June 2010
166 Posts
July 18 2010 07:18 GMT
#170
On July 18 2010 15:59 Brokengamer wrote:
Archons will soon be popular for countering ultralisks. They might be useless now but sit tight and watch as how the metagame shifts.


Yeah I agree to this 100%. This thread is over a month old, the meta game has changed. A large advantage of the Archon is that its only unit type is Psionic, which means they take very little damage from an ultralisk, and they do well against roaches and lings. An archon can tank Ultras REALLY well, and the splash is useful against roach ling.

On July 18 2010 14:52 PhiliBiRD wrote:
rofl stomped by EMP?

you realize it takes 4 emps to completely remove an archons shield.


Several people already commented on how it takes 4 EMPs a month ago, and the original discussion on this was about going mass Archons. 4 Emps removes the shield of 1 solo archon, or 6 clumped up archons.
ToxNub
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada805 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 07:25:32
July 18 2010 07:22 GMT
#171
On July 18 2010 14:59 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 13:51 ToxNub wrote:
On June 02 2010 10:37 indczn wrote:
Ill fess up, I use archons just about every pvt and pvz. They are really good bridge while researching storm/energy upgrade. Zealot/Archon/sentry holds off most annoying terran bio attacks, is a good followup after 10gate pressure on a zerg xp. Archons are definitely useful, tanky, do good damage to bio, and are available before storm, and open up the templar tech tree, which in other threads, people are conflicted on which is better. Being cheap on minerals allows for more XP, more zealots, more warpgates.



I think archon/zealot is the hardest counter to the roach in the game. It is stupid how effective archon + zealot is at killing roaches. They are also THE best damage absorber in the game if you are able to micro them since they can regenerate their entire enormous health pool, and they are quite fast.

A raiding party with a couple of archons that never overcommits is a very strong force. But it's cool, none of you have to use them, I'll make it my signature build :p


You obviously have no idea what yo'ure talking about if you think archon/zealot is a harder counter to roaches than Immortals or stimmed marauders with medivacs.


Is that so?

Immortal does 50 damage per 1.45 sec = 34.5 dps
Marauder stimmed does 20 damage per 1.5 sec (x2 stimmed) = 26.66 dps
Archon does 35 dmg per 1.75 sec (splash) = 20 dps

If the archon splash hits even 1 other roach, you deal more DPS than an immo or a marauder. I think for cost, marauder might come out barely on top assuming splashing 1 unit, but roaches in clumps easily can result in 3-4 hits. They also decimate lings, leaving your zealots and stalkers, who do crap damage to lings, more time to focus on roach, and they can attack air, unlike either of the other 2 units. I guess you guys just know everything tho, so you should probably ignore my comment. ^^
arb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Noobville17921 Posts
July 18 2010 07:26 GMT
#172
On June 02 2010 06:24 Slunk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2010 06:15 SichuanPanda wrote:
On June 02 2010 06:05 BDF92 wrote:
On June 02 2010 05:53 pyr0ma5ta wrote:
On June 02 2010 05:50 tarsier wrote:
they get roflstomped by emp... because emping the same unit 4 times is made of win?


Yes, when that unit has 10 HP after doing so. Wouldn't you?


um no.

waste 4 emps on a single archon? ...really?


His post about EMP leaving Archons with 10 HP is in regards to how come mass Archons versus Terran in BW could work quite well sometimes, but essentially never works in SC2. No one is suggesting you burn all of a Ghosts energy EMPing one Archon. If Terran is facing a Bio/Templar army, and is surprised with Archons in SC2, its as simple as building some Ghosts (which you should already have given how early you can get them in SC2) and spamming EMP, as stated above spamming EMP on an army of Archons will decimate it, and is far from a poor use of EMP.

In BW unless the Terran purposely went for a Sci Lab tech build it would require building that, then the Covert Ops add-on and then getting Ghosts. This is the primary reason that making it look like you're going a Templar army only to get Archons in BW was viable and could work in a number of situations versus Terran.

That said I do not believe the Archon should be as under-valued in PvP or PvZ battles, as it is still a good unit versus those races.


You know that SC1 ghosts didn't have EMP, right?
And archons were terrible in PvT in BW. Under all possible sircumstances.


You know under all circumstances i really cant agree with that statement.

I think archons are absolutely great in SC2, granted my templar die most of the time before i can warp them in, but when i do they provide pretty decent DPS, since they get the +25(i think?) damage against bio which is what most terrans army consists of
Artillery spawned from the forges of Hell
SoMuchBetter
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Australia10606 Posts
July 18 2010 07:27 GMT
#173
id personally rather keep my dt and empty templars rather than waste them by turning them into a completely useless unit
AUSSIESCUM
TeamLiquid eSTROgeneral #1 • RIP
MorroW
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden3522 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-18 07:30:09
July 18 2010 07:28 GMT
#174
On July 18 2010 16:22 ToxNub wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 14:59 FabledIntegral wrote:
On July 18 2010 13:51 ToxNub wrote:
On June 02 2010 10:37 indczn wrote:
Ill fess up, I use archons just about every pvt and pvz. They are really good bridge while researching storm/energy upgrade. Zealot/Archon/sentry holds off most annoying terran bio attacks, is a good followup after 10gate pressure on a zerg xp. Archons are definitely useful, tanky, do good damage to bio, and are available before storm, and open up the templar tech tree, which in other threads, people are conflicted on which is better. Being cheap on minerals allows for more XP, more zealots, more warpgates.



I think archon/zealot is the hardest counter to the roach in the game. It is stupid how effective archon + zealot is at killing roaches. They are also THE best damage absorber in the game if you are able to micro them since they can regenerate their entire enormous health pool, and they are quite fast.

A raiding party with a couple of archons that never overcommits is a very strong force. But it's cool, none of you have to use them, I'll make it my signature build :p


You obviously have no idea what yo'ure talking about if you think archon/zealot is a harder counter to roaches than Immortals or stimmed marauders with medivacs.


Is that so?

Immortal does 50 damage per 1.45 sec = 34.5 dps
Marauder stimmed does 20 damage per 1.5 sec (x2 stimmed) = 26.66 dps
Archon does 35 dmg per 1.75 sec (splash) = 20 dps

If the archon splash hits even 1 other roach, you deal more DPS than an immo and marauder. Roaches in clumps easily can result in 3-4. I guess you guys just know everything tho, so you should probably ignore my comment. ^^

just a heads up here but dps got nothing to do with anything of what counters what. its 100 times more complicated than that
afaik archons splash is 1 radius and that isnt gonna reach another roach from a roach, not sure tho
archons r horrible and have so little use in the game. they say they wanna only use necessary units for sc2 and not lurker but still they keep archon which literally noone who is top tier makes unless they get out or energy and wants something juicy and temporary
remove archon or buff it is my vote, would be totally badass if they moved feedback from ht to archon for a starter so this ht isnt some kind of mighty master with no counter

On July 18 2010 16:27 SoMuchBetter wrote:
id personally rather keep my dt and empty templars rather than waste them by turning them into a completely useless unit

yes thats pretty much how most ppl would say too. making archon its kinda like EMPing and go out of energy and say, alright lets run to the frontline and tank my marines because this ghost is useless now
Progamerpls no copy pasterino
Zombo Joe
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada850 Posts
July 18 2010 07:35 GMT
#175
The problem with Archons is that ranged units are much better in SC2. Its the same reason why Zealots aren't as good.
I am Terranfying.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
July 18 2010 07:37 GMT
#176
On July 18 2010 16:22 ToxNub wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2010 14:59 FabledIntegral wrote:
On July 18 2010 13:51 ToxNub wrote:
On June 02 2010 10:37 indczn wrote:
Ill fess up, I use archons just about every pvt and pvz. They are really good bridge while researching storm/energy upgrade. Zealot/Archon/sentry holds off most annoying terran bio attacks, is a good followup after 10gate pressure on a zerg xp. Archons are definitely useful, tanky, do good damage to bio, and are available before storm, and open up the templar tech tree, which in other threads, people are conflicted on which is better. Being cheap on minerals allows for more XP, more zealots, more warpgates.



I think archon/zealot is the hardest counter to the roach in the game. It is stupid how effective archon + zealot is at killing roaches. They are also THE best damage absorber in the game if you are able to micro them since they can regenerate their entire enormous health pool, and they are quite fast.

A raiding party with a couple of archons that never overcommits is a very strong force. But it's cool, none of you have to use them, I'll make it my signature build :p


You obviously have no idea what yo'ure talking about if you think archon/zealot is a harder counter to roaches than Immortals or stimmed marauders with medivacs.


Is that so?

Immortal does 50 damage per 1.45 sec = 34.5 dps
Marauder stimmed does 20 damage per 1.5 sec (x2 stimmed) = 26.66 dps
Archon does 35 dmg per 1.75 sec (splash) = 20 dps

If the archon splash hits even 1 other roach, you deal more DPS than an immo or a marauder. I think for cost, marauder might come out barely on top assuming splashing 1 unit, but roaches in clumps easily can result in 3-4 hits. They also decimate lings, leaving your zealots and stalkers, who do crap damage to lings, more time to focus on roach, and they can attack air, unlike either of the other 2 units. I guess you guys just know everything tho, so you should probably ignore my comment. ^^


Doesn't matter if they splash, archon range isn't anywhere near that of a Marauder, and the DPS is much less than an Immortal. Roaches are a direct COUNTER to zealots, especially since they can just burrow and run feature to regen HP after battle. Archon splash is virtually negligible when it comes to Roaches, no you don't deal more DPS. Marauders also have slow.

Your entire comments concerning lings and air are incredibly stupid because you were talking about the "hardest counter to roaches." You're wrong, clearly, and yes, I'm nearly positive I know much more than you.
Terranist
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States2496 Posts
July 18 2010 07:47 GMT
#177
On July 18 2010 15:59 Brokengamer wrote:
Archons will soon be popular for countering ultralisks. They might be useless now but sit tight and watch as how the metagame shifts.

Also: those who have been saying that ultralisks are still useless must have been living under a rock


again that goes back to the original statement that archons are just a way to convert your spent temps into something that's immediately useful rather than a direct counter.
The Show of a Lifetime
Comeh
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States18918 Posts
July 18 2010 07:55 GMT
#178
Give archons better splash, and they become desirable.
Whether or not we want Archons to be desirable is up to debate however.
ヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノDELETE ICEFROGヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
July 18 2010 08:01 GMT
#179
On June 02 2010 05:44 TheAngelofDeath wrote:
So, after running numerous tests on the unit tester with the Archon. It pretty much dismantles anything in large quantities. + Show Spoiler +
The exception being the carrier, and broodlords. The topic is short, but I haven't seen a dedicated topic about the Archon so....why all the hatred towards this unit? What is it that makes the Archon so terrible?? I've used it in real game and it holds up just fine, so why is it that it's never used much at all?
Thank you, I'm glad there's a topic for that. In late game turtling toss with enough cannons and max out archon ball is quite hard to stop. He'll just walk around the mighty archon ball to each enemy base one by one and destroy them. As zerg you could waste a couple of full waves to this walking wall, or lose your bases before catching them (carriers and BLs are slow).
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
Broodie
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Canada832 Posts
July 18 2010 08:04 GMT
#180
Terrible/expensive?

Well lets see, with two Templars you get 2 or 4+ storms(based on scenario) THEN morph mid battle to provide instant backup?

I think 100/300's a fair trade considering in a battle your zealots will tank out upwards of 1k(mid-late)

I dunno, I just dont think people are experimenting with them enough to use them effectively and thus properly

One thing I would suggest is a range upgrade or not take concussive dmg
SilentLiquid.Broodie - Author of Tango Terminal, Ophilia RE, Cajun Quandary, & The Beneath
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 204
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 444
Dota 2
monkeys_forever411
capcasts206
League of Legends
Grubby4605
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2260
Stewie2K623
taco 358
flusha323
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King135
AZ_Axe82
Liquid`Ken29
Other Games
tarik_tv18149
summit1g10454
gofns8198
FrodaN1854
C9.Mang0173
ViBE82
PPMD30
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 64
• poizon28 41
• RyuSc2 32
• musti20045 32
• davetesta15
• Adnapsc2 9
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 33
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22567
League of Legends
• Doublelift4035
Other Games
• imaqtpie1128
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
11h 15m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
15h 15m
CSO Cup
17h 15m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
19h 15m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 10h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.