• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:48
CEST 18:48
KST 01:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. Who will win EWC 2025? Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Corsair Pursuit Micro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pro gamer house photos Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 789 users

Patch 13 Discussion - Page 26

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 92 Next
Disastorm
Profile Joined January 2008
United States922 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 05:11:43
May 21 2010 05:10 GMT
#501
holy cow guys. frenzied ultras will be awesome, and well i think the overseer may now be one of the best zerg units in the game. Not only will he stop worker production and drop infested terrans, but he can also stop production of game changing units like collosi etc.
"Don't worry so much man. There won't be any more zergs left to QQ. Lots of QQ about TvT is incoming though I bet." - Vrok 9/21/10
pnSTYLE
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany3 Posts
May 21 2010 05:10 GMT
#502
pretty nice zerg changes
cant wait to try out that frenzy spell
Pervect
Profile Joined June 2007
1280 Posts
May 21 2010 05:10 GMT
#503
On May 21 2010 14:09 BLinD-RawR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2010 14:05 xnub wrote:
So do you think that FF will take Friendly fire massive walk overs ? Colos walkign over your own FF and killing them ? or ally ultras or thors


if thats true it would be an unintended bug,which would be fixed immediately.


"Now Massive units (Thor, Colossus, Ultralisk) will smash a Force Field if they are told to move through them. Ultralisks can use this ability to lead a Zerg charge onto a protoss position while protoss players can use their Colossus in an emergency to allow their army to attack or retreat."

From Blizzard's discussion of patch notes.
baconbits
Profile Joined April 2010
United States419 Posts
May 21 2010 05:12 GMT
#504
On May 21 2010 14:07 rK wrote:
I think people are overreacting to Overseer change. How often were Corruptors used to crush anyone by shutting down production/researches? Overseers cost the same (minus Spire), have a weakened version of the spell, can't do anything to units that are in play and can't morph to Brood Lords.

I'm sure it'll get played around with a lot, maybe a game or two will crop up with some super sweet Overseer magic action. But the whole "ah man, corruption and infested terrans...gg man, gg." Come on



I think its more of the timing issue.

Corrupter:
Pool -> lair -> spire -> corrupter, you had one hatch in ~6 minutes

Overseer:
Pool -> Lair -> morph overseer (which is very fast), you have one ~4 mins, float over and you could stop the 1st or 2nd robo or starport unit from being produced for 30 seconds.

Hell, you could actually just morph an overlord already near their base making it even better. Not to mention, you can stop worker production for 30 sec which is almost 2 workers.

Also really anxious to see if it stops larval production on hatches or just queens and research.
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
May 21 2010 05:13 GMT
#505
On May 21 2010 14:10 Salv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2010 14:06 junemermaid wrote:
On May 21 2010 14:02 Salv wrote:
On May 21 2010 13:58 junemermaid wrote:
On May 21 2010 13:53 Salv wrote:
On May 21 2010 13:51 junemermaid wrote:
On May 21 2010 13:38 Salv wrote:
On May 21 2010 13:35 junemermaid wrote:
On May 21 2010 13:32 Salv wrote:
On May 21 2010 13:30 junemermaid wrote:
[quote]

Oh ffs, kill the overseer, problem solved. Or make sure your robo bay isn't exposed to an easy contaminate hit... There are so many things you can do.

Seriously you guys are complaining for nothing. Wait to see how it plays. You act like Blizzard didn't test out the patch internally.


The overseer is a fast flying unit, if they want to contaminate your robo then they will be able to. You can only protect it if you surround it with your units a few matrix's away in each direction.


I hear blink is a pretty useful ability.


Yeah, because I have blink right after I expand, right? I don't prioritize a citadel and the blink upgrade over a robotics, support bay, thermal lance, and colossi. Overseers are units that all Zerg's make regardless, and they will come before I can do any thing reasonable to stop them from contaminating my building. The options are to either make high templar instead, or really focus on surrounding your robotics with your units so that it's very difficult to contaminate.


Blink is stupid strong, dude. I don't see why you wouldn't get it early game, as that is when it is most effective...

If you're rushing for a tier 3 unit (colossus) and prioritize it over increasing the usefulness of your tier 1 units, then thats the risk you take with getting contaminated.


If you stick with mass stalker/sentry/zealot versus hydralisks you're going to get raped. You need colossus to deal with them, that is a fact. I have yet to see a single good Protoss prioritize getting charge or blink before getting colossus.


1800 platinum here, I can send you replays if you want. I don't get colossus until I have an expansion up (aound 60ish supply). Stalkers go toe to toe with hydras, especially with upgrades. Blink + charge zealots & sentries work wonders if you know how to use them. Gets a little more tricky when roaches are in play, but having a zerg get enough roaches + hydras to actually start to roll stalker / zealot / sentry takes a bit of time, at which point getting colossus is a priority.

I just don't understand this mad rush for colossus...


Huh? Until expansion is up? That is what every one does, who rushes a colossus off of one base? You expand, make a citadel, prioritize blink and charge, then start working on robotics tech? Your colossus work take forever to come out. Tier 1 units can only deal with hydralisk for a finite amount of time before you're going to start losing hard. Most Protoss' expand, check what the opponent is doing, and if it's hydralisk like normal, they start to get colossi and the upgrade.


I get blink before I expand, usually. Start the harassment, force the zerg to make things he doesn't want to, all the while I expand. If I see an opportunity I can abuse, I'll get charge quicker and put more pressure on. After twilight I'll switch it up to two robo bays with colossus if hes going heavy hydra + roach.

I'll admit, if the harassment doesn't go very well, I'll get colossi more quickly. Usually it doesn't fail, since stalker + blink is insanely mobile, even against zerg on creep.


OK wait, you're making a citadel and upgrading blink before expanding? How late is your expansion? I don't see how you can put on any pressure with this build. The problem with PvZ expanding is that if you do so with out putting on any pressure they will whore drones and quickly outmacro you. If you're teching this much off of one base you're either:
-Expanding really late
-Have like one gateway and few units
Both of which sound very bad. That will mean the Zerg will have had his expansion up for a long time before you. How much harassment can you honestly do versus a good Zerg with stalkers? This entire strategy sounds very sketchy.


Look up Tozar's ninja build. You do realize there is more than one viable play-style? It is ridiculously effective. If the zerg whores drones its almost instantly over for them. Stalkers in their base that can huddle behind minerals / vespene geysers so that lings and roaches are ineffective is very strong.

I mean, if you wanna stick to the ball vs ball mass attack, that's one way to play. Or you can exploit the usefulness of units to their maximum and use positioning / tactics to win battles. Two different play styles that yield similar results.
the UMP says YER OUT
Disastorm
Profile Joined January 2008
United States922 Posts
May 21 2010 05:14 GMT
#506
I can just imagine a game where Zerg has like 10 overseers and takes out an enemy ground army and just moves the overseers into enemy base and stops all unit production over and over essentially not letting the enemy build any units at all.
"Don't worry so much man. There won't be any more zergs left to QQ. Lots of QQ about TvT is incoming though I bet." - Vrok 9/21/10
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
May 21 2010 05:15 GMT
#507
On May 21 2010 14:14 Disastorm wrote:
I can just imagine a game where Zerg has like 10 overseers and takes out an enemy ground army and just moves the overseers into enemy base and stops all unit production over and over essentially not letting the enemy build any units at all.


That sounds fucking awesome :D
the UMP says YER OUT
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
May 21 2010 05:17 GMT
#508
Have any replays Junemermaid? In my experience stalkers are extremely ineffective against zerglings, even if you get a nice huddle behind minerals.
"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
Skyze
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada2324 Posts
May 21 2010 05:17 GMT
#509
On May 21 2010 14:14 Disastorm wrote:
I can just imagine a game where Zerg has like 10 overseers and takes out an enemy ground army and just moves the overseers into enemy base and stops all unit production over and over essentially not letting the enemy build any units at all.


thats 1000 gas + supply that is at potential risk if the protoss has any anti air.. very risky, but possible probably.

But think about it, 1000 gas on a unit that cant attack, or 10 mutas or 20 hydras. Hmm.
Canada Gaming ~~ The-Feared
roark
Profile Joined April 2010
United States187 Posts
May 21 2010 05:17 GMT
#510
On May 21 2010 14:12 baconbits wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 21 2010 14:07 rK wrote:
I think people are overreacting to Overseer change. How often were Corruptors used to crush anyone by shutting down production/researches? Overseers cost the same (minus Spire), have a weakened version of the spell, can't do anything to units that are in play and can't morph to Brood Lords.

I'm sure it'll get played around with a lot, maybe a game or two will crop up with some super sweet Overseer magic action. But the whole "ah man, corruption and infested terrans...gg man, gg." Come on



I think its more of the timing issue.

Corrupter:
Pool -> lair -> spire -> corrupter, you had one hatch in ~6 minutes

Overseer:
Pool -> Lair -> morph overseer (which is very fast), you have one ~4 mins, float over and you could stop the 1st or 2nd robo or starport unit from being produced for 30 seconds.

Hell, you could actually just morph an overlord already near their base making it even better. Not to mention, you can stop worker production for 30 sec which is almost 2 workers.

Also really anxious to see if it stops larval production on hatches or just queens and research.


Then you have to wait ~50 game seconds to get enough energy. Overseer starts with 50.
jisaeltl
Profile Joined May 2010
83 Posts
May 21 2010 05:17 GMT
#511
for 200 minerals and 400 gas (4 overseers) you can stop worker production for 2 minutes. what the fuck? infested terrans not a big issue as 125 energy is a lot. and when the hell is terran "struggling" to compete with protoss? "Reducing the cost of essential infantry upgrades should make the terrans a little bit more dangerous when going with an infantry heavy force." MMM vs "infantry force of protoss ie t1 gateway units only" = gg for toss
adadasdsdawdads
Jyvblamo
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada13788 Posts
May 21 2010 05:18 GMT
#512
Are people forgetting that Blizzard tests new patches internally so that retarded things such as the those being thrown around in this thread won't happen?

But of course, everyone here knows better than the Blizzard balance testers / designers!
RPGabe
Profile Joined January 2010
United States192 Posts
May 21 2010 05:18 GMT
#513
Zerg is being given a ton of spells that give small benefits on a 1-to-1 basis. Frenzy, Corruptor Corruption.. have fun getting your apm up to 400+ and spamming that out in the middle of fights to get your unit's worth.
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
May 21 2010 05:18 GMT
#514
On May 21 2010 14:17 Tsagacity wrote:
Have any replays Junemermaid? In my experience stalkers are extremely ineffective against zerglings, even if you get a nice huddle behind minerals.


Yeah, I can post some when I get on my other comp this weekend.
the UMP says YER OUT
roark
Profile Joined April 2010
United States187 Posts
May 21 2010 05:19 GMT
#515
On May 21 2010 14:18 RPGabe wrote:
Zerg is being given a ton of spells that give small benefits on a 1-to-1 basis. Frenzy, Corruptor Corruption.. have fun getting your apm up to 400+ and spamming that out in the middle of fights to get your unit's worth.


Select Spell, Shift + Click spam over units. It won't take 400 apm, but it won't be easy either.
Kvz
Profile Joined March 2010
United States463 Posts
May 21 2010 05:21 GMT
#516
I'm really curious to see how the ultra change will work out, i feel that blizzard failed to understand that ultras had fine damage, they were just unable to reach their intended targets.

Furthermore, i really really wish they would stop adding spells from world of warcraft into sc2.
Frenzy? really? sounds like recklessness/bezerker rage/death wish from the warrior's talent trees. go look those spells up. almost word for word the same as frenzy. lol. This game is about massive units going at it. Not buffing a single super unit and watching it.
NrG.Kvz
grog
Profile Joined May 2010
Turkey37 Posts
May 21 2010 05:26 GMT
#517
when is the patch again?
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 21 2010 05:26 GMT
#518
On May 21 2010 14:18 Jyvblamo wrote:
Are people forgetting that Blizzard tests new patches internally so that retarded things such as the those being thrown around in this thread won't happen?

But of course, everyone here knows better than the Blizzard balance testers / designers!




Cough Patch 9
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Endymion
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States3701 Posts
May 21 2010 05:27 GMT
#519
It'll certainly be interesting burrowing frenzied ultras where a terran ball is about to pass over and totally ravaging them within 3 attacks. Should at the very least make terran mobility very scan heavy when moving around the map, more-so then burrowed banelings.
Have you considered the MMO-Champion forum? You are just as irrational and delusional with the right portion of nostalgic populism. By the way: The old Brood War was absolutely unplayable
Wi)nD
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada719 Posts
May 21 2010 05:28 GMT
#520
another terran buff lol, interseting zerg changes, but still waiting for a raoch change....
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 92 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 17h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mcanning 310
BRAT_OK 122
UpATreeSC 111
StarCraft: Brood War
Flash 3960
Barracks 2295
Jaedong 2285
Mini 1122
EffOrt 1045
BeSt 673
Soma 563
Stork 485
firebathero 370
Snow 314
[ Show more ]
Larva 282
Zeus 246
Free 141
Mind 119
Hyun 114
Rush 101
Sharp 54
TY 48
soO 40
zelot 35
Shine 34
Shinee 34
Movie 30
sorry 22
scan(afreeca) 21
Terrorterran 18
SilentControl 9
ivOry 3
Dota 2
canceldota94
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1674
flusha197
fl0m197
allub163
Other Games
FrodaN1898
Beastyqt678
ceh9371
KnowMe120
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 42
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki43
• FirePhoenix2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3222
• WagamamaTV714
League of Legends
• Nemesis5483
• TFBlade760
Other Games
• Shiphtur256
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
17h 12m
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
1d 17h
Esports World Cup
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.