EPTAn Open Letter to Blizzard Regarding Divisions - Page 13
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Adonisto
Canada191 Posts
| ||
|
Klapdout
United States282 Posts
The top 1000 from sc/wc3 ladder gave me a huge drive to improve my play. It was a huge moment for me when I finally made it on the top 1000 in wc3, I was now on the official ladder ranking page for all to see! I felt truly triumphant! Yet I still had a long way to go, still a thousand players for me to set my sights on and it drove me to improve my rank. I don't have that feeling with the current system, and I really miss it. Blizzard, I humbly ask you to return a global ranking system to Starcraft 2. | ||
|
Stripe
United States67 Posts
Stroking your e-peen to a global ranking to feel better about yourself is basically the same thing as the division system, but catering to the opposite side of the player-base. I support having the division system and then having a pro league at the very top that's ranked, so everyone gets satisfied. | ||
|
Sowers
United States4 Posts
Also feel that when you get to the top of your division you get kind of slack, and feel lethargic with no other thing to "aim for" persay. | ||
|
ultimaniac
United States7 Posts
| ||
|
lentus
Poland10 Posts
| ||
|
hazelynut
United States2196 Posts
| ||
|
DrakanSilva
Chile932 Posts
| ||
|
kefka0
United States10 Posts
| ||
|
prosky
Poland83 Posts
How it is now: ( BEHOLD OF MY PAINT SKILLZ!): http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/1952/isnow.jpg Quite plain and stupid system we have now, don't we? How i think it should be : http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/8877/shouldbe.jpg I find it more interesting and giving more info about players. After all sc2 is competetive game and we we want it to be like that. But, those are just my wishes, nothing more ; - / | ||
|
YoonHo
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
Sieg
Canada42 Posts
I don't like this carebear approach to the game either. Ladder is ladder, and should be competitive, Viking Romeo doesn't tell me a thing. | ||
|
NeSS1
United States101 Posts
| ||
|
SkyTheUnknown
Germany2065 Posts
It's just extremely dissapointing how obscure and restricted the new Battle Net 2.0 is. Especially the ladder ranking system is a huge punch in everyone's face, who loves to look trough the ladder rankings. I remember doing this a lot in Wc3. | ||
|
Aylear
Norway3988 Posts
Seriously, there's no reason to hide it. I'm a bad player, and I still want to compare myself to others. Remember iccup? Boy, I sure do remember saying how much I didn't want to be looking at the standings. What's frustrating is, Blizzard has said nothing about which features will or will not be in Battle.net 2.0 at the release of StarCraft II, but almost everything I've seen - from horrible service to lack of even the simplest features that the original Battle.net took for granted - is a disappointing mess. Just... disappointing. | ||
|
DrBoo
Canada1177 Posts
| ||
|
T)AK47
United States46 Posts
| ||
|
Shade692003
Canada702 Posts
Regarding my previous posts, one thing I'd like them to add is a "league ladder" because divisions have too small of a player pool to judge. I still stand besides the league system though, and that comparing players between leagues is pointless. | ||
|
CursOr
United States6335 Posts
I don't care about my stupid Logo. Or how superior I feel bragging about it on TL. 99% of games I am matched up with someone very very comparable skill to me. Their APM is usually similar as well as their overall skill. This has proven true as I've worked my way through most of the Leagues and improved. Though- I understand this isn't true for the top 1% of players- this is because there could be very few on who would even offer you resistance. Lots of things about 2.0 are trash though- don't get me wrong. Challenging, but not overly difficult games- have been in abundance thus far for me. | ||
|
valaki
Hungary2476 Posts
| ||
| ||
