Sc2gears 14.3.3: Replay version 2.1 support - Page 143
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
StarGalaxy
Germany744 Posts
On July 26 2012 21:42 Swwww wrote: Awesome! This might just be the longest Op in whole of TL Yeah it's pretty insane what this program can do. So many functions. :D @Dakota_Fanning Are you working on that project alone and do you get something out of it other than some donations? | ||
Dakota_Fanning
![]()
Hungary2335 Posts
On July 26 2012 22:43 OrbitalPlane wrote: Yeah it's pretty insane what this program can do. So many functions. :D @Dakota_Fanning Are you working on that project alone and do you get something out of it other than some donations? I'm working on it alone, and no, I don't get anything else for it (except some rare donations). | ||
KirA_TheGreaT
France204 Posts
| ||
Dakota_Fanning
![]()
Hungary2335 Posts
On July 26 2012 23:19 KirA_TheGreaT wrote: Hi sorry but i'm not a huge computer nerd and i was wondering what's the difference between your streaming app and using justin tv and xsplit for example Read this page, it shall tell you everything: Sc2gears Private Video Streaming In short: Sc2gears broadcasts the stream to all clients who can view your stream from a browser. You have full control over the streaming parameters. The stream web page does not require any plugins, clients can even view the stream from cell phones. In case of justin tv and xsplit you have to register in a central service, you have to download and install a streaming client software which sends the stream to their central servers which are responsible to broadcast the stream to clients, meanwhile placing ads on it, requiring subscriptions etc. Their streaming web page usually requires a plugin (like Flash), so their use is limited. | ||
kerblaster
6 Posts
| ||
bITt.mAN
Switzerland3689 Posts
I'm curious though, why is it you're implementing a Streaming feature? It could really change things, but isn't this the sort of project that would require more resources than just a (albeit quite skilled) one-man-team? Could you explain what your reasoning for this is, and how you would reply to the claim "you're looking to challenge the fully-functional, satisfactory services provided by other free streaming providers"? | ||
Dakota_Fanning
![]()
Hungary2335 Posts
On July 27 2012 00:05 kerblaster wrote: I get like 30 frames ingame when I stream with xsplit. Does this have any chance to increase frames while streaming as compared to xsplit? No, probably not. Although in cases when xsplit is not able to produce 30 FPS, you can lower quality in Sc2gears to give higher FPS values... | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On July 26 2012 23:30 Dakota_Fanning wrote: Read this page, it shall tell you everything: Sc2gears Private Video Streaming In short: Sc2gears broadcasts the stream to all clients who can view your stream from a browser. You have full control over the streaming parameters. The stream web page does not require any plugins, clients can even view the stream from cell phones. In case of justin tv and xsplit you have to register in a central service, you have to download and install a streaming client software which sends the stream to their central servers which are responsible to broadcast the stream to clients, meanwhile placing ads on it, requiring subscriptions etc. Their streaming web page usually requires a plugin (like Flash), so their use is limited. i dont get it working the streaming id is wrong even using the id from my router °_° so sad ![]() i have to make WANIP/stream/nickpasswhateverthethingshowme ? or did i do anything wrong | ||
Demonhunter04
1530 Posts
:O I look forward to using this. | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
Dakota_Fanning
![]()
Hungary2335 Posts
On July 27 2012 00:18 bITt.mAN wrote: This is really cool, and I'm quite amazed by what you're doing. I'm curious though, why is it you're implementing a Streaming feature? It could really change things, but isn't this the sort of project that would require more resources than just a (albeit quite skilled) one-man-team? Could you explain what your reasoning for this is, and how you would reply to the claim "you're looking to challenge the fully-functional, satisfactory services provided by other free streaming providers"? Those "fully-functional, satisfactory" services exist for quite some time now, yet not everyone who would like to stream uses them... They are often not trivial to setup and use. The streaming feature in Sc2gears literally can be started with one click. Another reason can be not everyone wants to run 10 supplementary software while playing Starcraft II. Also many of those cannot be viewed on all platforms (like cell phones). Sc2gears streaming solves this problem. This streaming feature does not want to be a replacement or a contender to the streaming services, as this is unique and different in many aspects. Sc2gears streaming will never replace a service where there are many (tens, hundreds or thousands of) clients, since in this case the streaming server is your computer. This is more like a private video streaming feature (exactly what its name states) to share your screen or activity with your friend(s). If you want to show something to your friend, let's say how to setup Sc2gears or how to analyze your games, you would not register on twitch and download their client, install it etc. just so you can show your live action to your friend. With Sc2gears, you just click once, send the link to your friend, and your goal is achieved. As to "would require more resources than just a one-man-team": I'd say Sc2gears itself (including the Sc2gears Database, Parsing service etc.) without the video streaming feature is also more than a one-man job (bigger than the feature in question), yet I think it's doing okay. | ||
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
| ||
Dakota_Fanning
![]()
Hungary2335 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:56 graNite wrote: Can you add an overlay feature? I can, but what do you mean? Custom text? Custom image? Or just covered areas? | ||
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
thanks for everything ♥ | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
Jetaap
France4814 Posts
| ||
Dakota_Fanning
![]()
Hungary2335 Posts
On July 27 2012 15:21 CoR wrote: hm horrible lag or horrible quality seems 16/1 is faaar to worse upload xD The video encoding is optimized for pictures and not for text. So if you stream your OS windows, you might find a certain video size+image quality bad, but if you stream an SC2 game or a movie with the same parameters, you will find it a lot less disturbing. | ||
Torpedo.Vegas
United States1890 Posts
Dakota should be hired by Blizzard to get access to more game info and really make it the official analyzing tool. Or at least give Dakota a feat of strength achievement. Maybe even a portrait of Dakota Fanning in a Ghost outfit. | ||
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
On July 28 2012 13:06 Torpedo.Vegas wrote: I wonder how widespread this program is. You think KeSPA teams use it to quickly analyze their games to decrease the time it would take to improve? Are there any equalivalents to this in places where TL is not as well know? Dakota should be hired by Blizzard to get access to more game info and really make it the official analyzing tool. Or at least give Dakota a feat of strength achievement. Maybe even a portrait of Dakota Fanning in a Ghost outfit. He already has a Liquid Star next to his name. | ||
| ||