EPTAn Open Letter to Blizzard Regarding Divisions - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
eSuba.DeViL
Czech Republic5 Posts
| ||
|
Piy
Scotland3152 Posts
Signed. | ||
|
QuothTheRaven
United States5524 Posts
On May 22 2010 19:04 FrozenArbiter wrote: Signed a million times over. | ||
|
mnck
Denmark1518 Posts
But best thing of cause, would be to have one big bad ass division with everyone from Diamond, instead of divisions, or instead of those shitty battlegroups they figured out were such a success in WoW. A hint as to why they're doing this I think. | ||
|
Gibybo
United States229 Posts
On May 22 2010 20:53 Integra wrote: <beating a dead horse animation> We're in beta and major changes continue to be made to the ladder system. When something is this obviously broken, I will not give up until it's fixed. | ||
|
{ToT}ColmA
Japan3260 Posts
| ||
|
Korpze
United States27 Posts
| ||
|
Monoxide
Canada1190 Posts
/Signed | ||
|
drunkensolo
Germany56 Posts
| ||
|
Issor
United States870 Posts
| ||
|
iAmSoniK
Canada246 Posts
they could still keep the leagues but take off the divisions. | ||
|
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
On May 22 2010 20:53 Integra wrote: ![[image loading]](http://www.moltenimage.com/photos/animated/beating-a-dead-horse.gif) when blizzard refuses to acknowledge the flaws, then we're going to continue to voice our criticism and not only did they not acknowledge the problems, they made bnet 2.0 even worse On May 22 2010 20:56 {ToT}ColmA wrote: Hm, i dont really think that a global ranking is needed, its a fun toy to look at but the true measurement for players will be in tournaments. ladder in my eyes is practice and on higher levels probably mostly used when no practice partner is online for cgs. there is not a single amateur-pro gamer that did not, at one time, take a league/ladder practice very seriously on the release of the wc3, all the very best players were playing mass games on the ladder for many months until the game eventually faded from WoW hype and the competition died out Ladder competition isnt going to die out until the second expansion pack is released, all the strategies are established, and sponsored teams are assembled A big reason the ladder isnt competitive because 1) it isnt global so you wont even know who is at the top and 2) there isnt a top 16-32 player tournament at the end of each season for actual incentive to top the ladder long after wc3's strong competitive base faded away, blizzard managed to resurrect a little bit of the competition by creating a special ladder where the top players were invited to their blizzard world wide invitational tournament people took this ladder VERY seriously I envisioned a global ladder where the top 32 players are taken weekly or monthly for a bnet run tournament this would create a large amount of games played by competitive gamers on the ladder at the end of the week/month probably i thought they were going to do something like this except with the more complicated divisional system (top 8 from each division) | ||
|
freezingcat
1 Post
| ||
|
CoMMoDuS
Germany507 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51716 Posts
most respectful letter written to blizzard | ||
|
lovewithlea
168 Posts
| ||
|
aznhockeyboy16
United States558 Posts
also, people on the battlenet forums are kind of stupid... | ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
 agree with all | ||
|
DigitalD[562]
United States80 Posts
even though I'm in the copper/silver range I would like to see exactly where I stand so I can tell if I'm makeing any progress or not. | ||
|
Tdelamay
Canada548 Posts
On May 22 2010 19:53 billyX333 wrote: the current sc2 dev team is so stubborn! they hear criticism and get defensive they passionately defend their poor ideas to protect their ego, and refuse to objectively look at the pile of garbage they've created (bnet 2.0) You're sorely wrong on that. There are some apparent correlation between patches and discussion that were had on Team Liquid. The Starcraft 2 development team listens to these thread and they sometimes make change related to them. On the subject though, I don't have any gripe with the ladder system. I think ratings are trivial and only matter when used to match a player against a player of similar skill. In my experience, that works. Knowing your rating relatively to others serves only to indicate improvement or decrease. I see the ladder as being adequate. Having a global ladder with a single division would not necessarily be more accurate. It would however, be far more crowded. As for the top players, isn't the the professional league? | ||
| ||
