EPTBlizzard: "No plans for chatrooms, crossrealm play" - Page…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Longshank
1648 Posts
| ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13081 Posts
I just cant imagine the founder of Blizzard to give such an interview. | ||
|
Spritescaper
United States63 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:58 Assault_1 wrote: Lurker! Cross-realm, actually. That actually has the most potential to hurt the global community. | ||
|
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
Dear Blizzard: Battle.net 2.0 is terrible | ||
|
wdge
60 Posts
| ||
|
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:58 tnud wrote: If you have a EU key head over there, the mods are asleep. Rofl :D Am I the only one who finds this soooo funny lol. Can't stop laughing! | ||
|
Lord_of_Chaos
Sweden372 Posts
It wasn't. PGTour and ICCup was. B.net sucked badly too. The ladder was a joke. It was hack infested, and blizz didn't do anything about it. The latency was rediculous. etc. Blizzard wasn't good at this before. They never were good at giving the competitive community what we needed. We had to build it ourselves before too. Just sad to see that they tried to make changes without understanding the actual issues and without learning anything from the past. | ||
|
PhoenixM1
United States178 Posts
| ||
|
Alou
United States3748 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:59 iCCup.Raelcun wrote: Since blizzard is going out of their way to add facebook and shaft us on the features we actually want go sign up for the Facebook group telling them how terrible Battle.net 2.0 is. Dear Blizzard: Battle.net 2.0 is terrible Raelcun <3. I joined. | ||
|
DTown
United States428 Posts
Its still childish, trying to embarass Bluzzard this way makes me think of a little boy crying in a public place to force his mummy to do what he wants. It is a strategy the community is using to try to prevent Blizzard from making this game worse than it could be. They should know better than to challenge a community of RTSers to a game of WITS. lol. But seriously, I think it is legit tactic to try and wake up the drunk-ass blizzard sleeping at the wheel. | ||
|
Mr.Pyro
Denmark959 Posts
| ||
|
numberThirtyOne
United States294 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:46 Slayer91 wrote: 1 * amazon thing is childish. Nothing childish about it. Starcraft lives or dies by the quality of the online experience. So people should rate the game based on what, the single player campaign? No. If Bnet sucks, that directly influences whether or not SC2 is worth a damn. | ||
|
Disastorm
United States922 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:58 TeWy wrote: Its still childish, trying to embarass Bluzzard this way makes me think of a little boy crying in a public place to force his mummy to do what he wants. The whole "threatening" or "blackmailing" in order to get something is done by people of all ages. The only reason crying is considered childish is because thats the version that children usually engage in. The concept behind crying is actually not childish at all. | ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
 ![[image loading]](http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/3062/fankosc2.jpg) Hopefully I don't get shot, etc. | ||
|
Regulate140
Canada108 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:58 TeWy wrote: Its still childish, trying to embarass Bluzzard this way makes me think of a little boy crying in a public place to force his mummy to do what he wants. thats how i felt at first but then i spent more time thinking about it it's really not the same at all. we are trying to make the game better. we will be playing it, not blizzard. the current problems are a really big deal. and it's not an entirely unfair method, either. the reviewing system is there for people to put their opinion of the product. | ||
|
JohnStorm
Canada74 Posts
| ||
|
Artosis Fan Num230!!
10 Posts
On May 29 2010 07:00 Lord_of_Chaos wrote: The only thing I have problems with in this thread is the people saying b.net 1 was better. It wasn't. PGTour and ICCup was. B.net sucked badly too. The ladder was a joke. It was hack infested, and blizz didn't do anything about it. The latency was rediculous. etc. Blizzard wasn't good at this before. They never were good at giving the competitive community what we needed. We had to build it ourselves before too. Just sad to see that they tried to make changes without understanding the actual issues and without learning anything from the past. Actually the latest version of Bnet (WarCraft III's) wasn't bad. It only became infested with hacks when Blizzard abandoned WC3 a few years ago. I assume when most people mention Bnet1 they mean WC3's and not SC's. WC3 Bnet1 features: Chatrooms Automated match making Extensive stats (external website) Tournaments Clans Basically everything you'd need. If SC2 was built on WC3's bnet with more features I'm positive no one would complain. | ||
|
Magnum
United States62 Posts
| ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
How the hell is that childish? | ||
| ||
